HomeMy WebLinkAboutCASTLE RIDGE AT MIRAMONT PUD - PRELIMINARY & FINAL - 54-87J - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTSand Environmentervices
Planning Department
Lity or rort Lonins
June 24, 1993
Eldon Ward
Cityscape Urban Design, Inc.
3555 Stanford Road, Suite 105
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
Dear Eldon,
Staff` has reviewed your submittal for Castle Ridge at Miramont
PiU.D. - Preliminary 6 Final, and would like to offer the following
comments:
1. The storm drainage -related engineering documents received at
time of submittal on June 7th are considered to be
insufficient for a combined Preliminary & Final review. Staff
will continue to review these documents as a preliminary
submittal only and take this development request to the
Planning and Zoning Board on July 26th for a preliminary
decision. The concerns are centered around the impacts of the
off -site drainage flows into Mail Creek and the proposed
street crossing over the ditch, and the ownership of adjacent
property based on the possible need for an off -site drainage
easement. Kate Malers of the Stormwater Utility is your
contact person with storm drainage -related questions. Kate can
be reached at 221-6589.
2. A street width variance request, for the proposed 28' wide
private streets, needs to be formally submitted to the
Engineering Department for review. The streets as proposed do
appear to be appropriate for the nature of this development.
Please contact Mike Herzig of the Engineering Department with
questions on the variance procedure. Mike can be reached at
221-67.50.
3. A utility easement across Tract A, in line with the east
property line of Lot 1, is required by U.S. West_, or Tract A
could be described as a utility easement. A copy_ of the U.S.
West comment sheet is attached.
4. Public service Company has stated that all landscaping in the
utility easements should be coordinated with them and a
minimum 4' horizontal clearance must be maintained between
trees and their natural gas lines.
281 North College Avenue . P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 . (303) 221-6750
IF
5.. The Post Office has no comments until they have street names
to review.
6. A building envelope or setbacks for the gazebo must be shown
on the Site Plan. Also, a building permit will be required for
the gazebo.
7. The legal description on the subdivision plat does not, but
needs to, say "To the True. Point of Beginning". Also, the
legal description submitted as part of the Planning Objectives
packet must reference the "True Point of Beginning". This
legal has two "North 14 degrees, 10 minutes, 00 seconds". calls
(near the end of the legal) in a row that do not match the
subdivision plat.
8. The Mapping Department has a question. about how they can.
address the plat if Tract B is not intended to be named.
9. The subdivision plat should address how the tracts, especially
Tract B, will be maintained.
10. Light & Power has the following comments:
a) The electric system for the Upper Meadows at Miramont, 2nd
filing will need to be installed first in order to have an
electric source for Castle Ridge.
b) The easement along.Mail Creek. Lane needs to be 8' wide.
Also, continue the 8' easement onto Tract D along Mail
Creek Lane.
c) The developer will need to provide a location for 2 - 2"
conduits crossing Mail Creek at the box culvert on
Highcastle Drive.
d) Water service line locations will need to be coordinated
with Light & Power facilities prior to water service line
installation.
Please contact Doug Martine at 221-6700 with questions related
to electric service.
11. Parkland fees, currently $625 per dwelling unit, are proposed
to increase. These fees will be collected. at the time of
issuance of building permits.
12. The proposed Bechtel Crabapples are inappropriate because the
species is one of the most susceptible to fire blight. Please
arrange a site visit with Tim Buchanan, the City Forester, to
evaluate the existing trees and the potential impacts of the
overlot grading for the development on the trees. Tim can be
reached at 221-6640.
I
i
13. Is there a proposed trail access between Lots 9 and 10 (Tract
D)? If so, then a paved trail or gravel path should be
provided for access between the neighborhood and Werner
Elementary School.
14, The Site Plan should indicate the maximum height of homes in
Castle Ridge.
15. Tracts A and B should be a utility, drainage & public access
easements. What is the intent for access (public or private)
through Tract C and what is the general intent for Tract D?
General Note 5 on the Site Plan does not seem_ to coincide with
the subdivision plat or the assumed intent of the open space
tracts (providing private or public access).
16. The Planning .Objectives should discuss the density in this
phase and its relationship to the density reflected on the
Oak/Cottonwood Farm overall development plan. How does Castle
Ridge fit into the overall scheme of things?
17. Fencing details, guidelines, and possible restrictions should
be provided. The narrow open space tracts between lots and the
potential for these areas to get "fenced in" is of concern.
18. A concern about the notification area for Affected Property
Owners was expressed at the neighborhood meeting for
Oak/Cottonwood Farm held on June 2, 1993 and facilitated by
Ted Shepard of the Planning Department. A modified area map is
being provided to enable you to expand the current APO list.
This completes the review comments at this time. Additional
comments may be forthcoming as the various departments and
reviewing agencies continue to review this request. Please be aware
of the following dates and --deadlines to assure your ability to stay
on schedule for the July 26, 1993 Planning and Zoning Board
hearing:
Plan revisions are due July 7, 1993 by 12:00 noon. Please contact
me for the number of folded revisions required for each document,
PXT 1 s, renderings, and s folded copies of final revisions ( for the
Planning and Boning Board packets) are due July I9, 1993.
Final documents (including the signed development agreement,
applicable mylars and utility plans) are due July 22, 1993 by 12:00
noon.
Please contact me at 221-6750 if you have questions or concerns
related to these comments. I would like to schedule a meeting with
you as soon as possible, if necessary, to discuss these comments.
IL
S'
S Olt
roject Planner
xc: Kerrie Ashbeck
Sherry Albertson -Clark
Advance Planning
Stormwater Utility
Transportation
Parks & Recreation
Natural Resources
RBD inc.
file/Project Planner