Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE OVERLOOK/SENECA CENTER AT ARAPAHOE FARM PUD - FINAL - 55-87P - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTS • • ITEM NO. 4 MEETING DATE 5/18/00 STAFF Ted Shepard City of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD STAFF REPORT PROJECT: The Overlook/Seneca Center at Arapahoe Farm, Final P.U.D., #55-87P APPLICANT: Overlook Development Company, LLC. do Vignette Studios 719 Pear Street Fort Collins, CO 80521 OWNER: Overlook Development Company, LLC. c/o Mr. David J. Pietenpol, Manager 4714 Valley Ridge Court Fort Collins, CO. 80526 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for Final P.U.D. for a neighborhood convenience shopping center located at the southwest corner of new Harmony Road and Seneca Street. The parcel 4.69 acres in size. The proposed land uses include a 3,000 square feet convenience store, with gas pumps, canopy, and one-bay automatic carwash. There are two other proposed buildings. One is a 1 ,200 square foot, one-story, multi-tenant commercial building which may include retail, office, and child care facility. The third building is a mixed-use structure featuring 8,200 square of commercial square footage on the first floor and seven residential dwelling units on the second floor. The parcel is zoned L-M-N, Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION: Approval with Condition COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N.College Ave. P.O.Box 580 Fort Collins,CO 80522-0580 (970)221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT • • The Overlook/Seneca Center at Arapahoe Farm P.U.D. — Final, #55-87P May 18, 2000 P & Z Meeting Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The P.U.D. is in substantial conformance with the Preliminary and complies with the approved Arapahoe Farm O.D.P. The project complies with the design guidelines for convenience centers and continues to satisfy the All Development Criteria of the L.D.G.S. There were two conditions of Preliminary approval pertaining to pedestrian safety and hours of operation that have been satisfied. The recommended condition of Final approval would require the City Council to take action on the vacation of a portion of Old Harmony Road. COMMENTS 1 . Background: The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: N: R-L; Single Family (Overlook at Woodridge, 1st Filing, Gates at Woodridge, 1st Filing) S: L-M-N; Multi-Family Under Construction (Harmony Ridge 1st Filing) and Vacant (Harmony Ridge 2' Filing) E. L-M-N; Multi-Family (Arapahoe Farm Townhomes) and Lighthouse Church W: R-L; Single Family (Overlook at Woodridge, 1st Filing) This area was annexed in 1980 as part of the Horsetooth-Harmony West Annexation. In 1987, the parcel was included in the 224-acre Arapahoe/Mountain Ridge Farm O.D.P. The Arapahoe Farm portion of the O.D.P. is known as Woodridge P.U.D. New Harmony Road divides this neighborhood. The filings on the east side of new Harmony Road are known as The Gates at Woodridge. The filings on the west side of new Harmony Road are known as The Overlook at Woodridge. In the years 1991 through 1995, The Overlook at Woodridge P.U.D., Filings One through Four, and The Gates at Woodridge P.U.D., Filings One through Four, were approved. These eight filings represent 442 single family homes on 136 acres. • • The Overlook/Seneca Center at Arapahoe Farm P.U.D. — Final, #55-87P May 18, 2000 P & Z Meeting Page 3 In 1994, Arapahoe Farm Townhomes, consisting of 72 units, was approved. This project represents the only multi-family development on the Arapahoe Farm portion of the Arapahoe/Mountain Ridge Farm O.D.P. On January 27, 1997, the Preliminary P.U.D. was approved with two conditions. 2. Conditions of Preliminary Approval: There were two conditions of Preliminary. These conditions and their resolution are as follows: A. Pedestrian Crossing of Harmony Road: The condition of approval is as follows: "At the time of Final P.U.D., as part of the development review process, the affected parties shall work with the City's Traffic Operations Department to explore the options for installing traffic safety devices to promote pedestrian safety. These devices, if any, shall be stated on the Final Plan." The Transportation Department has determined that a "traffic gap study" is needed prior to installation of a pedestrian-actuated signal at the Harmony/Seneca intersection. This gap study will be conducted by Traffic Operations to see if pedestrians can cross Harmony safely without a signal. The study will be adjusted to factor in the traffic generated by the center. The results of the study will be available by the time of the Planning and Zoning Board hearing. If the result of this gap study reveals that there are sufficient gaps in traffic for crossing Harmony without a signal, then the developer will be required to lengthen the existing median to create a pedestrian refuge area. Traffic Operations will perform periodic warrant studies after completion of the center to determine if this solution is effective in providing safe pedestrian access to the center. Such studies will determine the timing of installing either a pedestrian-actuated signal or a full signal. As the area continues to develop, the new projects will be factored into these warrant studies. If a pedestrian-actuated • • The Overlook/Seneca Center at Arapahoe Farm P.U.D. — Final, #55-87P May 18, 2000 P & Z Meeting Page 4 signal is warranted, it would be supplemented by a crossing guard. Finally, as an arterial/collector intersection, the funding of the signal would be the obligation of the Street Oversizing Fund. Staff finds that the proposed actions of the Traffic Operations Department takes the necessary steps to ensure pedestrian safety at this intersection. Staff, therefore, finds the condition of approval is satisfied. B. Hours of Operation: "At the time of Final P.U.D., as part of the development review process, hours of operation shall be stated on the Final Plan. Review criteria shall be as follows: A. Intensity of noise and lighting; B. Character of abutting neighborhood; C. Size and scale of the proposed Convenience Center; D. Design arrangement of buildings, circulation, screening and activities on the site; E. Proposed land uses, activities and intensity." The primary issue is the hours of operation for the convenience store, not the multi-tenant retail buildings. The applicant has responded that the hours of operation of the convenience store will be from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. These hours will be stated on the Final Plan and, therefore, enforced through the Building Inspection and Zoning Department. Any change in the hours must be processed as an amendment to the Final Plan. These hours of operation are similar to three existing convenience stores operated by the applicant's tenant that are in close proximity to existing residential neighborhoods. These are: (1) Timberline and Vermont, (2) Horsetooth and Shields and (3) Horsetooth and Lochwood. The Zoning Department has not received any complaints regarding these three existing operations. Staff finds that these hours of operation are acceptable for a residential setting. Staff, therefore, finds the condition of approval is satisfied. S The Overlook/Seneca Center at Arapahoe Farm P.U.D. — Final, #55-87P May 18, 2000 P & Z Meeting Page 5 3. Land Use: A. All Development Criteria: The Final P.U.D. continues to satisfy the All Development Criteria of the L.D.G.S. The Final indicates to a greater degree of specificity the design elements that are necessary to ensure neighborhood compatibility. These include details regarding landscaping, lighting, and architecture. These design features are incorporated on the Final Plan. B. Neighborhood Convenience Shopping Center Point Chart: The Final P.U.D. continues to satisfy the one absolute criterion of the Neighborhood Convenience Shopping Center. The absolute criterion asks: "Have steps be taken to minimize any environmental hazards, particularly those associated with underground fuel storage tanks, and if the proposed development is located in or near an environmentally-sensitive area, have all applicable state and local environmental standards been met?" The installation of underground gasoline storage tanks is regulated by state and local codes. In addition to filing a Hazardous Material Impact Analysis, the installation of underground gasoline storage tanks requires a permit from Poudre Fire Authority. Details of the installation procedure and inspection of such tanks were provided by P.F.A. at the Board's worksession for the Preliminary P.U.D. The area has been determined the Department of Natural Resources not to be environmentally sensitive. Staff, therefore, finds that this absolute criterion has been satisfied. 4. Neighborhood Compatibility: The issue of neighborhood compatibility was addressed at Preliminary. In summary, there were two neighborhood information meetings held prior to the Preliminary P.U.D. hearing. The minutes to the Preliminary (attached) indicate that there was no citizen input at the public hearing. Staff continues to find that the project is sensitive to and maintains the character of the surrounding neighborhoods. • • The Overlook/Seneca Center at Arapahoe Farm P.U.D. — Final, #55-87P May 18, 2000 P & Z Meeting Page 6 5. Design: The design aspects of the P.U.D. are described as follows: A. Building Orientation: The site is arranged so that the parking area is formed by a central court surrounded by buildings. The c-store is "reverse mode" in that the gas pump islands, canopy, and carwash are oriented inward toward the central court rather than out on the edge next to the arterial street. This orientation internalizes the areas of low visual interest thus presenting a more attractive appearance to the immediate neighborhood and the traveling public. B. Architecture: The intent of the architectural character of the center is to blend in with the neighborhood by using exterior materials found in the surrounding neighborhood. This includes brick banding on the lower levels, synthetic stucco and/or lap siding, and high-profile asphalt-fiberglass shingles. All buildings will feature a pitched or mansard roof. Roofs are accented with dormers and gables for visual interest. C. Walkways: A bicycle and pedestrian circulation system provides direct connections to the existing sidewalk on Harmony Road and future walk along Seneca. Harmony Ridge First Filing will provide a sidewalk connection from Dusty Sage Court to the proposed attached walk along "Fromme Prairie Way." Internal sidewalks and ramps allow for circulation among the various buildings. D. Garages: The garages for the seven dwelling units will be located on the southwest side of the structure, away from the view of both public streets, and attached to the building. • • The Overlook/Seneca Center at Arapahoe Farm P.U.D. — Final, #55-87P May 18, 2000 P & Z Meeting Page 7 In summary, the design of the Final P.U.D. is in substantial compliance with the Preliminary and continues to satisfy the All Development Criteria of the L.D.G.S. 6. Natural Resources/Parks and Recreation: Since Preliminary, the old intersection of Harmony/Taft Hill has been closed. Also, Parks and Recreation Department has constructed the Cathy Fromme Observation Area along with a small parking lot at the trailhead for the Fossil Creek Trail. The Final P.U.D. remains consistent with the Preliminary in that access to this public area continues to be along the old Harmony Road right-of- way. Directional signage will be placed on Seneca indicating the location of the public area. 7. Disposition of Old Harmony Road: A. Original Plan: The vacation of the Old Harmony Road, between the closed intersection with Taft Hill and Seneca Street, has been discussed since the original master planning for Arapahoe/Mountain Ridge Farm back in 1987. The basic plan was to vacate Old Harmony Road and shift the arterial over to the interior of the quarter-section so New Harmony would intersect with Taft Hill Road at C.R. 38E, approximately one-half mile to the north. The owner of the adjacent quarter section at the time and the developer of Woodridge P.U.D. agreed to the realignment of the arterial subject to the vacation of Old Harmony Road adjacent to their property. B. Current Conditions: Now, New Harmony has been constructed and the old dangerous Harmony/Taft Hill intersection has been closed. The Overlook at Woodridge, First Filing on the north side of the old roadway has been approved and consists of five single family lots directly abutting the right-of-way. Harmony Ridge, First Filing has been approved and consists of two five-plexes flanking a public cul-de-sac called Dusty Sage Court directly abutting the right-of-way. Also, the Parks and Recreation facility has been constructed at the terminus of Old Harmony Road. • • The Overlook/Seneca Center at Arapahoe Farm P.U.D. — Final, #55-87P May 18, 2000 P & Z Meeting Page 8 Finally, the adjacent undeveloped properties are in the review process; Harmony Ridge, Second Filing and Overlook Convenience Center (Seneca Center) Final P.U.D. C. Vacation of Old Harmony Road: The basic concept is to vacate the Old Harmony Road in the following manner: (1 .) Old Harmony Road may be vacated from Seneca to the western property line of Overlook Convenience Center. An access easement will be dedicated to preserve the public's right to use. This will require an Ordinance and two readings by City Council. (2.) Underlying utility easements for existing utilities will be preserved. (3.) The roadway will act as a second point of access for Harmony Ridge, Second Filing. (4.) The roadway will act as an access driveway to the Parks and Recreation facility (observation area and trailhead parking). (5.) The roadway will be named "Fromme Prairie Way" to provide direction to the Parks and Recreation facility. This roadway will consist of two ten-foot wide travel lanes and two five-foot wide bikelanes. A six-foot wide attached walk will be located on the south side of the road. A five-foot wide attached walk will be located on the north side along the frontage of the mixed-use retail/dwelling units. (6.) The area between the west property line and the Parks and Recreation Facility will remain public but be downgraded to an access driveway versus a local street. The Parks and Recreation Department is in full agreement with this vacation of the Old Harmony Road and believes a fully improved local street is not needed to serve the observation area and trailhead parking lot. In fact, Parks and • • The Overlook/Seneca Center at Arapahoe Farm P.U.D. — Final, #55-87P May 18, 2000 P & Z Meeting Page 9 Recreation believes a downgraded access drive contributes to the ambiance of the open space. Because the vacation of public right-of-way requires two readings by City Council, the following condition of approval is recommended: "The approval of Overlook Convenience Center at Arapahoe Farm, Final P.U.D. is conditioned upon the passage, on two readings by City Council, of an Ordinance vacating the public right-of-way commonly known as Old Harmony Road between a point beginning on Seneca Street on the east and ending at a point along the west property line of the aforementioned P.U.D." 8. Transportation: A traffic impact study was prepared for the Preliminary P.U.D. Primary access is gained from Seneca Street, south of new Harmony Road. Secondary access is from eastbound new Harmony which will be restricted by the present median to a right-in/right-out only. A right-turn lane will be provided for eastbound Harmony Road into the site. The key intersection for operational analysis is new Harmony Road and Seneca Street. Harmony Road is classified as an arterial street. Seneca is classified as a collector street. The traffic study concludes that a traffic signal is not warranted at this intersection until the full build-out of The Overlook and The Gates at Woodridge and Harmony Ridge. In the short term, the intersection will operate between Levels of Service "A" and "B" with stop sign control during the peak hour. In the medium term, the intersection will operate between Levels of Service "A" and "C" also with nothing but stop sign control. As mentioned earlier, Traffic Operations will conduct periodic warrant studies to determine the need for either a pedestrian-actuated signal or a full signal. It is estimated that if Harmony Ridge First and Second Filings fully build-out over the next two years, then a full signal would be warranted at that time. Development of this convenience center does not trigger the widening of Harmony Road to east. • • The Overlook/Seneca Center at Arapahoe Farm P.U.D. — Final, #55-87P May 18, 2000 P & Z Meeting Page 10 As mentioned, safety for bicyclists and pedestrians crossing Harmony at Seneca is provided for by painted cross-walks and a pedestrian refuge in the median until such time as either a pedestrian-actuated signal or a full signal are warranted. The multi-modal analysis indicates that existing and planned sidewalks and existing and planned on-street bike lanes will provide pedestrian and bicycle facilities to the surrounding neighborhoods and the Fossil Creek Trail and Cathy Fromme Observation Area. In conclusion, Staff finds that the Final P.U.D. is feasible from a traffic operational standpoint and satisfies City transportation policies. 9. Findings of Fact/Conclusion: A. A neighborhood convenience shopping center on this parcel complies with the Arapahoe/Mountain Ridge Farm Overall Development Plan and is in substantial conformance with the Preliminary P.U.D. B. The Final P.U.D. continues to comply with the applicable All Development Criteria and the absolute criterion of the Neighborhood Convenience Point Chart of the L.D.G.S. C. The Final P.U.D. satisfies the two conditions of Preliminary approval. D. Based on site design and input from two neighborhood information meetings, the P.U.D. is found to be sensitive to and maintains the character of the existing neighborhood. E. In conjunction with the adjacent Harmony Ridge P.U.D. and the City's Parks and Recreation Department, provisions are made for a portion of Old Harmony Road to be vacated between Seneca Street and the west property line of the subject P.U.D. F. The Final P.U.D. continues to be feasible from a traffic operations standpoint and provisions are made for multi-modal facilities. • • The Overlook/Seneca Center at Arapahoe Farm P.U.D. — Final, #55-87P May 18, 2000 P & Z Meeting Page 11 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Overlook Convenience Center at Arapahoe Farm, (Seneca Center) Final P.U.D., #55-87P, subject to the following condition: "The approval of Overlook Convenience Center at Arapahoe Farm, Final P.U.D. is conditioned upon the passage, on two readings by City Council, of an Ordinance vacating the public right-of-way commonly known as Old Harmony Road between a point beginning on Seneca Street on the east and ending at a point along the west property line of the aforementioned P.U.D." • • I ����,� C - jir i. __ _- M� LM =Mop`° .•v mp MMII `� '� RL ��i#iii ' 1 - ra STRE D PA. 1�����* IIIII' . \II I■/ • ---.-- ._.. le iiiin ilov INN: di 7.11 ' 1hin• alilt0 � RY i♦1/4i�����■■■W ' u... .X 11 • MMN o pal : ►c di � ♦ ♦ I1 �.rr■nr011111 a ii~i��vi. vi- • = 140000" II I lyi, ,. _ ii�♦ii -• awn I NC 4# i .,..... , "N ----- ...-- ,4 ..to ..$*.,. - - ..„ ........, ,,,,„ 4,sat-tie.,•- • duo \ VAT.,ktyl cl ,,, _41 alli _ S. '-L41a i *POL vb. '111` 'A i 0 IPA 1 iii / • Ks'i '4 ..1 I° tSi4 I I 6A_ .L i r: I NO POL WO cn 1Naar • ♦ Ar ) \ I-41 vi FA t k \ \ --- , I itiii 1 I Wm.. I grab ilwrik VICINITY MAP 09/16/99 #55-87P Overlook Convenience Center © Arapahoe Farms (Seneca Center) Final P.U. D. 1••=1000• • I 1 I 1 j ...1...-.■� el j .\......j WESTRELD PARK r MN JOHN 3 ,z Matillik 1111% 14 sm 0111 ill IN NI El MK ASO roainn : ,,,,,„,,.,.„„ .,, ,,,,„ ...._. _ • __ .., NIB RR 1111" all al alij IV !::::::7:11:1: 144.,.._4117, • Illi ::::::::::7 II mil 5 ■■■ ■ ,�■,•� S� � • /OM it.li = W A il 1 a vik -rv,-- --0* ,\:/. ' 1,4 et- -- 1:0 pi i 's vim TAL,'" "V W• ' ' 1 W.0 41 I S 1 I I Pr# 1 0 r 04 1? 0 0 , & . 0111 It I III ta 4011 111111h V 41414 N ��1 ♦. 1 �I OOy II ail 0 \ NFP s 4 "::. • ♦4110.. IN. ..1 IR or 111/111 MIPI .::.40ter . int*.40 liv4 4, 4 N.6\ • iii —,�Iiitk# vir - ,,: pg vtai, . ❑ •RMON ..Elf0/ • NI 7 "k' . In I - - , i • _ ctu- S ' 111: Ill III 0 1- A * III 0 - PO L IIP yip Ilk Itik 4 ,-.-- t 1 VICINITY MAP 09/16/99 #55-87P Overlook Convenience Center at Arapahoe Farms (Seneca Center) Final P.U. D. 1"=600• L . • a sa "9 11 l8 OM/11010D`SHIT100 D103 a'. lii l' 1.Md 3.1JS'Q'n'd Wend M _ III g 1 •Q•n•d .aa4uaD eaauas /loo1aano gg 5 $ 1 -4 96 133 � 4�� 1 � ry u m�Eja�I��� ��[ � ll � � l � l f •,-i 11 1 mil Iiiiiii:Iilusirreilirfrvi 1:11,Irliirl 1 d 693 144i 5r3 ��}l 1Rp�Vie l it �hH1n��V ,� r rUi a ° �w 1 74 1 1 `,fit 11111 1 1:44��A s. • Iiid5 R ryry EA J i U If fi mAIA fl , itg 41 p rg if li 2 r !d:b ;w4r• 11'1 ..w...1 : ..a t ! sa V / 4I/ ✓ /1- 4,- / %/ III i ' a J , ! • ��s / ' I;! / C / o �ti o /,, as , ! 1itI ,gEl € 45 v � 111 ; ! t li 1i4 Ctil ,'' / / 1111111. , i $ irq , i gi I. , ,g 13 I ;1 , i`co6 �� f :�~` 1l ` `sue HJ1 gay 93 $pi S U 11/ligi 4 1 i : gag' 11 e [ �d I imrr-tee a—czr� s � o $ v r ,,/►,��.�►, !1 I§ • • .ai g a it & ii 4 t I- ---- .i ' li oB 5 11 4 16 glii 44 111 @ .g . ,�` � 1-- ci.i\ _ rill 9 II g• rlli:li 1 !1 g e g v''' „i.' '''/,;!i„ ,,,,' 444 ., ..1143'..i=trpil'h" p- I®1 ti., i z 6 .❖;4.,4..li:ikt ktifi* ill -.i licea_ _-13 I -#';‘, 4.:4• > z a i r t 1 i ..o• a I t . i. 4,41 161f tR,1.1t! \ ;;Is '1• •�;:i *A 'I ' S al!&{fEl tlftia"',t! ���11"lad O `'► s �:* ,}p3 Yl iA�cgyF Yc�.FYaajt I. 'aL •i i•.i�•�• 1 1 S 11 9 dE 1' R c>. ! El! :••;•4•.D• �O `F i 1Ii lEa t= E I "° a 9a 1 il b rn ';•::::.•: ' � ♦�II: S xa t�l 3 I a: •�slsy � a le' �� ' O.� 'g1�4Etfi}tg{cadt�F i ''')‘'Is. �� �O ■ II 1�t6illla dri(fy! t '61;l,Ya,ll 6 ;11-01;k1;hi II ii i;iI R17 `ii1III1;1iJ;11Jt RB1i,xl..iZMi a t 811 • I a OUV IO'OD'sruTToD.ixoa �11 q 1 tAr1d MIS'an•a1v►. a i t V°] 111 i I ' • I fl d Jai.uaJ eoauas /)1oo,aano a � � P Nni i fii .� 11 ales �$ � 14 �aE ill 1 $ tli 91 �� ..f. __f. f.w .Rfww. fRx.:xa.fea.t• a. I k i a i iilt iea sg$$1 a 111 1g12t ! Ph 11li 11 d 1n 2 a E1 i .�i i� E �� t i€2 III !V II; I. ,t: 111 A i 11 I6 6 11 III 2 44 II 1 i �'1 i si! 1 jai 21 ga; ili s i I q 1 i a lflf F$t — 11 1101.1 1i as 1 ill i d it ili 11 il EPa i 21@ a 1 6 lyi aai II Milli 01 131 F iiid)1aiIIIii39 ii a 9p1: i BNB N 28Sa JJ: a de i p§1 • R ai{l 4_H r i t s s5 1 gal .0, ziqlia• IT : :i 1 1 li II hilt! 1liii ;i! $rs ' $--iiQ ° e• !a ° 1 - g 1!a i! ig W 14,pt`l E1i1 adbi F1 3 r �` id i$eR p i el�� t >� 1 i1@I$ !lt i iflhihtilihi1lJ - w , . e • f . a e Y e • 16C a �I tskseR �61e3 � e$e �idd;c, �I:aeae:.ecggali�I at %/ / ��o8 1I GJ .\ �\ / o0poo� o A { 11 \— ! /:AW,.._.1':; : 0.tL}�/ // / ���/�i 0v;`2 E I r 11110 Q,cc� 40 2 i s It■.. DPP / j`•� s 1 xS:'I itsi //' 4'/ , i ! RI I t — lb III I 7,,--10.0Y ,,1.-; A, / . •.,t,s, 411\ i„, r.,,*.modi;mmlis, lil al 1, VP'''' , `. 7*41.4 1V4rTITIBI • i Anik,,A,-, '4,,,,, \sv,.... It:;:,,1 -41,1,..,„ 4-,,, ..mr, 0 r ,,, '. ' tot C. . sse, C`�% ,:O!' 'ems. r '4 Ja ls. ,',,-;11 • 4 1.- ,„._ ! .1 o . \\,_114---.. -,k_. ":' / 4t, 4:,.. it 2,,i—,?,— - 3 =i l'- v. 45,"•• ••• , %is. '1'. .,'• 60: ,.., -;;,t,,, / . 4. C4, 2 A , 1 R , '4' ,,,,(11.L...4:11, 7 flee``!`:' a �' `\ \ "4, 811I .i 18 I • • • OQVuOOO'SNET1OO nIO I a1 .Qn•d -PIA-Pp hrla Ss an 1VWW a eDauas / oolJano a � t7 ,.. , , , ( 4 ! pp •44\ :.•i• 3 ! Mid w 5 �i�i�0 4 i�i�to .% I \ s'',. I, • ..♦ ea•••• _." -41t/g. g• _ tlaki i § 'y�i•••• ds ilik ♦o \ Viet; AN I •T # I 1 ,- , N \ I it. \ z \ \ 1 ' 1 a , r ..:4\\*# A° $ 7/,/ '‘,, .44 ?'d gi 1 W ••• 4°:-P 43:--4' it la 1 1 I--IN—"1 !! II § % .•.�.• ,,. *%. , �( /, j J ii! i2.44. , ,*\44'.4' 1 'c) I 1 i •••4 r XiVifIC 1 g '- i 1 I 1 1 i cc. i 14 2 4 4) 41\F /..tv-.Qw 1 g 1 \9 # \ ta. cl. \\\\\\ ,>\\ A • 11 di ' 1 , R .-4 al c \\ \ 6 1 00 N \ \ . . , hi 1 61 l'iii • • 71 3 .,j paif OQYIO1OD``SrITIODI11 3 .1:/tN F1 y 1.1V1Q nJ S Mal �g ` . �Qnd aaquaD eaauas /1ooaanQy Y fu i I'l 11 Asia! i;j� i r I 1-40 u 1 ii�� O \` 0 6 4 i i I _:=.111 i j 11 1 ,,,, 1 . ,...,„, , N 0 iiii I di 1 ! .., 1-1)i ,,,r 1 , , ; iv mu; I II e7 ulllil4 r I i LI. rwr. liar li li A 11., i I \ ..> [ H 1 E el a - III iimil. 1 i 1 i 1E11 i �l � t I a ilt: 1I i Arilvill , ,,,_,\,, i, Ii „ ,„i,,,,,, ,....,„„ „ 11 ! \ .,,,,u \___ u, . ,„ ,,, , 7iIi'.„11 rum „,,„ ,„, pe OQVIIO1OO`SI�IITIOD lIO3 Ili R 7 AIV'Id 31IS TVISIA :11i 1 • .•f•d JQI.UPD eDauas /1oo,aanp r A 6� r_A 1O - , „ , :::: n,, , , , ii I 1 HE: ;---;! 11 • i j`i / -I0 ” 1 . � __ r um . lilmi 1 ii • Le 1 r ( _ 16111 - o.. I' ' A'I Ill 1�= 1 II5 I . 1I,g • i _ 0- �®I. , , II ° A C- \t)4H II 1 I 11 li il lir, ../ lj 4 III/ - . 1,___, �I I ,4 0 { 1 i _ I _ I 01/1\Plii ( - 1 g. 1—ki 1 l‘ (4\r-\ \NI :::: iii ,\ IA li\--Alk_, -I ,i C. L '1' pro i \JiI il 1/ � ` l - IIIFril gy I 1 /� S �� :� = E 7,,,E 11 ,y• ti �-fi 0 / LJ1 I �'. MI Iilil' III\_III ri (—= I �' •�Y. iii\ 1 1 al 8 /— § 1 1- \ r---1 8 - 1 E ,„\1Er 1- E�n, I i1t p I el ` I - I 2. J +- N • S il 41!iiOQV✓IIOTOY'SPIITIOD 11IO3 *! NV1d 311S 'CI n d 1VNIJ 4rIli • a • n • d Ja; uao oaauas />1ooAo 1 :WSW ! i igi! ilid i 1111 111 1 il is!/ 11 'il " I _' i" I.I.I I , �. 111114-',111111 ilr ,, i Aiii' 1 i 1 1 r MEI i I I ii ` IIIIIIIililiriIi`ili'i'iI I � 1 � IrI IIIII-II11rl ' I!r!1!1!I!r!1!1!_!1!1!1!1!r!I HE k 1 El El lilq11,11 11 1171 11111114 lir iiirmen 1111111 ggil .. ih III OMNI G II�1 L 1: isl1! p 1 ���rl 4 .9J - • i gill di II IlI{ IIIiin � �� 1 IHaF21 , ul n r lil 5I1 i i 1I 14IIIllill- ILIIEI. E5 1 I il'cl1itI�' I f lhillii I. 1 11 :.a 1e I. .1 r.IlFiill11 i` ,.-•r•prrl•I ? k O "";1111111 1:ilir :i: E 1 A • ,', i i 111it; ,: • 1 1 . O al I1l1i�r iIJ 1111111-1 �' 11.1.1.1.1.1.1�1 hi y A I1I 1I1r100 =illlll,l Irlllll_II 1 • • .Lrfq OQ�1O1OO`SNmoD I1103 !ill! NV1d 311S '0'fl'd 1VNIJ t - c d --191- u93 aaa uas / ooJ3Ao 1 :1111 1 1_E11 • Ii i1,1,1,1�111 • 11y!111!1;1!i4=IIII11111 1911 Pill' 1 Spµ§A •;;II, I111111 I r :�r r'rljl�l 11 luiiJ 1 b C III IIII I11lit i k I • 7IIEI1nl11111 11111 1i !Ili Fill I ��� • ! a -•`11.jig11j, I 1 I�dl11illlli -°/ �::. ! �p11 _41111111111111r'11�111 II11I1111 1" r I mm111 111)1 0 I!1!1!1!1!1!1!1_!1!11111!1! 1 li 8/, ll 11�I'IiII� '!11I,1�111 c m, 8AA !�'�r!I!!4I!I '—�41IIII. 6 1111i11„.„,llll,! . i, , , ii a1I 1111�I111111—II11,,, 1 2 :Itl!II!I.tlI-IIih11II,i i a IIIII 1 ,1 ,lI w;11,11H11 ---11111�1r,iilyy �:11II11111):1,1ii , ;----jl:'' :111:4,',1,lI! x7 I , ,,1I R IP ,� �iE� 1 iii, 41 I1 45 i t 111!1 �1IIIg1 • I I1l !Iit11111 :1111.ii!! i,,1,11 IIIlli 1pu 1,w, llllI I _ � II 1 11 11_r_ e 1 II !i�!i!II. Ip II,O III s Add II( 1111!1 I d IJ IIIdd11 14 t ,1111111111114-:11111:1: IIII111_I,1111d, 11 I I 1•11,11101m81116m115111 Ili iiill1j; !� k i k V1'1 ;' I @i I1r,1,!I kill 1 • 3d111! 1!I11^iIN1111 0,,111 II 1111,-.I'1AI11 11 4 II i iii! R 1 !f,.;1 111 it I • S 1;11 OCIV110100`SNITIIOO I1103 4 NVld 311S '0'n'd 1VNIJ `�Lk . a . n . d J3 U33 DO U9S / oojJAo 1- :21111 1 :� m ii 1. ill € i�pi I !II la lei !1! 1111 1/i 1 /il thili RIP gio I IA / i 6 L!iE!!„„.„1!!!!!1!1!r:!!I!u1!1!1111111...r.,- 0 Ili@ilflllflln! ri II{lin1�iiTiI 74- Ai 7 i ,. ii 4 1 31 11 t 1 I II) 11 \11'1'V - 1 r° III!I!IiRlllllili!!li!I!�!I!I!li!!I!lil!i"!I'(!!!!!!TI s !I�111111H1111MIHI 1111uIWI1llE Ell 111 —I Ili i Q 11 o d ' a,. Ward I • • 4 l i OCIV1I0100`SHITIOO 11103 ii N` id 3115 .a.n•d 1VN13 t r3 il; • � • n • � aa� ua� aaauas />1001_19A0 i :1111 I 101E if il' Ii I� C: IIlI7I�@�I!I��IC II�IIHl i �r 4 , 117111 k lIl I..t!1.1� 1'111', i .!I I I,I,I I 1I,III .11111 `w:��!LI�.,,,I,.,,,:rl=Imam 0I!1llili5 133€B1 t). .,;1i;Ii{ IlUI! 11 T I'I �I{ . 1 I I si,.,...,.,;;. 0 1 :irll i E „,10I �({IIV�IIi;iI{IIIII {I{ ,` II ill 1 `r j^re 410 kin i �pmi(! !1 i :"!,:;.;:.• !g .•:IA I po { IIIII €'i!i!I{i{!i!,!�{i{t{611�jd {�i!i!ilil •• , ;,:"1iij IIJi 1$1 -i ,]ill 1 ti. ii \ \\\ ill :1' 1 t ll ii 1 ill i. ix 0 • -R- oaYxo'too`sNmoo sxoa �I Ii NYld 311S '0'(1'd 1VNIJ t 110 q c . n . c _19I_ u93 D32U2s / ooAo � g n 0 lit efi- lea,,,,„,,,Lri , -, Ni Hilia: . lip .,ram .. _..• . , el ...-, . ...I t .y{Ly t. r 111111 IIII 0, It P ui! ; 1 �'�II, —' / '1n ' ,111 -2'1r-1 III:;111::::.1:. II t} 1 tr' l c ,,ice, i itsm,l44._ -le.--. I., lll��l 1111 11 1 4. 1 "ill 0 .111F,;:: Iso If MEP P` 111 kl 'IR fI. • , {1_ ic: ii i € .. It Is 41 --"N-r 1 1 1 t 4i - i ti_ _1 �/ '�i'; ,li ill ,]i :, "it : N . } .; ..., , ., . .. .........„. ,... r �' ` ,,,.... ,„..,, . Z,-; • ..vt'c[.� Tr:z`ia�' aK "k%SAY.. TF+ ,� . �:+ . <°�'c+ e. <,,",��!r .tom, ?`"'' `tom ? "R��Gr b 1 i \ 7-1,-ter ®.'W, y�,w %1,:1 "� .w, �` 4rsM jr�L.,a.� ti srn•- r • ( I 4 _ */!- . .till •4 •V1• AA.,. (., 1'1,' yy"•• ''I J,' `A'PS'.', +. • +;ram L t �f P..'Xs"i y { �, .( R ` .rS'�a fib':. %c .w 4 �c1.~7 st :— ..- i/10-4:4C '" '•:i _ 41°Z 1. ' -N ^ *10. •Na '' ! ." a �i.�, 4 ,. , l ',-z C• 'S• zvd it \ + 1 y ,sa! . ;v.., ulh � • • tit: $.;\ giant ^ i - . , t m !1-!ff •i y 3 0 J• _.•.•1 art �Y awl.awl. •i v _ _� yf� C lt- _. . sae , )11 r 1-- 4C7' - / _ -_7.. -- .,,. :. Zd t 1 * t i A- i n .ate - a '.II I I - r 1 r16 —i11 !j , I. I� y `.yam: Ad — � _ — P.v ti" r° ..; ' — — —'ems__ ._. ,.. — . a ` .. d r u U C M U N f E - R S E C _ 7 _ - F 0 N 1 Luminous Element2 Hood Optics 3 WND 4 WINDOWS ANG ANGLED SHADE H2 TYPE 2 REFLECTOR I I. H3 TYPE 3 REFLECTOR AIL H4 TYPE 4 REFLECTOR Cast frame with a diffused H5 TYPE 5 REFLECTOR acrylic lens 20"/508MM DIAMETER 8.75"/225MM DIAMETER 6.5"/165MM HIGH / I I \ 4.177105MM HIGH I( Reflector with cast door and standard sag glass lens OPTIONS FOR REFLECTOR OPTICS SR SOLID RINGS BEL BELL SHADE FTG FLAT GLASS LENS FLD FLAT GLASS WITH LDL FINISH Cast rings with a diffused acrylic lens HSS HOUSE SIDE 12"/305MM DIAMETER 24"/61OMM DIAMETER SHIELD FACTORY 4.4"/11 OMM HIGH 8"/205MM HIGH INSTALLED VSL VERTICAL SLATS FLR FLARED SHADE OAL OPAL ACRYLIC LENS Cast frame with a diffused acrylic lens 22"/560MM DIAMETER 8.75"/225MM DIAMETER 67150MM HIGH 4.17"/105MM HIGH 8"/205MM DIAMETER 9"/230MM) HIGH MAXIMUM 100 WATTS HID LUM LUMINOUS RINGS STR STRAIGHT SHADE GR3 TYPE 3 REFLECTOR GR5 TYPE 5 REFLECTOR Edge lit acrylic rings 247610MM DIAMETER with a diffused acrylic lens 4.5"/115MM HIGH 12"/305MM DIAMETER 4.47110MM HIGH *Colored inner lens option, Glass Refractor seep. 25. 6.5"/165MM DIAMETER 6"/150MM HIGH 24 ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING . Planning and Zoning Board Minutes January 27, 1997 Page 2 • Discussion Agenda: 16. #31-95D Hearthfire PUD, 1st Filing-Final 17. #55-87N The Overlook Convenience Center at Arapahoe Farm PUD - Preliminary 18. #54-87AL Oak/Cottonwood Farm -Amended Overall Development Plan (Continued) 19. #46-88G Park South PUD, Third Replat -Final Member Weitkunat declared a conflict of interest on Item #5, Country Club Corners. Chairman Bell asked to put Item#16, Hearthfire PUD on the Consent Agenda. There was no objection. Member Gaveldon moved for approval of Item #5. Member Davidson seconded the motion. The motion was approved 5-0. Member Weitkunat moved for approval of Consent Agenda items 1 (June 10 only), 2,3 (including variance), 4, 7, 8, 9, 10 (including variance), 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. Member Chapman seconded the motion. The motion was approved 6-0. THE OVERLOOK CONVENIENCE CENTER AT ARAPAHOE FARM PUD - PRELIMINARY. #55 -87A1 Ted Shepard, Senior Planner gave the staff report recommending approval with the following conditions: 1. At the time of Final P.U.D., as part of the development review process, the affected parties shall work with the City's Traffic Operations Department to explore the options for installing traffic safety devices to promote pedestrian safety. These devices, if any, shall be stated on the Final Plan. 2. At the time of Final P.U.D., as part of the development review process, hours of operation shall be stated on the Final Plan. Review criteria shall be as follows: A. Intensity of noise and lighting; B. Character of the abutting neighborhood; C. Size and scale of the proposed Convenience Center; D. Design arrangement of buildings, circulation, screening, and activities on the site; E. Proposed land uses, activities and intensity. • Planning and Zoning Board Minutes January 27, 1997 Page 3 Planner Shepard also stated that this project required a variance from the minimum required score on the Neighborhood Convenience Shopping Center Point Chart. Eldon Ward, Cityscape Urban Design, gave the applicant's presentation. Mr. Ward stated that this plan included a neighborhood convenience store, other retail services,provisions for the new Harmony Road alignment, the Seneca Street extension into the Harmony Ridge development to the south and access both for the possible residential component as well as if there is some access needs for what was Old Harmony Road. Mr. Ward discussed the variance and he stated that they did not meet the point chart but were in line with the intent of that provision. Member Weitkunat asked if they would be building Seneca Street. Mr. Ward replied that Harmony Ridge needs Seneca Street for access, but are blocked out by this piece of property. Which ever property develops first will build that stretch of Seneca Street. Member Weitkunat asked if this development would imply the closure of old Harmony Road. Mr. Ward replied not at this time. The closure of old Harmony Road will be when new Harmony Road connects through to Taft Hill. Member Weitkunat asked about the use of Tract A. Mr. Ward replied that the specific use has not been determined. Member Davidson asked about a trail on the other side of Arapahoe Farms. What was it? Planner Shepard replied that was a sidewalk that is detached and is on the Arapahoe Townhome property in an easement for public access. It acts as the public sidewalk. Member Davidson asked if the City foresaw a connection to The Cathy Fromme natural area. Would there be a bicycle trail across Harmony. Planner Shepard replied there is no planned underpass. Member Davidson asked if there would drive-thrus allowed. Planner Shepard replied that they are not allowed in neighborhood convenience shopping centers. PUBLIC INPUT • • Planning and Zoning Board Minutes January 27, 1997 Page 4 There was none. Chairperson Bell asked how this development would blend with the Harmony Ridge development. Would there be open space in between. Mr. Ward replied that there would with the open area around the attached housing buildings at • Harmony Ridge. The open space should merge together. Member Weitkunat recommended approval of the variance request for meeting minimum score on the Neighborhood Convenience Shopping Center Point Chart on the LDGS due to the nature of this particular property and the questionable nature of the multiple housing in proximity. Member Gavaldon seconded the motion. The motion was approved 6-0. Member Chapman recommended approval of the Convenience Center at Arapahoe Farms PUD,#55-87M subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Member Davidson seconded the motion. The motion was approved 6-0. PARK SOUTH PUD, 3RD REPLAT, PRELIMINARY AND FINAL, #46-88G Mike Ludwig, City Planner gave the staff report on the proposed project recommending approval with the standard final PUD condition for final utility plans and development agreement. Staff was also recommending the granting of a variance to All-Development Criteria A-1.1, Solar Orientation. Linda Ripley, VF Ripley Associates representing the applicant gave their presentation. Ms. Ripley stated that this was a straight forward residential development. The projects density is 5.47 dwelling units per acre. Ms. Ripley spoke on the Overall Development Plan Amendment, design issues with the interface with this project and the 4 Seasons project to the west, neighborhood compatibility, the rebuilding of the fence between the two developments and the stormwater issues. Ms. Ripley reviewed some slides depicting what the interface between the two housing developments would look like. Ms. Ripley stated that they believe they meet all All- Development Criteria except for the 65% solar oriented lots. They have submitted a request for a • variance from the solar orientation criteria. The proposed project has a layout of 28% solar and . • • co MEMORANDUM A rL [� r �C i co IC ?� U 1I j o n1 I 'I c� I °� TO: Dave Pietenpol, Wheeler Commercial i I'' APR 1 2 2000 , • L) Tricia Kroetch, North Star Design LL U a (0 Terence Hoaglund, Vignette Studios cc co City of Fort Collins By O o O rn U FROM: Matt Delich -"Of/4,„(0• i< o li DATE: April 10, 2000 z a J w SUBJECT: Overlook at Arapahoe Farms Transportation Impact Study O (File: 9679ME01) J • • co w O N Q 6The Overlook at Arapahoe Farms has been updated and is being p co resubmitted to the City of Fort Collins. As shown in Figure 1, this w o site is located in the southwest quadrant of the Harmony/Seneca a n intersection. The new site plan is shown in Figure 2. Since a I rn comprehensive traffic study was already performed ("The Overlook at w z Arapahoe Farms PUD Site Access Study," November 1996) , the scope of C' o this exercise provides a comparison of the trip generation of the N a former and currently proposed land uses, and an alternative modes n analysis. When the cited traffic report was prepared, an alternative N mode analysis was not a requirement of the City of Fort Collins. In the cited traffic study (1996) , the contemplated land uses at the Overlook consisted of commercial and residential uses. The trip generation for the Overlook was: 2790 average weekday trip ends, 267 morning peak hour trip ends, and 274 afternoon peak hour trip ends. The proposed uses are similar to those in the previous plan. Lot 4 of the previous plan was eliminated from the new plan. Table 1 shows the expected daily and peak hour trip generation from the Overlook using Trip Generation, 6th Edition, ITE as the reference W document. The day care is considered to be an alternative use on Lot CI. 1. The trip generation for the new Overlook plan is less than that z for the same area from the cited traffic study. It is expected that N the new Overlook plan would generate: 1788 average daily trip ends, w Iw 115 morning peak hour trip ends, and 153 afternoon peak hour trip Z ends. Even with the higher trip generation for the day care facility V z on Lot 1, the new plan will generate less vehicular traffic. J LLI la Figure 3 shows the location of the Overlook at Arapahoe Farms Q a and a radius of 1320 feet from the outer boundary of the parcel. Per the "Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual," there are 2 four existing or future "destination areas" within this radius. These Z four areas are designated by numbers: 1) the residential area to the a northwest of the site; 2) the residential area to the northeast of 1— the site; 3) the residential area (existing and future) to the east W ea and south of the site; and 4) the Kathy Fromme Prairie Trailhead. I 0 Appendix A contains the Pedestrian LOS Worksheets for the Overlook I" w as it relates to these "destination areas." The Overlook site is in l— H a Pedestrian District that is termed "other." The minimum pedestrian 4level of service for this district is C for all factors. Generally, 2 there are sidewalks along all properties within the quarter mile of • 110 this site that are developed. Future development will build sidewalks as part of their development plans. There is no sidewalk along the south and north sides of a portion of Harmony Road to the east of the site. It is not known when this segment of sidewalk will be completed. It is recommended that the sidewalk be completed along Harmony Road as part of future City street improvements to Harmony Road. The pedestrian level of service for the Overlook will be acceptable. There is one bicycle "priority destination area" within 1320 feet of the Overlook at Arapahoe Farms. This is the Kathy Fromme Prairie Trailhead. An inventory of all arterial and collector streets within 1320 feet of the Overlook indicates that bike lanes exist or will exist on all streets. Appendix B contains the Bicycle LOS Worksheet for the Overlook. The bicycle level of service is/will be acceptable. There are no existing bus routes within 1320 feet of the Overlook at Arapahoe Farms. According to the Fort Collins City Plan - 2015 Transit System Map, Harmony Road will have feeder service with 30 minute service. Appendix C contains a transit worksheet for the four specific transit destinations mentioned in the "Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual." The transit level of service will be acceptable. Conclusion It is concluded that the trip generation for the new plan for the Overlook at Arapahoe Farms will be less than that for the land uses on the site plan as shown in the comprehensive traffic study. The multimodal analysis indicates that acceptable level of service will be achieved. . . • • - ____1 -1--_ Ae, J N s � 1 —7.- -;=--- ,_. C-- 1 uU , . i , 1 ( } ) , N. 3p�y \iLJ -'Ti- ) Harmony t.---- - ` i The Overlook at Arapahoe _ , ) Farms 3 SCALE: 1"=2000 SITE LOCATION Figure 1 . . • N •• 4 • • • ./ t•• :�: •'RAT ' •'DREDGE QATSS AT .•61 a e' R I A R G A T E 4 • •1• •TFII,INc i• •T • — Q �-r zarm�4P �•\ .� ZONING ,itt1 4: to VAV i,•." °t W % Nj .,, W.N.:„. N... . . , f, , . 4,,:,,. .„ : �� .❖••ii '• �5� r n. oY°iu e LOT 3 l o lkilltt, / 0,_.„,./ i- / ,,, i 4.' .:;iii„, 11:II 1 ** 111• a .w,sit...$470 4%,..S 11-1 : i 'NA ii Fi I 1 %A4?!.A", 1.'` i 1.A! L-.--..1 LEI/ ,I -- 9 t illiht . NZ", ladr" ii. ow liWit � a•=iI T '4 4"I 'llm' - n'"1 '' -1 -1‘"All I Ili ill FA Ovif lc. „ARIA"! ,s e+ . a,r.,•• a001—l111�� ;- P U. I c - .- _ Li 1 _ / t 4/ / r --„, Ei n � v SCALE: 1"=100' SITE PLAN Figure 2 • • TABLE 1 Trip Generation AYWDTL AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Code Use Size Rat* M I Rate Out Rata to Rate Out Lot 1 814 Retail 6.05 KSF 40.67 246 0.60 4 0.38 2 1.11 7 1.48 9 710 Office 6.05 KSF 11.01 67 1.37 8 0.19 1 0.25 2 1.24 8 Subtotal 313 12 3 9 17 565 Day Care(alternative to 6.05 KSF 79.26 480 6.74 41 5.98 36 6.20 38 7.00 42 officSubtotal(with Day Care) 726 45 38 45 51 Lot 2 814 Retail 4.1 KSF 40.67 167 0.60 2 0.38 2 1.11 5 1.48 6 710 Office 4.1 KSF 11.01 45 1.37 6 0.19 1 0.25 1 1.24 5 220 Apartments 6 D.U. 6.63 40 0.08 1 0.43 3 0.42 3 0.20 1 Subtotal 252 9 6 9 12 Lot 3 846 Gas/C-store w/car wash 8 pumps 152.84 1223 5.43 43 5.21 42 6.60 53 6.60 53 Total 1788 64 51 71 82 Total (with Day Care) 2201 97 86 107 116 • • I -J .76 1 11 2 Harmony 4 \ SCALE: 1"=1000' PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE INFLUENCE AREA Figure 3 • • APPENDIX A . • i po Q cc N _ __ ti n.. � � •Ecr dICQ c� � _. rp uI ,, _ _C' �fE vab 003co U n V to A .-__ cC 01 -li -� bg vc ck dv d c� � cz 0 _ Iv I—ICZ E C.) �? c lC.) V V V v c 14.1 c Q I F Q1Ua..'� C LC -. G _ + _ _ y C cC7 - a.VJ > S C C -G `' - c�c d.-" R .3J 0La _ w Az Q1 0 O U. o i C 1L t`' p.4_, ,,_, . ..... :,.. ..:3- , L e. -3 u. __ fa, . -� ' �, es_, i0 . Ts At A Cti '- 4 Q 0 W R N -..‘ ,. .. (,) ,..„ p__, . 1.13 ,may -> •0. o V tt{ ''" \ �y i l U CAI 'v R .ram' "'i/ .+ 44) 111 ) it 1C kt V 1 r4. 0 (\c _ rs e � ��� � , Q, ._, cz , to . ... , ., �'� �" ,_, N M '7r \, �rQ-.1 p w E 1 \:. A 3 3 • • APPENDIX B • • 0 N Q ti L to ti O T L v 0 V C.. I a ? ' L --1 ° , O T.,-I—) > U ' O - 1 n 4) 9 >, c Z w ,- .. ? 0 cox n n 41 I �u Cr) O ›` " v lUb 1 O " ... O v O CNI 0 o A U _. a) < .r T. Q� ��_� PC) r yo oD ry O1, J U�, C Y1 v n .4 J- _ON • j C {_ ct5 b.!) ic cCi 0 II • • APPENDIX C • • FUTURE TRANSIT LEVEL OF SERVICE Travel Time Worksheet Destination Approximate Auto Travel Bus Travel Travel,Time Distancelime Time Factc r' CSU Campus Transit Center 5.3 19 37 1.95 Foothills Fashion Mall 3.2 14 29 2.07 Fort Collins High School 5.1 19 45 2.37 Downtown Fort Collins 6.5 22 41 1.86 Total Travel Time 74 152 2.05 Service Level Standards Worksheet Mixed Use h Remainder of r Standard w; ' the rice gets Standard Fails Standard N Area..... . ,.t"l�Q3� �� -y t , Hours of Weekday Service 18 hours 16 hours X Weekday Frequency of Service 15 minutes 20 minutes X _ Travel Time Factor 2.0 x 2.0 x X Peak Load Factor < 1.2 <1.2 X 2 of 4 = LOS D