The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2106 S. TAFT HILL ROAD (WEST VILLAGE OFF TAFT) - FDP - FDP170015 - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTSCity of Fort Collins June 14, 2017 Cara Scohy CS Design, Inc 2519 S. Shields St #129 Fort Collins, CO 80526 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/deve/opmentreview RE: 2106 S. Taft Hill Road (West Village Off Taft), FDP170015, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Meaghan Overton, at 970-416-2283 or moverton@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Ragasa, 970.221.6603, mragasa(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/13/2017 06/13/2017: Please see redlines for general Utility Plan clean up Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/13/2017 06/13/2017: Please reference the Utility and Drainage easement that was recorded by separate document on Lot 5, Village West Fourth Filing. This should be shown on both the Utility Plans and the Plat. The previous easement is a private easement not dedicated to the City. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/13/2017 06/13/2017: How will the detention pond retaining walls be constructed. Are there any offsite grading easements for the properties along the south of this project? Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 06/13/2017 06/13/2017: As depicted, a building permit will be required for the retaining walls. Since structures aren't allowed within an easement, either the wall design needs to be changed or the walls need to be outside of the blanket easement. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 06/13/2017 6/13/2017: A building permit is not required for the following cross sections: For Section A -A, the slope between the two walls must be flat. It can't have a surcharge (slope above the top of wall). The distance between the two walls be equal to the total height of the bottom wall, including the footer. The top wall can't be more than 148" tal, including the footer: For Section B-B, the wall can't be more than 48" total, Inc u Ing t Tooter. Page 1 of 5 Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 06/13/2017 06/13/2017: More spot elevations are needed at the driveway. The private sidewalk ties into the driveway ramp. In order to meet ADA standards, all portions will need to meet the 2% cross slopes. Another option is to have the sidewalk connect to the back of the driveway ramp. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 06/13/2017 06/13/2017: Where is Drawing 710 (Asphalt Paving Detail - Cross Pan) and Drawing 708 (Street Intersection Crosspan) being used? A cross pan isn't being proposed on site. A driveway detail would be needed at South Taft Hill. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 06/13/2017 06/13/2017: A sidewalk chase detail is needed for the chase on Dover Street. Please include in the Utility Plan set. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 06/13/2017 06/13/2017: A driveway with an attached walk detail is also needed. Please include in the Utility Plan set. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 06/13/2017 06/13/2017: Are there any fire lane signs that are required by PFA to be included in the Utility Plans? Please include. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-4290, sblochowiak(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/05/2017 06/05/2017: On native seed mix table please add note or asterisk that the rate included in the table is for drill seed rate and to double the rate if broadcast seed method is to be used. This can be cleared up via electronic pdf. Environmental Planning has no further comments at this time. Thank you. „Oepartment: PFA Contact: Cal Sheesley, 970-416-2599, csheesley(cD-poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/13/2017 06/13/2017'. NO FURTHER COMMENT PFA has no further comment for 2106 S Taft Hill Road. Department: Planning Services Contact: Meaghan Overton, 970-416-2283, moverton(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Page 2 of 5 Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/12/2017 06/12/2017: The PDP was approved with the following condition: "The successful development and continued long-term viability of Taft Hill Village Project will require the formation of a homeowners' or property owners' association and an associated declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions ("CCRs") to be recorded in the real property records of Larimer County, Colorado, that will ensure continuing compliance with ongoing maintenance obligations specific to the Project, including but not limited to maintenance of the private access drive, snow removal, maintenance of the detention pond, maintenance of the bioswale feature, and other maintenance obligations identified with particularity during the review of the Final Plan and related Project -specific submittals to the City. The Applicant shall cause a homeowners' or property owners' association to be created that will bear responsibility for ensuring continuing compliance with ongoing maintenance obligations of the Project. A copy of the draft CCRs shall be provided by the Applicant to Staff as part of the initial Final Plan submittal, and the CCRs shall be reviewed by Planning Staff and the City Attorney's Office for sufficiency. Comments or suggested revisions provided by the City to the Applicant on the CCRs shall be incorporated into same by Applicant. The Applicant and the City shall agree on the final form and content of the CCRs prior to, or concurrently with, the approval or conditional approval of the Final Plan." Please submit the draft declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CCRs) for City review. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/12/2017 06/12/2017: Common questions we receive at this point in the process: When can I get my building permit? and, When can I submit for building permit? Please be aware of the following steps and policies regarding the finalization of your documents prior to full building permit review: -- Development Agreement, Contact: Marc Ragasa at (970) 221-6603 to coordinate. -- Development Permit Coordination: DCP or excavation permit, utility coordination meeting, etc. Also finalize the coordination of any offsite easements prior to recording of mylars. Contact: Marc Ragasa at (970) 221-6603 to coordinate. —Signing and Recording: Three documents are signed. This includes the planning set, utility plans and plat. The planning set is held until the utility plan mylars are signed, then the planning mylars are signed last. It may take several days for staff to gather all of the signatures on the utility plans, and then the planning mylars are signed shortly thereafter. --Land Records Established: Technical Services and GIS will then work on establishing your land records in order to trigger your full building permit review (see below). o Mylars must be recorded and indexed first o GIS steps: plat and easement information entered into CAD, o assignment of addresses (if not assigned), o import land records data into City database, o data is reviewed for accuracy and made available for building permit review. --Building Permit Review: Once GIS has completed the land records process above, you are ready to submit for full BP review. Contact, Building Services at 416-2740 if you have questions on the submittal items. The DCP (Development Construction Permit) process can overlap with the above preparation and review of the building permit. Page 3 of 5 Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 06/12/2017 06/12/2017: The utility plans need to be updated to accurately reflect the revised tree mitigation/landscape plans. Trees shown to remain on the landscape plan should also be shown to remain on the utility plans, and trees shown to be removed on the landscape plans should also be shown as such on the utility plans. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/12/2017 06/12/2017: Please add a row to the table on sheet L2 of the landscape plans that shows the total number of trees required (33) and the total number of trees provided (44). Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 06/12/2017 06/12/2017, The tree mitigation and protection plan indicates that 21 mitigation trees are required, but the inventory/mitigation table only adds up to 19.5 mitigation trees based on what is proposed to be removed. Please resolve this discrepancy and make sure the number of mitigation trees corresponds accurately to the tree inventory/mitigation table. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 06/12/2017 06/12/2017: Please add the following note to the site plan: "At the hearing for this Project Development Plan, the decision maker approved a modification to the 60 foot lot width requirements in Section 4.4(D)(2)(a) to permit lot widths of 40-41 feet on Lots 6, 7, and 8." Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 06/12/2017 06/12/2017: Please add the following note to the site plan: ""At the hearing for this Project Development Plan, the decision maker approved a request for alternative compliance to the 150 foot minimum lot depth requirement in Section 3.6.2(G)(1) to permit a lot depth of 83 feet, 7 inches for Lot 1." Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam(�fcgov.com Talc: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/05/2017 06/05/2017: Current Erosion Control Report has minor redlines that need to be corrected. Redline Comments were returned directly to Blaine with Northern due to CD issues on the original materials. If you need clarification concerning the erosion control section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Department: Traffic Operation `Contact: Nicole Hahn, 970-221-6820, nhahn(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/09/2017 06/09/2017: Please include a stop sign at the access location for the egress movement on to Taft Hill. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/09/2017 06/09/2017: Is there driveway access provided to each lot? The circulation is not clear based on the site plan provided. Department: Zoning Page 4 of 5 Contact: Marcus Glasgow, 970-416-2338, mglasgow(cDfcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 06/14/2017: No Comments Comment Originated: 06/14/2017 Page 5 of 5