Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPOUDRE PLAINS SUBDIVISION - PRELIMINARY - 72-87 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - STREET RELATED DOCUMENT • REPORT OF A PAVEMENT DESIGN FOR • POUDRE PLAINS SUBDIVISION FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MR. JIM SABIN TIMNATH, COLORADO PROJECT NO. 7321-87 BY EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. 301 NORTH HOWES STREET FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80521 4110 • TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Letter of Transmittal Report 1 Appendix A i A-1 Test Boring Location Plan A-2 Key to Borings A-3 Log of Borings A-4 Appendix B B-1 Hveem Stabilometer Data B-2 Summary of Test Results B-3 Appendix C C-1 0 . • • . • Empire Laboratories, Inc. - - P.O.Box 503 • (303)484-0359 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING&MATERIALS TESTING 301 No.Howes • Fort Collins,Colorado 80522 December 16, 1987 Mr. Jim Sabin P. O. Box 125 Timnath, Colorado 80547 Dear Mr. Sabin: We are pleased to submit our Report of a Pavement Design prepared for the Poudre Plains Subdivision located on West Vine Drive in northwest Fort Collins,. Colorado. , The accompanying report presents our findings in the subsurface and our recommendations for pavement design based upon these findings. Very truly yours, ; EMPIRE LABORA RIES, INC. -,5�� �",'r,i i; .''e,, rx,-• 2370 ,', i V , ci g ,, 'i ,i, 4jTC, CPC( / :1—•. 1, ii...:..1 Senior Engineering Geologist Fy�...,,,• -;; ,> / E/(R . C.,.„, Reviewed by: .,%%. ar '''.f.4:://:::40..e.........2d, ...t:::.•\>.,,,...,.. •... li, ..4.• Chester C. Smith P.E. :" o President • 4808 }' fs.'e ?, ';o'''* CIO. • '• jT , cc: Stewart & Associates Mr. Dick RI th rford p� Branch Offices oar vi Z. P.O.Box 1135 P.O.Box 1744 P.O.Box 10076 Longmont,Colorado 80502 Greeley,Colorado 80632 Cheyenne,Wyoming 82003 �� �? (303)776-3921 (303)351-0460 (307)632 9224 Member of Consulting Engineers Council Afie I 4 a :1 ii REPORT OF A . PAVEMENT DESIGN SCOPE This report presents the results of a pavement design prepared for Poudre Court, North Briarwood Road and the widening of West Vine Drive in the Poudre Plains Subdivision in northwest Fort Collins, Colorado. The scope of the project included test borings and laboratory testing of samples obtained from these borings. The objectives of this study were to (1) determine the soil and ground water conditions at the site, (2) develop criteria for determining pavement design, and (3) make recommendations regarding pavement types and thicknesses for the proposed streets to be constructed at the site. SITE EXPLORATION The field exploration, carried out on December 7, 1987, consisted of drilling, logging, and sampling two (2) test borings. The locations of the test borings are shown on the Test Boring Location Plan included in Appendix A of this report. Boring logs prepared from the field logs are shown in Appendix A. These logs show soils encountered, location of sampling, and ground water at the time of the exploration. The borings were advanced with a four-inch diameter, ..continuous-type, power-flight auger drill. During the drilling operation, a field engineer from Empire Laboratories, Inc. was present and made continuous observations of the soils encountered. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The proposed site is located on West Vine Drive west of Taft Hill Road in northwest Fort Collins, Colorado. More particularly, the site is described as Poudre Plains Subdivision, a tract of land situate in the -1 Northeast 1 /4 of Section 9, Township 7 North, Range 68 West of the Sixth P.M. , Larimer County, Colorado. The site consists of an open field vegetated with grass and weeds. The property is relatively flat and has minor drainage to the south. Small irrigation laterals traverse the site from northwest to the southeast. An existing church is located to the east, residences to the west and open areas to the south. The property is bordered on the north by West. Vine Drive. LABORATORY TESTS AND EVALUATION Samples obtained from the test borings were subjected to testing in the laboratory to provide a sound basis for evaluating the physical properties of the soils encountered. Moisture contents, dry unit weights, laboratory resistivity, pH, sulfides, oxidation-reduction potential, pH, and the Atterberg limits were determined. A summary of the test results is included in Appendix B. A Hveem stabilometer test was run to determine the "R" value of representative subgrade material at the site, and a curve showing this,data is included in Appendix B. SOIL AND GROUND WATER CONDITIONS The soil profile at the site consists of strata of materials arranged in different combinations. In order of increasing depths, they are as follows: (1 ) Topsoil: The area tested is overlain by a one (1) foot layer of silty topsoil. The upper six (6) inches of the topsoil has been penetrated by root growth and organic matter and should not be used as a roadway subgrade. It is recommended that the topsoil be stripped and stockpiled for reuse in planted areas or wasted from the site. (2) Sandy and/or Sandy Gravelly Silty Clay: This stratum underlies the topsoil and extends to the sand and gravel below -2- 0 and/or the depths explored. The silty clay contains varying amounts of silt and/or gravel, is moderately plastic, and is dry to damp in situ. When wetted, the clay stratum exhibits low subgrade bearing characteristics. (3). Clayey Sand and Gravel: A layer of clayey sand and gravel underlies the sandy silty clay in Boring 1 at a depth of five and one-half (5-1 /2) feet-below the surface and extends beyond the depths explored. The sand and gravel contains varying amounts of clay, is poorly graded, and is medium dense. (4) Ground Water: At the time of the investigation, no free ground water was encountered at the site to the depths explored. Water levels in this area are subject to change due to seasonal variations and irrigation demands on and/or adjacent to the site. -RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISCUSSION It is our understanding that Poudre Court and North Briarwood Road to be constructed at the site are residential streets. West Vine Drive, which is to be widened adjacent to the project area, is classified as an arterial street by the City of Fort Collins. Site Grading and Utilities_. • It is recommended that the upper six (6) inches of topsoil encountered at the site be stripped and stockpiled for reuse in planted areas. The upper six (6) inches of the natural subgrade below should be scarified and recompacted at or wet of optimum moisture to at least ninety-five percent (95$) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. (See Appendix C.) All fill should consist of the on-site soils or imported material having an "R" value of 10 or greater, and this material should be approved by the geotechnical engineer. Any fill placed at the site should be placed in -3- 111 uniform six (6) to eight (8) inch lifts and compacted at or wet of optimum moisture to at least ninety-five percent. (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. The finished subgrade in cut sections below streets should be scarified a minimum of six (6) inches and recompacted at or wet of optimum moisture to at least ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. In areas where subgrade compaction cannot be met due to unstable conditions, ' the subgrade should be stabilized by use of granular pit run or geotextiles. Each successive lift of fill placed on slopes should be benched slightly into existing grade. Utility trenches dug four (4) feet or more into the upper soils should be excavated on safe -and stable slopes in accordance with OSHA regulations, or the excavations should be properly shored. All piping should be adequately bedded for proper load distribution. Backfill placed in utility trenches in open and planted areas should be compacted in uniform Gifts at optimum moisture to at least ninety percent (90%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78 the full depth of the trench. The _upper four (4) feet of backfill placed in utility trenches under streets should be compacted at or near optimum moisture to at least ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78, and the lower portion of these trenches should be compacted to at least ninety percent (90%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. Addition of moisture to and/or drying of the subsoils may be needed for proper compaction. Stripping, grubbing, subgrade preparation, and fill and backfill placement should be accomplished under continuous observation of the geotechnical engineer. Field density tests should be taken daily in the compacted subgrade, fill, and backfill under the direction of the geotechnical engineer. Laboratory resistivity tests, pH, oxidation-reduction and _ sulfide tests performed in the laboratory indicate that the subsoils at the site are noncorrosive, and protection of metal utility pipe, in our opinion, will not be required. -4- 411 Flexible Pavement It is our opinion that flexible pavement is suitable for the proposed street construction at the site. A flexible pavement alternate should consist of asphaltic concrete underlain by crushed aggregate base course or asphaltic concrete underlain by plant mix bituminous base course. Using the City of Fort Collins "Design Criteria and Standards for Streets" dated July 1986, a serviceability index of 2.0 for Poudre Court and North Briarwood Road and 2.5 for West Vine Drive, a regional factor of 1 .0, an "R" value of 10, a twenty ' (20) year design life, eighteen (18) kip equivalent daily load applications of 5 for Poudre Court, 10 for North Briarwood Road and 130 for West Vine Drive, and weighted structural numbers of 2.10 for Poudre Court, 2.35 for North Briarwood Road and 3.70 for West Vine Drive, the following minimum pavement thicknesses are. recommended: Poudre Court Asphaltic Concrete 3" Crushed Aggregate Base Course 7" Total Pavement Thickness 10" Asphaltic Concrete 2" Plant Mix Bituminous Base Course 31" Total Pavement Thickness 51" - North Briarwood Road Asphaltic Concrete 3" Crushed Aggregate Base Course 9" Total Pavement Thickness 12" Asphaltic Concrete 2" Plant Mix Bituminous Base Course 41" Total Pavement Thickness 61" -5- ' * West Vine Drive Asphaltic Concrete 3" Plant Mix Bituminous Base Course 7" Total Pavement Thickness 10" The crushed aggregate base course should meet City of Fort Collins Class 5 or 6 specifications. The subgrade below the proposed asphalt pavement should be prepared in accordance with the recommendations discussed in the "Site Grading and Utilities" section of this report. Upon proper preparation of the subgrade, the subbase and base course should be placed and compacted at optimum moisture to at least ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density ASTM D 698-78. (See Appendix C. ) It is recommended that the asphaltic concrete and/or plant mix bituminous base course be placed in two (2) to three (3) inch lifts. All plant mix bituminous base course and asphaltic concrete shall meet City of Fort Collins specifications and should be placed in accordance with these specifications. The crushed aggregate base course shall have an "R" value of 78 or greater, the plant mix bituminous base course shall have an Rt value of 90 or greater, and the asphaltic concrete shall have an Rt value of 95 or greater. The "R" value of the pavement materials used should be verified by laboratory tests. Field density tests should be taken in the aggregate base course, bituminous base course, and asphaltic concrete under the direction of the geotechnical engineer. Rigid Pavement A feasible pavement alternate at the site would be rigid pavement. Using the eighteen (18) kip •equivalent daily load application described above, a modulus of subgrade reaction of one hundred five (105) pounds per square inch per inch based on an "R" value of 10, a design life of twenty (20) years, and concrete designed with a modulus of rupture of six hundred (600) pounds per square inch, the following minimum pavement thicknesses are recommended: -6- Poudre Court and North Briarwood Road Nonreinforced Concrete - 5" West Vine Drive Nonreinforced Concrete - 7" Subgrade below proposed streets should be prepared in accordance with the recommendations discussed in the "Site Grading and Utilities" section of this report. Concrete pavement should be placed directly on the subgrade that has been uniformly and properly prepared in accordance with the above recommendations. All concrete used in the paving shall meet ASTM specifications, and all aggregate shalt conform to ASTM C-33 specifications. The concrete should be designed with a minimum modulus of rupture of six hundred (600) pounds per square inch in twenty-eight (28) days. It is recommended that laboratory mix designs be done to determine the proper proportions of aggregates, cement, and water necessary to meet these requirements. It is essential that the concrete have a low water-cement ratio, an adequate cement factor, and sufficient quantities of entrained air. Joints should be carefully designed and constructed in accordance with the. City of Fort Collins "Design Criteria and Standards for Streets" to ensure good performance of the pavement. It is recommended that all concrete pavement be placed in accordance with City of Fort Collins specifications. If paving is done during cold weather, acceptable cold weather procedures as outlined in the City specifications should be utilized. The concrete pavement should be properly cured and protected in accordance with the above specifications. Concrete injured by frost should be removed and replaced-. It is recommended that the pavement not be opened to traffic until a flexural strength of four hundred (400) pounds per square inch is obtained or a minimum of fourteen (14) days after the concrete has been placed. GENERAL COMMENTS This report has been prepared to aid in the evaluation of the property and to assist the engineer in the design of this project. In the event that any changes in the street grade or designs are planned, the -7- conclusions and recommendations contained in this report will not be considered valid unless said changes are reviewed and conclusions of this report modified or approved in writing by Empire Laboratories, Inc, the geotechnical engineer of record. Every effort was made to provide comprehensive site coverage through careful locations of the test borings, while keeping the site investigation economically feasible. Variations in soil and ground water conditions between test borings may be encountered during construction. In order to permit correlation between the reported subsurface conditions and the actual conditions encountered. during construction and to aid in carrying out the plans and specifications as originally contemplated, it is recommended that Empire Laboratories, Inc. be retained to perform continuous construction review during the subgrade preparation, fill placement, and paving phases of the work. Empire Laboratories, Inc. assumes no responsibility for compliance with the recommendations included in this report unless they have been retained to perform adequate on-site construction review during the course of subgrade preparation and pavement placement. -8- • • APPENDIX A. 0 TEST BORING LOCATION PLAN t W. vi�J� n N� I CI 0-Ev. = loo.o Igo. ® o • t 11 g ' -- st 1 1 y----- do.Z e poLnIzE. 9Zt s .. _../ [ . '\ 1 i i. • L _ 2 ,,, , . si-f „AI.E..: III= Iq,.01 lr' A-2 EMPIRE LABORATORIES. INC. • • KEY TO BORING LOGS i 00� TOPSOIL • GRAVEL FILL ,• .•' SAND& GRAVEL •/e SILT •i SILTY SAND&GRAVEL i i ,• ,. :ice CLAYEY SILT oo O COBBLES • •i�' SANDY SILT d• SAND,GRAVEL&COBBLES CLAY imin WEATHERED BEDROCK SILTY CLAY SILTSTONE BEDROCK SANDY CLAY aimCLAYSTONE BEDROCK .v '• ' SAND ® SANDSTONE BEDROCK / ••,� SILTY SAND MINE LIMESTONE %. .Fei ■-■ CLAYEY SAND ® GRANITE A SANDY SILTY CLAY a SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE {I STANDARD PENETRATION DRIVE SAMPLER WATER TABLE 24 HOURS AFTER DRILLING r. HOLE CAVED 5/12 Indicates that 5 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches was required to penetrate 12 inches. A-3 _____._ _.._..__ _ FMPIRF I At ORATORIES Illr,. • LOG OF BORINGS E.VArloL1 1-10. 00.0 100 • . • 6/12 95 ' ' • i. 13/12 ; 4/12 3/12 •••• '. •: 3/12 • 7• • 90 37/12 35 IBM, center line West Vine Drive opposite nortfitvest property corner, el eeati on = 100.0' . A-4 EMPIRE LABORATORIES, INC. APPENDIX B. • RESISTANCE R-VALUE AND EXPANSION PRESSURE • OF COMPACTED SOIL ASTM D 2844 • • CLIENT: JIM SABIN PROJECT: POUDRE PLAINS SUBDIVISION • LOCATION OF SAMPLE: BORING 2 COMPOSITE @ 1 . U'-3. 0' • SAMP.LE_.DATA TEST SPECIMEN 1 2 ._ 3 COMPACTION PRESSURE - PSI 80 ' 11.0 130 DENSITY - PCF 105. 6 113. 1 114. 5 MOISTURE - •i. 20. 5 18. 1 17. 2 EXPANSION PRESSURE - PSI 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 HORIZONTAL PRESSURE-0 160 psi 141-. 131 125 SAMPLE HEIGHT - in. 2. 53 2. 44 • 2, 46 EXUDATION PRESSURE PSI 205 380 493 UNCORRECTED R-VALUE 7.7 14. 4 17. 2 CORRECTED R-VALUE 7. 7 14. 0 17. 2 R-VALUE AT 300 .PSI EXUDATION PRESSURE = 10. 6 1.00 1.1 60 P _ p........... ......4.----..-.. x Q4 0 ............ • 100 . 200 300 400 500 800 700 800 • EXUDATION PRESSURE - psi EMPIRE LABORATORIES TORIES INC . o• ° N N N0 N CV N 0 . •` .--1 .--1 -.--1 .--i 1--1 .-1 C O CON CO. - l0 c}' Cr) d CO ...I CO ffi_ c 0 ' _J J $0 U V .. I•-8 i.Q s N. 01 .) V l0 l0 1 1 Q ct a. m CO ov l0 CO u m U) CD m c- U) l0 d •--I • .--I a« l0 O c E-;E N U) Cl) J-) C) C") I-- -J - N V W = 2 CC a V1 tU N GC W 0 I... 1•- y N Q LL cc O 11•w it co >- in to Q CC J Q cc E 6 a Le 014 y .d a. w m CLL it 3U) • r N O. p and N 01 p O _ .--I O U) N CV 01 CO r"-- o" l0 I . 1-. co .-i CD l0 01 a .-r .-4 .--t .-t • «^ CD CD O O O O O CD CD v l~L Cr) N Cr') U) CO Cr) per- 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I O O O O O O O O O O .--I N ct 1",.. • .--t .--t N ^ '--I a) a) 1- a, an a an a 0 .--I 0_ 0. N 0. 0. co0`'2 CO.) N O V) 8-3 Aft SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS Boring Depth Resistivity Oxidation-Reduction No. (Ft. ) (ohm/cm) Potential (mV) Sulfide pH 2 1.0-3.0 3200 163 trace 8.0 B-4 APPENDIX C. APPENDIX C. Suggested Minimum Specifications for Placement of Compacted Earth Fill and/or Backfills GENERAL The geotechnical engineer shall be the owner's, architect's, engineer's or contractor's representative to observe placement of compacted fill and/or backfill on the. project. The geotechnical engineer or his representative shall approve all earth materials prior to their use, the method of placement and the degree of compaction. MATERIALS Soils used for all compacted fill and backfill shall be approved by the geotechnical engineer or his representative prior to their use. Fill material shall be free from organic matter, frozen material and other unsuitable substance and shall not contain rocks or lumps having a diameter greater than six (6) inches. SUBGRADE PREPARATION • All topsoil, vegetation, trees, brush, timber, debris, rubbish and all other unsuitable material shall be removed to a depth satisfactory to the geotechnical engineer or his representative. The material shall be disposed of by suitable means prior to beginning preparation of the subgrade. The subgrade shall be scarified a minimum depth of six (6) inches, moisture conditioned as necessary and compacted in a suitable manner prior to placement of fill material. Fill shall not be placed until approval by the geotechnical engineer or his representative; and in no case, shall fill material be placed on frozen or unstable ground. Subgrade which is not stable may require the use of imported granular material, geotextiles or other methods for stabilization as approved by the geotechnical engineer. FILL PLACEMENT Fill material shall not be placed during unfavorable weather conditions. Material proposed for use as fill shall be approved by the geotechnical engineer or his representative prior to use. Proposed import material shall be approved.... by the geotechnical engineer or his representative prior to hauling to the project site. Fill material shall be • C-2 uniformly mixed such as to preclude the formation of lenses of material differing from the surrounding material. All clods shall be broken into small . pieces. The contractor shall construct the fill in approximately horizontal lifts extending the entire length of the fill. The thickness of the layers before compaction shall not be greater than eight (8) inches. Fill being placed on slopes or hillsides shall be benched into the existing slope. A minimum two (2) foot horizontal bench shall be cut into the existing excavated slope for each four (4) feet vertical of fill, or each lift should be benched slightly into the existing grade. MOISTURE CONTROL Prior to and during compaction operations, the fill material being placed shall be maintained within the range of optimum moisture specified. A general recommendation is to maintain the fill material within two percent (2%) plus or minus of optimum moisture so that proper compaction to the specified density may be obtained with a minimal effort. In building pad and paved areas, material exhibiting swelling potential shall be maintained between optimum moisture and two percent (2%) wet of optimum moisture content. The moisture content of the fill material shall be maintained- uniform throughout the fill. The contractor may be required to add necessary moisture to the fill material and to uniformly mix the water with the fill material if, in the opinion of the geotechnical engineer, it is not possible to obtain uniform moisture content by adding water on the fill surface: If, in the opinion of the geotechnical engineer, the material proposed for use in the compacted fill is too wet to permit adequate compaction, it shall be dried in an acceptable manner prior to placement and compaction. Uniform mixing may require discing, blading or other methods approved by the geotechnical engineer or his representative. Adjustments of moisture content shall be made on the basis of determinations of moisture content by field tests as construction progresses. COMPACTION The contractor shall furnish and operate the necessary types and kinds of equipment to perform -the operations required to obtain the specified compaction. This equipment may include approved tamping rollers, rubber tired rollers, smooth wheeled rollers and vibratory rollers. If a sheepsfoot roller is used, it shall be provided with cleaner bars so attached as to prevent the accumulation of material between the tamper feet. Fill areas which are not accessible to full-sized construction equipment shall be placed in maximum four (4) inch lifts and compacted with power tampers to the specified density. C-3 • Compaction should meet the minimum percentages of maximum density as set forth in the project specifications or the recommendations of the report. The contract specifications supercede the recommendations given in this report. MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP DETERMINATION Samples of representative fill materials to be placed shall be furnished by the contractor to the geotechnical engineer for determination of maximum density and optimum moisture or relative density. Sufficient laboratory moisture density or relative density curves will be made to determine the optimum moisture content and maximum density for the various soils placed as fill. Tests for this determination will be made using the appropriate method conforming to the requirements of ASTM D 698 (Standard Proctor) , ASTM D 1557 (Modified Proctor) or ASTM D 4253, D 4254 (Relative Density). The materials used for fill shall be classified in accordance with ASTM D 2487 in order to permit correlation between the moisture density relationship data and the material being placed and compacted. Copies of the results of these tests will be furnished to the client and others as directed by the client. These test results shall be the basis of control for all compaction effort. FIELD DENSITY AND MOISTURE TESTS The in-place density and moisture content of compacted fill will be determined by the geotechnical engineer or his representative in accordance with ASTM D 1556 (sand cone method) or ASTM D 2922, D 3017 (nuclear methods). Material not meeting the required compaction and/or moisture specifications shall be recompacted and/or moisture conditioned until the required percent compaction and/or moisture content is obtained. Sufficient compaction tests shall be made and submitted to support the geotechnical • engineer's or his representative's recommendations. The results of density tests will also be furnished to the client and others as directed. C-4