The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutENCLAVE AT REDWOOD - FDP220014 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Page 1 of 5 Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6689 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview November 21, 2022 Klara Rossouw Ripley Design, Inc. 419 Canyon Ave., Ste. 200 Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: Enclave at Redwood, MJA220003, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of Enclave at Redwood. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through y our Development Review Coordinator, Todd Sullivan via phone at 970-221-6695 or via email at tsullivan@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Development Review Coordinator Contact: Todd Sullivan, 970-221-6695, tsullivan@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/15/2022 I will be your primary point of contact throughout the development review and permitting process. If you have any questions, need additional meetings with the project reviewers, or need assistance throughout the process, please let me know and I can assist you and your team. Include me in all email correspondence with other reviewers and keep me informed of any phone conversations. Thank you! Ripley Design Response: Thanks, Todd! Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/15/2022 As part of your resubmittal, you will respond to the comments provided in this letter. The final letter is provided to you in Microsoft Word format. Please use this document to insert responses to each comment for your resubmittal, using a different font color. When replying to the comment letter please be detailed in your responses, as all comments should be thoroughly addressed. Comments requiring action should NOT have a response such as noted or acknowledged. You will need to provide references to specific project plans, pages, reports, or explanations of Page 2 of 5 why comments have not been addressed [when applicable]. Ripley Design Response: Acknowledged. Thanks. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/15/2022 Please follow the Electronic Submittal Requirements and File Naming Standards found at https://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/files/electronic submittal requirements and file naming standards_v1_8 1 19.pdf?1566857888. File names should begin with the file type, followed by the project information, and round number. Example: UTILITY PLANS_PROJECT NAME_PDP_Rd2.pdf File type acronyms may be appropriate to avoid extremely long file names. Example: TIS for Traffic Impact Study, ECS for Ecological Characterization Study. Reach out to me if you would like a list of suggested names. *Please disregard any references to paper copies, flash drives, or CDs. All plans should be saved as optimized/flattened PDFs to redu ce file size and remove layers. Per the Electronic Submittal Requirements AutoCAD SHX attributes need to be removed from the PDF’s. AutoCAD turns drawing text into comments that appear in the PDF plan set, and these must be removed prior to submittal as they can cause issues with the PDF file. The default setting is "1" ("on") in AutoCAD. To change the setting and remove this feature, type "EPDFSHX" (version 2016.1) or “PDFSHX (version 2017 and newer) in the command line and enter "0". Read this article at Autodesk.com for more on this topic: https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/autocad/troubleshooting/caas/sfdcarti Cles/sfdcarticles/Drawing-text-appears-as-Comments-in-a-PDF-created-by-AutoCAD.html Ripley Design Response: Acknowledged. Thanks Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/15/2022 Once your project has been formally reviewed by the City and you have received comments, please resubmit within 180 days, approximately 6 months, to avoid the expiration of your project. Resubmittals are accepted any day of the week, with Wednesday at noon being the cut-off for routing the same week. When you are preparing to resubmit your plans, please notify me with an expected submittal date with as much advanced notice as possible. Ripley Design Response: Noted. Thank you. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/15/2022 ANY project that requires four or more rounds of review would be subject to an additional fee of $3,000.00. Ripley Design Response: Noted. HKS Response: Noted. Department: Historic Preservation Contact: Jim Bertolini, 970-416-4250, jbertolini@fcgov.com Page 3 of 5 Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/25/2022 10/25/2022: NO HISTORIC REVIEW REQUIRED: This proposal does not require historic review because there are no designated historic resources on the site and the nature of the project does not impact any historic resources that may lie on the development site or within 200 feet of the site. Ripley Design Response: Thank you. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sophie Buckingham, , sbuckingham@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/16/2022 11/16/2022: FOR HEARING: Is the intersection of Bergen Parkway and Redwood Street limited to right-in and right-out movements? If so, Engineering may have some concerns with the lack of vehicular connectivity through Lupine Drive. If further discussion would be helpful, please contact Engineering, Planning, and Traffic Operations. HKS Response: The intersection of Bergen Parkway and Redwood Street has been analyzed as a T -stop controlled intersection. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Steve Gilchrist, 970-224-6175, sgilchrist@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/15/2022 11/15/2022: Based on the narrative provided and previous traffic memos, the proposed closure of Lupine to regular vehicular traffic, while maintain bike, pedestrian, and emergency vehicle access, would not result in a failing level of service for the intersections the traffic will be diverted to. Ripley Design Response: Thank you. Department: Stormwater Engineering – Erosion Control Contact: Andrew Crecca, , acrecca@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/01/2022 11/01/2022: For information Only No Comment from Erosion Control. Based upon the submitted materials it has been determined that this project; will disturb less than 10,000 sq. ft., is not proposed to be in a sensitive area, has no steep slopes (greater than 3H:1V) within or adjacent to the project, and is not part of a larger common development that will or is under construction. Therefore, Erosion Control Material submittal is not needed. If this project substantially changes in size or design where the above criteria now apply, erosion control materials should be submitted. Although the project at this time requires no erosion control material submittal, the project still must be swept and maintained to prevent dirt, saw cuttings, concrete wash, trash & debris, landscape materials and other pollutants from the potential of leaving the site and entering the storm sewer at Page 4 of 5 all times during the project in accordance with City Code §26 -498. If complaints are received or site observation of the project seem not to prevent the pollutants from being discharged the City may require the project to install erosion and sediment control measures. Nearby inlets that may be impacted by the pollutants, in particular dirt, should be protected as a good preventative practice and individual lots should be protected from material escaping onto the sidewalk through the use of straw wattles or silt fence. If at building permit issuance any issues arise please email erosion@fcgov.com to help facilitate getting these permits signed off. HKS Response: Site will disturb greater than 10,000 sq. Ft.. An erosion control materials submittal will be provided with thi s submittal. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/01/2022 11/01/2022: For information Only MJA to approved PDP. Any EC will fall under current stockpile permit and approved FDP submittals at Final. DHI Response: Acknowledged. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Matt Simpson, (970) 416-2754, masimpson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/17/2022 11/17/2022: FOR APPROVAL: Changes to the site plan must meet utilities requirements for separations and access to public water, sewer, and storm infrastructure. Design change must maintain drainage functionality and meet drainage criteria. HKS Response: Changes to the site have been made to provide sufficient utility separations. Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Matt Simpson, (970) 416-2754, masimpson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/17/2022 11/17/2022: FOR APPROVAL: Changes to the site plan must meet utilities requirements for separations and access to public water, sewer, and storm infrastructure. HKS Response: Changes to the site have been made to provide sufficient utility separations. Department: Light And Power Contact: Rob Irish, 970-224-6167, rirish@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/14/2022 11/14/2022: Light & Power has no comment with regard to the MJA for Enclave at Redwood. Light & Power will be tying into existing conduit along Lupine Dr. either way. Approval of MJA could require changing of the streetlight layout for the intersection. Ripley Design Response: Acknowledged. Page 5 of 5 Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Scott Benton, (970)416-4290, sbenton@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/14/2022 11/14/2022: No comments. Ripley Design Response: Thank you. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/15/2022 11/15/2022: INFORMATION ONLY: We have no comments but will need to see any future submittals. Ripley Design Response: Thank you.