Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPOWERHOUSE 2 - FDP220015 - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTS  Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6689 970.224.6134 ‑ fax fcgov.com/developmentreview March 31, 2023 Roger Sherman BHA Design 111 S Meldrum, Suite 110 Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: Powerhouse 2, FDP220015, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of Powerhouse 2. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through your Development Review Coordinator, Brandy Bethurem Harras via phone at 970‑416‑2744 or via email at bbethuremharras@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Development Review Coordinator Contact: Brandy Bethurem Harras, 970‑416‑2744, bbethuremharras@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 01/10/2023: INFORMATION: I will be your primary point of contact throughout the development review and permitting process. If you have any questions, need additional meetings with the project reviewers, or need assistance throughout the process, please let me know and I can assist you and your team. Please include me in all email correspondence with other reviewers and keep me informed of any phone conversations. Thank you! Comment Number: 2 01/10/2023: SUBMITTAL: As part of your resubmittal, you will respond to the comments provided in this letter. This letter is provided to you in Microsoft Word format. Please use this document to insert responses to each comment for your submittal, using a different font color. When replying to the comment letter please be detailed in your responses, as all comments should be thoroughly addressed. Comments requiring action should NOT have a response such as noted or acknowledged. You will need to provide references to specific project plans, pages, reports, or explanations of why comments have not been addressed [when applicable]. Comment Number: 3 01/10/2023: SUBMITTAL: Please follow the Electronic Submittal Requirements and File Naming Standards found at https://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/files/electronic submittal requirements and file naming standards_v1_8 1 19.pdf?1566857888. File names should begin with the file type, followed by the project information, and round number. Example: UTILITY PLANS_PROJECT NAME_PDP_Rd2.pdf File type acronyms maybe appropriate to avoid extremely long file names. Example: TIS for Traffic Impact Study, ECS for Ecological Characterization Study. Reach out to me if you would like a list of suggested names. *Please disregard any references to paper copies, flash drives, or CDs. Comment Number: 4 01/10/2023: SUBMITTAL: All plans should be saved as optimized/flattened PDFs to reduce file size and remove layers. Per the Electronic Submittal Requirements AutoCAD SHX attributes need to be removed from the PDF’s. AutoCAD turns drawing text into comments that appear in the PDF plan set, and these must be removed prior to submittal as they can cause issues with the PDF file. The default setting is "1" ("on") in AutoCAD. To change the setting and remove this feature, type "EPDFSHX" (version 2016.1) or “PDFSHX (version 2017 and newer) in the command line and enter "0". Read this article at Autodesk.com for more on this topic: https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/autocad/troubleshooting/caas/sfdcarti cles/sfdcarticles/Drawing‑text‑appears‑as‑Comments‑in‑a‑PDF‑created‑by‑Aut oCAD.html Comment Number: 5 01/10/2023: SUBMITTAL: Resubmittals are accepted any day of the week, with Wednesday at noon being the cut‑off for routing the same week. When you are preparing to resubmit your plans, please notify me with an expected submittal date with as much advanced notice as possible. Comment Number: 6 01/10/2023: INFORMATION: Please resubmit within 180 days, approximately 6 months, to avoid the expiration of your project. Comment Number: 7 01/10/2023: INFORMATION: ANY project that requires four or more rounds of review would be subject to an additional fee of $3,000.00. Comment Number: 8 01/10/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: All "For Final Approval / For Approval" comments need to be addressed and resolved prior to moving forward with the final documents and recording of this project. I will provide a recording checklist and process information when we are closer to this step. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: John Gerwel, , jgerwel@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 8 03/08/2023: FOR APPROVAL: I noticed that the certification header was removed on the cover sheet of the utility plans. That certification statement needs to state the following: "I hereby affirm that these final construction plans were prepared under my direct supervision, in accordance with all applicable City of Fort Collins and State of Colorado standards and statutes, respectively; and that I am fully responsible for the accuracy of all design, revisions, and record conditions that I have noted on these plans." That statement needs to be signed and dated by the reviewing engineer with their associated PE number. Comment Number: 9 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL: We will need a Temporary Construction Easement for 740 College, which is owned by the City. The easement will be need to be conveyed from the City to the developer. Comment Number: 10 03/08/2023: FOR RECORDING: Make sure you have the current date (month and year) under the legal description in the utility plans. Contact: Tim Dinger, tdinger@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL ‑ UPDATED: This meeting is currently scheduled for Monday April 10th at 11am. 01/05/2023: FOR APPROVAL: The cost‑sharing discussion around the crosswalk seems to be still ongoing. We will look to set up a meeting to negotiate and finalize the cost sharing for the sidewalk. Comment Number: 5 03/08/2023: FOR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ‑ UNRESOLVED: The lending information is still needed. 01/05/2023: FOR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: The DA information form is missing some necessary information. The "attest" field is blank, and needs to be filled in with a person who will be the witness to Mike Freeman's signature. Additionally, under "Lender Name", you have marked not applicable. Does this mean that you are not getting a construction loan, and you will finance the project yourselves? Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Steve Gilchrist, 970‑224‑6175, sgilchrist@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 03/27/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL ‑ UPDATED: Additional redlines have been provided in response to the changes that were made previously. 01/09/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: We will need more detailed signing and striping plans. Redlines have been provided. Please reach out if you have questions on the notes provided. Comment Number: 2 03/27/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL ‑ UPDATED: A meeting regarding the proposed cost share will need to occur prior to the next round of submittal, or it will be denied. 01/09/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: The memo and spreadsheet detailing the proposed cost share for the regional trail and crossing will need further discussion. This is shown on the Trails Master Plan as a location for a grade separated crossing, but through the development review process we have moved to an at grade crossing with a rectangular rapid flashing beacon. This provided considerable cost savings, and minimized the right of way that would be needed with an underpass. Given this change we feel a larger proportional share for the crossing is warranted compared to what is outlined in the memo provided. The City would like a like to split the costs 50/50 with developer. We can set up an outside meeting to discuss further and iron out the fine details. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Basil Hamdan, 970‑222‑1801, bhamdan@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 4 03/23/2023: FOR APPROVAL ‑ UPDATED: Please address comments provided on the redlined plans. 01/05/2023: FOR APPROVAL: The submitted Erosion Control Plans and report are inadequate and incomplete, it is not possible to review these since most of the information required is lacking. Please review requirements as detailed in the Fort Collins Stormwater Criteria Manual (FCSCM), Chapter 2, Section 6.0. A copy of those requirements can be found at www.fcgov.com/erosion and meet these with future submittal; failure to do so will result in the rejection of any future submittal. Since not all required sequence sheets were provided comments are limited and will change once all required materials are submitted. The Erosion Control estimate will also need to be updated with future plan additions/revisions. Topic: Fees Comment Number: 1 03/23/2023: INFORMATION: 01/05/2023: INFORMATION: The City Manager’s development review fee schedule under City Code 7.5‑2 was updated to include fees for Erosion Control and Stormwater Inspections. As of January 1st, 2021, these fees will be collected on all projects for such inspections. The Erosion Control Inspection fee is based on; the number of lots/building permits, the total site disturbance and the estimated number of years the project will be active. Based on the proposed site construction associated with this project we are assuming 1 building permit and lot, 4.97 acres of disturbance, 2 years from demo through build out of construction and an additional 3 years until full vegetative stabilization is achieved. Which results in an Erosion Control Fee estimate of $1,974.06 . Please note that as the plans and any subsequent review modifications of the above‑mentioned values change the fees may need to be modified. I have provided a copy of the spreadsheet used to arrive at these estimates for your review. The Stormwater Quality Inspection Fee is based on the number of LID and other Water Quality Features that are designed for this project. Based on the submitted plans we identified 7 porous pavers fields ,4 bioretention systems/rain gardens and 1 extended detention basin which results in an estimate of the Stormwater LID/WQ Inspection fee of $ 4,065. Please note that as the plans and any subsequent revisions to the above‑mentioned values change, the fees may need to be modified. I have provided a copy of the spreadsheet used to arrive at these estimates for your review. The fees will need to be paid prior to building permit issuance. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Matt Simpson, (970) 416‑2754, masimpson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL – UPDATED: The siphon design is progressing however I will need more information and documentation of the hydraulic pipe analysis. From the information provided in the drainage report, I am not clear how much flow is being conveyed in the pipe system south to the Whitewater Park outlet. Please see the drainage report redlines for more information. Please also see the included email from 2‑23‑2023, between myself and Andy Reese, that included instructions for what we wanted to see. You will need to send updates on this hydraulic design directly to me for review before the next formal development submittal. 01/10/2023: FOR APPROVAL: The applicant team has informed us that is a significant conflict with the proposed storm drain outlet due to an existing electric encasement and FO ducts. An acceptable stormwater outfall solution must be figured out before submitting for FDP round 2 review. The project design team will need to present other options to the City for consideration. Please contact me directly to follow up. Comment Number: 3 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL– UNRESOLVED: 01/10/2023: FOR APPROVAL: All offsite easements will need to be executed and recorded before or with the development project. Comment Number: 4 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL – UNRESOLVED: Thank you for providing these 3 easements, however I did not find an easement document for the offsite stormwater parcel located immediately adjacent to the northwest corner of the development site. 01/10/2023: FOR APPROVAL: A temporary construction easement (TCE) will be needed for the proposed grading work on the offsite City Stormwater parcel, located at the northwest corner of the development site. Please provide a draft of this easement for our review. Comment Number: 5 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL – UPDATED: You will need to apply for a formal variance for the inverted siphon. Please fill out the included variance form and send back for our review. Once we have confirmed the form and justification are acceptable, the site owner will need to sign the form. Please also see the included email from 2‑23‑23 date where I provided instruction to apply for a variance. 01/10/2023: FOR INFORMATION: Variances – processing of the Stormwater and Water‑Wastewater variances will be on hold untill the stormwater outfall pipe redesign is worked out. We are willing to continue working on solutions for the gravity outfall pipe, including reasonable concessions on critieria. Comment Number: 6 03/28/2023: FOR INFORMATION: 01/10/2023: FOR INFORMATION: There will be Stormwater items in the Development Agreement. I expect the DA draft to be availible between FDP rounds 2 and 3. Comment Number: 11 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL – UNRESOLVED: The offsite TCEs, located at the Stormwater Dept parcel and on the Jerome Site, are not identified on the Utility Plans. Please add these and label them on the Utility Plans – or show me if I have missed them. 01/10/2023: FOR APPROVAL: Please show the offsite temporary construction easements on the Utility Plans. Comment Number: 13 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL – UPDATED: The comment below has been addressed. Follow up – please provide a specific detail of the inlet structure containing the snouts. Add a add a stainless trash screen to the snouts (48FSTS or appropriate size to match). Please see redlines for additional comments in redlines. 01/10/2023: FOR APPROVAL The Utility Plan needs to provide specifications and details for the installation of the Snout in inlet OA1. Comment Number: 14 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL – UPDATED: I understand the approach to use boulders to define the spillway crest. This is acceptable – assuming they are sunk into the earth. Please provide a design cross section and/ or profile plus any other details necessary to construct the overflow. 01/10/2023: FOR APPROVAL: Pond overflow and freeboard comments: a. Along the pond overflow, provide a design profile (parallel) and cross section (perpendicular). b. Provide a detail for the spillway section, this needs to include a concrete sill defining the overflow section. c. The overflow spillway may be set at the same elevation as the 100‑yr WSEL. The pond design must provide 1‑ft of freeboard measured from overflow crest to top of bank. d. The variance request for reduced freeboard is denied. Comment Number: 15 03/28/2023: FOR INFORMATION: Follow up – In response to your question: “The 100‑yr WSEL is hatched in the grading plan. For what it is worth, we’d prefer to use a solid line or something other than the solid hatch for plan readability. Have you seen any other methods of delineating the 100‑yr WSEL that weren’t a hatch over the whole pond?” Usually pond WSELs are labeled on the grading plans with simple line, maybe of a different line type or color, and labeled as “pond WSEL xxxx”. 01/10/2023: FOR APPROVAL: ‑ addressed Label and delineate the 100‑yr pond water surface elevation and extents on the grading plan. Comment Number: 16 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL – NOT ADDRESSED: I did not find pothole locate information on the Utility Plans. Please show me if I missed it. Otherwise, provide an additional “pothole locate information” sheet showing pothole locations and corresponding utility information. 01/10/2023: FOR APPROVAL: Present the utility pothole locate information in the Utility Plan set. Comment Number: 19 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL – UPDATED: I will need more information and documentation of the hydraulic pipe analysis. From the information provided in the drainage report, I am not clear how much flow is being conveyed in the pipe system south to the Whitewater Park outlet. I am also unclear on the total flow rate at these 2 inlets (design points). Please see the drainage report redlines for more information. Please also see the included email from 2‑23‑2023, between myself and Andy Reese, that included instructions for what we wanted to see. Send updates on this hydraulic design directly to me for review BEFORE the next formal development submittal. 01/10/2023: FOR APPROVAL: Provide HGL profiles for the Vine Drive storm pipes. The junction loss coefficients for need to take the snouts into consideration. Please document and include in the calculations for the snout losses. Comment Number: 20 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL – UPDATED: Provide a hydraulics section in the body of the report presenting the results of the inlet calculations and showing that street flow/ street encroachment critieria is met. 01/10/2023: FOR APPROVAL: Provide inlet calculations for the Vine Drive stormwater inlets or show me if I missed them. Provide a section in the report body discussing the stormwater inlet calculations. Comment Number: 21 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL – UPDATED: The weir coefficient in the drainage report (3.33) is too high for an overflow weir. Coefficients for broad‑crested weirs are usually in the range of 2.6 ‑ 2.9. Please make a conservative selection or justify a higher value. 01/10/2023: FOR APPROVAL: A weir calculation for the detention overflow spillway needs to be provided in the drainage report or show me if I missed it. As a reminder, the pond overflow needs to be sized using the peak 100yr inflow rate with a maximum allowable flow depth of 6‑inches. Comment Number: 22 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL: Please see redline comments on the drainage report, utility plans, landscape plans, and plat. The redlines will be included with the final comment letter sent on Friday. Comment Number: 23 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL: Provide a section in the drainage report discussing the hydraulic design. Include a discussion of the outlet pipe hydraulics including flow rates and design criteria. Include a discussion of the Vine Drive street encroachment for major and minor storms and the related curb inlet sizing. Include a discussion of the sizing of the snout devices. Comment Number: 24 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL: At rain garden 1, please explain why the inflow pipe is not discharging to the rain garden surface and instead into the underdrain directly. Please revise for these flows to discharge to the rain garden surface or explain if I do not understand. Comment Number: 25 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL: Provide detail of quantity detention orifice. Department: Water‑Wastewater Engineering Contact: Matt Simpson, (970) 416‑2754, masimpson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL – UNRESOLVED: All existing water and sewer services in the area of the project do need to be shown on the plans. I have included an image of our utility mapping with the comments. Please have all water and sewer services in Vine Drive added to the Utility Plans and labeled “approximate.” There may still be some conflicts along the length of sewer replacement. 01/10/2023: FOR APPROVAL ‑ UPDATED: All existing water sewer services need to be shown on the plans. Please see the included information about the Vine Drive water and sewer services. Comment Number: 5 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL – UPDATED Comment below addressed. Please have the base utility map updated in the irrigation plan set. 01/10/2023: FOR APPROVAL: On the irrigation plans – please label the rain gardens. Do not run irrigation pipes through the rain gardens if it can be avoided. Do not run irrigation pipes through the 3‑inch water meter vault on the west side of the building. Comment Number: 7 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL: 01/10/2023: FOR APPROVAL: All offsite easements will need to be executed and recorded before or with the development project. Comment Number: 8 03/28/2023: FOR INFORMATION: 01/10/2023: FOR INFORMATION: There will be Wastewater items in the Development Agreement. Comment Number: 9 03/28/2023: FOR INFORMATION – UPDATED: It appears that you are intending to apply for “alternate compliance” for the water allotment (WSR required purchase). This is based on the information contained in the submitted “Water Sizing Calculation_Powerhouse2_Rd2.pdf.” I will need to route this for review by our water conservation department. Please expect future comments on this item. 01/10/2023: FOR INFORMATION: For an estimate of water development fees please contact UtilityFees@fcgov.com. These are due at the time of building permit. Comment Number: 10 03/28/2023: FOR INFORMATION: 01/10/2023: FOR INFORMATION: Industrial Pretreatment ‑ Please note that all City of Fort Collins Utility Customers are subject to City Code requirements for wastewater. These requirements include Section 26‑306 Wastewater Discharge Permit Requirements and Section 26‑332 Prohibitive Discharge Standards. A permit may be required depending on activities on the site; however, discharge standards apply to every customer, both large and small, regardless of what activities take place on the site. Please contact Industrial Pretreatment, Industrial_Pretreatment@fcgov.com or (970)221‑6900, to discuss these requirements and how they apply to this development. Comment Number: 11 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL – UNRESOLVED: The submitted file “Water Sizing Calculation_Powerhouse2_Rd2.pdf” did not contain a water service sizing calculation. This is a peak flow calculation that is used to determine the diameter of the water service and meter. The submitted memo provided an annual water use estimate (GPY). Please provide a calculation for peak water demand and a memo explaining the service size selection. 01/12/2023: FOR APPROVAL: Submit a water service sizing calculation (AWWA M22 preferred, but UPC also accepted) with the round 2 submittal. Comment Number: 12 03/28/2023: FOR APPROVAL: Please see redlines of Utility Plan for adjustments to the sewer main replacement. Comment Number: 13 03/28/2023: FOR INFORMATION: Your response to comments contained this question: “Irrigation Tap – We would like to explore the option of downsizing the 1.5” irrigation tap to a 1” tap. The justification for downsizing is that most of the proposed landscaping is native/drought tolerant and seed irrigation zones will be turned off after the seed is established (could be turned on occasionally during very dry periods). With this approach, the long‑term irrigation water demand will be lower than it will be during the first 2‑3 years. With a 1” tap, longer watering windows will be required during establishment. What information does the city need to evaluate this request?” ‑ In response to this question, the size selection for irrigation meters is based on the “maximum continuous flow” rating for each meter type compared to the design irrigation rate for the system. Our meter options include a 1‑inch disc meter (25 gpm max continuous) and the next step up is a 1.5‑inch turbine meter (160 gpm max). Your irrigation plans are showing 50 GPM, therefore a 1.5‑inch service and meter is the correct selection. To reduce the design to a 1‑inch meter you will need to decrease the irrigation design flow to 25 GPM. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Emma Pett, , epett@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 03/22/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Please provide an irrigation plan that includes a pressure loss chart and smart controller chart. Department: Light And Power Contact: Cody Snowdon, 970‑416‑2306, csnowdon@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 01/10/2023: FOR DCP: Please document the size of the electrical service(s) that feeds the existing property prior to demolition of the building to receive capacity fee credits. Comment Number: 5 03/29/2023: INFORMATION ‑ UPDATED: Sorry for the confusion with the wording. All permits, including Floodway Use Permit, will need to be obtained by the by the developer. 01/10/2023: INFORMATION: All utility easement and crossing permits (railroad, ditch, floodplain, etc.) needed for the development will need to be obtained by the developer. Comment Number: 7 03/29/2023: FOR APPROVAL ‑ UPDATED: This variance request is currently under review. Thank you for providing it. 01/10/2023: FOR APPROVAL: Thank you for coordinating the meter location. A formal variance will be required to place the meters internal to the building, but as discussed, Light and Power is currently in favor of this request from a high‑level understanding. Reference Section 8 of our Electric Service Standards for electric metering standards. A link has been provided below. https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/img/site_specific/uploads/ElectricServiceStanda rds_FINAL_18November2016_Amendment.pdf Comment Number: 8 01/10/2023: FOR DCP: Please provide a one‑line diagram and show the main disconnect size and meter sequencing. A copy of our meter sequencing can be found in our electric policies practices and procedures below. http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders‑and‑developers/development‑fo rms‑guidelines‑regulations Comment Number: 10 01/10/2023: FOR DCP: Light & Power will require AutoCAD files of the Site Plan, Utility Plans, and Landscape Plans prior to the Entitlement Process approval. Comment Number: 13 03/29/2023: FOR APPROVAL: It appears that Storm Drain E is very close to the proposed transformer pad. Can we look into shifting this line to the East? Please reach out to go over some design options. Thanks. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Scott Benton, (970)416‑4290, sbenton@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 4 03/10/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL ‑ UPDATED: Prior to the FDP approval please provide an estimate of the landscaping costs for the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone, including materials, labor, monitoring for a minimum of three years, weed mitigation and irrigation. We will then use the approved estimate to collect a security (bond or escrow) at 125% of the total amount prior to the issuance of a Development Construction Permit. Comment Number: 5 03/10/2023: FOR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND DCP: Language regarding the protection and enhancement of the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone will be included in the Development Agreement for this project. A security will need to be provided prior to the issuance of a Development Construction Permit that accounts for the installation and establishment of the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone. The security amount will be based on the estimate provided prior to final plan approval. Comment Number: 6 03/10/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: RESTORATION AND WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN: ‑Please remove reference to quadrats when describing the use of line point intercept (LPI) methodologies for estimating plant cover. There are no quadrats with LPI. ‑Please include the final success criterion, which is: ≥80% survival of woody plants (trees and shrubs). Department: Forestry Contact: Christine Holtz, , choltz@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 03/27/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Please specify the ‘exclamation’ variety of London planetree which does the best in our region. Please also specify the cultivar of Sugar maple from the following: green mountain, fall fiesta, or flashfire. Comment Number: 2 03/27/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: The required mitigation size for both shade and ornamental trees is 2.0” caliper balled and burlapped. Please upsize the two serviceberries labeled as mitigation trees to this size requirement. Department: Park Planning Contact: Missy Nelson, , mnelson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 01/10/2023: INFORMATION: Both Park Planning & Development and Parks department comments will be provided by Missy Nelson | mnelson@fcgov.com Comment Number: 3 03/28/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Please add note to landscape plan that property owner will maintain irrigation and landscaping in the public right‑of‑way along E Vine Dr. and N College Ave in perpetuity. Note 2 of the General Landscape notes is a little confusing regarding Parks so would like that cleaned up a bit. ***We spoke about this in the review meeting, thank you for updating your comment! Comment Number: 4 03/28/2023: INFORMATION: There will be DA language for Parks and Park Planning & Development. Comment Number: 5 03/29/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Can you please show crosswalk striping across E Vine Dr. on site and landscape plan as well? Comment Number: 7 03/29/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Please add note to landscape plan: This development contains a trail section that is a part of the regional trail system, the City is responsible for the long‑term maintenance of the community trail within the development. Maintenance consists of snowplowing of the paved surface, occasional seasonal mowing 2‑3’ adjacent to the trail surface, repairing/replacing surface damage of the trail. All other landscaping maintenance within the easement is the responsibility of the underlying property owner. Landscaping shall be designed in accordance with all applicable City codes and please coordinate with the City’s Parks Department. Spray irrigation if required, shall be designed and maintained to avoid spray on the trail. Comment Number: 6 03/31/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Portions of the sidewalks in this development are also serving as a section of the regional trail. Please add the following to the plan sets: SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS ‑ Please show the section that is regional trail and hatch (or other way of identifying) and add the note: Regional trail section: color: Yosemite Brown, see page ___,section ___ for details. CIVIL ‑ Please add a separate page for the trail specifications and cross‑section with the following notes: CONCRETE TRAIL NOTES: 1. 4,500 PSI CONCRETE WITH FIBERMESH 2. CONTROL JOINTS: 10' CENTER TO CENTER 3. ALL CONTROL JOINTS TO BE SAW CUT 4. EXPANSION JOINT: EVERY 400' 5. 1.5% CROSS SLOPE ON TRAIL SURFACE 6. LEVEL AND RECONDITION SUBGRADE TO 95% COMPACTION 7. CONCRETE SURFACE FINISH SHALL BE HEAVY BROOM 8. COLORED CONCRETE: DAVIS COLOR 'YOSEMITE BROWN", 2 LBS PER SACK OR APPROVED EQUAL 9. FORM WORK TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER OR INSPECTOR PRIOR TO POUR Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970‑221‑6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 11 03/28/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL‑UNRESOLVED: Some of the sheet numbers in the sheet index do not match the sheet numbers on the noted sheets. See redlines. Comment Number: 14 03/28/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Please provide the following information for the Benchmark Statement in the EXACT format shown below. PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88 BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS. IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) = NAVD88 DATUM ‑ X.XX’. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 1 03/28/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL‑UPDATED: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. If you have any specific questions about the redlines, please contact John Von Nieda at 970‑221‑6565 or jvonnieda@fcgov.com Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 13 03/28/2023: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: There are text over text issues. See redlines.