HomeMy WebLinkAboutSTITCH-TECH WAREHOUSE - EXPANSION OF A NON-CONFORMING USE - 16-88B - CORRESPONDENCE - MEETING COMMUNICATIONNOTE TO FILE: RE: Meeting on Stitch -Tech, Inc.
Meeting held at Stitch -Tech on April 26, 1988 at 2:30 p.m.
Meeting attendees: Tom Peterson, Greg Conger, Jerry Jones, Sherry
Albertson -Clark
Intent of meeting: to discuss city review and processing of
non -conforming use request.
Jerry Jones
was told
the
basic procedure for processing
a
non -conforming
use; why this
site
is a non -conforming use
and what
would be the
purpose of the
May 5
neighborhood meeting. Mr.
Jones was
also informed
that future development
of the remainder of
the site
(northern -most
area) would
require
review as a PUD.
Mr. Jones
expressed concerns
re:
- time involved in the process;
- what happens if P & Z Board does not approve his request;
- neighbors "stopping the request".
A discussion took place regarding anticipated neighborhood concerns and
issues, with noise, traffic and visual impacts the issues most expected
to come from the neighborhood meeting.
Mr. Jones was informed of needed requirements (ie. storm drainage
report, on -site detention requirement). He indicated "no problems''
with this, since it is a code requirement. Discussion continued
regarding how neighborhood input works into the process and what would
happen between May 5 and the May 23rd P & Z meeting.
A tour of the facility was given and the following items were
discussed:
- noise at the site comes from the shifter, which shifts rail cars to
the building's spur line;
- activity occurring outside is from rail cars being shifted to the
spur line and from trucks coming to/from the site;
- an average of 8 rail cars come/go to the site daily;
- no vegetation can be located within 4' from the building (a
contractual requirement for Mr. Jones);
- a minor change to an existing interior curb may be proposed (Mr.
Jones was instructed to show this on the site plan now);
- a total of 60,000 square feet of building expansion may be the
ultimate desire of the applicant (Mr. Jones was instructed to show and
address the entire addition area at this time and then could phase
actual construction; rather than proposing an addition now and one in
the near future).
•
\
•
0
J 3
�Z
_Q
N O
„gin
O
Q'
_
O1�
H
c?
L_
W
•--•
W
W
= W
v �
�
No
o
N
W
O
�
_
Z
o
rza
_d
ra
z
3
�
J
14
®�� W O z
11 J
d
105 NUMBERS,
CLIENT
SHEET NUMOER',-_