Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIDLAND GREENS PUD MASTER PLAN - COUNTY REFERRAL - 7-88A - CORRESPONDENCE - MEETING COMMUNICATION41 U CITY OF FORT COLLINS OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: May 20, 1988 TO: Planning and Zoning Board FROM: Linda Ripley, Senior Planner RE: Midland Greens There was a meeting regarding Midland Greens Commercial and Residential PUD held May 3rd at Landmark Engineering. The property owners, engineering consultants, legal counsel, Realtors, representatives from the County and Loveland planning staffs and myself attended. The following items were dis- cussed. 1. The property owners asked the planning staff representatives to clarify their objections to the existing proposal and to define what kind of project would win their support. All three planning staffs stated that the visual break between the two cities was the most important criteria. I reiterated the concerns stated in my April 26 letter, asking for a generous open space along College Avenue visually connected to the open space along the drainage way. 2. The developer stated his case for commercial development. All three planning staffs had difficulty supporting any commercial development in the corridor. 3. The appropriate amount of open space was discussed at length. I suggested 50% with an increase in allowable density. The developer offered 10% with no commercial element. The existing plan has 30% open space. 4. The developers and Realtors inquired about the possibility of the County maintaining a "park" if they would donate the land. They stated that keeping the open space in the existing unirrigated native grasses would be unacceptable to them. I] SERVICES, PLANNING - a0 i 5. The following compromise was eventually offered: * No commercial development. * An overall housing density of .92 dwelling units per acre. Lot layout similar to the existing plan with a somewhat smaller average lot size. * Approximately 3.5 acres of community service uses. Potential uses include churches, day care facilities and/or recreational uses. * 250 foot depth along College Avenue frontage donated to the appropriate governmental agency, provided they agree to develop the property as a passive urban park and maintain it. 6. It was agreed that the planning staff representatives would take this proposed compromise to the appropriate Boards as soon as possible in an effort to gain a sense of whether or not the cities and county could support such a plan.