HomeMy WebLinkAboutSIT AND STAY DOG BAR - PDP210016 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
1
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6689
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov.com/developmentreview
October 22, 2021
Katy Thompson
Ripley Design Inc
419 Canyon Ave Suite 200
Fort Collins, CO 80521
RE: Sit and Stay Dog Bar, PDP210016, Round Number 1
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing
agencies for your submittal of Sit and Stay Dog Bar. If you have questions about any
comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through your
Development Review Coordinator, Tenae Beane via phone at 970-224-6119 or via email
at tbeane@fcgov.com.
Responses: Ripley Design, VFLA, Olsson, Patrick Duncan
Comment Summary:
Department: Development Review Coordinator
Contact: Tenae Beane, 970-224-6119, tbeane@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: INFORMATION:
I will be your primary point of contact throughout the development review and
permitting process. If you have any questions, need additional meetings with the
project reviewers, or need assistance throughout the process, please let me
know and I can assist you and your team. Please include me in all email
correspondence with other reviewers and keep me informed of any phone
conversations. Thank you!
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: INFORMATION:
As part of your resubmittal you will respond to the comments provided in this
2
letter. This letter is provided to you in Microsoft Word format. Please use this
document to insert responses to each comment for your submittal , using a
different font color. When replying to the comment letter please be detailed in
your responses, as all comments should be thoroughly addressed. Provide
reference to specific project plans or explanations of why comments have not
been addressed, when applicable, avoiding responses like noted or acknowledged.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: INFORMATION:
Please follow the Electronic Submittal Requirements and File Naming
Standards found at https://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/files/electronic
submittal requirements and file naming standards_v1_8 1 19.pdf?1566857888.
File names should begin with the file type, followed by the project information,
and round number. Example: UTILITY PLANS_PROJECT
NAME_PDP_Rd2.pdf
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: INFORMATION:
Resubmittals are accepted any day of the week, with Wednesday at noon being
the cut-off for routing the same week. When you are ready to resubmit your
plans, please notify me advanced notice as possible.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: INFORMATION:
Temporary Service Changes - City of Fort Collins Development Review
In order to continue providing thorough reviews and giving every project the
attention it deserves, the City of Fort Collins is implementing temporary
changes in how we serve our development customers. As you may be aware,
we are experiencing staff shortages in a number of key departments, which has
begun to impact the timeliness of our reviews. We recognize that development
and construction play a critical role in our community’s vibrancy and economic
recovery, and we have been exploring options for mitigating impacts to our
customers. As a result, we will be making some temporary service changes.
Beginning Monday May 10th one additional week of review time will be added
to all 1st and 2nd round submittals (increase from 3 weeks to 4 weeks).
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: INFORMATION:
Development Review and Building Permit fees are proposed to change
3
January 1st, 2022. The fees are not finalized at this time, but your Development
Review Coordinator will keep you updated on the final amounts.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: INFORMATION:
LUC 2.211 Lapse, Rounds of Review: Applicants, within one hundred eighty
(180) days of receipt of written comments and notice to respond from the City
on any submittal (or subsequent revision to a submittal) of an application for
approval of a development plan, shall file such additional or revised submittal
documents as are necessary to address such comments from the City. If the
additional submittal information or revised submittal is not filed within said
period of time, the development application shall automatically lapse and
become null and void.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: INFORMATION:
LUC 2.211(D) Project Development Plan and Plat. Following the approval of a
project development plan and upon the expiration of any right of appeal, or upon
the final decision of the City Council following appeal, if applicable, the
applicant must submit a final plan for all or part of the project development plan
within three (3) years... If such approval is not timely obtained, the project
development plan (or any portion thereof which has not received final approval)
shall automatically lapse and become null and void.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: FOR HEARING:
The proposed development project is subject to a Type 1 Review. The decision
maker for your project will be an Administrative Hearing Officer at a public
hearing. For the hearing, we will formally notify surrounding property owners
within 800 feet (excluding public right-of-way and publicly owned open space).
As your Development
Review Coordinator, I will assist with preparing the mailing and coordinating the
hearing date with your team.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: FOR HEARING:
All "For Hearing" comments need to be addressed and resolved prior to
moving forward with scheduling the Hearing. Staff would need to be in
agreement the project is ready for Hearing approximately 3 5 weeks prior to the
hearing.
4
Response: Acknowledged
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Sophie Buckingham, sbuckingham@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/14/2021
10/14/2021: INFORMATION ONLY:
On sheet C6.0 of the Utility Plans, it would be helpful to indicate more clearly
that the scale is 1 inch equals 20 feet.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/14/2021
10/14/2021: INFORMATION ONLY - REVISED:
At this time, it appears that no grading changes are proposed in the private
drives surrounding the property. If this is not the case, please contact me at
sbuckingham@fcgov.com or 970-416-4344.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: INFORMATION ONLY:
The City of Fort Collins Master Street Plan shows a collector street running
along one of the private drives bordering the property. At this time, the City does
not believe it is feasible to plan a collector street along either of these private
drives. The City may need to revise the Master Street Plan to change the
alignment of the future collector street. At this time, nothing is required from this
development related to the future collector street.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: FOR FINAL:
If any easement dedications are required along with this project, information
about the dedication process can be found at
https://www.fcgov.com/engineering/devrev.php. If you have any questions,
please contact me at sbuckingham@fcgov.com or 970 -416-4344.
Response: Acknowledged
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Spencer Smith, 970-221-6603, smsmith@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: FINAL APPROVAL
I have a few comments about proposed sidewalks around the site. It looks like
the walk dimensions include the curb width. Typically walk width is defined from
5
back of curb, so the proposed walk widths are technically 0.5' narrower than
dimensioned on the plans. The walk at the very southeast corner of the site is
shown as 6 feet wide. Just curious why it is narrower than the other walk on site.
Is 6 feet just matching the existing walk on the adjacent parcel? You may want
to provide a setback between the proposed fencing and the ramp/walk to the
west building entry. It may be helpful to provide a detail of the walk, tree grates
and parking area on the west side of the building. You will need to make sure
there is adequate spacing for bumper overhang adjacent to the proposed trees
and that you have adequate ADA width between the trees and fence. If
possible, the tree located adjacent to the HC parking area and pedestrian ramp
on the west side of the site should be moved out of the ramp area. See redlines
for additional detail.S
Response: The walk at the southeast corner of the site matches with the sidewalk on the adjacent parcel which provides
more space for planting. A 5 foot setback has been added between the proposed fence and the main walkway to the
building. A section of the tree grate has been added to sheet 4. Tree grates have been moved back 2 feet to provide room
for bumper overhang. There is 4.25 feet between tree trunks and the edge of sidewalk providing adequate space for ADA
access. The tree located in the HC ramp has been removed.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: FINAL APPROVAL
I have several comments regarding the tables and figures in the TIS: Please
label the Total/AM/PM trip gen lines in Table 1. The roundabout at Willox and
private drive #2 should be labeled on every exhibit. Please label private drive
#4 on Fig. 2. Label the private drive numbers on Fig. 4. Also, there is text
overlap on Fig. 4 (see redlines).
Response: Thank you for providing the redlines. All redlines are addressed and these labels are added to both the figures
and tables in the report.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: HEARING
The trip generation table in the TIS written report (Table 1) indicates 50 students
(dogs), but the trip gen table in the TIS attachments lists the number at 20 .
Please confirm anticipated max. number of dogs and make sure all tables and
your calculations reflect this. Also, Table 1 indicates 6,600 sf of drinking place
area and the project narrative mentions restaurant space at 7,847 sf. Is there a
reason for the discrepancy in these numbers? Please make sure all numbers
are correct and that they are shown the same in all reports, plans, etc.
Response: The discrepancy in SF was not intentional and was due to site plan revisions not being tracked through the
report properly. The site layout has since changed again and is now updated consistently throughout the report and trip
generation. The study indicates 50 students (dogs) and 3.64 KSF dedicated to the bar.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: FOR HEARING
Since I am new to the project, I am following up on a previous comment made
on the scoping form about providing more operational details regarding the use
of the proposed dog park being for customers only or open to the public. I don't
6
necessarily see this clarified in the TIS and I don't know if this was
communicated to Steve Gilchrist directly and he decided it didn't need to be in
the study.
Response:
Department: Erosion Control
Contact: Basil Hamdan, 970-222-1801, bhamdan@fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/14/2021
10/14/2021: INFORMATION ONLY:
Based on the area of disturbance State permits for stormwater will be required
since the site is over an acre and should be obtained prior to commencement of
Construction Activities on this site.
The City Manager’s development review fee schedule under City Code 7.5 -2
was updated to include fees for Erosion Control and Stormwater Inspections.
As of January 1st, 2021, these fees will be collected on all projects for such
inspections.
The Erosion Control fees are based on; the number of lots, the total site
disturbance, the estimated number of years the project will be active and the
Stormwater Inspection Fees are based on the number of LID/WQ that are
designed for on this project.
Based on the proposed site construction associated with this project we are
assuming 1 lots, 2.42 acres of disturbance, 2 years from demo through build out
of construction and an additional 3 years till full vegetative stabilization due to
seeding. Which results in an Erosion Control Fee estimate of $1974.06.
Based on no planned stormwater quality control measures there would be no
LID/WQ Inspection fee.
Please note that as the plans and any subsequent review modifications of the
above-mentioned values change the fees may need to be modified. I have
provided a copy of the spreadsheet used to arrive at these estimates for your
review.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/14/2021
10/14/2021: FOR FINAL:
Please submit an Erosion Control Plans to meet City Criteria (FCDCM Ch 2
Section 6.1.3)
Please ensure that the Erosion Control Plans provided include a sequence
chart in accordance with (FCDCM Ch 2 Section 6.1.3.2)
7
Please submit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation based upon the
accepted Erosion Control Plans to meet City Criteria. (FCDCM Ch 2 Section
6.1.5)
Please submit an Erosion Control Report to meet City Criteria. (FCDCM Ch 2
Section 6.1.4)
Response: Acknowledged
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/18/2021
10/18/2021: FOR HEARING:
Additional documentation is needed to ensure the site is meeting the LID
requirements. Please provide calculations in the drainage report that both
Stormtech systems, plus the rain garden together are meeting the requirement
of 75% of the site's impervious area being treated. This is typically done with
an exhibit or table showing the different sub-basins being treated and the
basins contributing percentage for the whole site that equal to 75% or more.
Response: LID table has been added to drainage plan with 75% impervious area calculations
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/18/2021
10/18/2021: FOR HEARING:
Stormtech calculations are needed for sizing of the water quality volume portion
of the underground chambers and the isolator rows need to be identified as they
are the only ones that provide the water quality treatment. The City has adjusted
some the water quality sizing methodology for the Stormtech systems, so
please coordinate with me on obtaining the spreadsheet and on the
methodology.
Response: Calculations have been provided in the drainage report appendix for WQCV of isolator rows using the
equations found in the stormwater criteria manual.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/18/2021
10/18/2021: FOR HEARING:
The separation requirement for storm water improvements and trees is 10 feet.
There is a storm sewer located directly under a row of trees and the Stormtech
system looks to be 5 feet away from a tree as well. Please revise.
Response: Trees, Stormtech chambers and storm sewer have been moved to avoid separation conflicts.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/18/2021
8
10/18/2021: FOR HEARING:
Drainage easements are required for the rain garden and the Stormtech
system, as well as any storm sewers needed to convey the 100 -year storm.
Response: Drainage easements have been drafted and labeled in provided utility plan.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/18/2021
10/18/2021: FOR HEARING:
Documentation of how much volume the Stormtech chambers are providing for
quantity detention is needed as well. Also, my calculations show around 19,400
cf is required to detain the 100-year flows.
Response: Calculations have been provided in the drainage report appendix for detention volumes using a modified FAA
method in compliance with the stormwater criteria manual.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/18/2021
10/18/2021: FOR HEARING:
Rain garden calculations are needed to show it is sized appropriately.
Response: All rain gardens have been removed and substituted by additional Stormtech chambers.
Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/18/2021
10/18/2021: FOR HEARING:
Generally, every structure requires it's own separate water and sewer service
from the mains. The City will inquire internally if this small accessory structure
needs it's own services, or if the proposed design is acceptable in this case.
Response: Services are planned come from building to accessory building. They are currently shown on the utility plan as
¾’’ water main and 4” sewer main.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/18/2021
10/18/2021: FOR HEARING:
Please label the proposed water service size and fire service.
Response: Water and fire service line sizes have been labelled on provided utility plan.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/18/2021
10/18/2021: FOR HEARING:
Please label all valves, fittings, restrained joints, etc. for the water, fire, and
9
sewer services.
Response: Domestic water line and fire line structures have been labeled on provided utility plan.
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Austin Kreager, 970-224-6152, akreager@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: PRIOR TO HEARING:
Please show your proposed transformer location on your next submittal. Please
note that the transformer must be a minimum of ten feet from any combustible
walls, ten feet from any building openings, and twenty feet from an emergency
exit.
Response: Transformer location has been labeled on provided utility plan.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: FOR FINAL REVIEW:
Please provide a one line diagram and a C-1 form to Light and Power
Engineering. The C-1 form can be found at:
https://www.fcgov.com/utilities/img/site_specific/uploads/c-1_form.pdf?159767
7310
Response: To be provided once the building design is further along.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: INFORMATION:
Transformer locations shall be within 10' of a paved surface and must have a
minimum of an 8' clearance from the front side and a 3' clearance around the
sides and rear. (1000 kVA up to 2500 kVA requires 4' around the sides and
rear.)
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: INFORMATION:
Electric Capacity Fee, Building Site charges and any system modification
charges necessary will apply to this development.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: INFORMATION:
Light and Power would like to remind you that all of our facilities must have a ten
foot clearance away from all water, wastewater, and storm sewer facilities. We
also require a three foot clearance away from all other utilities with the exception
of communication lines.
10
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: INFORMATION:
You may contact Austin Kreager, project engineering if you have questions.
(970) 224-6152. You may reference Light & Power’s Electric Service
Standards at
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/img/site_specific/uploads/ElectricServiceStandar
ds_FINAL_18November2016_Amendment.pdf
You may reference our policies, development charge processes, and use our
fee estimator at
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers.
Response: Acknowledged
Department: Forestry
Contact: Molly Roche, 224-616-1992, mroche@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: FOR HEARING
Please include a full plant list that provides species name (common and
scientific name), quantity, caliper and method of transplant (B&B), and species diversity percentages.
Response: A full plant list with common and scientific name as well as quantity caliper and method can be found on sheet
3. Tree species diversity table was added to sheet 4.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: FOR HEARING
Please do not specify Lindens in parking lot islands/cut outs. In their place,
please propose Kentucky Coffeetree ‘Espresso’, Catalpa, or Choice City Elm.
Response: The Lindens in the parking lot islands have been replaced with Northern Catalpa. The Lindens in the tree grates
have been replaced with Kentucky Coffeetree ‘Espresso’.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: FOR HEARING
The tree cutouts/grates that are proposed on the west side of the building are
quite small (under 5x5-ft). Please consider planning for larger tree grates (5x7,
4x9, or larger) to allow additional room for root growth so that the trees can
grow, thrive, and survive long term.
Response: The tree grates have been removed.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: FOR HEARING
11
There is a storm drain that runs almost directly underneath the trees on the west
side of the building. This tree-utility placement is not ideal for long term
functionality of the utility because it will inevitably be impacted by tree roots.
Please provide additional separation (at least 6-ft) between the trees and utility.
Response: The utilities and tree locations have been updated and are no longer in conflict.
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: 10/19/2021: FOR HEARING
Although this isn’t a requirement because species diversity percentages are
met, I strongly recommend planting at least one additional shade tree or
ornamental tree species. There is opportunity to further increase diversity
on-site by adding another species into the mix.
Response: Diversity has been increased.
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: INFORMATION ONLY
Is there any planned construction, demo or grade changes proposed near the
existing honeylocust to remain?
Response: The existing honeylocust shall be protected in-place specified on the utility and existing conditions plan.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: FOR HEARING
There appear to be opportunities for additional tree plantings within the large
outdoor space to increase shade. Please include additional trees within this
space, within either irrigated turf or a mulch bed with direct drip irrigation.
Response: Canopy trees have been added within and along the outer perimeter of the unleashed zone to increase shade
as requested.
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: FOR HEARING
Please include the tree protection notes to the utility plan set and label the
existing tree to remain and be protected.
Response: Tree protection notes have been added to the general notes page and callouts to protect trees in-place have
been added to the utility and existing conditions plan.
Department: PFA
Contact: Marcus Glasgow, 970-416-2869, marcus.glasgow@poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR HEARING
FIRE LANES
The proposed fire apparatus access roads must be dedicated as Emergency
12
Access Easements. All access roads must enter and exit onto a public way so
a cross access easement may be required. The private drive to the East must
provide though access from Bristlecone to Willox or provide an approved
turnaround. The West private drive must connect from Bristlecone to College
and/or Willox.
Response: Access Easements for both private drives have been labeled on provided site plan. The private drive to the East
does provide through access from Bristlecone to Willox. The private drive to the West also does provide access from
Bristlecone to Willox.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN
FIRE LANE SIGNS
The limits of the fire lane shall be fully defined. Fire lane sign locations should be
indicated on future plan sets. Refer to LCUASS detail #1418 & #1419 for sign
type, placement, and spacing. Appropriate directional arrows required on all
signs. Posting of additional fire lane signage may be determined at time of fire
inspection. Please add sign detail and locations to civil plans.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN
ADDRESSING ON MULTIPLE SIDES OF BUILDING
- IFC 505.1.7: Buildings, either individually or part of a multi- building complex,
that have emergency access lanes on sides other than on the addressed street
side, shall have the address numbers and street name posted on each side that
fronts a fire lane.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR PERMIT INFORMATION
KEY BOXES REQUIRED
- IFC 506.1 and Poudre Fire Authority Bureau Policy P-13-8.11: Poudre Fire
Authority requires at least one key box ("Knox Box") to be mounted in an
approved, exterior location (or locations) on every new or existing building
equipped with a required fire sprinkler or fire alarm system. The box shall be
positioned 3 to 7 feet above finished floor and within 10 feet of the front door, or
closest door to the fire alarm panel. Exception can be made by the PFA if it is
more logical to have the box located somewhere else on the structure. Knox
Box size, number, and location(s) to be determined at building permit and/or by
time of final CO.
All new or existing Knox Boxes must contain the following keys as they apply to
the building:
- Exterior Master
- Riser room
- Fire panel
- Elevator key if equipped with an elevator
13
The number of floors determines the number of sets of keys needed. Each set
will be placed on their own key ring.
- Single story buildings must have 1 of each key
- 2-3 story buildings must have 2 of each key
For further details or to determine the size of Knox Box required, contact the
Poudre Fire Authority Division of Community Safety Services.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR PERMIT INFORMATION
EMERGENCY RESPONDER RADIO COMMUNICATION - AMPLIFICATION
SYSTEM TEST 2018 IFC 510 & 1103.2 New and existing buildings require a
fire department emergency communication system evaluation after the
core/shell but prior to final build out. For the purposes of this section, fire walls
shall not be used to define separate buildings. Where adequate radio coverage
cannot be established within a building, public-safety radio amplification
systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with criteria established
by Poudre Fire Authority. The installation of required ERRC systems shall be
reviewed and approved under a separate permit process through PFA.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR PERMIT INFORMATION
COMMERCIAL KITCHEN HOODS
- IFC 609.2: A Type I hood shall be installed at or above all commercial cooking
appliances and domestic cooking appliances used for commercial purposes
that produce grease vapors.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR PERMIT INFORMATION
CARBON DIOXIDE SYSTEMS USED IN BEVERAGE DISPENSING
SYSTEMS
Compresses gases utilized in beverage dispensing systems shall comply with
Section 5307.3 of the 2018 International Fire Code (IFC). At time of
construction, a separate permit for CO2 dispensing may be required.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN
FIRE DEPARTMENT HOSE CONNECTION
- IFC 912.2: Fire Department Connections shall be installed in accordance with
NFPA standards. Fire department connections shall be located on the street
side of buildings, fully visible and recognizable from the street or nearest point
of fire department vehicle access. The location of fire service lines and FDC(s)
14
shall be approved by the fire department and the location labeled on Utility
Plans.
Response: Acknowledged
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Scott Benton, (970)416-4290, sbenton@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/11/2021
10/11/2021: No comments.
Department: Building Services
Contact: Katy Hand, khand@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Insp Plan Review
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/18/2021
10/18/2021: FOR BUILDING PERMIT:
Each detached structure requires a separate building permit (i.e. main building,
stage, satellite bar/restrooms)
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/18/2021
10/18/2021: NOTICE:
An NFPA13 type fire sprinkler system will be required.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 3. Comment Originated: 10/18/2021
10/18/2021: NOTICE:
Restroom fixture calculations must include all seasonal outdoor seating and
entertainment areas additional restrooms may be needed. (2018 International
Plumbing Code) Coordinate with architect as this may impact building size and
layout.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/18/2021
10/18/2021: NOTICE:
Additional exit gates may be required from the large fenced gathering area
based on the occupant load (max number of people for largest event/gathering).
Coordinate with architect.
Response: Additional exits have been added on the east side of the project.
15
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/18/2021
10/18/2021: NOTICE:
A separate review/permit is required to be submitted to the Larimer County
Health Department. Building permit issuance is contingent upon Larimer County
Health Department approval. Contact Larimer County Health Department for
feasibility and requirements.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/18/2021
10/18/2021: Building Permit Pre-Submittal Meeting:
Please work with your review coordinator to schedule a pre-submittal meeting
for any new commercial or multi-family building with Building Services for this
project. Pre-Submittal meetings assist the designer/builder by assuring, early
on in the design, that the new projects are on track to complying with al l of the
adopted City codes and Standards. This should be scheduled when
architectural drawings are at least 50% complete. Be prepared to present site
plans, floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of
occupancy, square footage, type of construction, egress, accessibility, and
energy compliance.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/18/2021
10/18/2021: FOR BUILDING PERMIT:
Please visit our website for current adopted codes, local amendments and
submittal requirements.
https://www.fcgov.com/building/application.php
https://www.fcgov.com/building/codes.php
https://www.fcgov.com/building/energycode
Response: Acknowledged
Contact: Lauren Wade, 970-302-5962, lwade@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/13/2021
10/13/2021: GIS has no comments at this time.
Response: Acknowledged
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: General
16
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/12/2021
10/12/2021: Unless required during PDP, a complete review of all plans will be
done at FDP.
Response: Acknowledged
Department: Outside Agencies
Contact: Lea Schneider, Larimer County Health and Environment Department,
970.498.6775, poc@co.larimer.co.us,
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/19/2021
10/19/2021: Please see attached comments from the Larimer County Health
and Environment Department for the Sit and Stay Dog Bar.
Response: Acknowledged