Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGATEWAY AT HARMONY ROAD PUD, 2ND FILING - FINAL - 1-88D - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTESPLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MINUTES OF CONTINUED ITEMS April 3, 1989 The continued meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board began at 6:32 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall West, 300 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado. Board members present included Vice -Chairman Sanford Kern, Chairwoman Laurie O'Dell, Jim Klataske, Lloyd Walker, Jan Shepard and Rex Burns. Mem- ber Groznik was absent. Staff members present included Tom Peterson, Ken Waido, Joe Frank, Ted She- pard, Mike Herzig, Paul Eckman and Kayla Ballard. Tom Peterson stated that the only change on the agenda from last Mondav's meeting was that the final was added to Creekside at the Landings PUD. CREEKSIDE AT THE LANDINGS PUD - Preliminary and Final - �44-79G Ted Shepard gave a description of the proposed' item. Drank Vaught, Vaught -Frye Architects and a representative for the applicant Ken Slyziuk, briefly discussed lot sizes, the detention ponds, safety of the ponds, shrubbery on the shoreline, and traffic circulation/turnarounds. He then submitted a letter to the Board from Maryan Schotanus, Board of Directors President of the Harmony Cove Condominium Association. Mr. Shepard gave the staff report. He stated that this project was in confor- mance with applicable criteria and recommended approval of the preliminary and final. Member Kern moved to approve Creekside at the Landings PUD, Preliminary and Final. Member Shepard seconded the motion. The motion passed 6-0. GATEWAY TO HARNIONY ROAD PUD, 1st Filing - Final - #1-88C GATEWAY AT HARMONY ROAD PUD, 2nd Filing - Final - #1-881) Joe Frank gave a description of both proposed filings for Gateway at Harmony Road properties. He briefly discussed the conditions placed on the recommend- ations of these items. Ric Hattman, Gefroh-Hattirtan, Inc., discussed the gas station canopy, reduction of the signage impact with the freestanding sign in relation to the change in the location of the car wash, water quality and volumes, storm drainage, canopy lighting, and canopy brick columns. He continued with Filing Two by discussing McDonald's litter policing program, lighting of the building and the Site, and the root architecture. Member Kern asked if the gas station canopy columns would be painted metal and what color. Mr. Hattman replied that they would be painted gray Mr. Frank gave the staff report. He recommended approval of both items with the condition on Filing One that brick columns be placed in consistency with the Amoco project approved in the Raintree Shopping Center. Member Kern inquired as to the sway of the columns. Mr. Frank replied that he discussed this with other architects and they said it could be overcome. It would take some special engineering and architecture to make it work. The Raintree Amoco was approved with brick columns. Bob Pennock, who represented Raintree Village Amoco in October, stated that the brick columns were not required by the Board. He stated that it was the architect's error in not removing the brick columns from the elevations on Raintree Village Amoco approved plan. Member Walker asked for clarification of the implication of the added state- nient in the access agreement. Mr. Frank stated that Council will meet with staff to discuss the response of the State flighway Department and the conditions placed by Council of no medians in College Avenue. Discussion would --be on how to proceed with the South College Access Plan. The added responsibility would be placed on the developer to get the state highway approval for the access on this site. Member Klataske asked if there were a tanker spill at this site, where would the excess gas go. Mr. Hattman responded that the Poudre Fire Authority would be notified if a spillage were to occur. None of the fuel would flow onto the street but would be confined on -site and would flow to the storm drainage area. Mr. Frank commented that the Poudre Fire Authority did review this project and approved this plan. Member Kern commented that the use of the brick columns was not clarified as to whether the entire column would be brick or if there would be only 4 or 5 feet of brick at the base. Member Walker moved to approve Gateway at Harmony Road PUD, 1st Filing Final excluding the brick columns. Member Kern seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed 6-0. Member Shepard moved to approve Gateway at Harmony Road PUD, 2nd Fil- ing Final. Member Burns seconded the motion. The motion to approve passed 6-0. DIAINIOND SHAMROCK CORNER STORE NO. 1100 PUD - Preliminary #14-89 Fed Shepard gave a description of the proposed project.