Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMONTAVA - PHASE E - TOWN CENTER RESIDENTIAL - BDR220003 - DOCUMENT MARKUPS - ROUND 3 - UTILITY PLANSCity of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date The linetype differences between existing and proposed are not clear enough. They look almost identical, and it makes the plans less clear. The linetypes should be more consistent. Why does the proposed gas linetype look thinner than the existing, but the proposed electric linetype is thicker than existing? ’ “” – ’ ’ ’ — ’ “” “” “”“” – “” – – “ ” – ” ” ” ” ” ’’ ’ ’ City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date The approval block should only be on sheet 1. Remove from all other sheets. insert "for the project" The highlighted section were not addressed from last round of comments. Please fill out the notes properly. City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Remove all brick pavers from the roundabout. The City does not want pavers anywhere in the public ROW. The City will not maintain any brick pavers within the ROW, and it does not make sense to split out maintenance responsibilities for the small areas within the roundabouts. Should the regional trail be marked to clearly define it's path? Colored concrete and/or signage added, since it is different from the rest of the sidewalks? Please label these existing contours City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date It seems like there are current existing contours depicted here instead of just the soon-to-be existing contours per Phase G improvements. Please correct which contours are shown. City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date The City is not comfortable with brick pavers in the public ROW. If the Montava team wants to keep the brick paver roadways, you will have to make these streets private instead of public. The City will not provide roadway maintenance, nor plow the snow or salt the streets in the winter. Instead of providing right-of-way, you will need to provide public access easements, and a utility easement for any public utilities that are located under these brick paver roadways. Coordination of utility maintenance that will occur and the responsibilities of replacing brick pavers will be written in to the Development Agreement. City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date The City is not comfortable with brick pavers in the public ROW. If the Montava team wants to keep the brick paver roadways, you will have to make these streets private instead of public. The City will not provide roadway maintenance, nor plow the snow or salt the streets in the winter. Instead of providing right-of-way, you will need to provide public access easements, and a utility easement for any public utilities that are located under these brick paver roadways. Coordination of utility maintenance that will occur and the responsibilities of replacing brick pavers will be written in to the Development Agreement. VAU L T VAULTVAULTVAULT VAULTVAULT VAUL T VAULT VAULTVAULTVAULTVAULT VAULT VAULT VAULTVAULT VAULTVAULTVAULT VAULTVAULTVAULTVAULTVAULT VAULTVAULT VAULTVAULTVAULTVAULTVAULTVAULT VAULTVAULTVAULTVAULTVAULT VAULT VAULT VAULT VA U L T VAULT VAULTVAULT VAULTVAULTCity of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Where does this go? Is there a detention pond here? Was it intentional that there is no sanitary sewer proposed in Godwink Dr? Will future development southeast of Godwink Dr be served by an extension of the sewer in Montava Dr, or perhaps a connection to the existing sewer running north-south? City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Electric utilities owned by the City need to be within an easement. What is this dashed line? VAULT City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date What is this dashed line? The space between the planting bed and the ramp does not meet minimum ADA width. Please increase the width to meet ADA standards, including any required turning space. City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date What are these bubbles? Why does the irrigation line bump out here? What are these? City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date This hydrant looks like it could be in the middle of a future sidewalk, in which case it would need to be relocated in the future. Is that the intention? City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date This hydrant looks like it could be in the middle of a future street, in which case it would need to be relocated in the future. Is that the intention? Please be mindful of minimum parking distance from a fire hydrant. It might make sense to extend the bump-out to prevent parking too close to the hydrant. City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date This utility needs to be within an easement dedicated to the owner of the utility. Pedestrian ramps should be provided for this access. Please be mindful of minimum parking distance from a fire hydrant. It might make sense to extend the bump-out to prevent parking too close to the hydrant Please add pedestrian ramps to each corner. City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date No single point grade break shall exceed 0.50%. See LCUASS section 7.4.1.B.3. City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Minimum K value at a sag on a minor collector is 64. Although this is a future improvement to be constructed under another phase, we cannot approve plans that show a design that does not meet LCUASS standards. Either revise the vertical curve design to make the k-value equal to or greater than 64, or remove this VC label from the plans and fix the vertical curve later. Vertical curves should not overlap with horizontal curves. Additionally, 100' is not long enough for a vertical curve in a collector street -- please review LCUASS Figure 7-17 using a collector design speed of 40 mph. City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date 250'-1/4" City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Variance required for the reverse diagonal parking, which is non-standard. Please submit the variance with the next submission. 35' is not long enough for a vertical curve in a residential street. Please review LCUASS Figure 7-17 using a design speed of 30 mph. City of Fort Collins, Colorado UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: City Engineer, APPROVED: Water & Wastewater Utility, APPROVED: Stormwater Utility, APPROVED: Park Planning and Development, APPROVED: Traffic Operations, APPROVED: Environmental Planner,Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Approved Sheets Date Is this sidewalk constructed under Phase G? Remove all brick pavers from the roundabout. The City does not want pavers anywhere in the public ROW.