Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOVERLOOK AT WOODRIDGE PUD, 2ND FILING - FINAL - 55-87G - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTES . • PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING MINUTES March 23, 1992 Council Liaison: Gerry Horak Staff Liaison: Tom Peterson The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board began at 6:35 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall West, 300 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado. Board members present included Chairman Bernie Strom, Vice-Chairman Lloyd Walker, Joe Carroll, Jim Klataske, Laurie O'Dell, Jan Cottier, and Rene Clements-Cooney. Staff members present included Planning Director Tom Peterson, Deputy City Attorney Paul Eckman, Sherry Albertson-Clark, Kirsten Whetstone, Ted Shepard, Steve Olt, Kerrie Ashbeck, Mike Herzig, Kayla Ballard and Patti Schneeberger. Member Carroll moved to have Item E, Other Business, discussed prior to the reading of the agenda. Member O'Dell seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0. Member Carroll stated that there have been several public comments about the sign erected by CSU at the southeast corner of Elizabeth and Shields. He commented that the Board was not aware of the particulars concerning this sign. Member Carroll moved to have staff present a report to the Board regarding the signage at the regular April meeting stating in that report the following: 1) the compliance, of non-compliance, of the sign with the City Sign Code and if it does not comply, in what regards it does not comply; 2) the presentation of a report from the City Police Services stating any traffic hazards that may or may not occur through the installation of the sign, and; 3) comments from staff regarding the interaction and discussions between the City and CSU before the installation of the sign. Member Clements-Cooney seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0. Member Carroll commented that he would welcome any comments from CSU staff at the April meeting and extended an invitation for them to attend the meeting in April. • Mr. Peterson presented the Consent Agenda which consisted of: Item 1 - Minutes of the February 24,1992 meeting; Item 2 -Pinewood Patio Homes PUD, Preliminary & Final, Case #4- 92A; Item 3 - Villages at Harmony West, Amended Overall Development Plan, Case #3-90D; Item 4 - Fort Collins Second and Harmony PUD at the Villages at Harmony West, Lot One, Preliminary, Case #3-90E;Item S -Gates at Woodridge PUD 2nd Filing, Final, Case #55-87F; Item 6 -Overlook at Woodridge PUD 2nd Filing, Final, Case #55-87G; Item 7 -Seven Lakes Medical Office Building PUD, Phase 2, Final, Case #95-81I; Item 8 - Park South PUD, 1st Replat, Final, Case #46-88D;Item 9 -Poudre Plains Subdivision, Two Year Extension, Case #72- 87A; Item 10 - Overland Hills Subdivision, 1st Filing, Final, Case #38-90B; Item 11 - North Lemay Plaza PUD, One Year Extension, Case #57-87B;Item 12 -Resolution PZ92-3 Vacation of Easements at Spring Creek Professional Park PUD; Item 13 -Resolution PZ92-4 Vacation of Easements at Hickory Hill Village at Cunningham Corner PUD; Item 14 -Resolution PZ92-5 Vacation of Easements at Sunray Place PUD was continued to the April meeting; Item 15 - Springwood Institute PUD, Preliminary & Final, Case #2-92. Mr. Peterson presented the Discussion Agenda which consisted of: Item 16 - Paragon Point PUD, Final, Case #48-91B;Item 17 -Replat of a Portion of Tract A, Southridge Golf Course, Case #9-82AE; Item 18 - Paragon Point PUD, 1st Replat, Final, Case #48-91C; Item 19 - Housing Authority Facility PUD, Preliminary & Final, Case #28-89A; Item 20 - Laurie Subdivision PUD, 2nd Filing, Final, Case #44-89E;Item 21 -Laurie Subdivision PUD, 1st Filing, Amended Preliminary & Final, Case #44-89F; Item 22 - Pheasant Ridge Estates Subdivision, Final, Case #43-83D,and; Item 23 -Potts PUD, Preliminary, Case #6-92 was continued to the April meeting. N • P&Z Meeting Minutes March 23, 1992 Page 2 Chairman Strom pulled Item 4, Fort Collins Second and Harmony PUD at the Villages at Harmony West, Lot One, Preliminary. Member O'Dell moved to approve Consent Agenda Items 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15. Member Cottier seconded the motion. The motion for approval passed 7-0. FORT COLLINS SECOND AND HARMONY PUD AT THE VILLAGES AT HARMONY WEST, LOT ONE - PRELIMINARY -Case #3-90E Chairman Strom stated that he had a concern with the two access points on Harmony Road, particularly in close proximity with the Regency Drive intersection. He stated that the City usually resisted access along major arterials especially close to intersections and particularly one use with more than one access. He asked what kind of precedent the City would be setting. Kirsten Whetstone stated that the Transportation Department addressed this concern when the project was brought forward at Conceptual Review and through the review process. The two points of access were allowed at that time. The Transportation Department did not want anything other than a church use to have access on Harmony at that point. If there were a shared access on Harmony, this would allow uses on the adjacent lot to access Harmony. If the church were to sell the building for some other use, they would lose access on Harmony. She added that, in regards to setting a precedent, it is typical in Fort Collins for churches to have access on major arterials. In this case, the two access points work for the church site and do not create a conflict because the peak time for a church is the minimum time for rest of the traffic. Two access points work better for circulation for a church use because the traffic is so concentrated. She added that any change of use at this site would have to come before the Board. Member O'Dell moved to approve Fort Collins Second and Harmony PUD at the Villages at Harmony West, Lot One, Preliminary with the two conditions suggested by staff and with the third condition that if there is any change of use or added use to this particular church, then it must come back to the Planning Department to have the traffic impacts reviewed. Member Walker seconded the motion. The motion to approve carried 7-0. PARAGON POINT PUD, FINAL -Case #48-91B Mr. Eckman stated that this project was tabled from last month's meeting to this month's meeting. He stated that he sent a memorandum to the Board through Mr. Peterson regarding the participation of Member O'Dell and Member Klataske and their absences from the last meeting. He stated that if they were to participate in the discussion this evening, they would need to have reviewed the video of last month's meeting in its entirety before participation this evening. He suggested that Member O'Dell and Member Klataske indicate that they have reviewed the tape so that they are familiar with the record. He added that, since the matter was tabled, all of the record that was made at last month's meeting was still a part of the record in the event of an appeal, as well as tonight's information. Member O'Dell stated that she did review the tape and that she will be participating in the discussion.