HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE COTTAGES AT MIRAMONT PUD, PHASE IV - FINAL - 54-87AD - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSSTAFF REPORT
PROJECT: Cottages at Miramont P.U.D., Phase IV, Final
(Portion of Parcel Q of the Amended Oak/Cottonwood
Farm O.D.P.) - #54-87AD
APPLICANT: Vaught -Frye Architects
1113 Stoney Hill Drive
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
OWNER: Albrecht Homes
4836 South College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This is a request for final planned unit development (P.U.D.)
approval for 16 single family lots on 2.22 acres located west of
south Lemay Avenue and south of Oakridge Drive. The property is
zoned RP - Planned Residential.
RECOMMENDATION: approval with a condition
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This request for final P.U.D. approval:
* Is in conformance with the approved Cottages at Miramont
P.U.D. - Preliminary;
* meets the applicable All Development Criteria in the Land
Development Guidance System (L.D.G.S.);
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
•
Cottages at Miramont PUD - Final, #54-87AD
June 26, 1995 P & Z Meeting
Page 2
COMMENTS:
1. Background:
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
N: RP; recreation center under construction (Miramont Fitness and
Tennis Center)
S: RP; vacant, approved single family (Courtyards at Miramont)
E: BP; Collinwood Senior Housing and Assisted Living Center
W: RP; vacant, approved multi -family (Oak Hill Apartments)
The Cottages at Miramont P.U.D. - Preliminary was approved by the
Planning and Zoning Board on June 27, 1994 for 16 single family
residential lots on 2.22 acres.
2. Land Use:
This is a request for final planned unit development (P.U.D.)
approval for 16 single family lots on 2.22 acres. The proposal
represents a small -lot, single family, detached housing product.
Lot sizes will average 3,000 square feet. One of the side yards
will feature a zero lot line setback. This housing product is
commonly referred to as "patio homes". The garages are located in
the rear of the units and served by an alley. The gross residential
density is 7.2 dwelling units per acre. The final P.U.D. is in
conformance with the Cottages at Miramont P.U.D. - Preliminary and
meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the L.D.G.S.
3. Design:
As a "patio home" project, the single family homes are detached and
placed on lots less than the required minimum of 6,000 square feet
in size. The average lot size will be 3,000 square feet. One side
yard will feature a zero lot line to create more useable space on
one side of the home. Front yard setbacks will be 15' (generally,
from the flowline of the private street to the front face of the
porch). This project increases the variety of housing types in the
area and contributes to the neighborhood diversity.
Architecture:
The houses on these lots will be of the "bungalow style". They will
range in size from 1,000 to 1,500 square feet on long (100' deep),
narrow (30' wide) lots. There are three distinct models of homes
(as shown on the final building elevations plan) featuring
different combinations of porches and rooflines. Materials will be
horizontal wood lap siding with asphaltic shingle roofs. There will
be Shakertown shingles as accents on the vertical gabled surfaces.
Cottages at Miramont PUD - Final, #54-87AD
June 26, 1995 P & Z Meeting
Page 3
Landscaping:
The fronts of the lots will contain deciduous trees as a formal
(regularly spaced) streetscape and a combination of deciduous and
evergreen shrubs as entry features to the homes. The alley will
contain deciduous and broadleaf evergreen shrubs in small planting
areas between the garages.
Parking:
On -lot parking will be provided in garages that gain access from
the alley located at the rear of all lots. This allows for a more
pleasing streetscape, especially given the size and narrowness of
the lots.
4. Neighborhood Compatibility:
The Cottages at Miramont represents a "patio home" concept. Patio
homes and duplexes are found in Oak Ridge Village, a residential
community on the east side of South Lemay Avenue. This P.U.D. is
bordered by future apartments, a fitness and tennis club (under
construction), an elderly care facility, and patio homes. The
proposed use is a good housing product that contributes to the mix
of uses and maintains the character of the area.
5. Transportation:
Primary access will be gained from Rule Drive, a local public
street that intersects with South Lemay Avenue. The public right-
of-way ends at the east property line (extended to the north) of
this development. At that point it will become a private driveway
on the Miramont Fitness and Tennis Center and the Cottages at
Miramont. A secondary point of access to this development will be
provided through the fitness and tennis center, from the north, at
an intersection with Oakridge Drive, a collector street.
This 2.22 acre site is well served by bicycle/pedestrian paths that
connect south into the Courtyards and west into the Oak Hill
Apartments. Also, a path will be stubbed to the north property line
to tie into Phase Two of the Miramont Fitness and Tennis Center.
Combined with other projects in the area, these paths will create
easy access to the fitness and tennis center and the Harmony Market
Shopping Center.
Cottages at Miramont PUD - Final, #54-87AD
June 26, 1995 P & Z Meeting
Page 4
FINDINGS of FACT/CONCLUSIONS:
In evaluating the request for the Cottages at Miramont P.U.D.,
Final, staff makes the following findings of fact:
* It is in conformance with the Cottages at Miramont
P.U.D., Preliminary.
* It meets the applicable All Development Criteria in the
T. T) r' q
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Cottages at Miramont P.U.D., Phase
IV, Final - #54-87AD, with the following condition:
1. The Planning and Zoning Board approves this planned unit
development final plan upon the condition that the development
agreement, final utility plans, and final P.U.D. plans for the
planned unit development be negotiated between the developer
and City staff and executed by the developer prior to the
second monthly meeting (August 21, 1995) of the Planning and
Zoning Board following the meeting at which this planned unit
development final plan was conditionally approved; or, if not
so executed, that the developer or the City staff, at said
subsequent monthly meeting, apply to the Board for an
extension of time. The Board shall not grant any such
extension of time unless it shall first find that there exists
with respect to said planned unit development final plan
certain specific unique and extraordinary circumstances which
require the granting of the extension in order to prevent
exceptional and unique hardship upon the owner or developer of
such property and provided that such extension can be granted
without substantial detriment to the public good.
If the staff and the developer disagree over the provisions to
be included in the development agreement, the developer may
present such dispute to the Board for resolution. The Board
may table any such decision, until both the staff and the
developer have had reasonable time to present sufficient
information to the Board to enable it to make its decision.
(If the Board elects to table the decision, it shall also, as
necessary, extend the term of this condition until the date
such decision is made.)
If this condition is not met within the time established
herein (or as extended, as applicable), then the final
approval of this planned unit development shall become null
and void and of no effect. The date of final approval for this
Cottages at Miramont PUD - Final, #54-87AD
June 26, 1995 P & Z Meeting
Page 5
planned unit development shall be deemed to be the date that
the condition is met, for purposes of determining the vesting
of rights. For purposes of calculating the running of time for
the filing of an appeal pursuant to Chapter 2, Article II,
Division 3, of the City Code, the "final decision" of the
Board shall be deemed to have been made at the time of this
conditional approval; however, in the event that a dispute is
presented to the Board for resolution regarding provisions to
be included in the development agreement, the running of time
for the filing of an appeal of such "final decision" shall be
counted from the date of the Board's decision resolving such
dispute.
by
Trh LP
by
RL
I
NRmP
RP
r
I
RLP
rp
by
by
— -
y
o
r
�
O�
O
LW
Q
Q'
+
J
p
�
l o 0
i
�
I
i
�
i
rp
lip
VICINITY MAP
54-87R THE COTTAGES
AT MIRAMONT PUD
Phase VI - Final
04/28/95
LEGAL DESCRIPTION �.
rwo-
# i ii ii
OAKVIDGE WEST (LrOEVELOPED)
p'
i� r ----- I ---- ----- —-------- -------
mpi w N r fzrr ess ND To t is a t4TEI
-
Z 1 - -e 1• k: r ` �
nvr.r rN,l.
ii I is ems, . m,�e I r.ro ro r RULE DRIVEPLANNN
BOARDAPPROVAND AL
GENERAL NOTE ---------------------- -- �,& �..w
:.4;iI0.tl&OR> 6dBE -' Wemvemwome iiP/�ib4i 1• S
5 89' 00, E 32000'
OWWRS CERTFICATION
h.. '°3'dEC5Y3.iP.tl'kP.4NTd1t'FBE- .._. _.-m: I"`v,ul�"uai"is..'le.setc.w..oe.wQew.als..ow.
tt r
('All ...—.
LAND USE BREAKDOWN
i F 8 7 6 Fa 4 3 2
VICINITY MAP wt w *a" `
}V �,,fJ II,� j 3 f� a•et.r.a
_ _ _ k bi>D➢Y1
r
1 _ ��. F � is I ar.oveo ream
e.wam rn.
� A
3 Ll n' . ...
I 1 1 I I I ! R41R T
1 i 1
.0•
TrI 1
i
I f i umo� VAUGHT
�9
10
/
-Yi 12 13 14 f5 16
L.m:,�' PHASE VI
,:�4 AT OI@NOIpY
THE COTTAGES
AT MIRAMONT P.U.D.
&
x:
,N,w
WE PLAN
A PORTION OF PARCELS P & O
,s4
..........
AMENDED OAK / COTTONWOOD O.D.P.
a ,
'�- ' Zd-p1:R
m I•Jns11ii'enm
— ---
i�
00• .- .. .. }
--
N W 90' 00' W 26
�'���"��
Z� AT NWZA ICTE Y
y.
r�iul Kr�w�ew�
FLM
ZONED by
TYPICAL IM MEET I OF p
fdl0 1+v1
---------- - -- -
RULE DRIVE
;G�9f
♦ 1*
yas. G wretl M�ng�w~b Wii
�=w u.uv�i p arm Iw gsnvVm w! atbuYwn.
r�qq w papw be�n�i wime _
NM�pbn vutiiN Wli mes A4i .uuds.d. ro. �w w g r�
ewewc��gx.. vp ���u res axw�n �PWn err wiiitY
.0 aunty ra 4exxY a piuu oval W n a reuuuu
W .PPeu�! uTlr+Pe P�Pa
w p�an.eren.u�stl Wsti °'a.�a..a°wwa"� ywxi.. �iteP.t.a wiiw uµea
All
psFE:
. do �rwa �wO niew .ada wukip�wrne �g.9we.w
.ivi ��tM1ur a.r wPI�Lv rki�! uNe Fy uutlMacap� wn a tuaeuG w�� M unh an
�igeuan�y��g luwa� �pbi..c w.w .igu.w.
.y
nm p��x .eua ea cbuwl nm w G�ty Mav tNw� ay
urnM. T� w rwnu.a uiW. W
�ia wa p�unvg�.w• p canny Papeu.. Leru o1 �P� �elunnn b M ry uuv w wiury
v P �i M1m K wa ligu or 10 h. Iw urge
�V6Lll�yNl® i�JL4!-0IIR$
L':e �Wv
o — �1.. •.w,�i�""ffi a ✓�.^s.`.
t /Sn1?
�raNhg¢s
VACGHT
F'H1"E
PHASE VI L
THE COTTAGES
AT MIRAMONT P.U.D. -AL
"MSCAPE PLAN
A PORTION OF PARCELS P & Q
AMENDED OAK / COTTONWOOD O.D.P.
SHEET 2 of 3
Attic Vent
® 12 /-Asphalt Shingles Accent Shakertown Shingle
d
1oF
®� I
Painted Horizontal
Lap aiding -
ELEVATIONS 1/4"= 1`0"
Front Porch and
Window W/ Basement Option Bay Window Varies
V FRYET
PHASE VI
THE COTTAGES _�==
AT MIRAMONT P.U.D. rNAL
ELEVATIONS
A PORTION OF PARCELS P 6 Q
AMENDED OAK / COTTONWOOD O.D.P.
SHEET 3 OF 3
•
•
•
SCHOOL PROJECTIONS
PROPOSAL: COTTAGES @ MIRAMONT PUD
DESCRIPTION: 16 single family units on 2.22 acres
DENSITY:
General Population
7.20 du/acre
16 (units) x 3.5 (persons/unit) = 56
School Age Population
Elementary - 16 (units) x
Junior High - 16 (units) x
Senior High - 16 (units) x
450
(pupils/unit) =
7.2
.210
(pupils/unit) =
3.36
185
(pupils/unit) =
2.96
Activity A: ALL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA
ALL CRITERIA ERIA I APPLICABLE CRITERIAN ONLY
CRITERION
the =tenen `M11 the antenc
acchcatzle? I be satisfied?
a . Yes No
iz
_a
Al. COMMUNITY -WIDE CRITERIA,.
1.1 Solar Orientation I I
1.2 Comorehensive Plan
1.3 Mid Iife Habitat ( i I
1.4 Mineral Deccsit 1 1 IV
1. , Ecciccically Sensitive Are:-s rzs2r✓ed
Te Lands cf Acricultural Im�crance I reserved
1.7
Enercv l.Crser/aticn I
I I
; I
1.8
Air Qualitv I
I ✓
I 1
1.9
Water Quality I
I I I
1C Se`Ncce arc 'V'%c Si.ac 1
!
1 11
Wa-erCor. =^va"on I
! I
1 I
1.12
Residential Density 1
j '/7l
j'7 1 I
A 2
NE?G'r'EGRH ,OC COMPATiBILI T Y CRIT== A.I
I
2.1
Veicuiar P=d=sr;an. Bike Transocration
VT
2 2
Buiici.^.c P!=ce.r;ent and Orient_,;cn (
1 i I✓
1 I
2
N2tu oral re- ,fires 1
I ✓1 I
✓j 1
2.4
Vehicular Circ:.,i-adon and Parkinc I
I
2. ,
Emnergencv Ac cuss _ I
I ✓
2.8
'ecesz,... Ci ,I—r I
r..�.._�„ter, �,,rc�,�,ion
I ✓� I
I i
2.7
Arc; ,itecturs
2.8
Buiicina Heicrt and Views I
I I
I I
2.9
Shading
2.10
Solar Acoess 1
I ✓1 !
1
2.11
Historic Res`urces I
1 I Z
I I
2.12
Seftacks I
I ✓I I
2.13
Lancscace I
I I
TI I
2.14
Sicns I
I ✓1 I
✓ I
2.15
Site Lichtinc I
I V1 I
✓ I I
2.1 e
Noise and Vibration I
I ✓1 I✓
1 1
2.17
Glare or Heat
I I I
I
2.18
Haz_rdous Materials
I 1
A 3.
ENGINEERING CRITERIA
I
3.1
Utiiity Capacity
I
✓
3.2
Design Standards
I
3.3
Water Hazards 11
I
I.
3.4
Geologic Hazards
I I A
I I
If no, please ex::fain
Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments
The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised . fi 1994
- 61 - /jp,-� U c, i