The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutGATEWAY AT HARMONY ROAD PUD, 1ST FILING - PRELIMINARY & FINAL - 1-88F - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTES °PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING MINUTES June 28, 1993 Gerry Horak, Council Liaison Tom Peterson, Staff Support Liaison The June 28, 1993 meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board was called to order at 6:36 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall West, 300 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado. Board members present included Chair Lloyd Walker, Joe Carroll, Jim'Klataske, Laurie O'Dell, Bernie Strom, Jan Cottier and Rene Clements-Cooney. Staff members present included Planning Director Tom Peterson, Deputy City Attorney Paul Eckman, Sherry Albertson-Clark, Ted Shepard, Steve Olt, Kirsten Whetstone, Mike Herzig, Kerrie Ashbeck and Heidi Phelps. PRESENTATION Chairman Walker presented outgoing Board member O'Dell with a plaque recognizing her eight years of service on the Planning & Zoning Board. AGENDA REVIEW Mr. Peterson reviewed the Consent Agenda which consisted of: Item 1 - Minutes of the May 3 and May 24, 1993 P & Z Meetings; Item 2 - Save More Self Storage PUD - Preliminary & Final, #27-93; Item 3- Orchard Park Apartments PUD -Final, #25-93; Item 4-Gateway at Harmony road PUD, 1st Filing - Preliminary & Final, #1-88Ff Item 5 - 424 West Oak PUD - Final, #40-92B; Item 6 - English Ranch Subdivision, 3rd Filing - Final, #75-86J; Item 7- Modification of Conditions of Final Approval; Item 8 - Modification of Conditions of Final Approval for Best Western Transmission PUD, Preliminary and Final; Item 9 - Frame Annexation and Zoning - #11-93; Item 10 - Karl Peterson Annexation and Zoning - #29-93,A; Item 11 - Ricketts First Annexation and Zoning - #33-93,A; and Item 12 - Ricketts Second Annexation and Zoning - #34-93,A. Mr. Peterson reviewed the Discussion Agenda which included: Item#13-The Preserve at Fort Collins Apartments PUD - Final, #146-790; Item 14 - Lindimer Subdivision- Preliminary - #26-93; Item #15 - Greenbriar Village PUD - Overall Development Plan, #19-93; and Item #15 - Greenbriar Village PUD - First Filing - Preliminary & Final - #19-93A. Discussion Items #17, Provincetowne PUD - Amended Overall Development Plan, #73-82P and #18 - Provincetowne PUD - Preliminary - #73-82N were continued to the July Planning & Zoning Board Meeting at the applicant's request. • Staff pulled Item #5, 424 West Oak PUD - Final. i • Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Minutes June 28, 1993 Page 2 Chairman Walker asked if there was anyone from the Board or public that would like to pull an item for discussion. Mr. Nicholas Kendall, 4808 Cambridge Avenue, requested that Items #11 and #12 - Ricketts First and Second Annexations and Zoning, be pulled from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Member Strom moved to approve Consent Agenda Items #1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. Member Carroll seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed 7-0. 424 WEST OAK PUD - FINAL. #40-92B Steve Olt, Project Planner, gave the staff report recommending approval. He stated that the project had been approved at preliminary with the condition that there be additional landscaping at the back of 120 S. Sherwood. Mr. Olt showed a map of the PUD. Mr. Olt said that at this point in time, the staff was looking for the intent of the applicant regarding that landscaping condition. Don Richmond, co-applicant with Lynda Williams, and co-owner of 424 W. Oak, stated that they would be future owners of a Victorian home to be built at 120 S. Sherwood. Mr. Richmond stated that the reason for the delay in meeting the landscaping condition, was that the applicants had turned part of the project over to CSU to pursue a grant through the State Department of Water Conservation. Mr. Richmond said that his ongoing interest in energy conservation had led to the concept of this house being used as a demonstration project. Mr. Richmond cited contact with the State Office of Energy Conservation and passed out related materials [attachment to original Minutes]. Mr. Richmond assured the Board that it would be provided with a detailed landscaping plan. Member Cottier stated that she was the Board member who originally requested the landscaping condition, since she wanted to ensure that the property at 120 S. Sherwood had the best chance of keeping its residential character. Member Cottier said that it was her understanding that there would be just a fence between this property and the properties where houses were being converted to offices. She added that she did not believe that the fence alone was an adequate buffer.