HomeMy WebLinkAboutOAK/COTTONWOOD FARM PUD - MASTER PLAN - 54-87 - MINUTES/NOTES - CORRESPONDENCE-NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING • •
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
FOR
OAK/COTTONWOOD FARM - MASTER PLAN
MEETING PLACE: St. Elizabeth Seton Catholic Church
MEETING DATE: Thursday, September 3, 1987
MEETING TIME: 7:00 - 8:45 P.M.
QUESTIONS, CONCERNS, COMMENTS
1. Access to school:
- would like more access
- traffic reduced from Mail Creek Lane
RESPONSE: The applicant added additional pedestrian ways to the school
site. Detailed access(s) to the school will be addressed at prelimi-
nary and final review.
2. Excess of multi-family in project.
RESPONSE: Staff does not feel there is an excess of multi-family.
3. Buffering adjacent to Fairway Estates; would like large lots adjacent
to Fairway Estates/Fossil Creek Meadows.
RESPONSE: The applicant revised the plan to provide single family dwel-
lings, at 3 units per acre, adjacent to Fairway Estates.
4. Concerns with type of business uses;
- style
- low profile
- no metal roofs
- no intense lighting
RESPONSE: Detailed design elements will be addressed at preliminary and
final review.
5. Buffer the single family uses adjacent to business uses along Harmony.
RESPONSE: The master plan provides for a 70' to 80' buffer along Har-
mony.
6. Type of multi-family?
RESPONSE: Specific types and styles of the multi-family units will be
addressed at preliminary and final review.
r
Oak/Cottonwood Farm M er Plan •
Neighborhood Meetingill,
pt. 3, 1987
Page 2
7. Palmer Drive going through, some want it to and others don't.
RESPONSE: Specific access(s) to adjacent properties has not been tied
down at this point. City Staff would like to leave the options open
and review traffic circulation at the time of preliminary review.
8. Feel theres too much comnercial uses.
RESPONSE: The Staff is satisfied with the proposed balance of land
uses.
9. Eye sore shopping centers. Would like to know the percentage of com-
mercial vs. residential City Wide.
RESPONSE: Results of the Land Use Survey which was conducted in July
1987 show residential uses at 22.2% (single family 17.2%, and multi-
family 5%) and retail, office, industrial, at 7.8% city wide.
10. Fairway Estates is surrounded by traffic and noise and would like as
much mitigation as possible from future development.
RESPONSE: The master plan proposes buffering along Fairway Estates and
Fossil Creek Meadows. Detailed design elements will be addressed at
preliminary and final review.
11. Residents would prefer the park adjacent to Fairway Estates.
RESPONSE: The City Parks and Recreation Department is working with the
applicant to provide a public park in this section of land. A number
of items are taken into consideration and at this point the proposed
park location is satisfactory to Staff.
12. Some residents would like to limit the development to LOCAL developers.
RESPONSE: Staff has no control over this issue.
13. Existing drainage / detention areas are a problem now. Residents want
to insure that future development does not create or add to drainage
problems.
RESPONSE: Through out the review process the City will review the
drainage for the specific sites.
PROJECT: ii /0./. /i _ / -.1 •'At 1 J/ /LA 7
TYPE OF MEETING: I L _I. i AA.ii t NJ' .
- IL l/ _.r
I ai z
DATE: 9-3— '7 0
WRITTEN
NOTIFICATION
NAME ADDRESS YES/NO OWNER RENTER
B0t3 d YA.o - 9 f 4CN Ck .S"3/ 3 /''A/4-- C, J< ,_A/1/ i'C-
Narrecl /IefP*.aa Vreci arq /&5' P4 ru'ay IN P5 _
J i_ 1
f • ,,,e,), 4 San /YOG.stry DES' • . s 4._— .
y
/,& A;. 6-7: -,461W.1) 0-14//w.e /fk~r/lfrR,07‘
7edle-L.t4) (/-77, 17-e--r3 f4
7n Ik) RJAJJ -o P L t ,z b le, 7i= s
Terry sS a. ,A7t 3 N/ ctict,vS er r .
le 44 b `.flab, L7-7-4,e Pd /),o;'A z jgs 2..--
X „?.., . ...____c), / - - 44)dp-‹._ /6-- i /
e //G ♦ ,I�i 4} f ,it I c- --,
o _.cxt-) \ -.,-AiiiiiiieiiiEi-- s L------
r -7-/A^-z-. NC/L- -61_, 9_3-,4 3---q1-64,- a--i.
,` m i)?1 57 3 -7- ye s l-------
!j 67"--W ocai r? 4f3 7 ,Ieiuvet y 6k-G/e_ Vex" ---------
A/76'.0 Wry,fi-i /1--c-/ 1.------- ,___
..-,•:z-c_-c- Z lu k-ems t` ,
I •
- - ✓17 q' zv /4, a Or,vt
G `k' C 32-/ 7 - dye9v71/,'40-tPP
/ 0/2 ( .._JU/2 t St ) V/0 ,/'o s src. c 7-A_RD , A__" C
b/e- S/am 52240 (2l-i ff/ .. i r/ve7
"1Q,-a-,.t iJa 'r ._'3,L) 10 6; i 4. 1, br ,-v e
V-v-j 60 5/05 C.# ,, -
.2)4J-,, ,c,-)1 4,„;.: Id f6. 6149 oa__ . _--- . :__-
' IC . -° f . L 9 d 1 �� I�a D 2 JES
4
qt.4.47/' i"
v I-7Y 6-0- 0
L -'" ,
PROJECT:
TYPE OF MEETING:
DATE:
WRITTEN
NOTIFICATION
NAME ADDRESS YES/NO OWNER RENTER
CleCALOva,t4igt4:44./IL
5•84-'