HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOBBLESTONE CORNERS PUD - PRELIMINARY - 55-87E - CORRESPONDENCE - FIRE AUTHORITY REQUIREMENTS Start of Item 3. S
Message. Dated: 05/28/93 at 1655.
Subject: Richmond Dr. H2O
Sender: Warren JONES / CFC52/01 Contents: 2.
TO: Ted SHEPARD / CFC52/01
Part 1.
FROM: Warren JONES / CFC52/01
TO: Ted SHEPARD / CFC52/01
Part 2.
Ted,
This issue has come up before, probably during the annexation
but I don't remeber specificaly. This subdivision was developed
many years ago, probabley well before the County had utility
standards for fire protection (1981) . The water line is
only 4" so it unlikely that it can meet the county standard
of 500 gpm much less the city minimum of 1000 gpm.
As you know the water supply standards we have now are tied
to new buildings and/or new land divisions and is not retroactive.
For this reason we do not have any way of compelling anyone to
add fire hydrants or upgrade the water line unless the
subdivision is expanded or new lots created. My recollection
also is that the water district was not any help the last time
this came up.
This is not an isolated situation, w ave several like it in
other areas of the city, including th mobile home park where we lost
two kids in a fire several years ago. I looked at severalways
to get fire hydrants into that area but since no one was willing
to pay and I couldn't require it of anyone it wasn't doable.
End of Item 3.
Start of Item 4.
Message. Dated: 06/01/93 at 0917.
Subject: Tract D Fairbrooke PUD
Sender: Gina JANETT / CFC/01 Contents: 2.
TO: Ted SHEPARD / CFC52/01
Part 1 .
FROM: Gina JANETT / CFC/01
TO: Ted SHEPARD / CFC52/01
CC: Greg BYRNE / CFC52/01
Part 2.
Ted,
If I remember correctly, you are the planner on the Tract D of Fairbrooke