Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE SAVOY - FDP230012 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTSCommunity Development Neighborhood Services 281 North College AvenuePO Box 580Fort Collins, CO 80522970.221.6689970.224.6134 faxfcgov.com/developmentrevieApril 28, 2023Blaine Mathisen Northern Engineering301 N Howes Street, Unit 100Fort Collins, CO 80521RE: The Savoy, FDP230012, Round Number 1Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of The Savoy. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through your Development Review Coordinator, Todd Sullivan via phone at 9702216695 or via email at tsullivan@fcgov.com. Design StudioHenry DesignNorthernMilestone/ImagoStudio LightingEROPaulComment Summary:Department: Development Review CoordinatorContact: Todd Sullivan, 9702216695, tsullivan@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralNE: Todd, thanks for all the informative information below.Comment Number: 1 INFORMATION:I will be your primary point of contact throughout the development review and permitting process. If you have any questions, need additional meetings with the project reviewers, or need assistance throughout the process, please let me know and I can assist you and your team. Please include me in all email correspondence with other reviewers and keep me informed of any phone conversations. Thank you!Comment Number: 2 SUBMITTAL:As part of your resubmittal, you will respond to the comments provided in this letter. This letter is provided to you in Microsoft Word format. Please use this document to insert responses to each comment for your submittal, using a different font color. When replying to the comment letter please be detailed in your responses, as all comments should be thoroughly addressed. Comments requiring action should NOT have a response such as noted or acknowledged. You will need to provide references to specific project plans, pages, reports, or explanations of why comments have not been addressed [when applicable].Comment Number: 3 SUBMITTAL:Please follow the Electronic Submittal Requirements and File Naming Standards found at https://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/files/electronic submittal requirements and file naming standards_v1_8 1 19.pdf?1566857888. File names should begin with the file type, followed by the project information, and round number. Example: UTILITY PLANS_PROJECT NAME_PDP_Rd2.pdfFile type acronyms may be appropriate to avoid extremely long file names. Example: TIS for Traffic Impact Study, ECS for Ecological Characterization Study. Reach out to me if you would like a list of suggested names.*Please disregard any references to paper copies, flash drives, or CDs.Comment Number: 4 SUBMITTAL:All plans should be saved as optimized/flattened PDFs to reduce file size and remove layers.Per the Electronic Submittal Requirements AutoCAD SHX attributes need to be removed from the PDF’s.AutoCAD turns drawing text into comments that appear in the PDF plan set, and these must be removed prior to submittal as they can cause issues with the PDF file. The default setting is "1" ("on") in AutoCAD. To change the setting and remove this feature, type "EPDFSHX" (version 2016.1) or “PDFSHX (version 2017 and newer) in the command line and enter "0". Read this article at Autodesk.com for more on this topic:https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/autocad/troubleshooting/caas/sfdcarticles/sfdcarticles/DrawingtextappearsasCommentsinaPDFcreatedbyAutoCAD.htmlComment Number: 5 SUBMITTAL:Resubmittals are accepted any day of the week, with Wednesday at noon being the cutoff for routing the same week. When you are ready to resubmit your plans, please notify me with as much advanced notice as possible.Comment Number: 6 INFORMATION:Please resubmit within 180 days, approximately 6 months, to avoid the expiration of your project.Comment Number: 7 INFORMATION: ANY project that requires four or more rounds of review would be subject to an additional fee of $3,000.00.Department: Planning ServicesContact: Kai Kleer, 9704164284, kkleer@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 104/25/2023 FOR FINAL APPROVAL:It appears that the entryway features have been substantially reduced. Standards require that each building provide a unique entrance feature that is clearly visible from the street and public areas through the use of architectural features and landscaping. Please provide a more substantial canopy overhang, low architectural walls, landscaping and other features to create a clearly visible and distinct entrance.As a note here is the language of the Condition of Approval that was approved: prior to final approval which required that each street facing façade shall contain a minimum of one primary entryway, similar in design to what is found on the opposing side of the building (prehearing). The entryway shall be emphasized using landscaping, roof forms, balcony overhangs, block walls, and must act as the primary entrance to at least one or more units of each building.DSA: Two Canopy Overhangs have been added to each of the buildings to create a clearly visible and distinct primary entry to one or more units in each building from the street.HDG: Upright trees have been located at building entries to signify a destination point from the street and public areas.  The use of foundation shrubs and waves of ornamental grasses will provide consistent lines directed toward building entries and specimen shrubs adjacent to the entries will provide a sense of arrival.Comment Number: 204/25/2023 FOR FINAL APPROVAL: The proposed stone treatment seems to have been unified and no longer provides material that is varied from structure to structure. Please specify the exact stone that will be used on the building facade.DSA: The stone treatments have been clarified on the drawings and coordinated with selections at Environmental Stoneworks in Denver. The drawing elevations have been revised to reflect this. The two stones will be Southern Ledge Cartona & Fieldstone Slate.Comment Number: 304/25/2023 FOR FINAL APPROVAL: It appears that the unique railing feature that helped distinguish the buildings midcentury modern theme has disappeared from the elevations. Please revert back to the previously depicted railing systems and add a detail sheet to the development plan set.DSA: We have reverted back to the previous railing design and provided a detail in the development plan set.Comment Number: 404/25/2023 FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Please include a material and color board on one sheet within the plan set.DSA: A material and color board has been provided in the plan set.CommentNumber: 504/25/2023 FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Please indicate on the site plan the location of each building design and color scheme (e.g., Elevation A, 24plex, Harvest Gold)DSA: Each building design and color scheme has been indicated on the site plan.Comment Number: 604/25/2023 FOR FINAL APPROVAL:Please add the following notes to the title sheet of the development set:At the Planning and Zoning Commissions November 17, 2022 Regular Meeting a ,modification of standard to 3.8.30(D)(2) Block Size was approved to allow for the project to exceed the maximum multifamily block size of 7acres by providing enhanced pedestrian connectivity through the site. Elements of the enhanced connectivity include a 35foot pedestrian corridor that bisects the site east/west. The corridor features entry portals, enhanced pedestrian crossings within the parking area, landscaping, amongst others. Additionally the plan provided enhanced connectivity into the central feature and gathering space through a north/south connection.NE:See note 17 on cover sheetDepartment: Engineering Development ReviewContact: Sophie Buckingham, , sbuckingham@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralCommentNumber: 104/24/2023: INFORMATION:Thank you for submitting the Development Agreement Information Form. The form indicates that Milestone Parcel M is the developer and owner for the project. Our records show that the property is currently owned by Imago Enterprises. Will Milestone Parcel M acquire the property from Imago Enterprises prior to executing the Development Agreement?NE: Plat and DA will be Imago Comment Number: 204/24/2023: FOR APPROVAL:In the utility plans, please add LCUASS Trench Detail, Construction Drawing 2201.NE: Added to sheet D10Comment Number: 304/24/2023: FOR APPROVAL:On the grading plan, please label existing contours, as well as proposed sidewalk cross slopes and running slopes.NE: Existing contours have been labeled and cross slopes and running slopes have been added tograding sheetsComment Number: 404/24/2023: FOR APPROVAL:For Le Fever Drive, flowline grades approaching an inlet should be designed with a series of grade breaks rather than a vertical curve. Please see my redlines and refer to LCUASS Section 7.4.1.B.3 and 7.4.1.B.4.NE: Flowlines have been revised.CommentNumber: 504/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL:Please fill out and submit the City's general deed template for the offsite drainage easement. Information about the easement dedication process is available athttps://www.fcgov.com/engineering/devrev.php under Easement and Right Of Way Dedication. Please review the Process document and reach out to me with any questions.NE:General Deed has been supplied with “Drainage Easement” added. Once city agrees with Easementwidth we will route this language and exhibit to owners lawyer to review. Once ownership agrees withlanguage we will route for signatures and get recorded prior to final recordation. Comment Number: 604/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL:Please review my redlines on the utility plans and update the plans accordingly.NE:Plans have been updated based on redlines, questions have been responded to on the plansheets.CommentNumber: 704/26/2023: INFORMATION:Several comments from Stormwater may require coordination with Engineering, such as the ODP Pond maintenance agreement, the offsite drainage easement, and the storm pipe material within public rightofway. Please feel free to copy me on any correspondence with Matt Simpson regarding the Stormwater comments.NE: Previous ODP Pond agreement has been supplied. This previous agreement included this parcelthere should be no need for a new one. See response to Comment #5 for offsite drainage easement.Storm pipe material has been revised per Matt’s comments.Department: Traffic OperationContact: Steve Gilchrist, 9702246175, sgilchrist@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 104/23/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Please be sure to include the final signed and stamped Transportation Impact Study and any subsequent memos or amendments with the final documentation for this project.NE: Stamped TIS is supplied.Comment Number: 204/23/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: The striping on Cinquefoil south of Le Fever will need to be corrected to show what is existing today. With a two way left turn lane north of Le Fever, the striping transitions or tapers to allow for the alignment across the intersection. There is currently an area where the parking lane ends on the east side of the roadway, and the existing red curb will need to be replaced if removed during construction. I have placed an image in the redlines folder for reference.NE: Stripping has been updated and is reflected across the entire plan set. Sheet EX1 also has the red curb called out on the east side with a note that it needs to be replaced if damaged. Comment Number: 304/23/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: We would like for you to add 6 No Parking Anytime signs with arrows adjacent to the intersections in order to maintain adequate sight distance with the on street parking on Le Fever between Cinquefoil and Brookfield. See redlines for details. The eastbound stop sign on Le Fever at Brookfield should also be removed.NE: Signs have been added and removed per comment and redlines.Comment Number: 404/23/2023: FOR INFORMATION: Any existing pavement marking or traffic signs damaged or removed during the construction of this development will need to be replaced accordingly even if they are not currently detailed on the Utility Plans.NE: See note 7 on sheet HC1Comment Number: 504/23/2023: FOR INFORMATION: Trees should not be planted within 50 feet on the approach to stop signs in order to maintain visibility to them. Stop signs should be detailed on the Landscape Plans.HDG: Trees have been relocated a minimum of 50’ from stop signs.Comment Number: 604/23/2023: FOR INFORMATION: Additional No Parking Fire Lane signs might be needed internal to the site. The access south of Le Fever is one area I don't see any. May need to coordinate with Poudre Fire Authority. You are also showing a sign in the middle of the ADA ramp for the enhanced crossing to the south/east of the pool.NE: Sign has been moved. We have also addressed PFA comments but will continue to coordinatewith them.Department: Stormwater Engineering – Erosion ControlContact: Basil Hamdan, 9702221801, bhamdan@fcgov.comTopic: Erosion ControlComment Number: 204/20/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:Please address all redlined comments provided on the utility plans. Update escrow as needed after addressing plan comments.NE:Redlines have been addressed and escrows updated. See redline comment responses foradditional clarification. Topic: FeesComment Number: 104/20/2023: INFORMATION:The City Manager’s development review fee schedule under City Code 7.52 was updated to include fees for Erosion Control and Stormwater Inspections. As of January 1st, 2021, these fees will be collected on all projects for such inspections. The Erosion Control fees are based on; the number of permits, the total site disturbance, the estimated number of years the project will be active. Based on the proposed site construction associated with this project we are assuming 10 building permits, 10.30 acres of disturbance, 3 years from demo through build out of construction and an additional 3 years until full vegetative stabilization is achieved due to seeding. Which results in an Erosion Control Inspection Fee estimate of $3,296.88 . The Stormwater Quality Inspection Fee are based on the number of LID/Water Quality features that are designed for this project. Based on the plans we identified 1 bioretention/rain garden and 1 underground treatment system, which results in an estimate of the Stormwater LID/WQ Inspection fee of $730.00 . Please note that as the plans and any subsequent review modifications of the abovementioned values change the fees may need to be adjusted. I have provided a copy of the spreadsheet used to arrive at these estimates for your review.The fee will need to be paid prior to the issuance any building permit for this site.MI: Acknowledged Department: Stormwater EngineeringContact: Matt Simpson, (970) 4162754, masimpson@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 104/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL:The proposed drainage easements for the storm outlet pipe (Storm A) will need to be widened at 2 different locations based on the easement formula in the FCSCM (Ch 9 section 4.2), described as follows:Between Building 2 and Building 3: This storm pipe should have a 38ft drainage easement based on the formula. I will accept a 30ft easement in this case. Please widen the drainage easement to 30ft.The public outlet pipe, north of LeFever Drive: This drainage easement should be 42ft minimum width based on the formula. Since the pipe is offset in the easement, you will need to provide a minimum of 10feet of easement (clear) on the north side of the pipe. Please offset the north easement line 10feet (min.) from outside of storm pipe.NE:30’ easement added between Bldg 2 and 3. Storm Line A has been revised too not be sodeep through here but we still added the 30’ easement. NE: Offsite drainage easement is now 42’ at its smallest point. 10’ separation provided from edge of pipe to edge of easement.Comment Number: 204/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL:Please review and confirm all stormtech details are provided on the utility plans. Has ADS provided a sitespecific design for this project? See redlines for more information.NE: Site specific design now provided. See detail sheets.Comment Number: 304/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL:All storm pipe located in ROW, and public storm outside of ROW, will need to be RCP or HP Storm material and not HDPE. Please update plans accordingly. For HP Storm, please check with the Engineering department to confirm their acceptance of this material on this project. The Stormwater dept is agreeable to this.NE: HP Storm now specified in ROW.Comment Number: 404/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL:Provide an inlet schedule or call outs indicating each inlet type on the Utility Plans.NE: Inlet schedule can’t fit in the legend so it is provided in the detail sheets next to the inlet details for ease.Comment Number: 504/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL:Match crowns on the public storm mains or explain if this is not possible.NE: Crowns matched where is makes sense. See redline responses for additional clarification.Comment Number: 604/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL:The rain garden forebays should not be located on top of rain garden media. Please shift forebays back, off of the rain garden surface.NE: Forebays are not located on top of rain garden media. We plan on replacing the media with compacted soil at the ODP pond but we need all the depth we can get and we have provided 2 additional MC-7200 isolator chambers to offset the 16 sq. ft. of bio media that we are going to displace. ODP Pond has a flat bottom area of 30,809 sq. ft. so 16 sq. ft. is 0.05% which is negligible.Comment Number: 704/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL:Please add a table and narrative to the drainage report presenting the results of the LeFever Dr public inlet sizing and street encroachment calculations. In this table please identify the street classification and the corresponding max spread and depth requirements from the FCSCM.NE: See narrative in Section E.2. Spread calculations are shown in Appendix B as part of Inlet A3-1and A3-1.1. This shows compliance with Chapter 9.Comment Number: 804/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL:Comments on storm pipe hydraulics:a.Provide an output summary table in the format I provide. (see redlines) This makes reviewing the pipe analysis easier and more transparent.NE: I don’t see any redlines for summary table format. However, there is no way tochange these formats as this is how the program runs.b.Provide the manning n hydraulic roughness values.NE: n provided now.c.The summary tables show “0” friction slope for many pipes, please review and revise or explain.NE: It’s a rounding thing. Please see response in redlines for additional clarification.d.Confirm the stormtech diversion weir is included in the pipe hydraulic calculations.NE:Stormtech layout has been revised and weir is no longer needed. However, Storm A is modeling this new configuration appropriately. Stormtech system extents are also shown in Storm A profile CommentNumber: 904/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL:Please see redlines on drainage report, utility plans, and landscape plans for further comments.NE: Redlines have been addressed. Refer to redline responses.HDG: Redlines have been noted and landscape revised accordingly.Comment Number: 1004/25/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:For the new outfall to the “ODP Pond” (northeast of the site), an agreement for the maintenance of the pond will be required for approval. This agreement will be between the private property owners of the Savoy development and the private detention pond. The agreement will need to detail maintenance responsibilities between the parties. The City will not be party to this agreement, but the agreement will need to be recorded with the County before approval and attached to the DA.NE: There is already a maintenance agreement in place with the current owner for this parcel. It has been provided with this submittal.Comment Number: 1104/26/2023: FOR APPROVAL:On the plans, identify the surface overflow location for flows that need to bypass the stormtech unit.NE: See redline response (on grading sheet) for additional clarity but overflow areas are now also shownon drainage exhibit.Department: WaterWastewater EngineeringContact: Matt Simpson, (970) 4162754, masimpson@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 11.FOR INFORMATION:The sewer is provided by SFCSD, please coordinate with them for sewer comments.NE: We have addressed SFCSD redlines. Comment Number: 204/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL – REPEAT COMMENT FROM PDP:* The water main and service configuration along the northern drive aisle do not meet minimum requirements. This is a follow up comment from PDP. I did provide a water main configuration with the PDP redlines; I recommend reviewing this again.** Based on the continued complications with the onsite water main – we recommend servicing all buildings from adjacent water mains located in the adjacent ROW. This would require relocating the water services for the mail lounge and clubhouse buildings to LeFever Drive, relocating the fire line for the club house, and finding a new location for the irrigation service on the site. *** If you do not want to proceed with this recommendation. The following items need to be addressed with an updated design for the next submittal:a.Deadend water mains must have a hydrant on the end.b.We are not agreeable to this configuration with double deadends. Move all services onto 1 deadend main. We will not allow an irrigation service alone on the end of a deadend water main.c.The water main must provide minimum 5feet separation from curb and gutter (measured from FL)d.10feet clear horizontal separation must be provided between storm and water. (for storm less than 24inch diameter the separation may be measured to CL of pipe)e.The water meter should not be located near a lowpoint.f.18inchs minimum vertical clearance must be provided at the water/ storm crossing.**** Please send a draft of the updated water configuration to review before the next submittal.*****NE: Draft was submitted and approved on 6/05/2023 with Matt S and Sophie B. Comment Number: 304/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL:The onsite water main is not shown on the storm drain profile (Sheet ST 6), please add this crossing to the profile.NE: It is now a service and it is also now shown in sheet ST 6.Comment Number: 404/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL:At the northeast corner of the site, please make the water and fire line taps from the same main for Building 3 if possible. In addition, this water meter needs to be relocated to provide 4feet min. separation from the building.NE: Water entry room has been relocated to south side of building to allow for more space.Thiswas also vetted with Matt S and Sophie B on 6/07/2023.Comment Number: 504/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL:Please review the water service and light pole separations across the site plan. Light poles will need to be located 6feet or greater from water and fire services. Revise as necessary.NE: We have revised as necessary.Comment Number: 604/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL:Provide a sheet showing pothole locate information in the Utility Plan set.NE: Pothole information is shown on Le Fever Street centerline where the existing line is shown.Pothole information also shown on existing conditions sheet. Comment Number: 704/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL:The water infrastructure shown Utility Plan and Irrigation Plan do not match, please review and update.HDG: The irrigation plans have been revised to match the utility plan.Comment Number: 804/25/2023: FOR INFORMATION:Based on the ongoing and unresolved issues related to the water main design (comments 2 and 3) a completeness check will be required with FDP round 2.NE: New water design was vetted with city staff on 6/05 and 6/07.Department: Light And PowerContact: Cody Snowdon, 9704162306, csnowdon@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 104/25/2023: FOR APPROVAL:Thank you for providing the C1 Forms for the project. In reviewing the C1 Forms, it appears that the Electric Vehicle Chargers will require 8 runs of 4wire. Our singlephase transformer has max positions for 8runs of 3wire. This will also require a dedicated transformer for each Electric Vehicle Service proposed for the project. Currently the transformers shown on the plans are for each building. Please show the locations of the transformers required for the electric vehicle charging stations on the Utility Plans with associated primary and secondary cable.FREE Response: The C-1 Forms had an error in them and should’ve listed 3-wire in lieu of 4-wire. However, the project’s electrical systems have been revised from 1-phase to 3-phase, so the C-1 Forms have been amended.Comment Number: 204/25/2023: FOR FINAL:On the oneline diagram, please show the main disconnect size and meter sequencing. A copy of our meter sequencing can be found in our electric policies, practices, and procedures below.http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/buildersanddevelopers/developmentformsguidelinesregulationsFREE Response: One line diagrams have been provided. Comment Number: 304/25/2023: FOR DCP:Light & Power will require AutoCAD files of the Site Plan, Utility Plans, and Landscape Plans prior to the Entitlement Process approval.NE: CAD files will be supplied at time of approval. Comment Number: 404/25/2023: FOR INFORMATION:Electric capacity fees, development fees, building site charges and any system modification charges necessary to feed the site will apply to this development. Please contact me or visit the following website for an estimate of charges and fees related to this project:http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/buildersanddevelopers/plantinvestmentdevelopmentfeesMI: Acknowledged Comment Number: 504/25/2023: FOR INFORMATION:Please reference our policies, construction practices, development charge processes, electric services standards, and fee estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/buildersanddevelopersNE: Thanks gentlemen. Department: Environmental PlanningContact: Kirk Longstein, 9704164325, klongstein@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 104/20/2023: PRIOR TO DCP Prairie DogsPrior to the Development Construction Permit (DCP) being released, a qualified wildlife biologist must be retained to determine the presence of prairie dogs and burrowing owls on the project site. The contractor will provide monitoring and reporting of any prairie dog colonies that have established themselves between now and the DCP being issued.The applicant must pay the paymentinlieu fee of $1,637 per acre as described in the 10/14/2022 Memorandum Development Review – Prairie Dog Colonies – PaymentinLieu for the entire property (8.336 acres). Language will be included in the Development Agreement monumenting this requirement.Finally, the applicant team must follow the Colorado Parks and Wildlife permit requirements including:•Describe mitigation measures to ensure no recolonization•monitoring and reporting of prairie dog colonies on site prior to DCP•Burrowing owl survey prior to DCPMI: Burrowing Owl Survey is provided with this submittal. Future monitoring and reporting of prairie dog colonies will be performed at time of DCPContact: Scott Benton, (970)4164290, sbenton@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 204/25/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Thank you for including the details of the Native Seed Mix for the BioRetention Raingarden. Hatching for the seed mix is shown at the rain garden location on the Landscaping Plan but it must defined in the Legend as well.HDG: The legend has been updated as requested.Department: ForestryContact: Freddie Haberecht, , fhaberecht@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 104/25/2023: FOR APPROVALPlease include a Street Tree Permit Note on any Landscape sheet indicating trees that will be placed in the city ROW.These notes are available from the City Planner or by following the link below and clicking on Standard Plan Set Notes: https://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/applications.phpHDG: The street tree permit note has been added to the landscape sheetsComment Number: 204/25/2023: FOR APPROVALPer LUC 3.2.1 (D) (c), canopy shade trees shall constitute at least fifty (50) percent of all tree plantings. Shade trees currently make up less than 40% of the new plantings on site. Columnar trees do not count toward the canopy shade tree count.HDG: The landscape plan / plant schedule has been revised to include 50% canopy shade trees.CommentNumber: 3FOR APPROVAL Each landscape island should be 8’ in its smallest dimensions to allow for tree root growth (LUC 3.2.1 5©).NE: All landscape islands are larger than 8’ measured from back of curb to back of curbComment Number: 404/25/2023: FOR APPROVALPlease change the selection ‘Scarlet Letter’ to another selection this tree has not done well in Fort Collins.HDG: Scarlet letter oak has been replaced with another selection (Regal Prince Oak).Comment Number: 504/25/2023: INFORMATION ONLYForestry will provide Development Agreement language (if appliable) to the City Engineer during FDP.HDG: NotedDepartment: PFAContact: Marcus Glasgow, 9704162869, marcus.glasgow@poudrefire.orgTopic: GeneralComment Number: 104/25/2023: FOR APPROVALADDRESSING ON MULTIPLE SIDES OF BUILDING IFC 505.1.7Buildings, either individually or part of a multi building complex, that have emergency access lanes on sides other than on the addressed street side, shall have the address numbers and street name posted on each side that fronts a fire lane.DSA: Addresses will be posted on each side that fronts a fire lane. See elevations.Please add general address locations to the elevation plansComment Number: 204/25/2023: FOR APPROVALFIRE LANE SIGNS The limits of the fire lane shall be fully defined. Fire lane sign locations should be indicated on future plan sets. Refer to LCUASS detail #1418 & #1419 for sign type, placement, and spacing. Appropriate directional arrows required on all signs. Posting of additional fire lane signage may be determined at time of fire inspection. Code language provided below. IFC D103.6: Where required by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING FIRE LANE signs complying with Figure D103.6. Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and have red letters on a white reflective background. Signs shall be posted on one or both sides of the fire apparatus road as required by Section D103.6.1 or D103.6.2.Fire lane signs will be required on Lefever Dr in front of Building 1 and Building 2 in order to provide aerial access to these buildings. Please provide LCUASS fire lane signage detail to the civil plans.NE: Detail is provided on horizontal control plan. Signs are also shown on horizontal control plan.Department: Park PlanningContact: Missy Nelson, , mnelson@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 1 04/25/2023: INFORMATION: Both Park Planning & Development and Parks department comments will be provided by Missy Nelson | mnelson@fcgov.com No comments, thank you.Department: Internal ServicesContact: Russell Hovland, 9704162341, rhovland@fcgov.comTopic: Building Insp Plan ReviewComment Number: 104/24/2023: Construction shall comply with adopted codes as amended. Current adopted codes are:2021 International Building Code (IBC) with local amendments2021 International Existing Building Code (IEBC) with local amendments2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) with local amendments2021 International Mechanical Code (IMC) with local amendments2021 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) with local amendments2021 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code (ISPSC) with local amendmentsColorado Plumbing Code (currently on the 2018 IPC)2020 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of ColoradoProjects shall comply with the current adopted building codes, local amendments and structural design criteria can be found here: https://www.fcgov.com/building/codesAccessibility: State Law CRS 95 & ICC/ANSI A117.12017.Snow Live Load: Ground Snow Load 35 PSF.Frost Depth: 30 inches.Wind Loads: Risk Category II (most structures):· 140mph (Ultimate) exposure B or Front Range Gust Map published by The Structural Engineer's Association of ColoradoSeismic Design: Category B.Climate Zone: Zone 5Energy Code: • Multifamily and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2021 IECC residential chapter.• Commercial and Multifamily 4 stories and taller: 2021 IECC commercial chapter. DSA: Building will comply with adopted codes as amended. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: · Electric vehicle charging parking spaces are required, see local amendment.DSA: Noted· This building is located within 250ft of a 4 lane road or 1000 ft of an active railway, must provide exterior composite sound transmission of 39 STC min.DSA: This project is NOT located with 250ft of a 4 lane road or 1000ft of an active railway.· R2 occupancies must provide 10ft to 30ft of fire separation distance (setback) from property line and 20 feet between other buildings or provide fire rated walls and openings per chapter 6 and 7 of the IBC.DSA: Noted· All multifamliy buildings must be fire sprinkled. City of Fort Collins amendments to the 2021 International Fire Code limit what areas can avoid fire sprinklers with a NFPA 13R, see local IFC 903 amendment.DSA: We are providing fire sprinklers with a NFPA 13· Bedroom egress windows required below 4th floor regardless of firesprinkler. All egress windows above the 1st floor require minimum sill height of 24”.DSA: Noted· If using electric systems to heat or cool the building, ground source heat pump or cold climate heat pump technology is required.DSA: Noted· A City licensed commercial general contractor is required to construct any new multifamily structure.DSA: Noted· Energy code requires short hot water supply lines by showing plumbing compactness.DSA: Plumbing drawings will illustrate plumbing compactness.· For projects located in Metro Districts, there are special additional code requirements for new buildings. Please contact the plan review team to obtain the requirements for each district.DSA: NotedStock Plans:When the exact same residential building will be built more then once with limited variations, a stock plan design or master plan can be submitted for a single review and then built multiple times with site specific permits. More information can be found in our Stock Plan Guide at fcgov.com/building/resrequirements.php.DSA: NotedDepartment: Technical ServicesContact: Jeff County, 9702216588, jcounty@fcgov.comTopic: Building ElevationsComment Number: 604/25/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:There are line over text issues. See redlines.DSA: We have addressed these issues.Topic: Construction DrawingsComment Number: 704/25/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:Please provide the following information for the Benchmark Statement in the EXACT format shown below.PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTIONELEVATION:BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTIONELEVATION:PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) = NAVD88 DATUM X.XX’.NE: Format for Benchmark Statement has been updated to match that shown above.Comment Number: 804/25/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:Some of the sheet titles & sheet numbers in the sheet index do not match the noted sheets. See redlines.NE: Redlined line over text has been resolved on Northernand DSAsheets.Comment Number: 904/25/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:All Benchmark Statements must match on all sheets.NE: Benchmark Statements have been updated to match.CommentNumber: 1004/25/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:There are sheet numbering issues. See redlines.NE: Sheet numbers have been corrected.Comment Number: 1104/25/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:There are text over text issues. See redlines.NE: Redlined text over text issues have been resolved.Comment Number: 1204/25/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:There are line over text issues. See redlines.NE: Redlined line over text issues have been resolved.Topic: EasementsComment Number: 1304/25/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:OFFSITE EASEMENT: Please make changes as marked. See redlines.NE: Easement was revised per redlines.Topic: Landscape PlansComment Number: 404/25/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:There are line over text issues. See redlines.HDG: The text overlap has been fixed.Comment Number: 504/25/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:There are text over text issues. See redlines.HDG: The text overlap has been fixed.Topic: PlatComment Number: 104/25/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. If you have any specific questions about the redlines, please contact John Von Nieda at 9702216565 or jvonnieda@fcgov.comNE: Changes have been made. See redline responses for additional clarification.Topic: Site PlanCommentNumber: 204/25/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:Some of the sheet titles & sheet numbers in the sheet index do not match the noted sheets. See redlines.Comment Number: 3 04/25/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:There are line over text issues. See redlines.NE: Site plan line over text issues have been resolved.Department: Water ConservationContact: Emma Pett, , epett@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 104/18/2023: Please provide a hydrozone plan view diagram that corresponds to the landscape plan and water use table. You can find more information on what is required here: https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/img/site_specific/uploads/irrigationplansubmittalreqs.pdf?1649260267HDG:Refer to L-6 of the FDP for the hydrozone plan. The irrigation plan is currently stand alone forreview, but will be added to the recorded FDP when approved.Comment Number: 204/18/2023: Please update your irrigation plan to include a smart controller chart. Include the following columns: Zone, Sprinkler Type, Precip. Rate (in./hr.), Plant Material Type, Soil Type, Slope, Microclimate (Sun/Shade). The columns labeled precipitation rate, slope and microclimate may be left blank to be completed on the “asbuilt” drawings.HYDROSYSTEM: See sheet IR7 in the irrigation plan (see controller chart)Department: Outside AgenciesContact: Comcast, Marcus Petty, Marcus_Petty@comcast.net, , Topic: GeneralComment Number: 1 Comcast will be able to serve this location. Please reach out with any questions.Contact: Trevor Crane, South Fort Collins Sanitation District, tcrane@fclwd.com, , Topic: GeneralComment Number: 204/21/2023: Please see redlines.NE: See redlines for comment responses. Contact: Xcel Energy, , Topic: GeneralComment Number: 304/28/2023: No comments received.