The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTHE SAVOY - FDP230012 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6689 970.224.6134 ‑ fax fcgov.com/developmentreview October 07, 2022 Blaine Mathisen Northern Engineering 301 N Howes Street, Unit 100 Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: The Savoy, PDP210019, Round Number 3 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of The Savoy. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through your Development Review Coordinator, Todd Sullivan via phone at 970‑221‑6695 or via email at tsullivan@fcgov.com. RESPONSE LETTER: NORTHERN ENGINEERING HENRY DESIGN DESIGN STUDIO DEVELOPER/OWNER Comment Summary: Department: Development Review Coordinator Contact: Todd Sullivan, 970‑221‑6695, tsullivan@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 I will be your primary point of contact throughout the development review and permitting processes. If you have any questions, need additional meetings with the project reviewers, or need assistance throughout the process, please let me know and I can assist you and your team. To best serve you, please include me in all email correspondence with other reviewers and keep me informed of any phone conversations. Thank you! -Thanks Todd Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 As part of your resubmittal, you will respond to the comments provided in this letter. This letter is provided to you in Microsoft Word format. Please use this document to insert responses to each comment for your submittal, using a different font color. When replying to the comment letter please be detailed in your responses, as all comments should be thoroughly addressed. Provide reference to specific project plans or explanations of why comments have not been addressed, when applicable, avoiding responses like noted or acknowledged. Please follow the Electronic Submittal Requirements and File Naming Standards found at https://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/files/electronic submittal requirements and file naming standards_v1_8 1 19.pdf?1566857888. Files are to be named PLAN NAME_PROJECT NAME_REVIEW TYPE_ROUND NO. Example: UTILITY PLANS_MY PROJECT_PDP_RD1.pdf Resubmittals are accepted any day of the week, with Wednesday at noon being the cut‑off for routing the same week. When you are ready to resubmit your plans, please notify me as much in advance as possible. -Deliverables named accordingly. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 All "FOR HEARING" comments need to be addressed and resolved prior to moving forward with scheduling the hearing for this project. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 LUC 2.211 Lapse, Rounds of Review: Applicants, within one hundred eighty (180) days of receipt of written comments and notice to respond from the City on any submittal (or subsequent revision to a submittal) of an application for approval of a development plan, shall file such additional or revised submittal documents as are necessary to address such comments from the City. If the additional submittal information or revised submittal is not filed within said period of time, the development application shall automatically lapse and become null and void. -How does this impact us now that we just submitted? Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 PRIOR TO FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL: Multi‑Family projects are required to have a Pre‑submittal Building Code Review Meeting prior to Final Plan submittal. Please reach out to me to schedule this meeting when you are ready. Thank you. -Pre-submittal Building Code Review Meeting with Russ Hovland was completed on February 6th, 2023 with Design Studios. Department: Planning Services Contact: Kai Kleer, 970‑416‑4284, kkleer@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 10/03/2022 10/03/2022 FOR HEARING: For the suites and mail lounge 3.5.2 and 3.8.30 requires a primary entrance to a dwelling unit to face the street or be clearly visible from the street through the use of architectural elements. Could the building be flipped so that the south elevation faces the street or is duplicated along the northern facade? -The building has been flipped as suggested. The primary entrance for the residents faces the main street entering the site and is clearly visible from Le Fever Street. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 10/03/2022 10/03/2022 FOR HEARING: Staff is still concerned about the project meeting variation in color and materiality standards. Specifically with the shared color palette and materiality of shingle siding, smooth panel, and board and batten between each model. In some of our other meetings we spoke about the mid‑century modern design style of the project and ideas around staying true to the architectural style but with greater changes in materiality. What consideration has the team given to wood‑look architectural paneling, modern brick, and horizontal siding? -At the PDP hearing on November 17th, 2022, the Planning Commission was complimentary on the exterior materials and range of color as presented. The team’s intent is to maintain the design as originally presented to the Planning Commission. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 10/03/2022 10/03/2022 FOR HEARING: 3.8.30(F)(2) requires that no similar buildings be placed next to each other along a street. The project proposes two identical buildings (Building 3 & Building 4) next to one another. Easiest solution to address this issue would be to switch Building 4 to a pitch roof version of the 24 plex. Thank you for the proposed solution, we agree. Building 4 now has a pitched roof as suggested. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sophie Buckingham, , sbuckingham@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 09/30/2022: FOR FINAL ‑ REVISED: Per discussion with Northern Engineering, the existing right‑of‑way line will be removed from the Horizontal Control Plan for FDP. -Existing ROW is no longer shown in Horizontal Control Plan 05/13/2022: FOR HEARING ‑ UPDATED: The existing property line still appears on the Horizontal Control Plan. Can this be frozen so that it only appears on the Existing Conditions sheet? 01/04/2022: FOR HEARING: Please have the drawings reflect the proposed right‑of‑way as the predominant property line instead of the existing property line prior to the right‑of‑way dedication along streets. It is difficult to follow how the site development conditions (new sidewalk, utility locations. etc.) are situated in relation to the property line that is being established. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 10/04/2022: INFORMATION: This variance request for the Precision Drive and Brookfield Drive cross‑sections has been approved by the City Engineer on October 4, 2022. -Thank you. 05/25/2022: FOR HEARING ‑ UPDATED: This variance request is still being reviewed. I anticipate that it will be approved, but it may require some additional coordination. I will follow up when I have more information. 01/04/2022: FOR HEARING: We'll look to review a variance request for the next submittal pertaining to the street design for Brookfield and Precision with respect to the inset parking and sidewalk/parkway design. I am initially in support of the variance, but would want to verify if there are concerns from a utility or forestry perspective. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/19/2022 10/03/2022: FOR FINAL ‑ UNRESOLVED: I am seeing shrubs with a mature height of three feet in the landscape bump‑outs along Precision Drive and Brookfield Drive. As I previously commented, shrubs and grasses in these areas must have a mature height of two feet or less. You will need to select a different shrub, grass, or other landscaping in the parkway bump‑outs along Precision and Brookfield, and at the intersection of Precision and Cinquefoil. -(CSC) Creeping Sand Cherries (Prunus besseyi 'Pawnee Buttes') are being proposed in the bump-outs. The mature size is 1.5’x5’. I have corrected the error in the plant schedule that incorrectly listed the size as 3’x3’. 05/19/2022: FOR FINAL: For sight distance purposes, all shrubs and grasses in parkways must have a mature height of two feet or less. Please confirm the mature height of the shrubs and grasses to be planted in the parkways. Trees are okay as long as there are no branches in the first six feet above ground when the tree reaches its mature height. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/20/2022 09/30/2022: INFORMATION ONLY: Thank you for submitting a variance request for driveway spacing on Brookfield Drive. This variance request has been approved by the City Engineer on September 30, 2022. -Thank you 05/20/2022: FOR HEARING: The proposed driveway onto Brookfield Drive is 128 feet from the intersection of Brookfield Drive and Precision Drive. This is less than the 150‑foot minimum per LCUASS Table 7‑3. However, Engineering recognizes that this driveway is located directly across from an alley, and we will support the location of the proposed driveway. Please submit a variance request so that Engineering can formally approve the location of this driveway. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 10/03/2022 10/03/2022: FOR FINAL: I see that you are no longer proposing a driveway onto Cinquefoil Lane, but the Existing Conditions and Demolition Plan still indicates roughly 65 feet of curb and gutter to be removed in the location where the driveway had previously been proposed. Do you still intend to remove this section of curb and gutter? -No we do not plan on removing that. Existing Conditions sheet has been updated. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Spencer Smith, 970‑221‑6820, smsmith@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/24/2022 09/30/2022: INFORMATION ONLY: Thank you for providing the update to the TIS without the proposed access onto Cinquefoil. The general conclusions have been accepted. Be sure to include a signed and stamped copy of the final TIS for recording in final for recording purposes. -Signed and Stamped copy has been provided with FDP Round 1. 05/24/2022: INFORMATION ONLY The analysis and conclusions of the TIS have been accepted. Be sure to submit a stamped and signed final pdf version with the rest of the plans for mylar/recording. Department: Stormwater Engineering – Erosion Control Contact: Basil Hamdan, 970‑222‑1801, bhamdan@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/19/2022 09/28/2022: Will look for Erosion Control Materials at Final Submittal. Erosion Control Materials have been submitted with FDP Round 1. 12/29/2021: FOR FINAL: Please submit an Erosion Control Plans to meet City Criteria (FCDCM Ch 2 Section 6.1.3) Please ensure that the Erosion Control Plans provided include a individual sequence sheets in accordance with (FCDCM Ch 2 Section 6.1.3.2) Please ensure that the Erosion Control Plans, Escrows, and Reports include phasing requirements (FCDCM Ch 2 Section 6.1.3, 6.1.4, & 6.1.5) Please submit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation based upon the accepted Erosion Control Plans to meet City Criteria. (FCDCM Ch 2 Section 6.1.5) Please submit an Erosion Control Report to meet City Criteria. (FCDCM Ch 2 Section 6.1.4) Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Matt Simpson, (970) 416‑2754, masimpson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 09/26/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: 05/19/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: 01/04/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: For the new outfall to the “ODP Pond” (northeast of the site), a maintenance agreement for the maintenance of the pond between private property owners will be required for approval. This will be referenced in the DA Maintenance agreement conversations have begun. LOI will be supplied 2nd Round FDP. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 09/26/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: 05/19/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: 01/04/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: Hydraulic calculations for the storm mains will be required with FDP round 1. Calculations are supplied with FDP Round 1. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 09/26/2022 09/26/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: For the next submittal ‑ a closer look at the stormtech chambers and storm drain configuration is needed. This is located in the northeast drive aisle. We need to see that there is enough space for all components since this site plan is very constrained. Specifically: A) High flows may not go through the water quality chambers; a bypass pipe needs to be added to the plans for high flows. B) Typically, lateral pipes do not tee directly into the chambers, rather they typically, they connect to a manifold pipe at the ends of the units. This is follow-up on Round 2 redline comments. Stormtech system have been revamped to have high flows bypass. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 09/26/2022 09/26/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: Please see the drainage report redlines for 1 comment regarding calculation of the C100 runoff coefficients. -Updated the calculations for C100 values. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 09/26/2022 09/26/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: Landscape Plan ‑ If ground cover for rain garden is to be grass, this will need to be seeded and not sodded. The concern is that local sod is grown in clay, which does not work for the rain garden soil structure. There should also be some form of delineation around the edge of the rain garden. Decorative rocks or a ribbon curb are suggestions. -The rain garden has been redesigned to include landscape boulders along the top edge. The sod has been replaced with a bio-retention seed mix. Additionally shallow root shrubs and ornamental grasses will be added for an immediate impact. Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 10/03/2022 10/03/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: Update the storm drain easement at the SW corner of the site to the full 13‑foot width. We will accept the existing sewer pipe in this easement. See redlines. -Easement has been enlarged. Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 10/04/2022 10/04/2022: Ready for Hearing. -Thanks for the help Matt. Department: Water‑Wastewater Engineering Contact: Matt Simpson, (970) 416‑2754, masimpson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 09/26/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN – UNRESOLVED: In the next submittal (PDP or FDP), please review the easement width around the watermain in the east‑west drive aisle on the north end of the site. There needs to be 10‑feet minimum easement provided on BOTH sides of the water main. See redlines of utility plan for more information. Easements have been updated to show 10’ minimum separation from line to edge of easement. Refer to updated utility sheet 05/19/2022: FOR HEARING – UPDATED: Please review the easement widths around the water mains. The utility easement must extend a minimum of 10‑feet each side of the water main. 01/04/2022: FOR HEARING: Water mains not located in ROW require a 20‑ft easement (min.) centered on the main. There are some locations where the proposed utility easement does not provide 10‑ft on each side of the water main. Please review and update the proposed utility easement. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 09/26/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: 05/19/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: 01/04/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: For FDP the existing water main along Le Fever drive will need to be pothole located and shown on the street profile. -Water main in Le Fever was potholed and is now shown in the centerline profile. The proposed storm is much deeper than the existing water line therefore no lowering or raising is required. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 09/26/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: 05/19/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: 01/04/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: Water service sizing calculations for each water service and summary memo are due at FDP round 1. -Summary memo for each unit type has been supplied. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 09/26/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: -Irrigation Plans have been provided with this FDP submittal including the items outlined below. 05/19/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: 01/04/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: Irrigation Water Service and Irrigation Plan Requirements: The first FDP submittal will need to include the following items. These are required as a result of recent changes to Fort Collins Utilities Water Supply Requirements (WSR) and Plant Investment Fees (PIF) code. Please ensure the FDP project submittal includes: Preliminary Irrigation Plan (PIP) – plan requirements can be found at www.fcgov.com/WCS. Please contact Eric Olson (eolson@fcgov.com or 970‑221‑6704) with questions regarding the required PIP. Water budget (annual usage) and peak flow (gallons per minute) for each irrigation service. Note: this information should be included on the PIP. Landscape Plan including hydrozone table updated with 2022 values – 3, 8, 14, and 18 gallons/square foot/year for very low, low, medium, and high zones, respectively. Water Need Form – form should be available soon. Please contact Utility Fee and Rate Specialists (UtilityFees@fcgov.com or 970‑416‑4252) with questions regarding the Water Need Form. Irrigation service(s), including curb stop and meter location, shown on the Utility and Site Plans. Irrigation service location(s) must match information on the PIP. On Oct. 5, 2021, Council adopted changes to Fort Collins Utilities Water Supply Requirements and Plant Investment Fees. In general developments that use more water may pay more and developments that use less water may pay less. These changes are to be implemented 1/1/2022; more information can be found at: HYPERLINK "http://www.fcgov.com/wsr‑update" www.fcgov.com/wsr‑update Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 10/03/2022 10/03/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: FOR THE NEXT SUBMITTAL ‑ The water main configuration in the north entrance and north drive aisle needs to be changed. We do not want a water vs. private storm crossing. We also want the water main shortened to the minimum length necessary. Please see the redlines for the configuration we are recommending. (Note these redlines are approximate, you may need to adjust based on site details). *This is a follow up from round 2 redline comments. The north entrance has been adjusted to a new layout but does not follow your recommended path. We had to add more storm drains along the north side and therefore we cannot meet separation requirements for your suggestions. Additionally, now that we have dialed on where our mechanical room is for the club house the new meters want to be stubbed where we are showing them now. The storm is significantly deeper than the water line so there is really no conflict. We are currently meeting City of Fort Collins separation requirements. Maybe further discussion is warranted. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 10/04/2022 10/04/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN: Related to comment 12, I understand that PFA would like to relocate the internal fire hydrant to be closer to the drive aisle entrance on Le Fever Drive. This may set up a design change where all buildings are served water from Le Fever and the internal water main is removed. Please consider this and coordinate with myself and PFA. -FH has been moved to entrance off of Le Fever. All buildings are now served from public ROW except for clubhouse and mail lounge. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 10/04/2022 10/04/2022: Ready for Hearing. Department: Light And Power Contact: Cody Snowdon, 970‑416‑2306, csnowdon@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 10/04/2022: FOR FINAL: There are many locations that do not meet our minimum streetlight separations to proposed street trees. Please see redlines for all locations and revise street tree locations accordingly. Feel free to reach out with any questions. The canopy shade trees have been relocated to a minimum of 40’ from the streetlights. A few ornamental trees have been located in the right of way when a canopy tree will not fit due to streetlight and utility spacing requirements. The ornamental trees are spaced a minimum of 15’ from streetlights. 05/24/2022: FOR HEARING: Please see redlined Utility Plan for revised streetlight locations. 01/04/2022: FOR APPROVAL: Streetlights will need to be installed within the parkway along all public right‑of‑way. A 40 feet separation on both sides of the light is required between canopy trees and streetlights. A 15 feet separation on both sides of the light is required between ornamental trees and streetlights. Please coordinate the light placement with Light & Power. A link to the City of Fort Collins street lighting requirements can be found below: https://www.larimer.org/sites/default/files/ch15_2007.pdf Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 01/04/2022: FOR FINAL: This project will need to comply with our electric metering standards. Electric meter locations will need to be coordinated with Light and Power Engineering. Residential units will need to be individually metered. Please gang the electric meters on one side of the building, opposite of the gas meters. Reference Section 8 of our Electric Service Standards for electric metering standards. A link has been provided below. https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/img/site_specific/uploads/ElectricServiceStanda rds_FINAL_18November2016_Amendment.pdf We will continue to coordinate with City Light and Power on meter locations. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 01/04/2022: FOR FINAL: A commercial service information form (C‑1 form) and a One‑Line Diagram for all Commercial & Multi‑Family meters will need to be completed and submitted to Light & Power Engineering for review prior to Final Plan. A link to the C‑1 form is below: http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils‑procedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C‑1Form.pdf -C1 Form has been supplied. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 01/04/2022: FOR FINAL: On the One‑Line Diagram, please show the main disconnect size and meter sequencing. A copy of our meter sequencing can be found in our electric policies practices and procedures below. http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders‑and‑developers/development‑fo rms‑guidelines‑regulations -One-line diagram has been supplied. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 10/04/2022 10/04/2022: FOR FINAL: Please provide AutoCAD files of the Utility Plans with your first round Final Plan Submittal. The files can be sent directly to Light & Power. -Files sent directly to Cody. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Kirk Longstein, 970‑416‑4325, klongstein@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/04/2022 10/04/2022: UPDATED ‑ FOR HEARING: a draft prairie dog mitigation and removal plan is required for Hearing. The plan needs to calculate the area of the active colony on site, an analysis of viable removal options (including passive relocation, active relocation, trap and donate, and euthanization), proof of communication with various entities regarding relocating and trap and donate options, anticipated timeline of removal activities, burrowing owl survey methods, and methods to prevent recolonization of the site. Note that Rocky Mountain Raptor Program (https://www.rmrp.org/, 970‑484‑7756) accepts prairie dog donations year‑round. A copy of RMRP’s donation standards will be supplied to the DRC for you to pass on to the prairie dog consultant. In Fort Collins, prairie dog colonies one (1) acre or greater in size are considered special habitat features (see LUC 5.1 Definitions). In addition, the Land Use Code requires that any prairie dogs inhabiting a site must be relocated or humanely eradicated prior to development activities [LUC 3.4.1(N) (6)]. Mitigation options are based from onsite assessment and include but are not limited to: active relocation; passive relocation; trap and donate; and payment‑in‑lieu. Regarding black tailed prairie dogs and the project site: a. City Land Use Code requires that for any prairie dogs inhabiting a project site, prior to any site construction work, the animals must be removed either through relocation or humane eradication. Relocation is the City's first preference, followed by trap and donate. b. If this project proceeds in the development review process, at least a concept prairie dog removal plan will be needed prior to Hearing. c. Should this project achieve approval and proceed to construction, a burrowing owl survey, in accordance with Colorado Parks and Wildlife standards shall be provided prior to any prairie dog removal and prior to issuance of Development Construction Permit (DCP). The survey must be completed by a qualified wildlife biologist. d. Should this project achieve approval and proceed to construction, documentation needs to be provided prior to issuance of DCP (at least one week prior to DCP meeting is ideal) regarding the burrowing owl survey and the relocation of black tailed prairie dogs. Documentation should be in the form of a signed letter or memo from the wildlife biologist for the survey, and from the contractor(s) for the relocation (date, time, methods). All documents that have been requested will be supplied prior to issuance of DCP. Contact: Scott Benton, (970)416‑4290, sbenton@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/23/2022 05/23/2022: FOR HEARING: A local resident reached out Prairie Protection Colorado regarding the prairie dogs on site, and that organization is aware of a unique relocation opportunity. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is accepting prairie dogs in order to establish a colony large enough to support black‑footed ferrets near Pueblo, and will be providing a transfer center as well. Please provide proof of coordination with Prairie Protection Colorado regarding organization of an active relocation. Reach out to Deanna Meyer at prairieprotectioncolorado@gmail.com or at 720‑487‑8057. We already went to Hearing so we feel that this comment has been resolved. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/23/2022 05/23/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: All exterior lighting must have a correlated color temperature of 3000K or less to meet the requirements of LUC3.2.4. Acknowledged, all exterior lighting will have a correlated color temperature of 3000k or less to meet the requirements of LUC3.2.4. This has been noted on the photometric. Department: Forestry Contact: Freddie Haberecht, , fhaberecht@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/20/2021 5/20/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL UPDATED Thank you for making suggested species substitutions. On the plan gingko is the most commonly used shade tree. while gingko does grow in fort Collins it grows incredibly slowly and has a high mortality rate. Please reduce the number of ginkgo currently being used on the plan. The other trees shade trees on your plan are all good species adapted for Colorado. Prairie sentinel hackberry is a columnar tree and is not considered a shade tree. please more it to the ornamental tree list. FOR INFORMATION Linden trees in parking lot situations are subject to leaf burn and early defoliation as well as mortality. Consider reducing the number of lindens used in parking lot situations. - Most of the ginkgo trees have been substituted for more appropriate species. The prairie sentinel hackberry has been revised to an ornamental tree. The lindens have been reduced in parking lot situations. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 12/20/2021 5/24/22: FOR FINAL APPROVAL Continued through final plan. - Final species counts have been provided with this FDP submittal. 12/20/21: INFORMATION ONLY Final species counts will be performed during FDP. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 12/20/2021 5/23/22: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Continued through final plan. -Acknowledged 12/20/21: INFORMATION ONLY Forestry will provide Development Agreement language (if appliable) to the City Engineer during FDP. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 05/24/2022 5/23/22: FOR FINAL APPROVAL There are a few streetlight locations that are too close to canopy shade trees. Forestry would like to keep the canopy shade trees in lieu of swapping them for ornamental trees, so if it is possible to accommodate 40‑ft spacing between trees and streetlights that is preferred. Light and Power will provide updated light locations which may conflict with current street tree layout. Applicant should coordinate light location and tree adjustments with Forestry and Light and Power through the next rounds of review. - The canopy shade trees have been relocated to a minimum of 40’ from the streetlights. A few ornamental trees have been located in the right of way when a canopy tree will not fit due to streetlight and utility spacing requirements. During the public hearing process, the Planning Commission requested the limited use of ornamental trees in order to meet street tree requirements. We will continue to update the landscape plan as additional information becomes available form Light and Power. Department: Park Planning Contact: Aaron Wagner, , aawagner@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/24/2022 05/24/2022: FOR INFORMATION: Parks Department Planning staff can help with any questions you may have regarding these comments. Please contact Jill Wuertz (jwuertz@fcgov.com), 970‑416‑2062, or Parks Planning Technician, Aaron Wagner (aawagner@fcgov.com) 970‑682‑0344, 413 S. Bryan Ave, Fort Collins, CO 80521 regarding the Parks’ Department’s interest. -Acknowledged Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/24/2022 05/24/2022: FOR INFORMATION: The Parks Dept. is NOT anticipating taking over the streetscape/tree lawn along the development frontage. Please provide irrigation, maintenance, and other services to keep this area in keeping with the Fort Collins Streetscape Standards. -Acknowledged epartment: PFA Contact: Marcus Glasgow, 970‑416‑2869, marcus.glasgow@poudre‑fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/20/2021 03/18/2022: UPDATED FOR FINAL Please add sign detail at final plans. -Sign details have been added to utility plans. 12/20/2021: FOR FINAL FIRE LANE SIGNS The limits of the fire lane shall be fully defined. Fire lane sign locations should be indicated on future plan sets. Refer to LCUASS detail #1418 & #1419 for sign type, placement, and spacing. Appropriate directional arrows required on all signs. Posting of additional fire lane signage may be determined at time of fire inspection. Code language provided below. ‑ IFC D103.6: Where required by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING ‑ FIRE LANE signs complying with Figure D103.6. Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and have red letters on a white reflective background. Signs shall be posted on one or both sides of the fire apparatus road as required by Section D103.6.1 or D103.6.2. -Refer to horizontal control plan for Fire Lane sign locations. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 10/04/2022 10/04/2022: FOR FINAL HYDRANTS The interior site hydrant should be relocated to the main entrance on Le Fever Dr. -Hydrant has been relocated near the main entrance on Le Fever Drive. Department: Internal Services Contact: Russell Hovland, 970‑416‑2341, rhovland@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review PRIOR TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL Building Permit Pre‑Submittal Meeting: Please schedule a pre‑submittal meeting with Building Services for this project. Pre‑Submittal meetings assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the design, that the new projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards listed above. The proposed project should be in the early to mid‑design stage for this meeting to be effective. Applicants of new projects should work through their Development Review Coordinator to schedule a pre‑submittal meeting. *This meeting is required to take place prior to Final Development Plan submittal. -Design Studios met with Russ Hovland in February. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970‑221‑6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 10/03/2022: INFORMATION ONLY: Unless required during PDP, a complete review of all plans will be done at FDP. -Acknowledged 05/20/2022: INFORMATION ONLY: Unless required during PDP, a complete review of all plans will be done at FDP. 01/04/2022: INFORMATION ONLY: Unless required during PDP, a complete review of all plans will be done at FDP. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/04/2022 10/03/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL‑UPDATED: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. If you have any specific questions about the redlines, please contact John Von Nieda at 970‑221‑6565 or jvonnieda@fcgov.com 05/20/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL‑UPDATED: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. If you have any specific questions about the redlines, please contact John Von Nieda at 970‑221‑6565 or jvonnieda@fcgov.com 01/04/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. If you have any specific questions about the redlines, please contact John Von Nieda at 970‑221‑6565 or jvonnieda@fcgov.com Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Todd Sullivan, 970‑221‑6695, tsullivan@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 03/09/2022 Fort Collins Loveland Water District ‑ HYPERLINK "mailto:DevelopmentReview@fclwd.com" DevelopmentReview@fclwd.com 10/06/2022: FOR FINAL Please see redlines. All items can be address with Final Plans. -Redlines have been addressed refer to redline comment responses in PDF. 03/09/2022: Please see the redlines provided. Although they are made on the original Round 2 submittal, they are still applicable in general. All items noted can be addressed in Final Plan. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 03/09/2022 Century Link ‑ John Nutini, HYPERLINK "mailto:John.Nutini@lumen.com" John.Nutini@lumen.com I will be the CenturyLink account manager for The Savoy project. Please add me to your distribution list for future communications. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/24/2022 Larimer County Assessor ‑ Megan Harrity, HYPERLINK "mailto:mharrity@larimer.org" mharrity@larimer.org I noticed that we show a prior ROW having been taken from this TRACT A, BROOKFIELD REPLAT, FTC (20060078300); LESS ROW PER 20140016786; I have attached a copy of the deed of dedication at recptn# 20140016786 for your review. I didn't see any reference to this ROW lessed out in the preliminary plat for The Savoy. Maybe the ROW was vacated at some point? -ROW has been annotated on Final Plat, which was submitted as apart of this submittal. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970‑221‑6704, eolson@fcgov.com T opic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 04/27/2022 04/27/2022: Preliminary irrigation plans (PIP) are required for review at Final Development Plan (FDP), prior to issuance of building permit. The requirements for the PIP must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to HYPERLINK "mailto:irrigationdr@fcgov.com" irrigationdr@fcgov.com or Eric Olson HYPERLINK "mailto:eolson@fcgov.com" eolson@fcgov.com -Irrigation Plans have been submitted with this submittal.