Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBANK ONE PUD - PRELIMINARY & FINAL - 54-87W - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTES (2)PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MINUTES SEPTEMBER 26, 1994 Council Liaison, Gerry Horak Planning and Zoning Board Liaison, Bob Blanchard The meeting was called to order at 6:32 p.m. Roll Call: Carnes, Bell, Fontane, Strom, Walker, Cottier, Clements. Chief Planner Bob Blanchard invited the Board to the Council .Worksession on October 1 lth regarding Congestion Management. The worksession will focus on transportation demand management and some of the relationships that occur between transportation and land use. AGENDA REVIEW: Chief Planner Bob Blanchard reviewed the agenda noting that the first item would be electing new officers for the 1995 year. Chief Planner Blanchard noted that the consent agenda items are of no known opposition or concern and are considered for approval as a group. Any member of the Board, the staff, or the audience may pull any item for discussion. Chief Planner Blanchard noted a change in Item 17 in their packets in that the date should read September 26, 1994 instead of August 22, 1994. CONSENT AGENDA: 1. MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 22 AND 29,1994 P & Z MEETINGS. 2. #54-87AA MIRAMONT PUD, FITNESS AND TENNIS CENTER - FINAL 3. #13-82BI OAKRIDGE RETAIL CENTER PUD, BLOCK ONE, 4TH FILING - PRELIMINARY 4. #96-810 THE MARKET @ HORSETOOTH COMMONS, LOT 3A, SEVEN OAKS ACADEMY PUD - AMENDED PRELIMINARY 5. #28-89C FORT COLLINS HOUSING AUTHORITY EXPANSION PUD - PRELIMINARY 6. #54-87AB HARMONY MARKET PUD, 8TH FILING, OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE - PRELIMINARY AND FINAL 7. #41-93B SUMMERHILL PUD - REPLAT 8. 13-82BJ OAKRIDGE BUSINESS PARK,17TH FILING, INNOVATION DRIVE PUD - PRELIMINARY AND FINAL 9. #54-87W BANK ONE PUD - FINAL 10. #65-82AB FAIRBROOKE PUD, TRACT A = PRELIMINARY AND FINAL 11. #60-91K DAKOTA RIDGE PUD, THIRD FILING.- PRELIMINARY 12. #55-87K THE OVERLOOK AT WOODRIDGE PUD, 4TH FILING - FINAL Planning and Zoning Board Minutes September 26, 1995 Page 3 Chairman Clements also pulled items 2, 3 and 8 because of a conflict of interest. Chairman Clements asked for any other items pulled for discussion. There were none. Member Fontane moved for approval of items 4, 6, 7, 9,11. 12,13, 14, 15, 16. Member Cottier seconded the motion. Motion was approved 7-0. Chairman Clements asked for legal advise on the items Chairman Clements had a conflict of interest on and Member Cottier had questions on. Deputy City Attorney Eckman replied that Vice -Chair Cottier should chair the meeting. Chairman Clements turned the meeting over to Vice -Chair Cottier: Vice Chair Cottier asked for explanations on items 3 and 8 because they are in the Harmony Corridor, and why they are not subject to the current moratorium on commercial development. City Planner Olt replied that the two items in question were Oakridge Retail Center PUD and Oakridge Business Park, 17th Filing, Innovation Drive PUD Preliminary and Final. Planner Olt explained that the Oakridge Center Retail PUD conformed with the approved Oakridge/Oakridge West Amended Overall Development Plan and that it was part of Parcel A of the approved ODP. Also, the proposed uses were considered retail or commercial development, by the City's definition. Planner Olt went on to verify that the City Council had approved a moratorium for suspension for this type of use in the Harmony Corridor, however, Section 5 of that Ordinance states that the provisions of the Ordinance should not apply to the review or approval of the proposed uses within parcels A, N and M of the approved Oakridge/Oakridge West Amended Overall Development Plan. Therefore, this was exempt due to the existing ordinance. Vice -Chairman Cottier thought that it would be good to get this publicly stated in the record due to where the projects were located. Vice -Chairman Cottier asked about item #8.