The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWEST VINE STORAGE - PDP - PDP170016 - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTS (2)• City af Fort �ollinS -.� • Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North Coliege Aver�ue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224 6134 - fax fcqov. eom/devefopmentreview October 27, 2017 Ric Hattman Hattman Associates 524 S. Loomis Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: West Vine Storage, PDP170016, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Ted Shepard, at 970-221-6343 or tshepard@fcgov.com. Comment Summarv: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mragasa@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/25/2017: There are aspects of Appendix E-4 that weren't addressed, at least specific to street design. Among them: Offsite design of plan and profile 500 feet to the east along Vine Drive, to show how establishment of the curb and gutter abutting the property can be tied into by future curb and gutter improvements to the east which would then tie horizontally and vertically to the existing curb and gutter further east (Appendix E-4: V.C.) The .93% flowline grade along Vine along the majority of the property then hitting a low point with a 3.33% flowline grade in the opposite direction exceeds grade break requirements in the sag condition. There may be similar concerns with the crest condition depicted in the flowline view on the west side as there is a depicted high point at the station 0+52, the location of this area isn't apparent in plan view due to lack of stationing information. (V.H. and V.I.) (At time of final) flowline grades will be required on the south side of Vine Drive (V.Q.) Minimum cross slope for reconstruction is 1.5%, the plans show cross sections of 1.23% and 1.48%. (VI.B.) Stationing infor�on along the flowline view and in general, c�lines with stationing at prescribed intervals for the profile view. (XX.O.) Curve table for line and curve data. (XX.P.) In general, the street plan and profile sheets aren't shown to their indicated scale, making review difficult. (XX.V.) 05/23/2017: Please refer to Appendix E-4 for the Utility Plan Requirements Checklist. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/25/2017: The Environmental Planner signature added to the civil plans should not have been added to the site plan. 05/23/2017: An Environmental Planner signature line is needed on the signature block on the Cover Sheet of the Utility Plans. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/25/2017: The Arthur Ditch Company's signature should be its own signature block on the civil set, not embedded with the City Approval Block. Please ensure the plans correct the name of this ditch company, which is reflected as both "Aurthur and Author". 05/23/2017: Please see redlines for sheets missing the City signature blocks as well as the Ditch company signature blocks required on each sheet. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/25/2017: The street patching information shows three street cuts within a 75 foot distance which would require an expanded street cut to encompass all three cuts. In general the patching shown on the plans cannot be solidified at this time, pending more design information on how the proposal implements the commercial local standard and how the patching then aligns with parking, bikelanes and/or travel lanes. 05/23/2017: The services (sanitary and water) that serve the 2 story apartment building need to run perpendicular to the street. Depending on the ROW requirements along Vine Drive, the services may need to move further north so they are not running parallel in the public ROW. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/25/2017: Carried over as detail did not appear to be included. 05/23/2017: The curb and gutter where the emergency access is located on Shields Street will need to be replaced with rollover curb and gutter. A detail will be needed for a 2' rollover curb and gutter. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/25/2017: The information presented at this time is difficult to determine if the half commercial locai street is being implemented at this time due to issues regarding the street plan and profile not being to the indicated scale, the lack of offsite design information, and the lack of a signing and striping plan showing the existing and proposed striping along both side of Vine Drive. Further review upon updating will needed. 05/23/2017: A Commercial Local street cross section is needed for Vine Drive. A total of 36' of ROW is needed for the north of the Street. This cross section also shows a 5' sidewalk, not a 4.5' walk. Additional ROW will be needed to meet the minimum cross section requirements. 2 Comment Numb• 13 �mment Originated 05/23/2017 10/25/2017: The plan and profile information added has concerns referenced in Comment ID #1 (lack of offsite design, grade break exceeding requirements, cross slope for the additional widening does not meet minimums, lack of stationing and curve data information. Assuming these issues are addressed, the culvert should be specified as a concrete culvert, depicting a widening of the sidewalk 6 inches on either side of the culvert. 05/23/2017: Additional information is needed for the Plan and Profile/cross sections of Vine Drive. Plan view, centerline, existing and proposed ROW, existing and proposed slopes, etc. Please label the existing slope of Vine Drive to the west. How will drainage be conveyed to the east of the property since there is no curb and gutter? Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated 10/25/2017: The plat's depiction of a"storm drainage" easement should be changed to "drainage easement". Likewise the "emergency vehicle access" should be changed to "emergency access". 05/23/2017: All detention ponds and LID need to be within a Drainage Easement. Also, Emergency Access routes will need to be within an Emergency Access Easement. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated 10/25/2017: The offsite existing right-of-way information does not appear to have been provided. 05/23/2017: Clearly delineate where the ROW is located. Also show where the property lines for surrounding properties are located. All easements should be clearly shown and labeled. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 20 05/23/2017 05/23/2017 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/25/2017: Carried over pending verification of establishment of right-of-way dedication along Vine Drive based on the commercial local standard. 05/23/2017: Additional ROW will need to be dedicated on West Vine Drive to meet the minimum cross section of the Local Commercial Street. Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 10/25/2017 10/25/2017: A signing and striping plan for Vine Drive should be provided to understand how the additional widening as part of the Commercial Local standard results in the eventual widening overall to the commercial local standard, and how much of the commercial local standard can be implemented in the interim, tying into existing infrastructure. Topic: General Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 10/25/2017 10/25/2017: The neckdown along Vine Drive shown for the curb and gutter transitioning to the roundabout further west is too abrupt with the right angle and would be difficult to reach for street sweeping/cleaning operations. Please implement a more gradual transition with curves that's more similar to the neckdowns at th�bther legs of the roundabout. This will need�e looked at in conjunction with understanding how the westbound bikelane movement is intended to transition from the frontage improvements to the existing roundabout operation. Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 10/25/2017 10/25/2017: The ditch crossing shown across Vine Drive further east has a measured distance between the abutments of about 68 feet yet the imagery online seems to measure this crossing closer to 50 feet. If the data of the structure shown more illustrative or is it surveyed information? I'm concerned that the parameters for the design of the widening of Vine to a commercial local standard does not reflect tying into existing infrastructure accurately. Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 10/25/2017 10/25/2017: Additional comments may be provided upon getting additional design information addressed. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 10/25/2017 10/25/2017: The plat should have a full City Engineer signature block. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Rebecca Everette, 970-416-2625, reverette@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/23/2017: See redlines for suggested changes to buffer zone. It would make more sense for it to follow logical boundaries on the site rather than the straight 50 feet in some places. Also, the buffer zone has not been labeled on all plans - please add labels to all plans that show the buffer zone. 05/23/2017: Please re-label the 50' Wildlife Buffer as "50' Natural Habitat Buffer Zone" on all sheets. The Natural Habitat Buffer Zone needs to be delineated and labeled on the site, grading, utility, and landscape plan. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/24/2017 10/23/2017: Some of the tree protection notes appear to be missing. Please use this document for all standard notes: https://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/pdf/CFC-Standard-Notes.pdf? 1453 487937 05/24/2017: Please use the latest standard City notes for the site and landscape plans. The project planner can provide these. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/24/2017 10/23/2017: Repeat comment. 05/24/2017: LANDSCAPE PLAN: Please remove Sorbus acuparia (Mountain Ash) from the species list. Planting of new ash trees is not recommended given potential pest issues. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/24/2017 10/23/2017: Repeat comment. 05/24/2017: LANDSCAPE PLAN: Please add the following notes to the landscape plan (for installation and establishment of the native seed mix): 4 NATIVE SEED �NOTES • 1. PREPARE SOIL AS NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE FOR NATIVE SEED MIX SPECIES THROUGH AERATION AND ADDITION OF AMENDMENTS, THEN SEED IN TWO DIRECTIONS TO DISTRIBUTE SEED EVENLY OVER ENTIRE AREA. 2. IF CHANGES ARE TO BE MADE TO SEED MIX BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS THEN APPROVAL MUST BE PROVIDED BY CITY ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER. 3. APPROPRIATE NATIVE SEEDING EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED (STANDARD TURF SEEDING EQUIPMENT OR AGRICULTURE EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE USED). 4. DRILL SEED APPLICATION RECOMMENDED PER SPECIFIED APPLICATION RATE TO NO MORE THAN �/z INCH DEPTH. FOR BROADCAST SEEDING INSTEAD OF DRILL SEEDING METHOD DOUBLE SPECIFIED APPLICATION RATE. REFER TO NATIVE SEED MIX TABLE FOR SPECIES, PERCENTAGES AND APPLICATION RATES. 5. TREAT NATIVE SEED MIX AREA PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SEED WITH APPROPRIATE HERBICIDE TO PROACTIVELY MITIGATE HERBACEOUS WEED SPECIES GROWTH DURING ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD THEN AFTER APPROPRIATE TIME PERIOD APPLY NATIVE SEED AS CALLED FOR ON APPROVED PLANS. 6. AFTER SEEDING THE AREA SHALL BE COVERED WITH CRIMPED STRAW OR OTHER APPROPRIATE METHODS AND PROVIDED TEMPORARY IRRIGATION UNTIL SEED IS ESTABLISHED. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR SEEDED AREA FOR PROPER IRRIGATION, EROSION CONTROL, GERMINATION AND RESEEDING AS NEEDED TO ESTABLISH COVER. 8. THE APPROVED SEED MIX AREA IS INTENDED TO BE MAINTAINED IN A NATURAL LIKE LANDSCAPE AESTHETIC. IF AND WHEN MOWING OCCURS IN NATIVE GRASS SEED MIX AREAS DO NOT MOW LOWER THAN 6 TO 8 INCHES IN HEIGHT TO AVOID INHIBITING NATIVE PLANT GROWTH. 9. NATIVE SEED AREA WILL BE CONSIDERED ESTABLISHED WHEN SEVENTY PERCENT TOTAL COVER IS REACHED WITH NO LARGER THAN ONE FOOT SQUARE BARE SPOTS AND/OR UNTIL DEEMED ESTABLISHED BY CITY PLANNING SERVICES. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/24/2017 10/23/2017: Repeat comment. Hydrozones are still not cleariy identified, and there is no table calculating the anticipated water use in each hydrozone, as well as the total water budget for the site. Please contact Eric Olson on Water Conservation if you need additional information. 05/24/2017: HYDROZONE PLAN: The hydrozone plan should include a table that totals the amount of planting area in each hydrozone, the water budget for each zone, and the average overall water use for the site. See section 3.2.1(E) (3) of the Land Use Code for more information. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 10/23/2017 10/23/2017: Thank you for providing an Ecological Characterization Study with the latest submittal. Staff agrees with the mitigation recommendations in the ECS: 5 • � 1. Retain (or plant) deciduous and coniferous trees and shrubs to create vertical structure and thermal cover for avifauna and mammals. For native flowering plant seed mix use Pawnee Butts Seed Inc. Prairie Wildflower Mix (http://www.pawneebuttesseed.com/seed-lisdmixes/) 2. Implement screening measures as described in the project proposal. 3. Enhance pollinator habitat by establishing native cool and warm season flowering plants along the top of berm near Arthur Ditch and within detention areas; limit the use of insecticides. 4. Maintain value of Arthur Ditch as a wildlife movement corridor by utilizing proposed setbacks as described in the site plan. 5. Utilize the Pawnee Butts Seed Inc. Foothills Native Mix as a restoration grass mix within detention areas (http://www.pawneebuttesseed.com/seed-IisUmixes/) Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 10/23/2017 10/23/2017: Within the natural habitat buffer zone, please use the prairie wildflower and/or native foothills seed mixes recommended by the Ecological Characterization Study, or similar mixes. If the seed mix that was already selected includes similar species, then that mix can continue to be used. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 10/23/2017 10/23/2017: I recommend grouping the trees and shrubs in the buffer zone closer together to form denser clusters. This will make irrigation and maintenance simpler, will reduce the likelihood that shrubs will be mowed over, and will provide better wildlife habitat. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 10/23/2017 10/23/2017: See redlines on various sheets for additional comments. Please return all redlines with your next submittal. Department: Forestry Contact: Molly Roche, , mroche@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 8 10/23/2017: Comment Originated: 10/23/2017 Please clarify if tree 13 is to remain or if the plan is to remove this tree. The tree is labeled to remove on sheet SP 2.3, but is stated to remain in the existing tree inventory. Update information on the landscape plans to remain consistent. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/23/2017 10/23/2017: Please use a distinct symbol for existing trees on-site and trees to remain. This symbol should differ from new plantings. City Forestry suggests using a lighter shade for the symbol to increase distinction between existing and proposed landscaping. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 10/23/2017 10/23/2017: In place of "X" and for additional clarity, please label all mitigation trees with a bolded and capitalized "M" on both the landscape plans and landscape schedule. • Comment Number: 11 �mment Originated: 10/23/2017 10/23/2017: Please include Minimum Species Diversity percentages in the landscape schedule. See Land Use Code 3.2.1. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/26/2017 10/23/2017: Thank you for including the City Street Tree Notes and Street Tree Permit Note. On sheet SP3.4, please change the title of "NOTE" to STREET TREE NOTE. Please contact Molly Roche (mroche@fcgov.com) to obtain the most recent version of the General Landscape Notes and Tree Protection notes, which are also to be included on the landscape plans. Please omit the Landscape Specifications notes on sheet SP 3.2 and use the City of Fort Collins General Landscape Notes in their place. 05/26/2017: Please use the City of Fort Collins General Landscape Notes, Street Tree Notes, Permit Note, and Tree Protection Notes on the landscape plans, which are available through the City Forester. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/26/2017 10/23/2017: Continued: 05/26/2017: - At the onsite meeting, evaluation of the feasibility of transplanting the spruce closes to Vine can be determined. - It also appears grading may impact two evergreens in the detention pond. - Existing spruce along Shields appears to be further to the west. Please adjust this on the landscape plans. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/26/2017 10/23/2017: Continued: 5/26/2017: Show location of any stop signs and street lights. Provide a legend which identifies these fixtures with a distinct symbol. Space trees if needed as follows. Stop Signs: 20 feet from sign Street Light: 40 feet for canopy shade trees and 15 feet for ornamental trees Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/26/2017 10/23/2017: Continued: 05/26/2017: Review locations of water and sewer service lines and provide at least 6� separation between trees. Please clearly label the utilities on the landscape plans. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/26/2017 10/23/2017: Please show irrigated turf in the right-of-way with a distinct symbol. 7 5/26/2017: � • Please clarify where irrigated turf is to be used on the project. The current symbol is difficult to see. Please note that irrigated turf must be used in the right-of-way. Comment Number: 7 10/23/2017: Comment Originated: 05/26/2017 All comments from 5/26/2017 still apply in regards to species selection. City Forestry would like the applicant to consider the use of Kentucky Coffeetree `Espresso' in place of the proposed Honeylocust on the project. We are reaching a maximum species diversity of Honeylocust in Fort Collins and would like to begin incorporating alternative species in their place. 05/26/2017: Tree Selection - Please replace American Linden with Kentucky Coffeetree or Catalpa. - Amur Chokecherry has poor survivability in Fort Collins. City Forestry has experienced early decline and sun scalding that usually results with premature removal/replacement. Forestry recommends using Gamble Oak in the dryland detention area and possibly Red Barron Crabapple for the two Chokecherry close to the Gas-O-Mat. - The conifers shown between the walk on Vine are close to the proposed street trees. This area will be heavily shaded as the street trees grow and mature. - Forestry recommends changing Limber Pine to either Rocky Mountain Juniper or Blue Spruce. - The two proposed pinyon pines and limber pines in the section along Shields on the west side of the building will not thrive due to heavy shading overtime as canopy shade trees mature. Please evaluate changing to a more shade tolerant species, such as Colorado Blue Spruce, and adding a couple more trees in this area. Department: Internal Services Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 06/06/2017: Comment Originated: 06/06/2017 Building Permit Pre-Submittal Meeting: Pre-Submittal meetings are required to assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the design, that the new commercial or multi-family projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the early to mid-design stage for this meeting to be effective and is typically scheduled after the Current Planning conceptual review meeting. Applicants of new commercial or multi-family projects are advised to call 416-2341 to schedulea pre-submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and el�ations and be able to discuss code issues�ccupancy, square footage and type of construction being proposed. Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as amended: Fort Collins will be transitioning to the 2015 series of Building codes in mid 2017. 2012 International Building Code (IBC) 2012 International Residential Code (IRC) 2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC) 2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) 2012 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado 2014 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado Fort Collins has amendments to most of the codes listed above. See the fcgov.com web page to view them. Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009. Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF. Frost Depth: 30 inches. Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B. Seismic Design: Category B. Climate Zone: Zone 5 Energy Code Use 1. Single Family; Duplex; Townhomes: 2012 IRC Chapter 11 or 2012 IECC. 2. Multi-family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2012 IECC residential chapter. 3. Commercial and Multi-family 4 stories and taller: 2012 IECC commercial chapter. West Vine storage — project specific concerns: 1. Fire-sprinkler/fire-sontainment required for buildings larger than 5k sq.ft. 2. 4. Upgraded insulation is required for buildings using electric heat or cooling. 3. Exterior walls and roof must meet a STC (sound resistance) rating of 40 min. if building located within 1000ft to train tracks. 4. Low-flow Watersense plumbing fixtures (toilet, faucets, shower heads) are required. Contact: Sarah Carter, 970-416-2748, scarter@fcqov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/23/2017 10/23/2017: Please schedule a pre-submittal meeting per previous comment. Department: Light And Power Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-416-2772, tsiegmund@fcgov.com Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/25/2017 05/25/2017: Light and Power has electric facilities along the south side of Vine Dr. that, with modifications to our primary system, can be utilized to provide power to the site. Modifications will include trenching or boring new primary line under Vine Dr and installing a new vault. Light and Power also has conduit stubbed along the east side of Shields St, adjacent to the site that could be utilized to provide power into the site. Further discussions are necessary to determine where the power feed into the site will come from. � Comment NumGer: 2 �omment Originated: 05/25/2017 05/25/2017: Electric capacity fees, development fees, building site charges and any system modification charges necessary to feed the site will apply to this development. Please contact me or visit the following website for an estimate of charges and fees: http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/plant-investmen t-development-fees Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/25/2017 05/25/2017: Transformer locations will need to be coordinated with Light & Power. Transformer must be placed within 10 ft of a drivable surface for installation and maintenance purposes. The transformer must also have a front clearance of 10 ft and side/rear clearance of 3 ft minimum. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/25/2017 05/25/2017: A commercial service information form (C-1 form) and a one line diagram for the commercial meter will need to be completed and submitted to Light & Power Engineering. A link to the C-1 form is below: http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development- forms-guidelines-regulations Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/25/2017 05/25/2017: Electric meter locations will need to be coordinated with Light and Power. Please show proposed meter locations on the utility and site plans. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/25/2017 05/25/2017: Please contact Tyler Siegmund at Light & Power Engineering if you have any questions at 970.416.2772. Please reference our policies, construction practices, development charge processes, and use our fee estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Mark Taylor, 970-416-2494, mtavlor@fcgov.com Topic: Drainage Report Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated 10/23/2017: An Discharge Agreement between the owner and the Arthur Irrigation Company will be required before storm water can be discharged into the irrigation ditch. Please contact Rosanna Harris, 730 Ash Mesa Road, Delta, Colorado 81416; rosannharris@gmail.com; 1.970.874.0189 to start working on the agreement. This agreement must be in place before any work can begin on the project. Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated 10/23/2017: An easement granted to Arthur Irrigation Company from the property owner will be required before plan approval. Please contact the Arthur attorney, Brent Bartlett (Fisher Brown Bartlett & Gunn), 1319 E Prospect Road, Fort Collins, Colorado 80525; 970.407.9000 to begin the easement process. 10/23/2017 10/23/2017 io Department: PFA � � Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, I�vnxwiler@poudre-fire.orq Topic: General Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated 10/21/2017: EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENTS (EAE) The dead-end hammerhead design that was dedicated for access to the Verizon cell tower does not indicate it being an EAE. It's my understanding that was a requirement at the time the cell tower was approved. If that portion was not previously dedicated as an EAE, it will require inclusion in the EAE dedication at this time. Comment Number: 12 10/21/2017: HYDRANT 10/21 /2017 Comment Originated: 10/21/2017 Please indicate if the hydrant will be on a public or private system. See also, prior comments regarding private hydrant systems. Comment Number: 13 10/21/2017: WEST VINE ACCESS DETAILS Comment Originated: 10/21/2017 > This connection design is not fully identified on the plans. Please provide further details and surfacing plan. > Turning radii at this connection do not appear to be consistent with minimum 25' standards. Please confirm 25' inside. turning radii at this location. > Fire lane sign posting will likely be required at this entrance or on both sided of the gate itself. Comment Number: 14 10/21/2017: GATE ACCESS Comment Originated: 10/21/2017 > Electric vehicle gates that serve as a primary means of facility access will require an integrated Knox Key Switch as part of the access design. Any other means of gate access will require further discussion and separate approval by the fire marshal. > Man-gates and manually operated vehicle gates may utilize a mounted and secured Knox Box system for access; however, the applicant might consider a Knox Padlock rather than a Knox Box, as a cheaper and more direct means of gate access. Your prerogative. See www.knoxbox.com for further details. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated 10/21/2017: FIRE LANE SIGNAGE VS RED CURB Red curbing may be used to identify the limits of the fire lane as indicated on the plans; however, posted signage may be required in specific locations as determined at time of final inspection. 10/21 /2017 11 Department: Planning Se�ces � Contact: Ted Shepard, 970-221-6343, tshepard@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/24/2017 10/24/2017: Carried Over: Regarding the response to comment number seven, the narrative indicates that the new fence along Shields is metal and appears nearly transparent. But on the Landscape Plan, SP — 3.4, the graphic indicates that the fence is solid and that only the gates utilize pickets. Please clarify. 05/24/2017: In the C-L zone, per Section 4.24(D)(2)(b) Nonresidential Development enclosed mini storage fencing along streets must be wrought iron or its visual equivalent. Also, any fencing along a public street that exceeds four feet in height must be placed in segments between buildings, not as a continuous fence. Fencing along Vine complies with this standard but not along Shields. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/24/2017 10/24/2017: Carried Over: Also, per Section 4.24(D)(2)(b), the standard calls for perimeter fencing that exceeds four feet must be placed in segments between buildings and not as a continuous perimeter fence. The narrative indicates the preference for a six-foot high continuous fence along both streets and provides a reasonable justification for this approach. Please amend the narrative to include a Request for Modification of Standard which can be justified by Section 2.8.2(H)(1) in that the proposed design may be considered equal to or better than a plan that would have otherwise complied with the standard. 05/24/2017: In general, the Site Plans and the Landscape Plan need to consistently call out the extent of the perimeter fencing. Please indicate height, material, etc. The Project Narrative indicates that the existing six foot solid wood fence along Shields will be retained but the Site Plan states "New Fence." And, regarding fencing along the northeast and east property lines, the Site Plan states that fencing is to remain but Staff is not aware of the nature of this existing fencing since it's not visible from the roadways. Please clarify and address the aforementioned standard. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 10/24/2017 10/24/2017: Regarding the graphic for the solid metal fence, I'm not sure where this occurs. Is this graphic necessary to be included on the plan sheets? It appears that fencing is either metal pickets (wrought iron or its visual equivalent) along the two streets, or solid wood along the two interior property lines. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 10/24/2017 10/24/2017: I'm still not seeing if the "6' High Wood Fence" along the northeast and east property lines is existing or new. Please clearly indicate on the Site Plan. 12 Department: Stormwater �ineering • Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-224-6192, dmogen@fcgov.com Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/27/2017: Comment still applies. Please provide letter of intent prior to hearing and agreement prior to final plan approval. 05/23/2017: An agreement is required in order to have this site outfall to Arthur's Ditch. Please contact Mark Taylor at 970-416-2494 to coordinate. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/27/2017: It appears the eastern pond will be used to treat and detain these flows. Please show sizing for these flows in the eastern pond. It appears flow from other areas will be treated by rain gardens prior to entering either detention pond; therefore, it is not required to provide water quality for this runoff as it will be treated by the rain gardens. 05/23/2017: It is required that half of the street frontage be brought into the site as it has historically flowed. This flow needs to be both detained and treated for water quality. LID treatment is not required. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/27/2017: Sizing calculations were not seen. Please provide sizing calculations for the rain gardens to show that adequate space has been provided for the rain garden footprint. 05/23/2017: Please provide sizing calculations for the proposed rain gardens and show that Low Impact Development requirements for the site are being met. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/27/2017: Please see redlines regarding water quality calculations and details in the drainage report. 05/23/2017: Please review the water quality calculations per the redlines. Do the proposed detention basins have a permanent water surface? Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/27/2017: Please expand discussion of water quality and low impact development requirements. It is noted that the majority of the site will be treated with the proposed rain gardens and areas that are not treated by the rain gardens will have extended detention water quality provided and sized in the proposed detention basins. No discussion of off-site flows was seen. Please address. 05/23/2017: Please update the drainage report to include thorough discussion of the drainage design including, but not limited to: - 4-step process - Off-site flows - Water quality and detention - Low Impact Development (LID) 13 Comment Num�r: 9 �omment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/27/2017: I see that these have been shown and will look to see that they cover the proposed areas in the updated plans next round. 05/23/2017: Please provide easements for the rain gardens, detention basins, and outfalls. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/27/2017: Although the response letter said compliance was shown, it was not seen. Repeat comment. 05/23/2017: Please provide evidence that the detention basin is in compliance with drain times per Colorado Revised Statute 37-92-602(8). More information on this statute is available at http://tinyurl.com/RevisedStatuteMemo, and a spreadsheet to show compliance is available for download at http://tinyurl.com/ComplianceSpreadsheet. Please contact Dan Mogen at (970)224-6192 or dmogen@fcgov.com with any questions about this requirement or for assistance with the spreadsheet. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/27/2017: Please see updated redlines provided via pdf. 05/23/2017: Please see redlined plans (pdf) and report (hard copy). Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/27/2017: Comment still applies. 05/23/2017: Please note that additional comments may be forthcoming upon future submittals as additional details are discovered. Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcqov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/16/2017: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq. ft. and therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. a copy of the erosion control requirements can be found at www.fcgov.com/eroison. The Erosion Control Materials will need to be submitted at time of the first round of FDP. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Plans as the recently received materials have comments and redlines that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Report as the recently received materials has comments and redlines that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria. Please resubmit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation as the recently received materials has comments and redlines, that needed to be addressed to meet City Criteria and as a result have changed the Erosion Control Plans and would require a recalculation of the Escrow. Based upon the area of disturbance, State permits for stormwater will be required since the site is over an acre and should be pulled before Construction Activities begin. If you need clarification concerning the Erosion Control Material Requirements or Comments presented above 14 please contact m�f. Jesse Schlam (970) 224-6015 jschlamC�gov.com 05/23/2017: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq. ft., therefore Erosion and Sediment Control Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted do not meet requirements. Please submit; an Erosion Control Plan (Based upon returned redlines), an Erosion Control Report (based off of Erosion Control Criteria), and an Escrow / Security Calculation. Also, based upon the area of disturbance State permits for stormwater will be required since the site is over an acre. If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 19 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 20 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: There are spelling issues. See redlines. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: Please remove the address from the title. With the project being replatted, the address could change. Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: Please revise the title to match the revised title on the Subdivision Plat. Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: Please make changes to the Benchmark Statement as shown. See redlines. Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: The legal description is not necessary. The sub-title serves as the legal description. Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets. 15 Comment Num�er: 27 �omment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/30/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/30/2017: The titles need to match on all plan sets. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: Emergency Service Plan: Please remove the address from the title. With the project being replatted, the address could change. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: Emergency Service Plan: Please revise the title to match the revised title on the Subdivision Plat. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: Emergency Service Plan: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: Please remove the address from the title. With the project being replatted, the address could change. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: Please revise the title to match the revised title on the Subdivision Plat. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This wili be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: The titles need to match on all plan sets. See redlines. Topic: Lighting Plan Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: Please remove the address from the title. With the project being replatted, the address could change. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: Please revise the title to match the revised title on the Subdivision Plat. 16 Comment Numb• 15 �mment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/30/2017 10/26/2017: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. 05/30/2017: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/30/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/30/2017: Please remove the address from the title. With the project being replatted, the address could change. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/30/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/30/2017: Please revise the title to match the revised title on the Subdivision Plat. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/30/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/30/2017: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/30/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/30/2017: The legal description is not necessary. The sub-title serves as the legal description. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/30/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/30/2017: The Benchmark Statement is not necessary. Please remove unless another department asked to have it added. Please make changes as shown. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/31/2017 10/26/2017: This will be verified at FDP. 05/31/2017: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/20/2017: The frontage improvements shown don't seem to tie into the �� roundabout appl�ch. A bike lane is needed, which is funne�into a ram� with striping that shows the bike lane ending. We're checking with our engineering department to see if that approach had a concept design completed that we can provide. 05/23/2017: The development will need frontage improvements along Vine Drive including sidewalk. Topic: Traffic Impact Study Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/20/2017 10/20/2017: The Traffic Impact Study has been reviewed and conclusions accepted. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fc o� Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/22/2017 05/22/2017: A landscape plan shall contain accurate and identifiable hydrozones, including a water budget chart that shows the total annual water use, which shall not exceed fifteen (15) gallons per square foot over the site. If you have questions contact Eric Olson at eolson@fcgov.com or 970-221-6Z04. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/22/2017 05/22/2017: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-224-6192, dmogen@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/27/2017: I see new services to the "dwelling unit with home occupation." Please call out as such to allow for one water and wastewater service to the building. Please see redlines and clarify proposed services to both buildings including providing adequate slope for the proposed sewer services, which is 2% minimum for a 4" sanitary service. 05/23/2017: It appears that the existing water and sewer seNices to the site will be utilized to provide services to the proposed buildings and no new building services are proposed. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/27/2017: Noted per response, this hydrant will be private. (This comment is left active to transfer documentation to final plan - no response required.) 05/23/2017: The proposed fire hydrant, as currently shown, will be considered private. A public hydrant would be considered if the hydrant is within 150' of the roadway and access is provided via a curb cut with access drive. 18 Comment Number: 3 �mment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/25/2017: Please update to include shrubs. 05/23/2017: Please update note 26 on SP-3.2 (Landscape Plans) regarding landscape separation requirements. No trees shall be planted with 10' of water and sewer mains or within 6' of service lines. No shrubs shall be planted within 4' of water and sewer mains or service lines. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/23/2017 10/27/2017: The majority of redlines from round 1 were not addressed. Please see updated redlines and provide response with next submittal. Please feel free to contact me if you would like to discuss anything shown in the redlines. 05/23/2017: Please see redlined plans (pdf). Comment Number: 5 10/27/2017: Comment still applies. Comment Originated: 05/24/2017 05/23/2017: Please note that additional comments may be forthcoming upon future submittals as additional details are discovered. Department: Zoning Contact: Ryan Boehle, Topic: General 970-416-2401, rboehle@fcgov.com Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/24/2017 05/23/2017: - Bicycle parking will need to be provided at this development. A minimum of 4 spaces as per industrial: employee parking in LUC 3.2.2(C)(4)(b) will need to be provided on a fixed bicycle rack for both visitors and the dwelling unit located on the premises. 10/24/17 : I see a rack is added to the plans but I will need to have the total amount added to the site plan breakdown and will need to see them depicted in an elevation Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/24/2017 05/23/2017: - How will the development handle refuse? Will a trash enclosure be provided for this storage facility? If an enclosure is provided it will need to be adequately sized and conveniently located. The enclosure will also need to have a separate pedestrian access for ease of use as per 3.2.5. 10/24/2017 : I see the shaded area of a private trash area but I need an elevation or a change to the site plan showing how the trash area will operate. 19