Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGATEWAY AT HARMONY ROAD PUD, 3RD FILING, LOTS 1 & 2, M & O TIRE AUTOMOTIVE - PRELIMINARY & FINAL - 1-88G - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTS Comnity Planning and EnvironmentServices • Current Planning Cit of Fort Collins May 19, 1995 Linda Ripley Ripley Associates 223 Jefferson Street, Suite A Fort Collins, CO. 80524 Dear Linda, Staff has reviewed your documents for the M&O Tire & Automotive Service Center P.U.D. (Lots 1 & 2 of the Gateway at Harmony Road P.U.D. , Third Filing) that were submitted to the City on April 24, 1995, and would like to offer the following comments: 1. A copy of the comments received from U.S.West is attached to this letter. 2 . The Landscape Plan must include the standard note about. "landscaping being completed or a deposit for 125% of the estimated cost of landscaping by a letter of credit or other acceptable collateral 11 3 . One additional handicapped parking stall is required, bringing them to a total of 3 spaces. The City can treat both Lots 1 & 2 as one parking lot for this use. 4. The City would like to see landscape islands up at the north end near the store (see enclosed Site Plan forwarded to Ripley Associates) . 5. The subdivision plat needs to describe the "monuments to be set" . 6. What about a utility easement, north to south, across the east side of Lot 3? The plats on either side of this plat have a utility easement in this location. 7. An additional fire hydrant, capable of providing fire flows of 1,500 gallons per minute with 20 pounds per square inch of residual pressure, must be located on the site, at the intersection of Mason Street and Kensington Drive. 8. The comments received from the Water/Wastewater Department are included on a red-lined Landscape Plan forwarded to Ripley Associates and on a set of red-lined utility plans that have been forwarded to Water, Waste & Land. 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6750 FAX (303) 221-6378 • TDD (303) 224-6002 ® ® a 9. The Light & Power Department has the following comments to offer: a. A transformer location will need to be coordinated. It needs to be near a paved surface for access by line trucks; however, it should not be located in a prominent place along the street where it cannot be adequately screened or visually mitigated. b. The shade trees along Mason Street and Kensington Drive will need to conform to the City's street light/street tree standard. c. The 13 .55' wide drainage easement needs to be an "access, drainage, and utility easement" so that Light & Power can get to Lot 3. d. Who is responsible for development charges for the parking lot on Lot 2? A parking lot is considered development and the normal electric development charges will apply. It would appear that M&O Tire & Automotive will be responsible. 10. The Transportation Department would like to have M&O Tire & Automotive put up signage that would control exits from the McDonald's right-in only access from South College Avenue. 11. The Engineering Department has the following comments to offer: a. Site Plan * Delineate approximate detention area. * Provide ramps at the south entrance (or are they existing?) . * Legal description does not agree with the subdivision plat. Please revise accordingly. b. Subdivision Plat • Establish a tie between the basis of bearing (SE corner of Section 35) and the point of beginning. c. Utility Plans. * An off-site easement is needed for drainage discharge to a storm sewer to the east of this property. * Sheet 3 - suggest moving MH D-7 south 20' (+/-) and provide a 45 degree ell in a 15" RCP in lieu of moving the light pole. 4 s , * 410 Title Sheet 1 - number the sheets. - make the title agree with Ithe subdivision plat. correct Note 12. * Details Sheet 6 - show section through the orifice plate detail, show reinforcing for the headwall. 12. A copy of the comments received from the Stormwater Utility is attached to this letter. 13. The Autumn Blaze Maple shouldn't be used in this quantity as a City street tree along Mason Street. If the applicant wishes to use experimental trees, use only 1 or 2 as street trees or place them on private property. 14. It appears that this plan could have difficulty meeting the drainage criteria due to the large amount of parking and impervious area on-site. 15. The pedestrian movement on-site, as well as from this site to adjacent development, is very awkward. Sidewalks providing pedestrian direction and safe movement are needed. 16. There is question as to whether this proposal, as presently designed, can meet a number of All Development Criteria in the Land Development Guidance System. These criteria are: A-2. 1 Vehicular, Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation - relating to incorporation into the "neighborhood" and community transportation network safely. Pedestrian and bicycle movement seems especially difficult. A-2.2 Building Placement. and Orientation - relating to integration into the surrounding area and aesthetic and privacy considerations. The massiveness of the north elevation and its placement on the site, relative to Kensington Drive, is of concern. A-2.4 Vehicular Circulation and Parking - generally, same as A-2. 1. A-2. 6 Pedestrian Circulation - generally, same as A-2.1. A-2 .7 Architecture - relating to height, bulk, mass, scale of the north elevation (mostly) , the architectural character, building materials. The height, relatively unbroken facade (materials and color, lack of windows, doors, reveals, etc. ) , and setback from the street is of concern. Also, as expressed in the Conceptual, Review comment letter dated May 3, 1994, "The M&O Tire building will be expected to use the similar exterior materials and architectural forms that are established within the center. The predominant color in the center is a combination of gray tones. Roofing materials will have to match the other two existing buildings. Again, please refer to the approved plans for both. Mcdonald's and Jiffy Lube/Texaco for a detailed specification of the approved building materials". Both of these site are now in existence. The color gray is not negotiable. A-2. 12 Setbacks - The building is 20' in height, has a north elevation length of 116' , and is set back only 25' from Kensington Drive. The proposed landscaping does not seem to be sufficient to properly mitigate the building impact to the north. This completes the review comments at this time. Additional comments may be forthcoming as the various departments and reviewing agencies continue to review this request. Please be aware of the following dates and deadlines to assure your ability to stay on schedule for the June 26, 1995 Planning and Zoning Board hearing: **************.**************************************************** Plan revisions are due no later than the end of the working day, June 8, 1995. Please contact me for the number of folded revisions required for each document. PMI's, renderings, and 8 folded copies of final revisions (for the Planning and Zoning Board packets) are due by 3:00 p.m. on June 19, 1995. ****************************************************************** Please contact me at 221-6750 if you have questions or concerns related to these comments. I would like to schedule a meeting with. you as soon as possible, if necessary, to discuss these comments. Sinc- ely, % AP Steve Olt Project Planner xc: Kerrie Ashbeck Stormwater Utility Transportation file/Project Planner Wdai w,Wa y Laud