HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE SAVOY - PDP210019 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 3 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTSCommunity Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College AvenuePO Box 580Fort Collins, CO 80522970.221.6689970.224.6134 faxfcgov.com/developmentreviewMay 27, 2022Blaine Mathisen
Northern Engineering301 N Howes Street, Unit 100Fort Collins, CO 80521RE: The Savoy, PDP210019, Round Number 2Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside
reviewing agencies for your submittal of The Savoy. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through your DevelopmentReview
Coordinator, Todd Sullivan via phone at 9702216695 or via email at tsullivan@fcgov.com. NorthernKephartHenry DesignDelichMilestoneComment Summary:Department: Development Review CoordinatorContact:
Todd Sullivan, 9702216695, tsullivan@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 1Comment Originated: 01/04/2022I will be your primary point of contact throughout the development
review and permitting processes. If you have any questions, need additional meetings with the project reviewers, or need assistance throughout the process, please let me know and I can
assist you and your team. To best serve you, please include me in all email correspondence with other reviewers and keep me informed of any phone conversations. Thank you!Thanks for
the help Todd.Comment Number: 2Comment Originated: 01/04/2022As part of your resubmittal, you will respond to the comments provided in this letter. This letter is provided to you in
Microsoft Word format. Please use this document to insert responses to each comment for your submittal, using a different font color. When replying to the comment letter please be detailed
in your responses, as all comments should be thoroughly addressed. Provide reference to specific project plans or explanations of why comments have not been addressed, when applicable,
avoiding responses like noted or acknowledged.Please follow the Electronic Submittal Requirements and File Naming Standards found at https://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/files/electronic
submittal requirements and file naming standards_v1_8 1 19.pdf?1566857888. Files are to be named PLAN NAME_PROJECT NAME_REVIEW TYPE_ROUND NO.Example: UTILITY PLANS_MY PROJECT_PDP_RD1.pdfResubmittals
are accepted any day of the week, with Wednesday at noon being the cutoff for routing the same week. When you are ready to resubmit your plans, please notify me as much in advance as
possible.All documents follow that naming conventionComment Number: 3Comment Originated: 01/04/2022Temporary Service Changes City of Fort Collins Development ReviewTo best provide
thorough reviews and give every project the attention it deserves, the City of Fort Collins is implementing temporary changes in how we serve our development customers. As you may be
aware, we are experiencing staff shortages in a number of key departments, which has begun to impact the timeliness of our reviews. We recognize that development and construction play
a critical role in our community’s vibrancy and economic recovery, and we have been exploring options for mitigating impacts to our customers. As a result, we will be making some temporary
service level adjustments.Currently, one additional week of review time will be added to all 1st and 2nd round submittals (increase from 3 weeks to 4 weeks). Lengths of subsequent rounds
of review will be considered after each round of review. Also, Completeness Checks will be performed on all initial and Round 2 submittals during this time. Please reach out with any
questions or concerns.NotedComment Number: 4Comment Originated: 01/04/2022All "FOR HEARING" comments need to be addressed and resolved prior to moving forward with scheduling the hearing
for this project.All “FOR HEARING” comments have been addressedComment Number: 5Comment Originated: 01/04/2022LUC 2.211 Lapse, Rounds of Review: Applicants, within one hundred eighty
(180) days of receipt of written comments and notice to respond from the Cityon any submittal (or subsequent revision to a submittal) of an application for approval of a development
plan, shall file such additional or revised submittal documents as are necessary to address such comments from the City. If the additional submittal information or revised submittal
is not filed within said period of time, the development application shall automatically lapse and become null and void.NotedComment Number: 6Comment Originated: 01/04/2022PRIOR TO
FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL:MultiFamily projects are required to have a Presubmittal Building Code Review Meeting prior to Final Plan submittal. Please reach out to me to schedule this meeting
when you are ready. Thank you.We will reach out during the final plan developmentDepartment: Planning ServicesContact: Kai Kleer, 9704164284, kkleer@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment
Number: 4Comment Originated: 01/03/202201/03/2022 FOR FINAL: Please provide a low screen wall/fence for all groundmounted condenser units that are visible to the street. Provide a
typical detail view of wall/fence.A 4-ft wood low screen fence has been provided on sheet L-10Comment Number: 5Comment Originated: 01/03/202205/24/2022 FOR HEARING: Comment is still
active.01/03/2022 FOR HEARING:Regarding the lighting fixture schedule, it is not clear what the BUG rating is for each respective luminaire. Additionally, fixtures C, SA3, SA5, SB, and
SC propose a 4,000K temperature and should be reduced to not exceed 3,000K.Please update the photometric plan to demonstrate compliance with the LC1 Lighting Context Area consistent
with the specifications in Tables 3.2.42,3, and 4.The photometric plan has been updated to demonstrate compliance with the specifications listed above.Comment Number: 6Comment Originated:
01/03/202205/24/2022 FOR HEARING: Met onsite with applicant team on May 13, 2022. Expect through further coordination that this comment will be resolved prior to the hearing.01/03/2022
FOR HEARING: The plan lacks compliance with 3.8.30(F) Design Standards for MultiFamily Dwellings. Big items for the plan to address are:Providing three distinctly different building
designs. Currently the plan provides a single building design an no significant variation in materials. More work is needed to ensure that each of the three building designs be distinguished
by unique architectural elevations and unique entrance features within a coordinated overall theme of roof forms, massing proportions and other characteristics. Such variation among
buildings shall not consist solely of different combinations of the same building features.Three distinct building designs employing the features listed above have been provided with
this resubmittal. We are currently showing 36-Plex, 24-Plex, and 3-Plex configurations each with distinctive architectural elevations and color schemes. Comment Number: 7Comment
Originated: 01/03/202205/24/2022 FOR HEARING: Met onsite with applicant team on May 13, 2022. Expect through further coordination that this comment will be resolved prior to the hearing.01/03/2022
FOR HEARING:Greater variation in facades and walls. From the site plan view it appears that there is no variation in exterior walls. Standards require that each multifamily building
be articulated with projections, recesses, covered doorways, balconies, covered box or bay windows and/or other similar features, dividing large facades and walls into humanscaled proportions
similar to the adjacent single or twofamily dwellings, and shall not have repetitive, undifferentiated wall planes. Building facades shall be articulated with horizontal and/or vertical
elements that break up blank walls of forty (40) feet or longer. Facade articulation may be accomplished by offsetting the floor plan, recessing or projection of design elements, change
in materials and/or change in contrasting colors. Projections shall fall within setback requirements.Following our meeting on-site, we have modified the building facades to incorporate
greater variation. 3D views have been provided with this resubmittal to further illustrate how the articulation requirements are being met.Comment Number: 8Comment Originated: 01/03/202205/24/2022
FOR HEARING: Met onsite with applicant team on May 13, 2022. Expect through further coordination that this comment will be resolved prior to the hearing.01/03/2022 FOR HEARING: Greater
variation in color. Currently, sheet A6 demonstrate identical siding, stone, panel, and trim colors for all buildings. Standards require providing three distinct color schemes with no
more than two (2) similarly colored structures placed next to each other along a street or major walkway spine. Colors of nonmasonry materials must be varied from structure to structure
to differentiate between buildings and provide variety and individuality. Further, colors and materials shall be integrated to visually reduce the scale of the buildings by contrasting
trim, by contrasting shades or by distinguishing one (1) section or architectural element from another. Bright colors, if used, shall be reserved for accent and trim.Following our meeting
on-site, we have modified the colors and materials to incorporate greater variation between each building type. Comment Number: 12Comment Originated: 01/04/202205/24/2022: FOR HEARINGA
few cleanup items for this comment. See redlines Sheet L1, Building 1 and Building 3 connections are required. For Buildings 5,6,7 the walkways are part of helping contribute to an equalto
or betterthan approach for building orientation and block standards.01/04/2022 FOR HEARINGPursuant to 3.5.2(D)(2), please add at least one building entry or doorway to the sides of Building
5, 3 and 1 that face Brookfield and Precision Drive.Update: 3.5.2(D)(2) StreetFacing Facades. Every building containing four (4) or more dwelling units shall have at least one (1) building
entry or doorway facing any adjacent street that is smaller than a full arterial or has onstreet parking.Almost all buildings have walkway connections as shown on your redlines. There
are no doors on the 3-plex out to Le Fever or the drive aisle to the east of the building so there is no need for a walkway to that building. The bottom floor of the 3-plex is going
to be used for maintenance equipment. Additionally, the units that face the pocket park on Buildings 7 and 8 do not have walkway connections for a variety of reasons. If we add 4 walkways
it makes this pocket park not very usable. The AC units for these two buildings need to be on the park side because of utility spacing issues on the south side of building 7 and sidewalk
issues on the north side of building 8. All other sidewalk connections have been made and we are hoping that if it is an absolute must that these connections be made we can work through
these minor details during final.Department: Engineering Development ReviewContact: Sophie Buckingham, , sbuckingham@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 2Comment Originated:
01/04/202205/13/2022: FOR HEARING UPDATED:The existing property line still appears on the Horizontal Control Plan. Can this be frozen so that it only appears on the Existing Conditions
sheet?Existing property line has been removed on Horizontal Control Plan01/04/2022: FOR HEARING:Please have the drawings reflect the proposed rightofway as the predominant property
line instead of the existing property line prior to the rightofway dedication along streets. It is difficult to follow how the site development conditions (new sidewalk, utility locations.
etc.) are situated in relation to the property line that is being established.ROW line is now the predominant property on all sheets other than existing conditionsComment Number: 3Comment
Originated: 01/04/202205/19/2022: FOR HEARING UPDATED:Has Xcel confirmed that the gas line is okay to be installed one foot behind the sidewalk?Coordination with Xcel has not commenced
because of the uncertainty of getting this site layout approved. There are no other utilities in the 9’ UE along the public ROW and we can always dedicate more easements internal to
the site as we move through coordination with them once at final. 01/04/2022: FOR HEARING:Looking to confirm the gas location in relation to the sidewalk along the public streets.
It appears to be depicted at the back of walk on some plans, or slightly behind the sidewalk on other sheets. Are the separation requirements between gas and electric sufficient for
both providers?Comment Number: 5Comment Originated: 01/04/202205/25/2022: FOR HEARING UPDATED:This variance request is still being reviewed. I anticipate that it will be approved,
but it may require some additional coordination. I will follow up when I have more information.The inset parking along Brookfield and Precision were requested by the cityto alleviate
some of the concerns expressed by a few neighbors with regards to that corridor feeling congested and hard to navigate. The same variance request that was supplied with PDP Rnd 2 is
the same variance request for PDP Rnd 3 excepted it is now addressed to you instead of Marc V.01/04/2022: FOR HEARING:We'll look to review a variance request for the next submittal
pertaining to the street design for Brookfield and Precision with respect to the inset parking and sidewalk/parkway design. I am initially in support of the variance, but would want
to verify if there are concerns from a utility or forestry perspective.Comment Number: 6Comment Originated: 05/19/202205/19/2022: FOR FINAL:For sight distance purposes, all shrubs
and grasses in parkways must have a mature height of two feet or less. Please confirm the mature height of the shrubs and grasses to be planted in the parkways. Trees are okay as long
as there are no branches in the first six feet above ground when the tree reaches its mature height.The tree lawn will be manicured sod and when shrub beds are used all material is a
maximum height of 18”. A note has been added to the plans that tress within the parkway should be installed at the 6-foot clearance.Comment Number: 7Comment Originated: 05/19/202205/19/2022:
FOR FINAL:The Existing Conditions and Demolition Plan should show street cuts for proposed utility stubs. Similarly, the Horizontal Control Plan should show asphalt patching over street
cuts.Street cuts are now shown on existing conditions and horizontal control plan for patchingComment Number: 8Comment Originated: 05/19/202205/19/2022: FOR HEARING:The Utility Plans
indicate a 10foot utility easement running through the southwest portion of the property. Please show this easement on the plat. Is this an existing or proposed easement?Not entirely
sure what 10’ UE you are refereeing to. However, all 10’ UE shown on the plat are proposed and the plat now matches the utility plans. There are several small bump outs along the 9’
UE that is adjacent to the ROW and these are for the curb stops and they are shown on the plat. Comment Number: 9Comment Originated: 05/20/202205/20/2022: FOR FINAL:Please add a line
type for existing curb and gutter to the legend on Sheet HC1.Existing C&G added to legend.Comment Number: 10Comment Originated: 05/20/202205/20/2022: INFORMATION ONLY:Thank you for
submitting a variance request for driveway spacing on Cinquefoil Lane. This variance request has been approved by the City Engineer on May 20, 2022.We are no longer seeking this variance
because this entrance has been removed.Comment Number: 11Comment Originated: 05/20/202205/20/2022: FOR FINAL:In the utility set for FDP, please include standard details for improvements,
including but not limited to enhanced concrete paving, sidewalk chase, ramps, and types of curb and gutter, as applicable.All details will be provided at first round FDP.Comment Number:
12Comment Originated: 05/20/202205/20/2022: FOR HEARING:The proposed driveway onto Brookfield Drive is 128 feet from the intersection of Brookfield Drive and Precision Drive. This
is less than the 150foot minimum per LCUASS Table 73. However, Engineering recognizes that this driveway is located directly across from an alley, and we will support the location of
the proposed driveway. Please submit a variance request so that Engineering can formally approve the location of this driveway.Variance has been supplied and noted on general notes sheetComment
Number: 13Comment Originated: 05/23/202205/23/2022: FOR FINAL:Electric lines along Brookfield Drive and Precision Drive are proposed under the inset parking areas. These electric
lines will need to be installed before curb and gutter. The construction timing will be specified in the Development Agreement.Electric lines will be installed before curb and gutter.Comment
Number: 14Comment Originated: 05/23/202205/23/2022: FOR HEARING:Thank you for showing proposed street crosssections on the cover sheet of the Utility Plans. Please update these crosssections
to indicate that the 6foot parkway and 4.5foot sidewalk are existing conditions on the south side of Precision Drive and Brookfield Drive. This will help to clarify that this side of
the crosssection is not part of the proposed variance from the current LCUASS crosssection. I would like this to be as clear as possible for members of the Planning and Zoning Commission.Cross-section
on cover sheet has been updated.Comment Number: 15Comment Originated: 05/24/202205/24/2022: FOR HEARING:The existing rightofway for Cinquefoil Lane is 72.5 feet, so after rightofway
dedication by The Savoy, the rightofway will be 76.5 feet. Please update the Cinquefoil crosssection on the utility plan cover sheet to reflect this rightofway total, and please doublecheck
the existing widths of the west sidewalk and parkway and the roadway striping. As long as you are very clear that the only thing being proposed is the east sidewalk and parkway per current
LCUASS, you will not need a variance request for the Cinquefoil crosssection.Cross-section has been updated. We are very clear throughout the plan set that we are only improving the
area directly east of the back of curb on Cinquefoil to meet LCUASS standards. This includes the 8.5’ parkway and 5’ walk as shown on the site plan and horizontal control plan. Department:
Traffic OperationContact: Spencer Smith, 9702216820, smsmith@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 5Comment Originated: 05/24/202205/24/2022: FINAL PLANInclude all variances
that are approved in the list of variances on the notes sheet of the utility plans.Variances are listed on notes sheet. (Note 48 under General Notes)Comment Number: 6Comment Originated:
05/24/202205/24/2022: INFORMATION ONLYThe analysis and conclusions of the TIS have been accepted. Be sure to submit a stamped and signed final pdf version with the rest of the plans
for mylar/recording.TIS report revised again to reflect the loss of the entrance off Cinquefoil. This entrance was removed because we needed additional parking spots. Department: Stormwater
EngineeringContact: Matt Simpson, (970) 4162754, Civil Engineer IIITopic: GeneralComment Number: 6Comment Originated: 01/04/202205/19/2022: 01/04/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:For
the new outfall to the “ODP Pond” (northeast of the site), a maintenance agreement for the maintenance of the pond between private property owners will be required for approval. This
will be referenced in the DACoordination with private property owner will commence at FDP Round 1. Comment Number: 12Comment Originated: 01/04/202205/19/2022: FOR HEARING – UPDATED:Please
see the round 2 redlines of the Landscape plan, there are numerous locations where additional separation needs to be provided to water services, fire service lines, or storm drains.01/04/2022:
FOR HEARING:Please review redline comments on the Landscape Plans. There are several locations that trees or shrubs do not provide the minimum separation to storm lines or facilities.
For reference:provide 10ft (min.) from trees to all storm drain mains and storm facilitiesprovide 6ft (min.) from trees and 4ft from shrubs to private storm laterals.Trees and shrubs
have been adjusted to meet the minimum separation requirements. Additionally, a note has been added to the plans in the event that as built field conditions vary from the plan set.Comment
Number: 14Comment Originated: 01/04/202205/19/2022: 01/04/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN:Hydraulic calculations for the storm mains will be required with FDP round 1.Hydraulic calculations
will be included in FDP Round 1.Comment Number: 16Comment Originated: 05/19/202205/19/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN:Check that the easements on the Plat match the Utility Plan. Also see the
redlines of UT Plan and Plat for comments on easements.Plat and Utility Plans match. Redlines on plans and plat have been addressed and comment responses to those redlines have been
included with PDP Rnd 3.Comment Number: 17Comment Originated: 05/19/202205/19/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN:Please note in the drainage report the depth to groundwater. I understand from
the geotech report that it is quite deep, however this should be noted in the drainage report.Depth to groundwater now included in Section I.B.5 of the drainage report. Comment Number:
18Comment Originated: 05/19/202205/19/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN:See redlines for additional comments for FDP.Most of redlines have been addressed. If redlines were not revised reasoning
was provided in redline responses. Department: WaterWastewater EngineeringContact: Matt Simpson, (970) 4162754, Civil Engineer IIITopic: GeneralComment Number: 2Comment Originated:
01/04/202205/19/2022: FOR HEARING – UPDATED:Please review the easement widths around the water mains. The utility easement must extend a minimum of 10feet each side of the water main.Easement
has been revised per redlines. 30’ wide now.01/04/2022: FOR HEARING:Water mains not located in ROW require a 20ft easement (min.) centered on the main. There are some locations where
the proposed utility easement does not provide 10ft on each side of the water main. Please review and update the proposed utility easement.Comment Number: 5Comment Originated: 01/04/202205/19/2022:
FOR HEARING – UPDATED:Please see the round 2 redlines of the Landscape plan, there are numerous locations where additional separation needs to be provided to water services, fire service
lines, or storm drains.01/04/2022: FOR HEARING:Please review redline comments on the Landscape Plans. There are many locations that trees or shrubs do not provide the minimum separation
to water lines or services. For reference:provide 10ft (min.) between trees and water mains or fire hydrantsprovide 4ft (min) between shrubs or other landscaping elements and fire hydrants.Provide
10ft (min) between trees and water services and metersProvide 4ft (min) between shrubs and water services and metersPlease review the Fort Collins Water and Wastewater design criteria
manual for separation requirements:https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/buildersanddevelopers/developmentformsguidelinesregulations/Comment Number: 7Comment Originated: 01/04/202201/04/2022:
FOR INFORMATION ONLY:This site is in the South Fort Collins Sanitation District for sewer. Please review this site plan with SFCSD to confirm sewer servicing approach.SFCSD redlines
were addressed but most of them are for first round final (i.e. profiles and sizing)Comment Number: 8Comment Originated: 01/04/202205/19/2022: 01/04/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN:For FDP
the existing water main along Le Fever drive will need to be pothole located and shown on the street profile.Potholes will be ordered once we are approved to go to hearing.Comment Number:
9Comment Originated: 01/04/202205/19/2022: 01/04/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN:Water service sizing calculations for each water service and summary memo are due at FDP round 1.Water service
sizing calculations will be supplied at FDP Round 1Comment Number: 10Comment Originated: 01/04/202205/19/2022: 01/04/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN:Irrigation Water Service and Irrigation
Plan Requirements:The first FDP submittal will need to include the following items. These are required as a result of recent changes to Fort Collins Utilities Water Supply Requirements
(WSR) and Plant Investment Fees (PIF) code. Please ensure the FDP project submittal includes:Preliminary Irrigation Plan (PIP) – plan requirements can be found at: www.fcgov.com/WCS.Please
contact Eric Olson (eolson@fcgov.com or 9702216704) with questions regarding the required PIP.Water budget (annual usage) and peak flow (gallons per minute) for each irrigation service.
Note: this information should be included on the PIP.Landscape Plan including hydrozone table updated with 2022 values – 3, 8, 14, and 18 gallons/square foot/year for very low, low,
medium, and high zones, respectively.Water Need Form – form should be available soon. Please contact Utility Fee and Rate Specialists (UtilityFees@fcgov.com or 9704164252) with questions
regarding the Water Need Form.Irrigation service(s), including curb stop and meter location, shown on the Utility and Site Plans. Irrigation service location(s) must match information
on the PIP.On Oct. 5, 2021, Council adopted changes to Fort Collins Utilities Water Supply Requirements and Plant Investment Fees. In general developments that use more water may pay
more and developments that use less water may pay less. These changes are to be implemented 1/1/2022; more information can be found at: www.fcgov.com/wsrupdateAcknowledged, irrigation
plans will be provided at time of final plans.Comment Number: 11Comment Originated: 05/19/202205/19/2022: FOR FINAL PLAN:See redlines for additional comments for FDP.Most of redlines
have been addressed. If redline was not revised reasoning was provided in redline responses. Department: Light And PowerContact: Cody Snowdon, 9704162306, csnowdon@fcgov.comTopic:
GeneralComment Number: 3Comment Originated: 01/04/202205/24/2022: FOR HEARING:Please see redlined Utility Plan for revised streetlight locations.Streetlights and vaults added/removed
per redlines. The site layout changed slightly but I still went with the redlines.01/04/2022: FOR APPROVAL:Streetlights will need to be installed within the parkway along all public
rightofway. A 40 feet separation on both sides of the light is required between canopy trees and streetlights. A 15 feet separation on both sides of the light is required between ornamental
trees and streetlights. Please coordinate the light placement with Light & Power. A link to the City of Fort Collins street lighting requirements can be found below:https://www.larimer.org/sites/default/files/ch15_2007.pdfWe
will continue to refine our separations as we move through final design.Comment Number: 10Comment Originated: 01/04/202201/04/2022: FOR FINAL:This project will need to comply with
our electric metering standards. Electric meter locations will need to be coordinated with Light and Power Engineering. Residential units will need to be individually metered. Please
gang the electric meters on one side of the building, opposite of the gas meters. Reference Section 8 of our Electric Service Standards for electric metering standards. A link has been
provided below.https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/img/site_specific/uploads/ElectricServiceStandards_FINAL_18November2016_Amendment.pdfComment acknowledged Comment Number: 11Comment Originated:
01/04/202201/04/2022: FOR FINAL:A commercial service information form (C1 form) and a OneLine Diagram for all Commercial & MultiFamily meters will need to be completed and submitted
to Light & Power Engineering for review prior to Final Plan. A link to the C1 form is below:http://zeus.fcgov.com/utilsprocedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C1Form.pdfComment acknowledged
Comment Number: 12Comment Originated: 01/04/202201/04/2022: FOR FINAL:On the OneLine Diagram, please show the main disconnect size and meter sequencing. A copy of our meter sequencing
can be found in our electric policies practices and procedures below.http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/buildersanddevelopers/developmentformsguidelinesregulationsComment acknowledged
Comment Number: 13Comment Originated: 01/04/202201/04/2022: FOR INFORMATION:Electric capacity fees, development fees, building site charges and any system modification charges necessary
to feed the site will apply to this development. Please contact me or visit the following website for an estimate of charges and fees related to this project:http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/buildersanddevelopers/plantinvestmentdevelopmentfeesAcknowledged
Comment Number: 14Comment Originated: 01/04/202201/04/2022: FOR INFORMATION:Please reference our policies, construction practices, development charge processes, electric services
standards, and fee estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/buildersanddevelopers.Acknowledged Comment Number: 15Comment Originated: 05/24/202205/24/2022: FOR FINAL:Please
see redlines for revised electrical layout.Electrical layout has been revised per redlines. Comment responses to redlines have been included with PDP round 3 submittal.Department: Environmental
PlanningContact: Scott Benton, (970)4164290, sbenton@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 1Comment Originated: 01/03/202205/23/2022: FOR HEARING: My apologies for not catching
this in the first round of review, but there is an active prairie dog colony on the site. In Fort Collins, prairie dog colonies one (1) acre or greater in size are considered special
habitat features (see LUC 5.1 Definitions). In addition, the Land Use Code requires that any prairie dogs inhabiting a site must be relocated or humanely eradicated prior to development
activities [LUC 3.4.1(N)(6)]. Mitigation options are based from onsite assessment and include but are not limited to: active relocation; passive relocation; trap and donate; and paymentinlieu.
Regarding black tailed prairie dogs and the project site:a. City Land Use Code requires that for any prairie dogs inhabiting a project site, prior to any site construction work, the
animals must be removed either through relocation or humane eradication. Relocation is the City's first preference, followed by trap and donate.b. If this project proceeds in the development
review process, at least a concept prairie dog removal plan will be needed prior to Hearing. c. Should this project achieve approval and proceed to construction, a burrowing owl survey,
in accordance with Colorado Parks and Wildlife standards shall be provided prior to any prairie dog removal and prior to issuance of Development Construction Permit (DCP). The survey
must be completed by a qualified wildlife biologist. d. Should this project achieve approval and proceed to construction, documentation needs to be provided prior to issuance of DCP
(at least one week prior to DCP meeting is ideal) regarding the burrowing owl survey and the relocation of black tailed prairie dogs. Documentation should be in the form of a signed
letter or memo from the wildlife biologist for the survey, and from the contractor(s) for the relocation (date, time, methods).
The availability of relocation sites for prairie dogs was evaluated by ERO in late April 2022. At that time, no relocation sites were available. In light of the lack of relocation
sites, the landowner made the decision to humanely euthanize the prairie dogs in accordance with the Fort Collins Land Use Code LUC 3.4.1(N)(6)
On July 19, 2022, ERO was notifed that the Pueblo site would be available for relocations starting on August 1, 2022.Comment Number: 2Comment Originated: 05/23/202205/23/2022: FOR
HEARING: A local resident reached out Prairie Protection Colorado regarding the prairie dogs on site, and that organization is aware of a unique relocation opportunity. The US Fish and
Wildlife Service is accepting prairie dogs in order to establish a colony large enough to support blackfooted ferrets near Pueblo, and will be providing a transfer center as well. Please
provide proof of coordination with Prairie Protection Colorado regarding organization of an active relocation. Reach out to Deanna Meyer at prairieprotectioncolorado@gmail.com or at
7204878057.Phone logs for prairie dog relocation sites have been provided with this submittal.Comment Number: 3Comment Originated: 05/23/202205/23/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: All exterior
lighting must have a correlated color temperature of 3000K or less to meet the requirements of LUC3.2.4.The photometric plan has been updated to demonstrate compliance with the specifications
listed aboveDepartment: ForestryContacts: Molly Roche, mroche@fcgov.com(Note: Molly’s last day with the City is 06/01/2022)Carrie Tomlinson, ctomlinson@fcgov.com Christine
Holtz, choltz@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 4Comment Originated: 12/20/20215/20/22: FOR APPROVALThis has not been done. Please include species diversity percentages in the
plant list.122021: FOR HEARINGPlease include species diversity percentages in the plant list.Species diversity percentages has been added to the plant list2/16/2021: INFORMATION ONLY
FOR PDP LUC standard for Tree Species Diversity states that in order to prevent insect or disease susceptibility and eventual uniform senescence on a development site or in the adjacent
area or the district, species diversity is required and extensive monocultures are prohibited. The following minimum requirements shall apply to any development plan:Number of trees
on siteMaximum percentage of any one species101950%203933%405925%60 or more15%The City of Fort Collins’ urban forest has reached the maximum percentage of the following species. Ash
(Fraxinus), Honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthose: ‘Shademaster’, ‘Skyline’, etc), Bur Oak (Quercus macrocarpa), and Chanticleer Pear (Pyrus calleryana). Please note that additional species
might join this list as we work through the review process.Acknowledged, tree species have been coordinated with City Forestry staff. Comment Number: 11Comment Originated: 12/20/20215/20/2022:
INFORMATION ONLYThank you for updating the tree calipers to 2.0” B&B. This is our standard noted in the Land Use Code. Trees larger than 2.0” caliper will not only be very difficult
to find in nursery stock, but they also take longer to establish. Thank you!You’re welcome!12/20/2021: FOR HEARINGPlease update all canopy shade tree calipers to 2.0” caliper B&B.Comment
Number: 12Comment Originated: 12/20/20215/20/2022: FOR APPROVALContinued:No Armstrong Gold Maple – red maples do not do well in FC soils. Substitute Crimson Spire Oak, Regal Prince
Oak, Scarlet Letter Oak (for upright, fall color). Please specify very limited quantities of Shangtung Maple. They are not planted very often in Fort Collins so we don’t know how well
they perform. Please do not propose Norwegian Sunset Maple since they are half Shantung and half Norway maple. Norway maples do not grow well in Fort Collins.Please use fewer number
of Eastern Redbuds and place them in very protected areas.12/20/2021: FOR HEARINGPlease do not propose the following species on this landscape plan. They do not thrive long term in Fort
Collins:Skymaster English Oak – sub with Shumard, Texas Red, or Chinkapin OakRedpointe Maple sub with Green Mountain or Fall Fiesta Sugar MapleCoralburst Crabapple – sub with Thunderchild
CrabappleNew Horizon Elm – sub with Choice City ElmAcknowledged, tree species have been coordinate with City Forestry staff.Comment Number: 13Comment Originated: 12/20/20215/23/2022:
FOR APPROVALContinued:Forestry requires 10ft separation between street trees and underground electric vaults. We are okay with closer spacing on private property, however after a conversation
with Light and Power, they prefer additional spacing between trees and transformers as well. If it is feasible to achieve 10ft spacing between trees and transformers/vaults on private
property that is the preference from both Forestry and Light & Power. Thank you!12/20/2021: FOR HEARINGPlease review Forestry redlines and adjust tree/utility locations in order to meet
required separation distances. *Please note that not all utility conflicts have been labeled but are redlined/identified to the best of my ability. Tree utility conflicts should be adjusted
each round if necessary. 10’ between trees and electric utilities, public water, sanitary, and storm sewer main lines4’ between trees and gas lines10’ between trees and electric transformersTrees
and shrubs have been adjusted to meet the minimum separation requirements. Additionally, a note has been added to the plans in the event that as built field conditions vary from the
plan set.Comment Number: 14Comment Originated: 12/20/20215/23/2022: FOR APPROVALContinued:Please do not propose upright, deciduous trees in the City of right of way. These may be placed
on private property, however they will grow too wide for the public right of way setting. Thank you!122021 FOR HEARINGPlease show all canopy shade trees in the right of way. There are
several ornamentals proposed in the ROW on sheet L4. Please provide 3040ft spacing between shade trees. Ornamentals are acceptable to squeeze in an extra tree closer to a street light
or if significant utility conflicts are present and prevent full tree stocking in the right of way. In general, shade trees provide more environmental benefits and are easier to maintain
long term. Thank you for making this change!All ornamental trees have been removed from the city right-of-way with the exception of one Crimson Spire Oak located in an eight foot tree
lawn signifying the entrance to the pedestrian spine walkway. A large canopy shade tree will not fit in this location due to a streetlight and utility connections. We can work with city
staff to find an appropriate substitute or remove the tree at time of final plans.Comment Number: 15Comment Originated: 12/20/20215/24/22: FOR APPROVALContinued through final plan.12/20/21:
INFORMATION ONLYFinal species counts will be performed during FDP.Acknowledged Comment Number: 16Comment Originated: 12/20/20215/23/22: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Continued through final
plan.12/20/21: INFORMATION ONLYForestry will provide Development Agreement language (if appliable) to the CityEngineer during FDP.AcknowledgedComment Number: 17Comment Originated:
05/24/20225/23/22: FOR APPROVALThere are a few streetlight locations that are too close to canopy shade trees. Forestry would like to keep the canopy shade trees in lieu of swapping
them for ornamental trees, so if it is possible to accommodate 40ft spacing between trees and streetlights that is preferred. Light and Power will provide updated light locations which
may conflict with current street tree layout. Applicant should coordinate light location and tree adjustments with Forestry and Light and Power through the next rounds of review.As we
continue to coordinate with City Light and Power we will continue to refine our separation to make sure we can, to the best of our ability, incorporate as many canopy shade trees as
possible.Comment Number: 18Comment Originated: 05/24/20225/23/2022: FOR APPROVALThere are several locations onsite where trees are too close to the roof drain utilities. Please provide
6ft separation between this utility and trees. Locations in conflict noted on redlines.Trees and shrubs have been adjusted to meet the minimum separation requirements. Additionally,
a note has been added to the plans if as built field conditions vary from the plan set.Department: ParksContact: Aaron Wagner, , aawagner@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number:
1Comment Originated: 05/24/202205/24/2022: FOR INFORMATION:Parks Department Planning staff can help with any questions you may have regarding these comments. Please contact Jill
Wuertz (jwuertz@fcgov.com), 9704162062, or Parks Planning Technician, Aaron Wagner (aawagner@fcgov.com) 9706820344, 413 S. Bryan Ave, Fort Collins, CO 80521 regarding the Parks’ Department’s
interest.Acknowledged Comment Number: 2Comment Originated: 05/24/202205/24/2022: FOR INFORMATION:The Parks Dept. is NOT anticipating taking over the streetscape/tree lawn along the
development frontage. Please provide irrigation, maintenance, and other services to keep this area in keeping with the Fort Collins Streetscape Standards.Acknowledged Department: PFAContact:
Marcus Glasgow, 9704162869, marcus.glasgow@poudrefire.orgTopic: GeneralComment Number: 2Comment Originated: 12/20/202105/24/2022: UPDATED FOR HEARINGThe updated exhibit still
has some overhang into parking spaces and into the trash enclosure. Exhibit has been updated and no overhangs. All residential buildings front a public ROW now so no 26’ drive aisle
is needed internal to the site. The clubhouse is only 1 story tall. Please note that the trash enclosure doors are shown as open in the drawings but they will be closed 99.9% of the
time. Additional exhibits will be supplied if requested. 03/18/2022: UPDATED FOR HEARINGThe provided turning exhibit shows overhang into the parking areas. The outside turning radius
of some corners are less than 50 feet which might be causing the overhang.12/20/2021: FOR HEARINGTURNING RADII IFC 503.2.4 and Local Amendments: The required turning radii of a fire
apparatus access road shall be a minimum of 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside.All corners appear to be less than the required minimum turning radius. The North entrance median might
make turns difficult without overhang. I would suggest modifying the median or remove.Comment Number: 3Comment Originated: 12/20/202103/18/2022: UPDATED FOR FINALIf the street is
used for aerial access, the street trees should include a species that will minimally interfere with aerial operations. ROW plantings follow City of Forestry requirements.12/20/2021:
FOR FINALLANDSCAPE PLAN: The proposed Landscape Plan indicates that tree canopy diameters may encroach on the fire lane over time. PFA would like to ensure the integrity of the EAE
remains intact as trees mature and a canopy develops. The EAE shall be maintained unobstructed to 14' in height. This comment is aimed at preserving both trees and fire apparatus. Please
be mindful when selecting tree species.Acknowledged. Upright canopy trees have been utilized to keep the EAE free of tree limbsComment Number: 10Comment Originated: 12/20/202103/18/2022:
UPDATED FOR FINALPlease add sign detail at final plans. Sign detail will be added at final. However, the horizontal control plan does show the detail now.12/20/2021: FOR FINALFIRE
LANE SIGNS The limits of the fire lane shall be fully defined. Fire lane sign locations should be indicated on future plan sets. Refer to LCUASS detail #1418 & #1419 for sign type, placement,
and spacing. Appropriate directional arrows required on all signs. Posting of additional fire lane signage may be determined at time of fire inspection. Code language provided below.
IFC D103.6: Where required by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING FIRE LANE signs complying with Figure D103.6. Signs shall
have a minimum dimension of 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and have red letters on a white reflective background. Signs shall be posted on one or both sides of the fire apparatus road
as required by Section D103.6.1 or D103.6.2.Fire lane signs are shown on the horizontal control plan now. Will continue to refine locations as we move through final design and development.Department:
Internal ServicesContact: Russell Hovland, 9704162341, rhovland@fcgov.comTopic: Building Insp Plan ReviewComment Number: 1Comment Originated: 01/10/202201/10/2022: Construction
shall comply with adopted codes as amended. Current adopted codes are:2018 International Building Code (IBC) with local amendments2018 International Existing Building Code (IEBC) with
local amendments2018 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) with local amendments2018 International Mechanical Code (IMC) with local amendments2018 International Fuel Gas Code
(IFGC) with local amendments2018 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code (ISPSC) with local amendments2018 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado2020
National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of ColoradoCopies of current City of Fort Collins code amendments can be found at fcgov.com/building.Important: Fort Collins will
be adopting the new 2021 Building Codes in March 2022.Accessibility: State Law CRS 95 & ICC/ANSI A117.12017.Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF.Frost Depth: 30 inches.Wind
Loads: Risk Category II (most structures):· 140mph (Ultimate) exposure B or· Front Range Gust Map published by The Structural Engineer's Association of Seismic Design: Category B.Climate
Zone: Zone 5Energy Code: · Multifamily and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2018 IECC residential chapter.· Commercial and Multifamily 4 stories and taller: 2018 IECC commercial chapter.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: · 10% of all parking spaces must be EV ready (conduit in place)· This building is located within 250ft of a 4 lane road or 1000 ft of an active railway, must provide
exterior composite sound transmission of 39 STC min.· R2 occupancies must provide 10ft setback from property line and 20 feet between other buildings or provide fire rated walls and
openings per chapter 6 and 7 of the IBC.· City of Fort Collins amendments to the 2018 IBC require a full NFPA13 sprinkler system in multifamily units with an exception to allow NFPA
13R systems in buildings with no more than 6 dwelling units (or no more than 12 dwelling units where the building is divided by a 2 hour fire barrier with no more than 6 dwelling units
on each side).· Bedroom egress windows required below 4th floor regardless of firesprinkler. All egress windows above the 1st floor require minimum sill height of 24”.· Prescriptive
energy compliance with increased insulation values is required for buildings using electric heat.· A City licensed commercial general contractor is required to construct any new multifamily
structure.Stock Plans:When residential buildings will be built at least three times with limited variations, a stock plan design or master plan can be submitted for a single review and
then built multiple times with site specific permits. More information can be found in our Stock Plan Guide at fcgov.com/building/resrequirements.php.Building Permit PreSubmittal Meeting:
Please schedule a presubmittal meeting with Building Services for this project. PreSubmittal meetings assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in thedesign, that the new projects
are on track to complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards listed above. The proposed project should be in the early to middesign stage for this meeting to be effective.
Applicants of new projects should work with their Development Review Coordinator to schedule a presubmittal meeting, prior to FDP submittal.Comment acknowledged Department: Technical
ServicesContact: Jeff County, 9702216588, jcounty@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 3Comment Originated: 01/04/202205/20/2022: INFORMATION ONLY:Unless required during PDP,
a complete review of all plans will be done at FDP.Acknowledged 01/04/2022: INFORMATION ONLY:Unless required during PDP, a complete review of all plans will be done at FDP.Topic: PlatComment
Number: 2Comment Originated: 01/04/202205/20/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVALUPDATED:Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written
response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. If you have any specific questions about the redlines, please contact
John Von Nieda at 9702216565 or jvonnieda@fcgov.com01/04/2022: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide
written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. If you have any specific questions about the redlines, please
contact John Von Nieda at 9702216565 or jvonnieda@fcgov.comChanges were made and response to redlines are included with this PDP round 3 submittalDepartment: Outside AgenciesContact:
Todd Sullivan, 9702216695, tsullivan@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralFort Collins Loveland Water District –Development Review, DevelopmentReview@fclwd.comPlease see the redlines provided.
Although they are made on the original Round 2 submittal, they are still applicable in general. All items noted can be addressed in Final Plan.SFCSD redlines were addressed. Redlines
with responses have been included with this PDP round 3 submittal.Century Link John Nutini, John.Nutini@lumen.comI will be the CenturyLink account manager for The Savoy project. Please
add me to your distribution list for future communications.Larimer County Assessor Megan Harrity, mharrity@larimer.orgI noticed that we show a prior ROW having been taken from this
TRACT A, BROOKFIELD REPLAT, FTC (20060078300); LESS ROW PER 20140016786;I have attached a copy of the deed of dedication at recptn# 20140016786 for your review. I didn't see any reference
to this ROW lessed out in the preliminary plat for The Savoy.Maybe the ROW was vacated at some point?ROW is being vacated with this Plat and rededicated to meet current LUCASS standards.Does
Northern need to coordinate with Xcel or is it better for you to handle that coordination?Department: Water ConservationContact: Eric Olson, 9702216704, eolson@fcgov.comTopic:
GeneralComment Number: 1Comment Originated: 04/27/202204/27/2022: Preliminary irrigation plans (PIP) are required for review at Final Development Plan (FDP), prior to issuance of
building permit. The requirements for the PIP must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to
irrigationdr@fcgov.com or Eric Olson eolson@fcgov.comAcknowledged