Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE GATES AT WOODRIDGE PUD, 4TH FILING - FINAL - 55-87L - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTES ` Y • O Planning and Zoning Board Minutes September 25, 1995 Page 2 Member Strom seconded. The motion to nominate Member Walker as Vice-Chair passed 5-0. Agenda Review: Current Planning Director Blanchard reviewed the consent and discussion agendas. The consent agenda items are as follows: 1. Minutes of the December 16, 1994 and January 23, 1995 Planning and Zoning Board Hearings. (January 23, 1995 minutes were continued) 2. #34-95 Pi Kappa Alpha Fraternity - NCB Site Plan Review 3. #90-85M Wildwood Townhomes PUD - Final 4. #35-95 Roberto's Burritos Expansion PUD - Preliminary and Final (Continued) 5. #12-78G Foothills Fashion Mall PUD, Phase 2 (Foley's), and Foothills East, Phase One - Amended Finals 6. #55-87L The Gates at Woodridge PUD, 4th Filing - Final 7. #13-95 Novovesky Garden Center PUD - Final 8. #66-93A Windtrail Townhomes PUD - Referral of an Administrative Change 9. #52-82E Southside Service Center - Amended Overall Development Plan 10. #78-81G Cimarron Plaza PUD, Phase 3 & 4 - Amended Preliminary and Final 11. Modifications of Conditions of Final Approval 12. Resolution PZ95-20 Easement Vacation 13. Resolution PZ95-21 Easement Vacation 14. Resolution PZ95-22 Easement Vacation (Continued) 15. Resolution PZ95-23 Easement Vacation Discussion Agenda: 16. #41-95, A Dry Creek Annexation and Zoning (Continued) 17. #28-81C Fairbrooke Heights PUD - Final (Continued) Member Strom pulled Consent Agenda Item 5 for discussion. Member Davidson pulled Consent Agenda Item 10 for discussion. • • Planning and Zoning Board Minutes September 25, 1995 Page 3 Member Mickelson moved to approve Consent Agenda Items 1 (December 16, 1995 only), 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13 and 15. Member Strom seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed 5-0. FOOTHILLS FASHION MALL PUD, PHASE 2 (FOLEY'S) AND FOOTHILLS EAST, PHASE ONE - AMENDED FINAL -#12-78G Ted Shepard, Project Planner, gave the Staff Report recommending approval with the condition that pertains to the timely filing of utility plans and other technical engineering documents. Member Strom pulled this item because he would like to see the circulation patterns addressed in regard to automotive and pedestrian circulation. He was also concerned about the net affect on landscaping and how much mature landscaping would be lost with this project. Frank Vaught, Vaught-Frye Architects, stated that in the 1987 proposed expansion of the Foothills Fashion Mall, an additional 42,000 square feet of was approved with the Master Plan. He addressed Member Strom's concerns by stating that the loop road that was in the 1987 plan, loops around the outside portion of the mall allowing circulation to recirculate from the major parking areas to the outlying parking areas and then to various different stores. Major entrances will not change with the exception of the elimination of the Stanford Road entry. From a pedestrian standpoint, the closer the buildings are, the better, in terms of encouraging people to park at one space and go in either direction. This would be an improvement for Foothills East. In addition, with the expansion, there will be a new south/east entrance that will have all the amenities and facilities as the others. Member Strom asked if the new alignment of the entry off of Foothills Parkway would function well. Mr. Vaught stated that they have reviewed this and concluded that because of the open space area, it would be beneficial to include a right turn lane with an island that would define the movement. Member Strom asked how the current situation is working and how does the applicant see this changing the flow.