HomeMy WebLinkAboutSILVER OAKS PAIRED HOUSING PUD - FINAL - 14-88M - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSITEM NO. 3
MEETING DATE 5/ 2 3/ 94
STAFF Kirsten Whetstone
City of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
STAFF REPORT
PROJECT: Silver Oaks PUD, Paired Housing, Final #14-88M
APPLICANT: Taft Hill Investments, Ltd.
c/o Gefroh-Hattman, Inc.
145 West Swallow Road
Fort Collins, CO 80525
OWNER: Taft Hill Investments, Ltd.
7730 E. Belleview, Suite 100
Englewood, CO 80111
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This is a request for a final PUD for 20 residential units in 10
duplexes on 3.86 acres. The site is Tract G of the Horsetooth West
Overall Development Plan and is located at the northwest corner of
Horsetooth Road and Auntie Stone Street, just south of Olander
Elementary School. The property is zoned RLP, Low Density Planned
Residential.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The request for duplexes on Tract G of Horsetooth West Overall
Development Plan conforms with the amended Overall Development Plan
and is in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary
PUD. The PUD satisfies applicable criteria of the All Development
Chart of the LDGS. The request is found to be compatible with the
surrounding area and the project is considered feasible from a
transportation standpoint.
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
•
•
Silver Oaks Paired Housing PUD - Final, #14-88M
May 23, 1994 P & Z Meeting
Page 2
COMMENTS:
1. Background
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
N: R-L-P; Olander Elementary School
S: M1, M (County); existing mobile home court and single family
homes
E: R-L-P; Vacant (Silver Oaks Third Filing PUD)
W: FA-1 (County); Vacant (Future City Southwest Community Park)
This parcel was part of a larger annexation approved in 1978. As
part of Horsetooth West ODP (Tract G), the site was designated as
"Multi -family" on the original ODP and approved in 1988. In 1992,
during deliberations on the Horsetooth West ODP, First Amendment,
the parcel was converted to "daycare/church".
In February 1994, a second amendment to Horsetooth West ODP re-
designated this parcel back to multi -family use.
2. Land Use
The request for 20 units in 10 duplex structures on 3.86 acres
represents a density of 5.18 dwelling units per acre. The layout
and density of the proposed plan are in substantial conformance
with the approved preliminary PUD.
3. Design
The primary design features of Silver Oak Paired Housing PUD are
the orientation of the structures and landscape treatment along
Horsetooth Road. The streetscape along Horsetooth Road is enhanced
with the garages and driveways placed on the north side of the
structures. Berms and landscaping will be planted along the
arterial to buffer the residential units and to create an
attractive streetscape.
4. Solar Orientation
Duplex lots are required to comply with the requirements of the
Solar Orientation Ordinance. With eight of the ten lots facing
south, or having a minimum of 50 feet of unobstructed open space
along the south lot line, the PUD has a compliance rate of 80%.
This exceeds the required minimum of 65%.
Silver Oaks Paired Housing PUD - Final, #14-88M
May 23, 1994 P & Z Meeting
Page 3
5. Transportation
A traffic impact analysis was done for the Horsetooth Overall
Development Plan, in 1992. At the time the traffic study was
performed, Tract G was given an anticipated land use of 58 multi-
family dwelling units. It was concluded, in 1992, that the trip
generation based on 58 units could be accommodated on the
surrounding street system in both the short and long term. With a
reduction from 58 to 20 units, the anticipated traffic impact will
be less. Thus the proposed PUD is considered feasible from a
transportation standpoint.
RECOMMENDATION
In reviewing the request for Silver Oaks Paired Housing PUD-Final,
Staff makes the following findings of fact:
1. The Final PUD is in substantial conformance with the approved
preliminary PUD.
2. The Final PUD is in conformance with the approved Horsetooth
West Overall Development Plan.
3. The Final PUD satisfies the All Development (Neighborhood
Compatibility) criteria of the Land Development Guidance
System.
4. The traffic impacts have been reviewed and can be accommodated
on the existing surrounding street system in both the short
and long term.
Staff, therefore, recommends approval of Silver Oaks Paired Housing
PUD, Final, #14-88M, with the following condition:
1. The Planning and Zoning Board approves this planned unit
development final plan upon the condition that the development
agreement, final utility plans, and final P.O.D., plans for
the planned unit development be negotiated between the
developer and City staff and executed by the developer prior
to the second monthly meeting (July 25, 1994) of the Planning
and Zoning Board following the meeting at which this planned
unit development final plan was conditionally approved; or, if
not so executed, that the developer, at said subsequent
monthly meeting, apply to the Board for an extension of time.
The Board shall not grant any such extension of time unless it
shall first find that there exists with respect to said
planned unit development final plan certain specific unique
and extraordinary circumstances which require the granting of
the extension in order to prevent exceptional and unique
•
C J
Silver Oaks Paired Housing PUD - Final, #14-88M
May 23, 1994 P & Z Meeting
Page 4
hardship upon the owner or developer of such property and
provided that such extension can be granted without
substantial detriment to the public good.
If the staff and the developer disagree over the provisions to
be included in the development agreement, the developer may
present such dispute to the Board for resolution if such
presentation is made at the next succeeding or second
succeeding monthly meeting of the Board. The Board may table
any such decision, until both the staff and the developer have
had reasonable time to present sufficient information to the
Board to enable it to make its decision. (If the Board elects
to table the decision, it shall also extend the term of this
condition until the date such decision is made).
If this condition is not met within the time established
herein (or as extended, as applicable), then the final
approval of this planned unit development shall become null
and void and of no effect. The date of final approval for
this planned unit development shall be deemed to be the date
that the condition is met, for purposes of determining the
vesting of rights. For purposes of calculating the running of
time for the filing of an appeal pursuant to Chapter 2,
Article II, Division 3, of the City Code, the Iffinal decisionve
of the Board shall be deemed to have been made at the time of
this conditional approval; however, in the event that the
dispute is presented to the Board for resolution regarding
provisions to be included in the development agreement, the
running of time for the filing of an appeal of such "final
decision" shall be counted from the date of the Board's
decision resolving such dispute.
-endt Dr.
�t Michener Dr. 1
Lron nu
o Aga
Ct. i W
0 01>
set
• v
re'� •
Moffet Drive
m
o Pri m rose Or.
� c
v
J
in
QTYLIMITS L)C HORSETOO
1 C o
c c
o
W ■■ m � m a PI.
Powell PI.
E
r _ �
ITEM: SILVER OAKS PUD
Paired Housing - Final
NUMBER: 14-88M
1 U
H line Or.
1
_ ■ t
■
Kinnison . Drive I
ai s
Birming�
rn
G o„
Devonshire c
s
l � Cheshire St.
Derby Ct.
Newcastle G�-
;nraey Amcs
Cr. C f.
Bronson St.T ter+
K�nr Ct.
S
Churchill Y Ct
T-T•H RM a
c
� c
c
Q
o WeslfFeld
0
C�
Westfiel Or
North
IIOTti 1AND USE, DESIGN ,CRITER LEGAL
aNtIRaL Bair ,, � w aw.w e.f. K. rw«Y. r.rt I. rr Y r r J:a
. Y.Is'111.eP IB• n^ N Ya .Ian al teae e M 1 nlr otw1b.yapoo b ru• N sd.Bo teat r.r er trM Pbtl brtll a,� • rlr IF rYY on tl,t-wet I101 of .lunta Trove tM of 10. 1 tMz• el e t td wet , elon9 \
aYrr r l,r rr IY bra rat W� rIM j rF a r YxYr rlraWl. 11.W I IVa art •rWr r dl•raew r e era tM a N.I1 IPoa —N.ua tar tuft re.t tee 10.24 leer.
. `r^eYrWr YYb YrYllY wrl I Y'•�y�Ky86 1 obu nMt. unblln•n xu F•Wu rrlr ��ry,r Yl,.ryWryyF r,IWrF r,y Mlen MN or rllcl wen S01' ll'E 00. Mue9.1n 106'21' \
ue.Ep TKIa T, io^ f si. io na ar m lenq ! r . u, rre r a ,. w r
r�irY �riy�rjl �'�r� .ew.IrB raa IlPnty v rNly rp..t .o r W w.F.l r.. I,.. w twYub n.Y+K. rqM a a.at.n. ee xs'.o• r«a. w .rota er r r r. s al• ie' te' II \
rt • I '�« � IY rn� all taro a'�luer r rr w Ixvr.l o�.W I. r•lu. Ir w naa,�• w r Y 22.21 Ie•t to tM eater eI Mtn el ry 1 , lal r N Met rn er \
t.elt� r• w. "n. Ir r a. r. r ulr •r,rl r a
t. � Yb tart �t r x•rr �Irlrrn � tall re Po �anr I� r•elnr�n• YluM1all ry lY r �.I xle r •yKF M e�l•e yn r rllW rw. yn.nr « W I•ss. `
R� _ .Y.LK r«. ruFrrb rbF rl�t
1. YWb�aurn `lYy•rYrYr �� e.vaeWC rpraWUlr IWUWtr ut�Vr ri Yryr.r lj•'P•a rnbr al aWn lrll \
YIve OM1Y n. YIY reYrrarYr Patnn� NP aprlT 1 rrrrrluyrrea br �bW YraYn.
Y rr aalYr rYr W. pyE ME, 6 cRO HP IVe�� .]op. oO ,.I. �tlr r IMV. \'W
I IWeIIYYYY�rbYr �r YxWB I
« rrlaerEr Ybrbr rYwrr yrT / a3aa pf . urW brY ub YlY•our ryx WI YIIYurYiW
ur
IN Ira .r. wlr T y s I r. m• rl r..r W ._.F r bFF Alnr r i
x. err +r Ylr mr R"rrr°w'iYar��. v�Y Ta°ary .e. 1 rY . •�• +•"'r'br.bW�art. �\ \ \
YYeaxr Y Y r�ryr.Wr r.1' I / I �� I
x Yl wlewA xlV raYrYnYY•rr I
:•I.r �lr Y axbrt r r Yl•r rt. / / 1 \ _ r \
Irr a. r.rs I I POlY7RE (.-I x1la�l. IOIS?FI�T \
a YI rrr robe x•rry we«Y 1ID PaIInIL14M1.1• I VERTICAL CURB - '�Ipik af. e.NIR)tb PaIW�I I \\
1. �y'a•� "rY"'r'r'. FLuaN eowc. el DEArwL« I r=N•�fr (NUN1N rlN6£ 111C fMVWI'Yr11 rglG•,M1Ativt4b� 4i��
r Yr�l. xb aY. 1 1ttKrrT G1FsffltlJf \ iuvtn -� I«wnaNs ` \
rwYw pww". . 91ffz
W nF rlr rrr nlYa. 31te
Ir, le�•'nr YllYxrleY Yrb r. rblrlYlr -J '•— �� — _ I \\
YYreIY. _ - OT L ODTPRI
In RYI YIIYYYrYrrryx lrb RNP ETYMy PRf O OARROE •F NT p
IbraYY erarxrwyuY. / 'S WTTExr . EINWaR - rOi }� �I'•�T'4Lk i DwIVEYAY� CURB CUT \
n, Yn �4r.«YY yr rYr «r(�vNltl�j,+NYt\� / Nr11'4ti ci ll I"' I Lect«[Ni cwcrE owlet q � z �W±
� F p'IT�I��L�pI�uJ \
n rT Mxr a�nr YlW rr«r•`r'`,r[ R_ a N+tvl�•I� \
,,. b•r rJ uWrW x .•W r b ie, xb 2B T f a _ 5114LE ThM I LY gmvl\N` I"
OT F Glh 1W5 3 , --tee; -- _ �R15e I FW,• y {XnTw4 ulRti +ylirnx
GHuiJ 17Y [lAorl K
I 2 F It ht spy uc
tot F 5 m ° j � nctsilw, mute s1�tT
r Yrxlru rrrbY dx..YYrd. w t - _� o1T I �< 1
ux'r'xrx vl`rr.ne M•Wa � 4W w �t I // DA , � __J - a
x. rrr «rYrxl..x y/ir uY.yr+ - L zbT
2rw
rYn.l.1. Pew.:.
> v
R'o D
/ L3dt I
_ i H I t�
- T
o�
- nuns NT —
•s PA I _vl FAMP• TP An.1401'R
_ T LINE - a (IG11L}11O�, L4
• _ - �18i0X6TL rlFM NC{d SN(•I:PLK 7T� s 'f6FP�+M1{aOlc�W f6VIN41 , �� �I�i •16'e1 �1 �GXISTYICI P6VIN4 I
f
BUIDLINO FOTPRiNT 1 A•25 0 -
• _ C LYrNDBCAPE BEAR _ Il _ _ - -._ _ 'Io(o 9Z holAu NNC eC 4•'�—
eAtaRAYF — K"--------- -------- •• �i 39'ISI II°u zb, i,fA - ..
St /4 eb -• -- j �
\ W. HORSETOOTH RD. 7f4z
Ex r,iIN4 Glkn+ 4Jtt(A
__ .. _ -• ••--�_•• ---�. r } }' `Collins
6r
PAIRED HOUSING P. site
_
IS I LV E R OiA KS _�� ..I;� 7�_ -•; . •—
scale tin= 3O.Oft o fo zs so FINAL SITE PLAN
Hdq 4,1994
PI ANNINr - OWNER ATTORNEY LE ION •-��• s% r.........It,CC i
tl by the Plennivg a ovivg Boa[ o[ tRe city tna i/r• are c e larivl Snle ie to c rc�fy cae ien t day ox e�C
of tort I undarelgnetl doe•/do nerMy
Approve ady a la ra of r 1 p[op—' deecribedvoe'thia slcalplav end tle Rar•ny 19 xsrrn ee t e pproper�y a
C hive, Colorado, cut — r[i[dy t [/we cope c6e cenditiooa avd yea iccivve tat torts aecenllened caae[ecLa or d p[19rietote f record of cneneaid
ev ear slte plan. p[epatty Y rued vie 31-33-111. a eb —
9errecary of pi—i.q a d Z. inq B ezd R f co10cY or
diver (e geedl �� Hey 0.egietralfov Yo.
r
VICINITY
ST r rmr RrV BV,I. n
I r aevR *rr .; �Rp«AP
nalrrn rexisr �yq� vwBPr
1 .����� ,� �!ri�b::�_ c_:��raa•�i�l mac- � �= Q��= ��s;�=ui�aC=.:� �l �a;�l��_ L�� II
s -/ �/� ' o-rr•■■�■.■ oc;...vu.� wus o■■■■ - •■uu■■ w--o-.■ ■ row■•■ `�
94-
:_ k ■�1 C !i.a� ��� � I .;�,��.� it
PENN—
ME
AIMS
21
,�%,,'�/,,yyam;--- ��•�iAll _,; I — �; _a—I—� .� �. ,
ID
C11� �.
ram..:._ . I ��ii�� �� Lei G�l�ir�•:iiJ`�' !Jl - i��il •� gMix
ILI
:.�".���.i I�
�'�.._ n. 'ate •� qu :.���►fj�►ic�� //// nia�rle �'/L ..�,' r,U�y!/ . t
a owl'
...p.,
�mmn.Td �r�r �iiiaiiwrrnvo�•aG-42",1�;��9■�L rf�QA!■!� rFAMISMA s.'�f�.1��
s��!!: A�t�/ �>f�C'll�E �=lI�JIS.� tom_ _ ��w; �� �► .� li
es bowl
X
..
�iJ /
V
N
K,&s6-4 �ILry&-ri Df l
NwH nave rm;4k. .
rAliTw-
Woo Ieca� -
LWo aysw
r,IWTW l~ ftKs
Wwo i4lwnw.,
�(tONT �I,CVI�IGt�I.2 `.i�IZ7 1�p.}JC{-} ,�1cD�.lr E1C�✓IaTIDIJ-1�A}JCN-KAi�IGN
KfaK tL�Vl� T IUN � - RANG �I KL&M G EvaTl cN 2 5my- r\" F�
i - r. EP
2 hTDi�'r SIDF. �L. \/AJIDN mil -m
ELEVATIONS SILVER OAKS PAIRED HOUSING P.U.D.
•
SCHOOL PROJECTIONS
PROPOSAL: SILVER OAKS PUD, Paired Housing - Final
DESCRIPTION: 20 single family units on 3.86 acres
DENSITY:
General Population
20 units x 3.5
5.18 du/acre
(persons/unit) = 70
School Age Population
Elementary - 20 (units) x .450
Junior High - 20 (units) x .210
Senior High - 20 (units) x .185
Affected Schools
Olander Elementary
Webber Junior High
Rocky Mountain Senior High
(pupils/unit) = 9
(pupils/unit) = 4.2
(pupils/unit) = 3.7
Design
Capacky Enrollment
568 551
900 977
1312 1404
•
5/L vi. 6,q,-S A/�,6 i)1L
Activity A: ALL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA
ALL CRITERIA
APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY
CRITERION
Is the cnterion
applicable?
Will the criterion
be satisfied?
If no, please explain
z
c
c
2 i` Z
Yes
No
Al. COMMUNITY -WIDE CRITERIA
1.1 Solar Orientation
x
X
1.2 Comprehensive Plan
1X/
1.3 Wildlife Habitat
X
1.4 Mineral Deposit
x
1.5 Ecologically Sensitive Areas
reserved
reserved
1.6 Lands of Agricultural Importance
1.7 Energy Conservation
1.8 Air Quality
iE
1.9 Water QualityX
1.10 Sewage and Wastes
A2. NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY CRITERIA
2.1 Vehicular, Pedestrian, Bike Transportation
?(
2.2 Building Placement and Orientation
X
X
2.3 Natural Features
X
2.4 Vehicular Circulation and Parkin
?C
2.5 Emergency Access
X
J(
2.6 Pedestrian Circulation
X
X
2.7 Architecture
X
2.8 Building Height and Views
x
2.9 Shading
X
2.10 Solar Access
X
X
2.11 Historic Resources
X
2.12 Setbacks
X
�(
2.13 Landscape
x
x(
2.14 Signs
X
2.15 Site Lighting
X
2.16 Noise and Vibration
X
2.17 Glare or Heat
X
2.18 Hazardous Materials
X
A3. ENGINEERING CRITERIA
3.1 Utility Capacity
X
X
3.2 Design Standards
3.3 Water Hazards
3.4 Geologic Hazards