Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MONTAVA - PHASE G & IRRIGATION POND - BDR210013 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 3 - STREET RELATED DOCUMENT (3)
Filename: Montava Year 2027 HCM RAB Analysis Chesapeake Timberline.j9 Path: Z:\AMT_TPTO\000 Roundabout Practice\KHA Roundabout Projects\Montava, Fort Collins, CO\ARCADY Report generation date: 8/17/2022 11:53:58 AM »2027, AM »2027, PM »2045, AM »2045, PM Summary of intersection performance Junctions 9 ARCADY 9 -Roundabout Module Version: 9.5.0.6896 © Copyright TRL Limited, 2018 For sales and distribution information, program advice and maintenance, contact TRL: +44 (0)1344 379777 software@trl.co.uk www.trlsoftware.co.uk The users of this computer program for the solution of an engineering problem are in no way relieved of their responsibility for the correctness of the solution AM PM Queue (Veh) 95% Queue (Veh) Delay (s) V/C Ratio LOS Intersection Delay (s) Intersection LOS Network Residual Capacity Queue (Veh) 95% Queue (Veh) Delay (s) V/C Ratio LOS Intersection Delay (s) Intersection LOS Network Residual Capacity 2027 Leg 1 0.1 0.5 5.20 0.08 A 5.58 A 269 % [Leg 3] 0.1 0.5 5.68 0.09 A 6.27 A 159 % [Leg 4] Leg 2 0.2 0.7 5.61 0.17 A 0.2 1.0 5.87 0.19 A Leg 3 0.2 0.5 5.85 0.15 A 0.1 0.5 5.68 0.11 A Leg 4 0.2 0.6 5.50 0.17 A 0.5 2.0 6.82 0.33 A 2045 Leg 1 0.1 0.5 5.07 0.06 A 5.70 A 234 % [Leg 2] 0.1 0.5 5.88 0.10 A 6.38 A 149 % [Leg 4] Leg 2 0.3 1.4 6.08 0.24 A 0.2 0.8 5.74 0.18 A Leg 3 0.1 0.5 5.78 0.09 A 0.1 0.5 5.29 0.05 A Leg 4 0.2 0.5 5.26 0.13 A 0.5 2.0 6.97 0.35 A There are warnings associated with one or more model runs - see the 'Data Errors and Warnings' tables for each Analysis or Demand Set. Values shown are the highest values encountered over all time segments. Delay is the maximum value of average delay per arriving vehicle. Intersection LOS and Intersection Delay are demand-weighted averages. Network Residual Capacity indicates the amount by which network flow could be increased before a user-definable threshold (see Analysis Options) is met. File summary Units Analysis Options File Description Title Location Site number Date 8/11/2022 Version Status (new file) Identifier Client Jobnumber Analyst KIMLEY-HORN\Jay.VonAhsen Description Distance units Speed units Traffic units input Traffic units results Flow units Average delay units Total delay units Rate of delay units ft mph Veh Veh perHour s -Min perMin Mini-roundabout model Vehicle length (ft) Calculate Queue Percentiles Calculate detailed queueing delay Calculate residual capacity Residual capacity criteria type V/C Ratio Threshold Average Delay threshold (s) Queue threshold (PCE) Page 1 of 14 8/17/2022file:///C:/Users/jay.vonahsen/AppData/Local/TempMontava%20Year%202027%20HCM... Demand Set Summary Analysis Set Details JUNCTIONS 9 18.86 ü ü Delay 0.85 36.00 20.00 ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm)Finish time (HH:mm)Time segment length (min)Run automatically D1 2027 AM PHF 08:00 09:00 15 ü D2 2027 PM PHF 17:00 18:00 15 ü D3 2045 AM PHF 08:00 09:00 15 ü D4 2045 PM PHF 17:00 18:00 15 ü ID Include in report Network flow scaling factor (%)Network capacity scaling factor (%) A1 ü 100.000 100.000 Page 2 of 14 8/17/2022file:///C:/Users/jay.vonahsen/AppData/Local/TempMontava%20Year%202027%20HCM... 2027, AM Data Errors and Warnings Intersection Network Intersections Intersection Network Options Legs Legs Mini Roundabout Geometry Slope / Intercept / Capacity Leg Intercept Adjustments Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments. Traffic Demand Demand Set Details Severity Area Item Description Warning Queue variations Analysis Options Queue percentiles may be unreliable if the mean queue in any time segment is very low or very high. Intersection Name Intersection type Use circulating lanes Leg order Intersection Delay (s)Intersection LOS 1 untitled Mini-roundabout 1, 2, 3, 4 5.58 A Driving side Lighting Road surface In London Network residual capacity (%)First leg reaching threshold Right Normal/unknown Normal/unknown 269 Leg 3 Leg Name Description 1 untitled 2 untitled 3 untitled 4 untitled Leg Approach road half- width (ft) Minimum approach road half-width (ft) Entry width (ft) Effective flare length (ft) Distance to next leg (ft) Entry corner kerb line distance (ft) Gradient over 50m (%) Kerbed central island 1 9.84 9.84 9.84 0.0 16.40 6.56 0.0 2 9.84 9.84 9.84 0.0 16.40 6.56 0.0 3 9.84 9.84 9.84 0.0 16.40 6.56 0.0 4 9.84 9.84 9.84 0.0 16.40 6.56 0.0 Leg Type Reason Percentage intercept adjustment (%) 1 Percentage 85.00 2 Percentage 85.00 3 Percentage 85.00 4 Percentage 85.00 Leg Final slope Final intercept (PCE/hr) 1 0.590 837 2 0.590 837 3 0.590 837 4 0.590 837 ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm)Finish time (HH:mm)Time segment length (min)Run automatically D1 2027 AM PHF 08:00 09:00 15 ü Page 3 of 14 8/17/2022file:///C:/Users/jay.vonahsen/AppData/Local/TempMontava%20Year%202027%20HCM... Demand overview (Traffic) Peak Hour Factor Data (Traffic) Origin-Destination Data Vehicle Mix Results Results Summary for whole modelled period Main Results for each time segment 08:00 - 08:15 Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCE Factor for a Truck (PCE) ü ü Truck Percentages 2.00 Leg Linked leg Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr)Scaling Factor (%) 1 PHF ü 52 100.000 2 PHF ü 125 100.000 3 PHF ü 99 100.000 4 PHF ü 126 100.000 Leg Hourly volume (Veh/hr)Peak hour factor Peak time segment 1 52 0.92 SecondQuarter 2 125 0.92 SecondQuarter 3 99 0.92 SecondQuarter 4 126 0.92 SecondQuarter Demand (Veh/hr) To From 1 2 3 4 1 0 12 12 28 2 12 0 12 101 3 9 12 0 78 4 39 71 16 0 Truck Percentages To From 1 2 3 4 1 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 Leg Max V/C Ratio Max Delay (s)Max Queue (Veh) Max 95th percentile Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Intersection Arrivals (Veh) 1 0.08 5.20 0.1 0.5 A 52 52 2 0.17 5.61 0.2 0.7 A 125 125 3 0.15 5.85 0.2 0.5 A 99 99 4 0.17 5.50 0.2 0.6 A 126 126 Leg Total Demand (Veh/hr) Intersection Arrivals (Veh) Circulating flow (Veh/hr) Capacity (Veh/hr)V/C Ratio Throughput (Veh/hr) Throughput (exit side) (Veh/hr) Start queue (Veh) End queue (Veh)Delay (s)Unsignalised level of service 1 49 12 93 758 0.065 49 56 0.0 0.1 5.075 A 2 118 29 52 782 0.151 117 89 0.0 0.2 5.410 A 3 93 23 132 735 0.127 93 37 0.0 0.1 5.601 A 4 119 30 31 795 0.149 118 194 0.0 0.2 5.315 A Page 4 of 14 8/17/2022file:///C:/Users/jay.vonahsen/AppData/Local/TempMontava%20Year%202027%20HCM... 08:15 - 08:30 08:30 - 08:45 08:45 - 09:00 Queue Variation Results for each time segment 08:00 - 08:15 08:15 - 08:30 08:30 - 08:45 08:45 - 09:00 Leg Total Demand (Veh/hr) Intersection Arrivals (Veh) Circulating flow (Veh/hr) Capacity (Veh/hr)V/C Ratio Throughput (Veh/hr) Throughput (exit side) (Veh/hr) Start queue (Veh) End queue (Veh)Delay (s)Unsignalised level of service 1 57 14 108 749 0.075 56 65 0.1 0.1 5.195 A 2 136 34 61 777 0.175 136 103 0.2 0.2 5.613 A 3 108 27 153 722 0.149 107 43 0.1 0.2 5.852 A 4 137 34 36 792 0.173 137 225 0.2 0.2 5.496 A Leg Total Demand (Veh/hr) Intersection Arrivals (Veh) Circulating flow (Veh/hr) Capacity (Veh/hr)V/C Ratio Throughput (Veh/hr) Throughput (exit side) (Veh/hr) Start queue (Veh) End queue (Veh)Delay (s)Unsignalised level of service 1 54 13 102 753 0.071 54 62 0.1 0.1 5.151 A 2 129 32 58 779 0.165 129 98 0.2 0.2 5.537 A 3 102 25 145 727 0.140 102 41 0.2 0.2 5.760 A 4 130 32 34 793 0.164 130 213 0.2 0.2 5.429 A Leg Total Demand (Veh/hr) Intersection Arrivals (Veh) Circulating flow (Veh/hr) Capacity (Veh/hr)V/C Ratio Throughput (Veh/hr) Throughput (exit side) (Veh/hr) Start queue (Veh) End queue (Veh)Delay (s)Unsignalised level of service 1 49 12 93 758 0.065 49 57 0.1 0.1 5.081 A 2 118 29 53 782 0.151 118 90 0.2 0.2 5.423 A 3 93 23 133 734 0.127 93 38 0.2 0.1 5.618 A 4 119 30 31 794 0.149 119 195 0.2 0.2 5.330 A Leg Mean (Veh) Q05 (Veh) Q50 (Veh) Q90 (Veh) Q95 (Veh) Percentile message Marker message Probability of reaching or exceeding marker Probability of exactly reaching marker 1 0.07 0.03 0.25 0.45 0.48 N/A N/A 2 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 N/A N/A 3 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 N/A N/A 4 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 N/A N/A Leg Mean (Veh) Q05 (Veh) Q50 (Veh) Q90 (Veh) Q95 (Veh) Percentile message Marker message Probability of reaching or exceeding marker Probability of exactly reaching marker 1 0.08 0.03 0.26 0.47 0.49 N/A N/A 2 0.21 0.03 0.25 0.46 0.48 N/A N/A 3 0.17 0.03 0.26 0.46 0.49 N/A N/A 4 0.21 0.03 0.25 0.46 0.48 N/A N/A Leg Mean (Veh) Q05 (Veh) Q50 (Veh) Q90 (Veh) Q95 (Veh) Percentile message Marker message Probability of reaching or exceeding marker Probability of exactly reaching marker 1 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 N/A N/A 2 0.20 0.03 0.27 0.48 0.67 N/A N/A 3 0.16 0.03 0.25 0.45 0.48 N/A N/A 4 0.20 0.03 0.26 0.48 0.56 N/A N/A Leg Mean (Veh) Q05 (Veh) Q50 (Veh) Q90 (Veh) Q95 (Veh) Percentile message Marker message Probability of reaching or exceeding marker Probability of exactly reaching marker 1 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 N/A N/A 2 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 N/A N/A 3 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 N/A N/A 4 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 N/A N/A Page 5 of 14 8/17/2022file:///C:/Users/jay.vonahsen/AppData/Local/TempMontava%20Year%202027%20HCM... 2027, PM Data Errors and Warnings Intersection Network Intersections Intersection Network Options Traffic Demand Demand Set Details Demand overview (Traffic) Peak Hour Factor Data (Traffic) Origin-Destination Data Vehicle Mix Severity Area Item Description Warning Mini-roundabout Mini-roundabout appears to have unbalanced flows and may behave like a priority intersection; treat results with caution. See User Guide for details.[Legs 2 and 4 have 73% of the total flow for the roundabout for one or more time segments] Warning Queue variations Analysis Options Queue percentiles may be unreliable if the mean queue in any time segment is very low or very high. Intersection Name Intersection type Use circulating lanes Leg order Intersection Delay (s)Intersection LOS 1 untitled Mini-roundabout 1, 2, 3, 4 6.27 A Driving side Lighting Road surface In London Network residual capacity (%)First leg reaching threshold Right Normal/unknown Normal/unknown 159 Leg 4 ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm)Finish time (HH:mm)Time segment length (min)Run automatically D2 2027 PM PHF 17:00 18:00 15 ü Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCE Factor for a Truck (PCE) ü ü Truck Percentages 2.00 Leg Linked leg Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr)Scaling Factor (%) 1 PHF ü 57 100.000 2 PHF ü 131 100.000 3 PHF ü 75 100.000 4 PHF ü 239 100.000 Leg Hourly volume (Veh/hr)Peak hour factor Peak time segment 1 57 0.92 SecondQuarter 2 131 0.92 SecondQuarter 3 75 0.92 SecondQuarter 4 239 0.92 SecondQuarter Demand (Veh/hr) To From 1 2 3 4 1 0 12 12 33 2 12 0 12 107 3 16 12 0 47 4 68 126 45 0 Truck Percentages To Page 6 of 14 8/17/2022file:///C:/Users/jay.vonahsen/AppData/Local/TempMontava%20Year%202027%20HCM... Results Results Summary for whole modelled period Main Results for each time segment 17:00 - 17:15 17:15 - 17:30 17:30 - 17:45 17:45 - 18:00 Queue Variation Results for each time segment 17:00 - 17:15 From 1 2 3 4 1 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 Leg Max V/C Ratio Max Delay (s)Max Queue (Veh) Max 95th percentile Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Intersection Arrivals (Veh) 1 0.09 5.68 0.1 0.5 A 57 57 2 0.19 5.87 0.2 1.0 A 131 131 3 0.11 5.68 0.1 0.5 A 75 75 4 0.33 6.82 0.5 2.0 A 239 239 Leg Total Demand (Veh/hr) Intersection Arrivals (Veh) Circulating flow (Veh/hr) Capacity (Veh/hr)V/C Ratio Throughput (Veh/hr) Throughput (exit side) (Veh/hr) Start queue (Veh) End queue (Veh)Delay (s)Unsignalised level of service 1 54 13 171 712 0.075 53 90 0.0 0.1 5.465 A 2 123 31 84 763 0.162 123 140 0.0 0.2 5.614 A 3 71 18 142 729 0.097 70 65 0.0 0.1 5.463 A 4 225 56 37 791 0.285 224 175 0.0 0.4 6.330 A Leg Total Demand (Veh/hr) Intersection Arrivals (Veh) Circulating flow (Veh/hr) Capacity (Veh/hr)V/C Ratio Throughput (Veh/hr) Throughput (exit side) (Veh/hr) Start queue (Veh) End queue (Veh)Delay (s)Unsignalised level of service 1 62 15 199 696 0.089 62 104 0.1 0.1 5.681 A 2 142 36 98 755 0.189 142 163 0.2 0.2 5.872 A 3 82 20 165 715 0.114 81 75 0.1 0.1 5.678 A 4 260 65 43 787 0.330 259 203 0.4 0.5 6.817 A Leg Total Demand (Veh/hr) Intersection Arrivals (Veh) Circulating flow (Veh/hr) Capacity (Veh/hr)V/C Ratio Throughput (Veh/hr) Throughput (exit side) (Veh/hr) Start queue (Veh) End queue (Veh)Delay (s)Unsignalised level of service 1 59 15 188 702 0.084 59 99 0.1 0.1 5.601 A 2 135 34 93 758 0.178 135 154 0.2 0.2 5.776 A 3 77 19 156 720 0.107 77 71 0.1 0.1 5.598 A 4 246 61 41 788 0.312 246 192 0.5 0.5 6.638 A Leg Total Demand (Veh/hr) Intersection Arrivals (Veh) Circulating flow (Veh/hr) Capacity (Veh/hr)V/C Ratio Throughput (Veh/hr) Throughput (exit side) (Veh/hr) Start queue (Veh) End queue (Veh)Delay (s)Unsignalised level of service 1 54 13 173 711 0.076 54 91 0.1 0.1 5.479 A 2 123 31 85 763 0.162 123 141 0.2 0.2 5.634 A 3 71 18 143 728 0.097 71 65 0.1 0.1 5.477 A 4 225 56 38 791 0.285 225 176 0.5 0.4 6.374 A Leg Mean (Veh) Q05 (Veh) Q50 (Veh) Q90 (Veh) Q95 (Veh) Percentile message Marker message Probability of reaching or exceeding marker Probability of exactly reaching marker 1 0.08 0.03 0.25 0.46 0.48 N/A N/A 2 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 N/A N/A Page 7 of 14 8/17/2022file:///C:/Users/jay.vonahsen/AppData/Local/TempMontava%20Year%202027%20HCM... 17:15 - 17:30 17:30 - 17:45 17:45 - 18:00 3 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 N/A N/A 4 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.39 N/A N/A Leg Mean (Veh) Q05 (Veh) Q50 (Veh) Q90 (Veh) Q95 (Veh) Percentile message Marker message Probability of reaching or exceeding marker Probability of exactly reaching marker 1 0.10 0.03 0.26 0.47 0.49 N/A N/A 2 0.23 0.03 0.25 0.46 0.48 N/A N/A 3 0.13 0.03 0.26 0.46 0.49 N/A N/A 4 0.49 0.03 0.25 0.49 0.49 N/A N/A Leg Mean (Veh) Q05 (Veh) Q50 (Veh) Q90 (Veh) Q95 (Veh) Percentile message Marker message Probability of reaching or exceeding marker Probability of exactly reaching marker 1 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 N/A N/A 2 0.22 0.03 0.28 0.53 1.02 N/A N/A 3 0.12 0.03 0.25 0.45 0.48 N/A N/A 4 0.46 0.03 0.29 1.03 1.97 N/A N/A Leg Mean (Veh) Q05 (Veh) Q50 (Veh) Q90 (Veh) Q95 (Veh) Percentile message Marker message Probability of reaching or exceeding marker Probability of exactly reaching marker 1 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 N/A N/A 2 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 N/A N/A 3 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 N/A N/A 4 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.40 N/A N/A Page 8 of 14 8/17/2022file:///C:/Users/jay.vonahsen/AppData/Local/TempMontava%20Year%202027%20HCM... 2045, AM Data Errors and Warnings Intersection Network Intersections Intersection Network Options Traffic Demand Demand Set Details Demand overview (Traffic) Peak Hour Factor Data (Traffic) Origin-Destination Data Vehicle Mix Severity Area Item Description Warning Queue variations Analysis Options Queue percentiles may be unreliable if the mean queue in any time segment is very low or very high. Intersection Name Intersection type Use circulating lanes Leg order Intersection Delay (s)Intersection LOS 1 untitled Mini-roundabout 1, 2, 3, 4 5.70 A Driving side Lighting Road surface In London Network residual capacity (%)First leg reaching threshold Right Normal/unknown Normal/unknown 234 Leg 2 ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm)Finish time (HH:mm)Time segment length (min)Run automatically D3 2045 AM PHF 08:00 09:00 15 ü Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCE Factor for a Truck (PCE) ü ü Truck Percentages 2.00 Leg Linked leg Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr)Scaling Factor (%) 1 PHF ü 43 100.000 2 PHF ü 172 100.000 3 PHF ü 59 100.000 4 PHF ü 97 100.000 Leg Hourly volume (Veh/hr)Peak hour factor Peak time segment 1 43 0.92 SecondQuarter 2 172 0.92 SecondQuarter 3 59 0.92 SecondQuarter 4 97 0.92 SecondQuarter Demand (Veh/hr) To From 1 2 3 4 1 0 2 5 36 2 12 0 12 148 3 12 12 0 35 4 22 63 12 0 Truck Percentages To 1 2 3 4 1 3 3 3 3 Page 9 of 14 8/17/2022file:///C:/Users/jay.vonahsen/AppData/Local/TempMontava%20Year%202027%20HCM... Results Results Summary for whole modelled period Main Results for each time segment 08:00 - 08:15 08:15 - 08:30 08:30 - 08:45 08:45 - 09:00 Queue Variation Results for each time segment 08:00 - 08:15 From 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 Leg Max V/C Ratio Max Delay (s)Max Queue (Veh) Max 95th percentile Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Intersection Arrivals (Veh) 1 0.06 5.07 0.1 0.5 A 43 43 2 0.24 6.08 0.3 1.4 A 172 172 3 0.09 5.78 0.1 0.5 A 59 59 4 0.13 5.26 0.2 0.5 A 97 97 Leg Total Demand (Veh/hr) Intersection Arrivals (Veh) Circulating flow (Veh/hr) Capacity (Veh/hr)V/C Ratio Throughput (Veh/hr) Throughput (exit side) (Veh/hr) Start queue (Veh) End queue (Veh)Delay (s)Unsignalised level of service 1 41 10 81 765 0.053 40 43 0.0 0.1 4.968 A 2 162 41 50 783 0.207 161 72 0.0 0.3 5.774 A 3 56 14 183 704 0.079 55 27 0.0 0.1 5.542 A 4 91 23 34 793 0.115 91 205 0.0 0.1 5.125 A Leg Total Demand (Veh/hr) Intersection Arrivals (Veh) Circulating flow (Veh/hr) Capacity (Veh/hr)V/C Ratio Throughput (Veh/hr) Throughput (exit side) (Veh/hr) Start queue (Veh) End queue (Veh)Delay (s)Unsignalised level of service 1 47 12 94 757 0.062 47 50 0.1 0.1 5.068 A 2 187 47 58 779 0.240 187 84 0.3 0.3 6.079 A 3 64 16 213 687 0.093 64 31 0.1 0.1 5.777 A 4 105 26 39 790 0.134 105 238 0.1 0.2 5.260 A Leg Total Demand (Veh/hr) Intersection Arrivals (Veh) Circulating flow (Veh/hr) Capacity (Veh/hr)V/C Ratio Throughput (Veh/hr) Throughput (exit side) (Veh/hr) Start queue (Veh) End queue (Veh)Delay (s)Unsignalised level of service 1 44 11 90 760 0.058 44 47 0.1 0.1 5.031 A 2 177 44 55 781 0.227 177 79 0.3 0.3 5.967 A 3 61 15 202 694 0.088 61 30 0.1 0.1 5.687 A 4 100 25 37 791 0.126 100 225 0.2 0.1 5.211 A Leg Total Demand (Veh/hr) Intersection Arrivals (Veh) Circulating flow (Veh/hr) Capacity (Veh/hr)V/C Ratio Throughput (Veh/hr) Throughput (exit side) (Veh/hr) Start queue (Veh) End queue (Veh)Delay (s)Unsignalised level of service 1 41 10 82 764 0.053 41 43 0.1 0.1 4.973 A 2 162 41 50 783 0.207 162 73 0.3 0.3 5.796 A 3 56 14 185 704 0.079 56 27 0.1 0.1 5.554 A 4 91 23 34 793 0.115 91 206 0.1 0.1 5.133 A Leg Mean (Veh) Q05 (Veh) Q50 (Veh) Q90 (Veh) Q95 (Veh) Percentile message Marker message Probability of reaching or exceeding marker Probability of exactly reaching marker 1 0.06 0.03 0.25 0.45 0.48 N/A N/A 2 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 N/A N/A 3 0.09 0.03 0.26 0.46 0.49 N/A N/A 4 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 N/A N/A Page 10 of 14 8/17/2022file:///C:/Users/jay.vonahsen/AppData/Local/TempMontava%20Year%202027%20HCM... 08:15 - 08:30 08:30 - 08:45 08:45 - 09:00 Leg Mean (Veh) Q05 (Veh) Q50 (Veh) Q90 (Veh) Q95 (Veh) Percentile message Marker message Probability of reaching or exceeding marker Probability of exactly reaching marker 1 0.07 0.03 0.26 0.47 0.49 N/A N/A 2 0.31 0.03 0.25 0.46 0.48 N/A N/A 3 0.10 0.03 0.26 0.46 0.49 N/A N/A 4 0.15 0.03 0.26 0.46 0.49 N/A N/A Leg Mean (Veh) Q05 (Veh) Q50 (Veh) Q90 (Veh) Q95 (Veh) Percentile message Marker message Probability of reaching or exceeding marker Probability of exactly reaching marker 1 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 N/A N/A 2 0.30 0.03 0.30 1.06 1.42 N/A N/A 3 0.10 0.03 0.25 0.45 0.48 N/A N/A 4 0.15 0.03 0.25 0.45 0.48 N/A N/A Leg Mean (Veh) Q05 (Veh) Q50 (Veh) Q90 (Veh) Q95 (Veh) Percentile message Marker message Probability of reaching or exceeding marker Probability of exactly reaching marker 1 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 N/A N/A 2 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 N/A N/A 3 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 N/A N/A 4 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 N/A N/A Page 11 of 14 8/17/2022file:///C:/Users/jay.vonahsen/AppData/Local/TempMontava%20Year%202027%20HCM... 2045, PM Data Errors and Warnings Intersection Network Intersections Intersection Network Options Traffic Demand Demand Set Details Demand overview (Traffic) Peak Hour Factor Data (Traffic) Origin-Destination Data Vehicle Mix Severity Area Item Description Warning Mini-roundabout Mini-roundabout appears to have unbalanced flows and may behave like a priority intersection; treat results with caution. See User Guide for details.[Legs 2 and 4 have 79% of the total flow for the roundabout for one or more time segments] Warning Queue variations Analysis Options Queue percentiles may be unreliable if the mean queue in any time segment is very low or very high. Intersection Name Intersection type Use circulating lanes Leg order Intersection Delay (s)Intersection LOS 1 untitled Mini-roundabout 1, 2, 3, 4 6.38 A Driving side Lighting Road surface In London Network residual capacity (%)First leg reaching threshold Right Normal/unknown Normal/unknown 149 Leg 4 ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm)Finish time (HH:mm)Time segment length (min)Run automatically D4 2045 PM PHF 17:00 18:00 15 ü Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCE Factor for a Truck (PCE) ü ü Truck Percentages 2.00 Leg Linked leg Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (Veh/hr)Scaling Factor (%) 1 PHF ü 60 100.000 2 PHF ü 124 100.000 3 PHF ü 35 100.000 4 PHF ü 252 100.000 Leg Hourly volume (Veh/hr)Peak hour factor Peak time segment 1 60 0.92 SecondQuarter 2 124 0.92 SecondQuarter 3 35 0.92 SecondQuarter 4 252 0.92 SecondQuarter Demand (Veh/hr) To From 1 2 3 4 1 0 12 12 36 2 12 0 12 100 3 12 12 0 11 4 52 168 32 0 Truck Percentages To Page 12 of 14 8/17/2022file:///C:/Users/jay.vonahsen/AppData/Local/TempMontava%20Year%202027%20HCM... Results Results Summary for whole modelled period Main Results for each time segment 17:00 - 17:15 17:15 - 17:30 17:30 - 17:45 17:45 - 18:00 Queue Variation Results for each time segment 17:00 - 17:15 From 1 2 3 4 1 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 Leg Max V/C Ratio Max Delay (s)Max Queue (Veh) Max 95th percentile Queue (Veh) Max LOS Average Demand (Veh/hr) Total Intersection Arrivals (Veh) 1 0.10 5.88 0.1 0.5 A 60 60 2 0.18 5.74 0.2 0.8 A 124 124 3 0.05 5.29 0.1 0.5 A 35 35 4 0.35 6.97 0.5 2.0 A 252 252 Leg Total Demand (Veh/hr) Intersection Arrivals (Veh) Circulating flow (Veh/hr) Capacity (Veh/hr)V/C Ratio Throughput (Veh/hr) Throughput (exit side) (Veh/hr) Start queue (Veh) End queue (Veh)Delay (s)Unsignalised level of service 1 57 14 198 696 0.081 56 71 0.0 0.1 5.626 A 2 117 29 75 769 0.152 116 180 0.0 0.2 5.512 A 3 33 8 139 731 0.045 33 52 0.0 0.0 5.154 A 4 237 59 34 793 0.299 236 138 0.0 0.4 6.442 A Leg Total Demand (Veh/hr) Intersection Arrivals (Veh) Circulating flow (Veh/hr) Capacity (Veh/hr)V/C Ratio Throughput (Veh/hr) Throughput (exit side) (Veh/hr) Start queue (Veh) End queue (Veh)Delay (s)Unsignalised level of service 1 65 16 230 677 0.096 65 82 0.1 0.1 5.883 A 2 135 34 87 762 0.177 135 208 0.2 0.2 5.741 A 3 38 10 161 718 0.053 38 61 0.0 0.1 5.294 A 4 274 68 39 790 0.347 274 160 0.4 0.5 6.968 A Leg Total Demand (Veh/hr) Intersection Arrivals (Veh) Circulating flow (Veh/hr) Capacity (Veh/hr)V/C Ratio Throughput (Veh/hr) Throughput (exit side) (Veh/hr) Start queue (Veh) End queue (Veh)Delay (s)Unsignalised level of service 1 62 15 218 684 0.090 62 78 0.1 0.1 5.785 A 2 128 32 82 764 0.167 128 198 0.2 0.2 5.657 A 3 36 9 152 723 0.050 36 58 0.1 0.1 5.241 A 4 259 65 37 791 0.328 259 151 0.5 0.5 6.777 A Leg Total Demand (Veh/hr) Intersection Arrivals (Veh) Circulating flow (Veh/hr) Capacity (Veh/hr)V/C Ratio Throughput (Veh/hr) Throughput (exit side) (Veh/hr) Start queue (Veh) End queue (Veh)Delay (s)Unsignalised level of service 1 57 14 200 695 0.081 57 72 0.1 0.1 5.642 A 2 117 29 75 768 0.152 117 181 0.2 0.2 5.527 A 3 33 8 140 730 0.045 33 53 0.1 0.0 5.161 A 4 237 59 34 793 0.299 238 139 0.5 0.4 6.487 A Leg Mean (Veh) Q05 (Veh) Q50 (Veh) Q90 (Veh) Q95 (Veh) Percentile message Marker message Probability of reaching or exceeding marker Probability of exactly reaching marker 1 0.09 0.03 0.26 0.47 0.50 N/A N/A 2 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 N/A N/A Page 13 of 14 8/17/2022file:///C:/Users/jay.vonahsen/AppData/Local/TempMontava%20Year%202027%20HCM... 17:15 - 17:30 17:30 - 17:45 17:45 - 18:00 3 0.05 0.03 0.25 0.45 0.48 N/A N/A 4 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.42 N/A N/A Leg Mean (Veh) Q05 (Veh) Q50 (Veh) Q90 (Veh) Q95 (Veh) Percentile message Marker message Probability of reaching or exceeding marker Probability of exactly reaching marker 1 0.11 0.03 0.26 0.46 0.49 N/A N/A 2 0.21 0.03 0.25 0.46 0.48 N/A N/A 3 0.06 0.03 0.26 0.46 0.49 N/A N/A 4 0.53 0.03 0.25 0.53 0.53 N/A N/A Leg Mean (Veh) Q05 (Veh) Q50 (Veh) Q90 (Veh) Q95 (Veh) Percentile message Marker message Probability of reaching or exceeding marker Probability of exactly reaching marker 1 0.10 0.03 0.25 0.45 0.48 N/A N/A 2 0.20 0.03 0.27 0.48 0.76 N/A N/A 3 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 N/A N/A 4 0.49 0.03 0.28 0.89 2.00 N/A N/A Leg Mean (Veh) Q05 (Veh) Q50 (Veh) Q90 (Veh) Q95 (Veh) Percentile message Marker message Probability of reaching or exceeding marker Probability of exactly reaching marker 1 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 N/A N/A 2 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 N/A N/A 3 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 N/A N/A 4 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.43 N/A N/A Page 14 of 14 8/17/2022file:///C:/Users/jay.vonahsen/AppData/Local/TempMontava%20Year%202027%20HCM...