Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNORTH LEMAY PLAZA PUD - PRELIMINARY - 57-87 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYn PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR LEMAY PLAZA P.U.D. SEPTEMBER 1987 PREPARED BY: PARSONS & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS 432 LINK LANE PLAZA FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80524 (303) 221-2400 PROJECT NO.: 87.18 PDQ - 0 0 ■ PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ' LEMAY PLAZA P.U.D. PROJECT LOCATION The site is 1.60 acres and is located at the Southwest corner of ' Lemay Avenue and Conifer Street, The Lemay frontage is 210 feet which is a "T" intersection. and the Conifer frontage is 302 feet. Lake Canal runs along the South property line, and at the Southeast corner of the property there is a 4' x 17' box culvert ' under Lemay. The proposed access to the site is one curb cut on each street. ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION ' Lemay Plaza P.U.D. is intended to be a neighborhood retail center consisting of a PDQ convenience store (2600 square feet with 3 gas pumps) and 10,000 square feet of undetermined use retail space. The anticipated use is service establishments on ' specialty retail shops. ' PRELIMINARY RESULTS A. ADJACENT STREET TRAFFIC ■ Figures 1 through 4 show the traffic counts obtained during the hours of 7 to 8 AM and 4 to 6 PM on Thursday, August 27, 1987, broken out in 15 minutes and peak hour intervals. The bulk of the AM traffic flows South on Lemay and the bulk of ' the -PM traffic flows North on Lemay. ' Lemay is currently a two-lane county road, a 30-foot section. Conifer is a city collector with a 60' section. The . intersection operates at A/B Level. ■ B. TRIP GENERATION The trip generation rates shown in Figure 5 were obtained from I.T.E.'s Trip Generation Report (See Figures 8 and 9). These rates were separated into two categories: those trips from passing traffic and those generated by the site. These site generated trips were then distributed according to the same percentages of existing traffic. C. SIGNAL WARRANT Based on the existing traffic counts, the intersection does not warrant a traffic signal. Adding in the site generated trips, the intersection will still not warrant a signal at this time. 0 D. POSSIBLE PROBLEM AREAS During the AM Peak, there appears to be no problems with movements into or out of the site. During the PM Peak, possible left turn conflicts exist --with the northbound Lemay traffic. E. PROPOSED LEMAY IMPROVEMENTS Lemay will eventually be an arterial. Based on the amount of traffic at the present time, a 52-foot section is adequate. The box culvert crossing of Lake Canal is wide enough for this section. If_ the City desires improvements to Lemay at the time of the development of this site, we propose a 52- foot section, which would allow three lanes, with sidewalk and bike lanes, which will:provide essentially a turning lane into the East entrance to the site. If the City desires that this site. If the City desires that this site not develop their portion of Lemay at this time and contribute at a later date, we feel the existing road sections will accommodate the flow of traffic. CONCLUSIONS Based on thispreliminary study, we feel the proposed development will not have a detrimental impact upon present traffic conditions. If future conditions warrant a traffic signal, we feel the curb cuts are an adequate distance from the intersection based on the number of vehicles making turning movements. Pre I� erred by:. '® A`AeoSA®e'��r Todd A. nimoda, P.E. 0 w Colorado License #18792 oeaaL��o`= O _OF GG�-���o` 0 ca- CM N Rufch � o 'srnns Or Cw a VICINITY MAP 2e ..2 La Porte Wlldllfe Are 70' ,M.m.Nnnd .,,• � F)7_1p) Poi & CLIENT l JOB NO. FPARSONS ASSOCIATES PROJECT �edFFIG e—'QQ lUT CALCULATIONS FOR t4OIIe--S 7.1 CONSULTING ENGINEERS Ft. Collins. Colorado 80524 MADE BY DATE R�27I87 CHECKED BY DATE SHEET ' OF 0 0 00 Do i i M i �_,,.. _ 1,1 a(1 An h i �... i ; k. __,. ' 7 .. ...... ............ . Y _ ...... .... ._.._ F3PARSONS & CLIENT JOB NO.—SJ%.1L FDn = ASSOCIATES PROJECT TP-d fl~ IG- ��f I1��T CALCULATIONS FOR WQ1 )��J 4 'Cs CONSULTING ENGINEERS Ft. Collins. Colorado 80524 MADE BY J(D 0ATEA/-z7A7CHECKE0 BY OATE SHEET 2 OFF ►� J V) �9 4.5 S•� F,NO. PARSONS & CLIENT JOB . ASSOCIATES PROJECT TF* 1F�IG �iM�A�T CALCULATIONS FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERS Ft. Collin. Colorado 90524 MADE BY -DATE -CHECKED BY DATE SHEET OF AM PCE N-T 5-7tZE- T 481 3�tU I ,yo/a Ig 372 5��a �5y1 I I 42 82. I 349� 66t I I I 1 CLIENT ' ' ` _ " PARSONS & JOB NO. RIASSOCIATES PROJECT T FrIG ZY�YA�-( CALCULATIONS FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERS Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524 MADE BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE SHEET OF AMACF—N-T 57i ZE-T T 5 —Co P�`°I Cd�JlF-F-2 f `NI �VAZr �- D, 10 JOB NO. PARSONS & CLIENT Irk- ASSOCIATES PROJECT CALCULATIONS FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERS Ft. Corr, Colorado 80524 MADE BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE SHEET OF F6 urzr-- VA 4 N CLI dJ .� op o qj �► t. d N1 �-. • PARSONS & CLIENT L`� ' OOB NO. !ram ASSOCIATES PROJECT TP—AsFYIG Zy�YA�1 CALCULATIONS FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERS Ft. Collins, Colorado W524 MADE BY -DATE -CHECKED BV DATE -SHEET -OF MDVEM EtihTS RPARSONS & CLIENT ���-f •JOB NO. �'' 5 P O lr , ASSOCIATES PROJECT �F'* SCALCULATIONS FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERS Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524 MADE BY -DATE -CHECKED BY DATE SHEET OF 1 1 SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type Special i •y R ta; 1 C n .Pr ITE Land Use Code R1 4 Independent Variable —Trips per 1,D00 Grass Square Feet of Teasahle Area Average Trip Rate Maximum Rate Minimum Rate Correlation Coefficient Number of Studies Average Size of Independent Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 40. 7 50.921. 2 7.7 Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic A.M. Between 7 and 9 Enter Exit Total P.M. Between 4 and 6 Enter Exit Total Peak Hour of Generator A.M. Enter Exit Total P.M. Enter Exit Total Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Generator Enter Exit Total Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Generator Enter Exit Total Source Numbers 100 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date: 1982 'F� 6 L� V-F- b L SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type 24—Hour Open Convenience Market ITE Land Use Code _851 Independent Variable —Trips per 10000 Gross Square Feet Average Trip Rate Maximum Rate Minimum Rate Correlation Coefficient Number of Studies Average Size of Independent Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of A.M. Between 7 and 9 Enter Exit Total Adjacent Street Traffic P.M. Between 4 and 6 Enter Exit Total Peak Hour Of Generator A.M. Enter Exit Total P.M. Enter Exit Total Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Generator Enter Exit Total Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Generator Enter Exit Total Source Numbers 78, 87, 90 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date: 1975, Rev. 1982 �IG�IIZE