HomeMy WebLinkAboutHUGH M WOODS PUD - PRELIMINARY - 26-88D - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSITEM NO. 16
MEETING DATE 11 / 14 / 94
STAFF Steve Olt
aik
City of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
STAFF REPORT
PROJECT: Hugh M. Woods P.U.D., Preliminary - #26-88D
APPLICANT: Jim Sell Design
117 East Mountain Avenue
Fort Collins, CO. 80524
OWNER: Payless Cashways
P.O. Box 419468
Kansas City, MO. 64141-0466
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This is a request for preliminary planned unit development (P.U.D.)
approval for a 73,500 square foot building, with an additional
63,576 square feet of canopy coverage (including building
materials, commodity storage), on 15.83 acres located at the
southwest corner of South College Avenue and Skyway Drive. The
property is zoned by - Planned Business.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This request for preliminary P.U.D. approval:
* Is in conformance with the Timan P.U.D., Overall
Development Plan (O.D.P.) that was approved by the
Planning and Zoning Board in June, 1988;
* scores 54% on the Auto -Related and Roadside Commercial
Point Chart in the Land Development Guidance System
(L.D.G.S.), exceeding the minimum required earned credit
of 50 percentage points;
* meets the applicable All Development Criteria in the
L.D.G.S.;
* is excluded from the Residential Neighborhood Sign
District and, therefore, all signage for this development
is subject to the strict regulations of the City Sign
Code that is administered by the Zoning Department.
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
0
Hugh M. Woods PUD - Preliminary, #26-88D
November 14, 1994 P & Z Meeting
Page 2
COMMENTS:
1. Background:
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
N: C, FA; existing single family residential in Larimer
County (Skyview Acres)
S: bp; vacant (Timan P.U.D., O.D.P.)
E: C; existing commercial in Larimer County (Kel-Mar
Strip)
W: FA; existing business/office in Larimer County
(Foothills -Gateway Rehabilitation Center)
This property was annexed into the City of Fort Collins with the
Timan First Annexation in June, 1988.
The Timan P.U.D., O.D.P. was approved by the Planning and Zoning
Board in June, 1988 for office/retail/warehouses on 53 acres. The
subject property is located on Parcel A (retail/warehouse), Parcel
B (open space/detention), and Parcel C (retail) of the approved
Timan P.U.D., O.D.P.
2. Land Use:
This is a request for P.U.D. approval for a 73,500 square foot
building, with an additional 63,576 square feet of canopy coverage
(including building materials, commodity storage), on 15.83 acres.
The request was evaluated against the Auto -Related and Roadside
Commercial Point chart and the applicable All Development Criteria
of the L.D.G.S. It scores 54% on the Point Chart, earning points
for: a) being located other than at the intersection of two
arterial streets (Skyway Drive is not classified as an arterial
street); b) gaining primary access from a non -arterial street
(Skyway Drive); c) containing more than two acres; and d) a
commitment to reducing non-renewable energy usage (a copy of
Appendix "E", the Energy Conservation Methods worksheet is
attached).
The Hugh M. Woods P.U.D., Preliminary is in conformance with the
approved Timan P.U.D., O.D.P., a 53 acre plan that extends along
the South College Avenue frontage from Skyway Drive to Trilby Road.
The project site is located on Parcels A, B, and C of the O.D.P.,
which were approved for retail, retail/warehouse, and open
space/detention. The nature of the proposed Hugh M. Woods operation
is considered to be retail/warehouse uses.
Hugh M. Woods PUD - Preliminary, #26-88D
November 14, 1994 P & Z Meeting
Page 3
"Superstore" Moratorium:
While the total proposed square footage equals 137,076, the Hugh
M.Woods proposal is not subject to the "Superstore" Moratorium.
"Superstores" are defined as any building or combination of
buildings exceeding 80,000 square feet which receive a single
certificate of occupancy. In the case of the proposed Hugh M. Woods
project, only the 73,500 square foot building will receive a
certificate of occupancy.
3. Design:
Site Configuration:
There will be two distinct areas of this operation:
* the first being the front entry of the retail center that
includes parking for in-store retail customers, and
* the second being
lumberyard/contractor
storage and pick-up. T
materials structures
that enclose the yard
well as a portion of t
a masonry wall, and t
the enclosure for the
the south side.
Architecture:
h
h
the completely enclosed
center that includes materials
he commodity storage and building
will serve as the fences or walls
on the north and west sides, as
e south side. The sales building,
e wrought iron fencing will form
entire east side and a portion of
The building will be a flat -roofed structure, 24' in height, with
standing seam metal canopies, primarily over doorways, extending to
an approximate height of 34' above grade. The exterior wall facades
will be a split -face block material.
The fencing and fence posts at the lumberyard/contractor center
entry will be a black wrought iron material.
Landscaping:
Street trees, spaced at 40' on -center, will be provided along the
South College Avenue and Skyway Drive frontages. The parking lots
outside of the lumberyard enclosure will contain planting islands
at the ends of and intermediate to the parking bays. There will
also be a planting island, containing a sidewalk, the full width of
the parking lot that will provide direct pedestrian access to the
front entry of the store. The islands will contain shade and
ornamental trees and a variety of shrubbery plant material.
Hugh M. Woods PUD - Preliminary, #26-88D
November 14, 1994 P & Z Meeting
Page 4
There will be setbacks of approximately 80' from the south edge of
Skyway Drive to the commodity storage structure that will contain
3' to 4' high earthen berms, shade and ornamental trees, evergreen
trees, and a grass -lined drainage swale.
There will be setbacks of 110' to 120' from the west property line
to the commodity storage and building materials structures that
will contain 3' to 5' high earthen berms, shade and ornamental
trees, evergreen trees, and a grass -lined drainage swale.
Parking:
There are a total of 294 parking spaces proposed for the Hugh M.
Woods site. Of these spaces, 253 are located outside of the
enclosed lumberyard/storage area and the remaining 41 spaces are
located inside the walled enclosure. The parking to
retail/warehouse building ratio (294:73,500) equals 4.0 parking
spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. The recommended
guideline for general retail use is 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet.
The parking being provided is considered to be sufficient for the
facility.
signage:
The property is excluded from the Residential Neighborhood Sign
District. All signage for this development is subject to the strict
regulations of the City Sign Code that is administered by the
Zoning Department.
4. Neighborhood Compatibility:
There were two neighborhood information meetings held to discuss
this development. Both meetings were at the Foothills -Gateway
Rehabilitation Center located directly west of the Hugh M. Woods
site.
The first neighborhood meeting was held on July 20, 1994 with 39
people (including Hugh M. Woods representatives) in attendance. The
concerns expressed at this meeting centered around the use of
Skyway Drive as the primary point of access to the development.
There are residential neighborhoods to the north, directly across
Skyway Drive, and to the south, separated by the Foothills -Gateway
facility. The neighborhoods feel that the existing street cannot
bear the pressure of the additional traffic from Hugh M. Woods.
There is a steep grade on Skyway Drive, from west to east, that can
be unsafe, especially in the winter, and this hill terminates at
the intersection of Skyway Drive and South College Avenue. The
general feeling of the neighborhood was to require the access to
Hugh M. Woods be directly from South College Avenue. The minutes of
this meeting are unavailable.
Hugh M. Woods PUD - Preliminary, #26-88D
November 14, 1994 P & Z Meeting
Page 5
The second neighborhood meeting was held, at the developer's
request, on August 11, 1994 with approximately 25 people (including
Hugh M. Woods representatives) in attendance. The purpose of the
meeting was for the Hugh M. Woods representatives to present
revisions of the plan to those in attendance. The revisions were a
result of the developer's response to concerns expressed at the
first meeting. The main concern was still, however, the primary
access to the Hugh M. Woods site being from Skyway Drive. The
minutes of this neighborhood meeting are attached to this staff
report.
5. Transportation:
The State of Colorado has in effect a South College Avenue Access
Control Plan that regulates movement to State Highway 287, both in
location and type.
The Hugh M. Woods site will gain its primary access from Skyway
Drive, a collector street, via South College Avenue, the State
highway. The access point will be approximately 300' west of South
College. The Skyway Drive -South College intersection is presently
signalized and full movement can occur. Due to increased vehicular
traffic that will be generated by Hugh M. Woods, improvements to
the intersection will be an obligation of this developer. These
improvements include a realignment of the existing frontage road on
the north side of Skyway Drive. This frontage road serves as the
access for numerous businesses. The realignment of the frontage
road will physically impact two existing restaurants, being the
Hickory House South and the Deli -Works. Staff is recommending a
condition of preliminary approval requiring signed agreements
between Hugh M. Woods and these restaurants that address the
necessary improvements.
A secondary point of access will be on South College Avenue,
approximately 850' south of Skyway Drive, at the southeast corner
of the Hugh M. Woods proposed site. This secondary point will be a
controlled access, not allowing full movement to and from the site.
It is doubtful that this access would ever be signalized.
6. Storm Drainage:
The general storm drainage pattern for this site is from west to
east. The stormwater outfall from this development occurs at a
point approximately 500' south of the Skyway Drive -South College
intersection and is piped under the highway to a point of release
that is not yet clearly identified. Potentially affected properties
on the east side of the highway include various businesses in the
Kel-Mar Commercial Strip, the Huntington Hills residential
development, the Lynn Acres Subdivision, Sunburst Knolls, and a
wetland area that is currently being considered for acquisition by
Hugh M. Woods PUD - Preliminary, #26-88D
November 14, 1994 P & Z Meeting
Page 6
the City's Natural Resources Division. Off -site drainage easements
for the Hugh M. Woods development may be necessary to allow release
of their stormwater onto and across other properties. Staff is
recommending a condition of preliminary approval requiring
dedicated off -site easements to Hugh M. Woods from the affected
property owners.
7. Resource Protection:
Staff is recommending a condition of preliminary P.U.D. approval
requiring that a design and mitigation plan for the wetlands on -
site, which is acceptable to the Natural Resources Division, be
part of the Final P.U.D. plan submittal to the City. The submittal
documentation must fully describe the extent of wetland impacts
from site development, including both construction and stormwater
discharge. The submittal must define the area of construction
disturbance for both on -site and off -site wetland areas, and must
set forth acceptable strategies, techniques, and costs for the
avoidance, alleviation, or mitigation of those impacts.
FINDINGS of FACT/CONCLUSIONS:
In evaluating the request for the Hugh M. Woods P.U.D.,
Preliminary, staff makes the following findings of fact:
* It is in conformance with the approved Timan P.U.D.,
O.D.P., which designates this site as retail,
retail/warehouse, and open space/detention uses.
* It scores 54% on the Auto -Related and Roadside Commercial
Point Chart in the L.D.G.S., exceeding the minimum
required earned credit of 50 percentage points;
* It meets the applicable All Development Criteria in the
L.D.G.S. except A-2.1 Vehicular, Pedestrian, and Bicycle
Transportation, A-3.1 Utility Capacity, and A-3..2 Design
Standards.
* The property is excluded from the Residential
Neighborhood Sign District. All signage for this
development is subject to the strict regulations of the
City Sign Code that is administered by the Zoning
Department.
* Realignment of the frontage road north of Skyway Drive
and west of South College Avenue is needed for the Skyway
Drive -South College intersection to operate safely.
* Off -site drainage easements are needed to allow the
release of stormwater runoff from the Hugh M. Woods site.
Hugh M. Woods PUD - Preliminary, #26-88D
November 14, 1994 P & Z Meeting
Page 7
* A design and mitigation plan for the wetlands on -site,
which is acceptable to the Natural Resources Division,
must be part of the Final P.U.D. plan submittal to the
City.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Hugh M. Woods P.U.D., Preliminary
- #26-88D with the following conditions:
1. That necessary improvements to the Skyway Drive and South
College Avenue intersection include a realignment of the
existing frontage road on the north side of Skyway Drive and
west of South College. The realignment of the frontage road
will physically impact two existing restaurants, being the
Hickory House South and the Deli -Works. Signed agreements
between Hugh M. Woods, the Hickory House South, and the Deli -
Works, outlining the scope of and obligation for the
improvements, must be part of the Final P.U.D. plan submittal
to the City.
2. That off -site drainage easements for the Hugh M. Woods
development may be necessary to allow release of their
stormwater onto and across other properties. Off -site easement
dedications for storm drainage, to Hugh M. Woods from affected
property owners, must be part of the Final P.U.D. plan
submittal to the City.
3. That a design and mitigation plan which is acceptable to the
Natural Resources Division be part of the Final P.U.D. plan
submittal to the City. The submittal documentation must fully
describe the extent of wetland impacts from site development,
including both construction and stormwater discharge. The
submittal must define the area of construction disturbance for
both on -site and off -site wetland areas, and must set forth
acceptable strategies, techniques, and costs for the
avoidance, alleviation, or mitigation of those impacts.
VICINITY MAP
26-88D Hugh M. Woods PUD - Prel.
No Text
Y.TLN6`B 4}�4
—
b'
EXISTING OUTFALL
SEC. 8-B
VICNITY MAP
^s 95
a ac eraan DRA Y
r' andw riE �
EYJIran Y• biOR`1
cwu+P11FI11
EXISTING OUTFALL PLAN
NOTES:
t ALEDLLAtELT 617m Ft.'JCx FGR P/dTELTION OF OIIIFdLL 4fEA plRelfs
1� TR 6TON•I B TO BE ['l1RIEa TO ALA FBV£GETATION CF UETLAlID.
1 DISTLPMW NR:A WLL M FW ADED TO FLEET Exi.TYYs GRADE6
d-oPe.ItlDf Tsµiv
D. FNlTO .VWE
TJTB�NT
4. FEDI!W NTOWIgLYAL ROW RIATE6 dW eTOFM 0.0W
FIII'1R11 BY M-BITE POND
AFD uErt.,eND. FEA.TWaE&
1"O6bini F LRIRi cF
-----_ � DlbTvrBAHCE <To et
i
r
,
FLAIED QID �
sErnM
_ aae�v n� RAr
___-- ,carerruau
=LAN
PROPOSED PROTECTION OF 30. OUTFALL
NOr M ia42
R
4 C o� p 61 TmAL
t � 'j� cNIGE
iygk
SECTION A -A
PLANNING rf ZONING APPROVAL
DITCH COMPANY APPROVAL
APRep.ID BT 1K IoL..A4Al1T vdLL.T � LAIC CAHAL OnCM t-s.
YURT UOILaR, C0.0RAD0. Ou 141R—DAY OP .IIr.4D.
Nb•EmrtE
OWNER'S CERTIFICATION
11E IlL96GFD, DEaG T1E LAWL OWEli6 GP 11E PlaF6QtT"
DBXF®M T116 BRE RAI1 W �T OHRPY THAT r1ET AfQF!
riE CO,DRIPD AIO f£.TRICTgl6lfl fORl11 M.dn 6HE PLYL
alrrr�. cars
brdre of coLtawoo�
murtv a LAtrr � �
Hi FOIF�lG KwlBtr Wb dGa1cW} D aEFafE rE naG oar
urtrse rrr wfD Aro aPlax eBA_
rtt OOFMa11ON k 'FIE _ -_
PROJECT STATISTICS
are AfEA a.neE daT Daa r.
P,eLI�,.� .D�.OBITARIER oRm
DnrprAl fISr4 D4 11
B1AnHSCW6fKi laDbr lla ma
cAiGPT LU�HIAlE W- W y
PAfFa1G ■n abrm f.143S51 ism Al
QiM MAc£ J41JIaal 6sl 1Ri
rorAl. wa,+rw esd m.
d16D116 RATp I . fll
fwolcr n»m,
rmAi xAcas �
naaan auLDw IElwr de A
aElBURBIr IR6LLE - IPIIVYa I•l2
EwsrBr. Traleas- w
PLANT NOTE
i Au Puwr wrnaxe ewai x r A�mA.IQ uru .,.w
aFKfY>TIpD sge.leeFR OK aRAoe
2 ALLL rus AfEAB 6HALL DE aiatidlED Y1rN MI AUrp+ATIU
PDP-uP amtiArnu sTamc
A eLL >� ro eE eaum • a�w_rsFfa.
odLL af..E aEca Ex�Pr nloe. roan. w nre Pr.,w
� � mm Pa.E Fr�slb. a• AverarE oerna
OLL OTwBe DsiB Ptas r0 DE HLCi� uXTu i� 1C'M COBBLE
W WGm pN.uCR sdmO.
fl EDGaG DETUEEN bRA/a Atn bAG DEDI bIILL D. Infan x
6TE.L IET LEM� WTN TOP 6.GO.
! 5eo 4REe2 T. DE Puallm Wn! A a_ImaAeO elan.
7. WnxE R,aIE deb pUT,FDED dRW cusna,erary r0
of aroau Dli'SR+�Or
-
/� /�
��//JV�I
...Ed�crvs� offs wfamsn
lFAbi t.ren srwut Al Iamm
�•v�, ro eE ar°Pum m A IVLa To T.. Iff-e�m
fl A s51Tf Tfdlf PERMIT MCT BB —TAim RY.i1 Tlf crtT
KIi9 aE IT AYt' 1R<�A CR 6eRBb 401nt®W TrM
FTNETi Oft !Q"O.'ED PI hE RSIIG
a'Cf+T ct.u<�
0. rmr_w cfwrfa w xecge Aro Pax* LocdreeD nAT e.
�aJRNS URi61RIGTIUN 461SGIlIIffU Dr BIrE
irlau oserv.L ownnm x.o aw.ln ra De
cae+_rBn wTu APFftO'.ED FD PLAN6.
10.6LL LAtn.CdPFIB FN.T L£ 416rdLLEO OR 9EOlED WTH
Aa.E LETIB! 6 CBDA. PEIadR1N,� D•'TO. OR
ECOi�R.:LCINr FUR 115s Oi TiE vAtJATgY 6 TfE
� FFsai TO Raiuu-E or A etsersr.ATE ai
n�crr.adua�", sKm.d.uoF.Biocouw�a
AfD clan..
i21fS4a1® U.RGAnOu bULI x IlNDIM ANp 4PPRO.m
TUE CIT' Ri.JR TJ ISBIYICE OF Nir B.YLDIIG Pf3d11r.
18.ALL LxMCdFTYa N ITI@T RYaNT-OF-Yur WLL D[
Mtd11Ea BT nE OWR3e
PROJECT NOTES
Les ntann.Rr !UT AeD YnLRT rt.re wR 4LL
e.�eiTe, Isr AaR.a ollsalaB Arn aE.I9v aF
� courts Ixs�vl aTerodRoa.
).OP@I /PAGE .YR:d.IItl.{. DE MAHlAf® DT
i�
.. LAraecAFaG o' o.sl xAa rar ew.0 DE
IrxuoeD WTN TRD PWa.E.
n mras DLLL tapLr um+arT aF rarer roLLrc i+n:
COaE
.. ALL RIB Oi1geIN NID uNT Pla�P9[M1 LnEO
b1eLL D. MAKiRT MAI9EAL, s' m0•A FTaB,ED
r�'� c
�inE.
gM�TiE�E � Of�80�it➢ P�IdWcLL
Isf .Ili.
PLANT KEY
ODECIDUOUS TREE
vEYEt�sREEN TREE
.-
EXISTIW, TREE
t� woo
J?
fur/ s1
PRELIMINARY CITE &
LANDOCAPE PLAN
r�
September 12, 1994
Sill De�,Slj
J,m AraLo
I,
Planning and Zoning Board Members
Planning Department
City of Fort Collins
RE: Hugh M. Woods P.U.D. Preliminary Submittal
Planning Objectives
Dear Board Members:
The 15-acre project site is located on the west side of
College Avenue at Skyway Drive, being a part of the Timan Master
Plan approved in 1987, with by zoning. Hugh M. Woods, a 73,000
S.F. building supply center will be the first user of the 55-acre master
planned site. The site is bounded on the east by the county Kelmar
Strip Subdivision, on the north by the county Skyview 1st Subdivision,
on the west by Poudre R-1 property and the Gateway Center, and on
the south by the undeveloped portion of the Timan Master Plan. This
facility is consistent with the use and circulation proposed on the master
plan, and will set the precedent for architectural and landscape treat-
ment to be followed by subsequent developers of the Timan Master
Plan.
Access and Circulation
In conformance with the Timan Master Plan and with the State
Highway Access Plan, the site will take its main entrance off of
Skyway Drive. Traffic studies have determined that the site distance is
adequate and that appropriate turning lanes justify this access point. A
secondary access point will be utilized off of College Avenue, being
right -in, right -out, as specified by the State Highway Access Plan.
Although adjacent to Skyview 1st Subdivision, no retail or delivery
traffic will pass residences in that subdivision.
Circulation within the site includes a parking lot, and an initial segment
of public street, with the potential for extension of the master planned ��� E s c Ave 80524
circulation. The Timan Master plan provides for a public loop street �30 )asa_,s21
from the proposed right -in, right -out access to an approved signalized
intersection approximately 700 feet north of Trilby Road. The master
plan also designates a fourth access off of Trilby Road.
Wetland Areas
The wetland area on the site has been surveyed, and the extent mapped.
Development will maintain this area, incorporating it into a storm
detention area, and preserving the existing trees at the site.
Open Space
Approximately 35 % of the site will be maintained as open space.
While some of this area consists of parking islands, the majority of
open space occurs as a landscaped buffer to the uses on the north and
west. Berms and landscaping along Skyway Drive will be 60 feet
wide, while those at the west property line will vary from 95 to 120
feet deep. The open space along College Avenue varies from 40 to 230
feet deep.
Buffering
Additional buffering will be provided by the grading and internal design
of the site. The yard loading area will set several feet below Skyway
Drive, and be completely screened from it by the material storage
structures which surround the yard. This configuration will also
attenuate any sound or lighting from within the yard area.
Energy Conservation
Construction techniques and equipment for this facility provide
numerous opportunities for energy conservation, and these methods will
be noted as part of the documented site plan.
0a
Land Use Policies
The specific land use policies achieved in the Preliminary PUD are
cited below, with policy numbers as shown in the City's Land Use
Policies Plan.
Policy 18 - exceeds minimum criteria as specified by point
chart
Policy 21 - development does not gain primary access off
College Avenue
Policy 22 - buffering mitigates potential for incompatible uses
Policy 24 - utilities exist adjacent to site
Policy 43b - existing wetland will be protected
Policy 43f - landscaping to incorporate native and drought
tolerant species
Policy 44 - site design mitigates noise impacts
Policy 46 - site design encourages energy conservation
Thank you for your consideration, and we look forward to working
with you throughout the development review process.
Sincerely,
JJIIM SELL DESIGN
Kay ) orce
3
Ad1L�- 1��j� 1, l t� �� `�'l"T? _,_�'�P A dog
Activity A: ALL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA
ALL CRITERIA
APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY
CRITERION
Is the criterion
applicable?
Will the criterion
tie satisfied?
If no, please explain
E LL = a
o <
a`
Yes
No
Al. COMMUNITY -WIDE CRITERIA
1.1 Solar Orientation
✓
1.2 Comprehensive Plan
V
1.3 Wildlife Habitat
t/
1.4 Mineral Deposit
✓
1.5 Ecologically Sensitive Areas
,ese,vec!
reserved
1.6 Lands of Agricultural Importance
1.7 Energy Conservation
1.8 Air Quality
✓
1.9 Water Quality
1.10 Sewage and Wastes
A 2. NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY CRITERIA
2.1 Vehicular Pedestrian Bike Transportation
u,
2.2 Building Placement and Orientation
2.3 Natural Features
V
2.4 Vehicular Circulation and Parking
V
V/
2.5 Emergency Access
✓
v'
2.6 Pedestrian Circulation
✓
2.7 Architecture
2.8 Building Height and Views
✓
2.9 Shading
2.10 Solar Access
2.11 Historic Resources
2.12 Setbacks
✓
2.13 Landscape
✓
2.14 Signs
2.15 Site Lighting
V
2.16 Noise and Vibration
2.17 Glare or Heat
2.18 Hazardous Materials
A 3. ENGINEERING CRITERIA
3.1 Utility Capacity
3.2 Design Standards
✓
�;
3.3 Water Hazards
3.4 Geologic Hazards
/
L I
Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments
The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994
Cai`^+_.�� ' :� A 7 - w.:S �+y{`�'+�'!"v.•. '--fd�''�Pgifrftrk[��'xc.
i •
M . Lo6� fuv--Fc2e_�
ACTIVITY.
Auto -Related and Roadside Commercial D
DEFINITION:
Those retail and wholesale commercial activities which are generally considered and typically found
along highways and arterial streets. Uses include free-standing department stores; auction rooms;
automobile service stations, repair facilities, car washes; boat, car, trailer, motorcycle showrooms, sales,
and repair; fuel and ice sales; greenhouses and nurseries; warehouses and storage; repair or rental of any
article; exterminating shops; drive-in restaurants; adult book stores; eating places with adult amusement
or entertainment; adult photo studios; adult theaters; any uses intended to provide adult amusement or
entertainment; and, other uses which are of the same general character.
CRITERIA:
Each of the following applicable criteria must be answered "yes" and implemented within the
development plan.
Yes No N/A
1. Does the project gain its primary vehicular access from a street other than
South Colleee Avenue?
2. Are all repair, painting and body work activities, including the storage of
refuse and vehicle parts, planned to take place within an enclosed
structure?
3. If the project contains any uses intended to provide adult amusement or
entertainment, does it meet the following requirements?
a. Is the use established, operated or maintained no less than 500 feet
from a residential neighborhood, church, and/or school meeting all of
the requirements of the compulsory education laws of the State of
Colorado?;
b. Is the use established, operated, or maintained no less than one
thousand (1,000) feet from another similar use?
4. DOES THE PROJECT EARN AT LEAST FIFTY (50%) PERCENT OF
THE MAXIMUM POINTS AS CALCULATED ON POINT CHART
"B" FOR THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA?
a. Is the activity located other than at the intersection of two arterial streets?
b. Is the project contiguous to and functionally a part of an existing neighborhood or
community/regional shopping center, office, or industrial park?
c. Is the primary access to the activity from a non -arterial street?
d. Is the project on at least two (2) acres of land?
e. Does the project contain two (2) or more significant uses (for instance retail, office, residential,
hotel/motel, or recreation)?
Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments
The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994
ma
Auto -Related and Roadside Commercial
(continued)
f. Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on -site parking areas and adjacent existing
or future off -site parking areas which contain more than ten (10) spaces?
g. Does the activity reduce non-renewable energy usage through the application of alternative energy
systems or through energy conservation measures beyond those normally required by the Model
Energy Code as adopted by the City? Refer to Appendix " E" for energy conservation methods to
use for calculating energy conservation points.
h. Is the project located with at least one -sixth (1/6) of its property boundary contiguous to existing
urban development?
i. If the site contains a building or place in which a historic event occurred, has special public value
because of notable architecture, or is of cultural significance, does the project fulfill the following
criteria?
1. Prevent creation of influences adverse to its preservation,
2. Assure that new structures and uses will be in keeping with the character of the building or
place. Imitation of period styles should be avoided; and
3. Propose adaptive use of the building or place that will lead to its continuance, conservation,
and improvement in an appropriate manner while respecting the integrity of the
neighborhood.
Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments
The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994
-69-
AUTO -RELATED AND
ROADSIDE COMMERCIAL
POINT CHART D
For All Criteria
Applicable Criteria Only
Criterion
Is
the
Criterion
Applicable
Yes No
I II III IV
Clrcie
the
Correct Score
Multiplier
Points
Earned
Ixtl
Maximum
ADollconle
Points
a, Not at Two Arterials
X
X
12
1 0
2
4-
4
b. Part of Planned Center
X
X
2
0
3
-
6
c. On Non -Arterial
X
X
2
0
4
s
g
d. Two Acres or More
X
X
2
I 0
3
6
e, Mixed -Use
X
X
1 2
0
3
6
f. Joint Parking
1
2
0
3
g. Energy Conservation
X
112I 3
4
0
2
g
h. Contiguity
X
X
2 I0
5
10
i, Historic Preservation
1 12
I
0
2
J
1
2 +0
k•
1
2
0
l
1 12
0
Totals
v vi
Percentage Earned of Maximum Applicable Points V/VI = VII �5 A-
vii
Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments
The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994
-70-
A
APPENDIX "E"
Method One: Direct comparison to Model Energy Code.
This method awards points based on the extent to which the proposed building exceeds the minimum
standard as established in the Model Energy Code using the systems approach. Certification by a
professional engineer licensed in Colorado will be required to demonstrate that the annual energy
consumption will be a certain percentage, less than the same building just meeting the minimum
standard as defined in the Model Energy Code.
Percentage below the
Mod:.l Energy Code Minimum
Points Awarded
15 - 25%
1.0 point
26-35%
2.0 points
36 - 45%
3.0 points
46% or more
4.0 points
Method Two:
Points will be given for the implementation of one or more of the energy conservation measures
listed below. The use of Method Two requires that the final approved PUD plans and construction
plans submitted for a Building Permit must specify all of the energy conservation measures for
which points have beLn awarded in the approved plan. The total number of energy conservation
points earned will be based upon the following table:
0.6 - 1.5 1.0 point
1.6 - 2.5 2.0 points
2.6 - 3.5 3.0 points
`3 6 or more; CZO points
Method Two Energy Conservation Measures:
1. Long axis of building is east/west (building
oriented to south, with majority of windows
on south wall) 0.2
2. Ratio of exterior wall area to interior floor
area is less than 1.5 0.3
3. Mass of exterior building walls greater than
30 lb/sq. ft. 0.2
Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments
The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994
- 120 -
4.
Passive solar heating utilized by building
heating system with a minimum of savings
fraction of 0.4 (using orientation that
maximizes solar gain and window coverings)
3.0
5.
Natural daylighting utilized, with automatic
insulated covers with minimum R-value of 2.5
0.3
6.
Overall wall U-value is <0.2
1
7.
Overall roof U-value is <0.6
0.3
8.
Reflective glass or film used on all windows
0.2
9.
Vestibules, air locks, or revolving doors used
on all entrances
0.2
10.
Automatic night/weekend temperature
setback is
(A '
provided
11.
"Free Cooling" (using outside air) used for fan
systems of less than 5000 CFM
0.2
12.
Low leakage outside air and exhaust air
dampers used; 1% leakage maximum at 5" W.C.
0.3
13.
Variable air volume system used, with inlet
vanes or variable speed drives
0.5
14.
High efficiency motors (as labeled by
manufacturer) used
0.1
15.
Water-cooled condensers used for
mechanical cooling systems
0.2
16.
Evaporati ve cooling used in lieu of
mechanical cooling
0.4
17.
Boilers or furnaces used with firing
than 82%
0.2
efficiencies greater
18.
Automatic spark ignition used for gas
fired boilers, furnaces, unit heaters, etc.
U.1
19.
Automatic dampers used in combustion
air intakes
0.1
20. Outside air reset used for boiler supply
water temperature control (boiler water
temp reset inversely from outside temp) 0.3
21. Exhaust or condenser heat recovery utilized ' 0.3
22. Waste water heat recovery utilized (car
washes, laundries, etc.) 2.0
Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments
The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994
- 121 -
23. Ice or low temperature water storage system
utilized for off-peak air conditioning and
reduced air conditioning equipment sires
24. Electric resistance heat not used
25. Night air used for pre -cooling space with
building air handling system, automatically
controlled ,
0
26. Fluorescent lamps and electronic ballasts are
used throughout the building
27. Motion detector lighting control is used for
all lighting
28. Lighting watt density less than 2W/sq. ft.
29. Building uses active solar, geothermal, wind,
or other non -depleting energy source (capable
of collecting, storing, and distributing) for
space heating, with a minimum savings fraction
of 0.4
.30. Radiant heating used in lieu of unit heaters
31. Roof automatically cooled with water spray
32. Windows are shaded from summer sun (over-
hangs, window coverings, deciduous trees)
33. Computerized energy management system
used with capability to cycle equipment,
automatic lights on/off, optimum start,
nighVweekend setback
34. Use of an existing structure that is in
compliance or is brought into compliance
with the adopted Model Energy Code
(entire structure must be in compliance)
35. Other methods (to accommodate new
technology).
1.0
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
3.0
0.2
0.1
0.2
In
Points wi!1 be assigned on a
proportionate basis by
comparing the amount of energy
that can be saved by the
proposed measure with the
amount of energy that can be
saved by utilizing other items
from the Method Two listing.
74&� 3.7
Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments
The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994
- 122 -
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
PROJECT: Hugh M. Woods, P.U.D.
DATE: August 11, 1994
APPLICANT: Barry Hilton, Payless/Cashways Company
CONSULTANT: Jim Sell, Jim Sell Design
PLANNER: Steve Olt
This meeting was a follow-up meeting. The purpose of this
meeting was for a design review of the original plans for the
Hugh M. Woods store to be built at the corner of Skyway Drive and
College Avenue in Fort Collins. The entire structure is to be
730,000 square feet. The warehouse showroom is to be 57,000
square feet. The building will be of concrete block/masonry.
There will be a drive through lumber yard with six lanes; three
entrance lanes and three exit lanes.
QUESTIONS, CONCERNS, COMMENTS
1. We are concerned about the neighborhood adjacent to Skyway
Drive.
2. Why does the access road have to be Skyway, can't this be
changed?
A. We have shifted the point of entrance 45 feet from the
intersection and added an alley to take up less of Skyway.
3. What changes have been made to the plans.
A. We have added 80 feet of landscape buffer with berms. There
has been an additional row of trees because no sidewalk was
required.
1
4. The building will be an eyesore.
A. The ground we are building on is depressed, essentially one
would look over the top of most of the building. This will
be a low profile building.
5. Will there be a separate right turn lane coming Southbound
on Skyway?
A. Yes, and an additional road to loop back to the flow of
traffic will be built.
6. How long will it be until the project is completed?
A. We are in the early stages of planning.
7. We are concerned about the construction of Skyway, will it
hold this traffic or can it be rebuilt?
A. The development proposal East of College, Huntington Hills
will have access via Skyway Drive. If both developments go
through Skyway will be reconstructed and aligned; additional
turn lanes will be added and an intersection constructed.
8. Why does Skyway have to be the access road, why not just
have Highway 287 be the access street?
A. Highway 287 is governed by the State Highway Access Control
Code which maintains the flow of traffic regarding how
development can intersect with a state highway. The state
would rather have a side street connect to the highway to
maintain movement and safety.
9. Skyway should not be the entrance to Hugh M. Woods because
it is a hill and it will be icy in the winter. People can't
control their cars on the hill when it is icy.
10. Why does Wal-mart have access to 287?
A. Wal-mart has access to 287 but it also has access to Harmony
Road.
2
11. Will this project be reason to widen the entrance of Skyway?
A. Yes, it will be widened.
12. Can you make a frontage road like the one on the East side
of 287?
A. No. The frontage road on the East side is a problem, it is
not set to standard. Cars stack up at the intersection and
cause problems at the turn intersection.
13. The residents here enjoy the wildlife that lives in this
area. What efforts have been made to protect the wildlife
instead of killing it off?
A. The City of Fort Collins Natural Resources Department will
evaluate the area.
14. Do people have any say regarding this site and the wildlife?
A. The habitat has not been evaluated yet but it must meet the
requirements set forth by the City of Fort Collins Natural
Resources Department.
15. Will this proposed development be within the city limits?
A. Yes.
16. Is the area across the street within the city limits?
A. No.
17. What is planned for the North side of College, South of
Trilby, on the North side of Tynans Nissan?
A. It is unknown at this time.
18. I see this as a quality development, I am in support of the
project coming in. I also like the development process.
19. Will we be notified of the public hearings?
A. Yes.
3
20. Some of us are concerned that our neighborhood is in the
County, we have bad streets and no drainage. What can the
City do to help us?
A. One option is annexation into the City. The City cannot
take care of the roads unless neighborhood is annexed.
21. We do not want any additional traffic on Constellation.
22. The City won't annex our neighborhood because of the poor
streets and the drainage problems. We would love to be a
part of the City.
23. Would you want this in front of your door; all the traffic?
24. Why was this site selected?
A. Payless/Cashways looks for sites that are zoned or master
planned for our use. This site was master planned as a
warehouse in 1989. Some of the things we have done to make
this development more attractive are: allowed for alot of
green area, have made a big buffer area, building is
recessed so that it is low profile, loading facility is at
the front of building so no more access of Skyway is
required.
25. Who makes the ultimate decision on the intersection?
A. Within the Urban Growth Area jurisdiction falls under the
city; however, 287 is State Highway so State ultimately
approves any plans.
26. I don't see any berms along the West Side, will they be put
in?
A. Yes, there are the same berms on both sides.
28. Will the 80 feet of landscape buffer be maintained if the
roads are widened or will the roads take away from berms?
A. Street will not be enlarged, berms will remain as planned.
4
29. This drawing does not match the existing property.
A. Curb gutter and sidewalk will be added, that is why it looks
different.
30. If changes are made to Skyway will the City require that the
entire street is fixed?
A. Sometimes streets are redone with money from the Street
Oversizing Fund.
31. What is being done to control noise and lighting?
A. No loud speakers are being used. Off site spillage of
lighting is not permitted by the City of Fort Collins.
32. Will the lights be on 24 hours a day?
A. Every fourth or fifth light would remain on after closing,
. but most lights are turned out.
33. Will there be perimeter lighting on the outside of the
commodities storage buildings?
A. No.
34. We are concerned with the architectural quality of the back
walls to the North and West. Will they be brick or
something more residential looking?
A. A compromise could be made such as to put a stone or brick
cap on top. It should look like a high quality security
wall.
35. Has the irrigation ditch been taken into consideration.
A. It will be straightened and relocated.
36. Will there be a detention pond?
A. Yes, there is already an existing detention pond.
5
37. The lane divider you plan to build on Skyway, will it be
painted or a raised divider?
A. It will be painted which is normal for a collector
street like this one.
38. We are concerned about the frontage road on the North side
of Skyway.
39. What kind of uses are proposed around this site?
A. Predominately retail/commercial master planned. However,
any master plan is subject to change.
40. Where are you in the development process?
A. This project has not been submitted to the City yet. The
next submittal date is August 22, 1994.
41. Are there any long range plans for Highway 287 becoming a 55
mph zone between Skyway and Harmony?
A. Nothing has been planned for the near future.
42. Will there eventually be a median built to divide the lanes
on Highway 287?
A. There are currently no plans for extending the existing
median on Highway 287.
111
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
'r-r
Project
Meetina Locatio
Dat
Attendees: lease sign this sheet. The information will be used to
update the project mailing list and confirm attendance at neighborhood
meetings. Contact the Planning Department (221-6750) if you wish to
receive minutes of this meeting.
Did You Receive
Written Notification
of this meeting?
Correct
Address.
Name Address Zip
Yes
No
Yes
No
�c ;mac r✓ �j vDSer di 0CA
VZ
_ (', C S `�1
.�XA, Mask sc,: -,
/ l IZ-60 A*/K7 w`7
('A 7�
b1z[Sf��r� 1 RSUi� 610� CMSTEU.4T-10N
a n ►� cz r 3 J ,�
,f ka Lv �J so Koa.
c gw/- PE41
7'
STEJL 3 to CID Z dos
✓
✓
��, f A/ ru o� />
Oea rl onoVa(A 3f'BOW 65Z5
� ��Z J
Y-
FF M A.0 ) 0rAc lAA
J
a
r1-0-YCV- �AjA t,(",J
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Written
You Receive Correct
Notification :address.
of this meeting?
Name Address Zip Yes No Yes No
{iL:c 1�A�t��� C���
PROJECT:
DATE:
APPLICANT:
CONSULTANT:
PLANNER:
and Environmental Onces
Planning Department
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
HUGH M. WOODS, retail building center
July 20, 1994
PAYLESS CASHWAYS, INC.
Jim Sell, Jim Sell Design, Inc.
Steve Olt
The meeting began with a description of the proposed project. The
site is located across the street from the Hickory House Restaurant
and near the corner of Highway 287 and Skyway Drive.
QUESTIONS, CONCERNS, COMMENTS
1. What kind of material is this building made of?
RESPONSE: Tilt -up masonry units for what we call the "box" of the
building which is the main, big building. Then the courtyard part
of the structure is siding.
2. Our biggest concern as nearby residents in this area is the
impact this project will have on Skyway Drive. We do not want an
entrance to this store from Skyway. The hill right there gets very
slick and dangerous in the winter months. The county puts lots of
sand on it and automobiles seem to slide to the traffic light
because of it.
3. Within five minutes of our homes we can shop at Builder's
Square or UBC and within fifteen minutes we can shop at Sutherlands
down on College Avenue. We do not need another store of this kind
in this part of town.
4. What are the stores working hours and will there be semi trucks
loading and unloading and coming in off of Skyway Drive?
RESPONSE: The store hours are 7:30 am to 8:00 pm, Monday through
Friday and typical summer hours will be 7:30 am to 9:00 pm.
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6750
Deliveries start at approximately 8:00 am and they stop around 5:00
pm. There should not be any overnight parking in our outside
parking lot of semi -trailer trucks.
5. Will there be a fence around the store? Our courtyard area
buildings will be built subterranean style, with part of the
structure built into the hillside and approximately eight feet of
the building above the ground. The lighting that we have along the
inside of the courtyard area will be installed on the buildings and
made to shine downward into the compound. The parking lot area in
the front of the store off Hwy 287 will have the required foot
candles needed to light a parking lot.
6. The front part of this proposed site is in a flood plain area,
so what will happen to the retention pond?
RESPONSE: It will be kept in place, however there will be less
standing water than there is now. Storm Drainage Department of the
City will design this area for a 100 year flood. The whole
existing irrigation and drainage system will be reviewed for this
area.
7. We're all County residents
patrol Skyway Drive and the area
this is built?
RESPONSE: Yes.
out here. Will the City police
surrounding the proposed site if
8. This proposed site has lots of wildlife living on it. Three
bald eagles have been seen living here along with numerous prairie
dogs, hawks, etc. Has the resident wildlife on this land been
taken into account and would the present owner of this property
even remotely be interested in keeping this area an open wildlife
area?
RESPONSE: Natural Resources does not have any data on this
particular area, however they will be involved in this process and
it will be reviewed.
9. Who are most of your customers? Are they wholesale or mainly
retail?
RESPONSE: It's about fifty - fifty.
10. The traffic impact on Skyway Drive is of utmost concern to us.
RESPONSE: A traffic study will be submitted. And the County will
also be involved will the review of this proposed building site.
11. What guarantees do we have that this store will be kept
looking presentable over the years?
RESPONSE: This store is one of our proto-types and we are proud of
the appearance of it and it will be kept looking nice.
0
12. Stanley Scott, one of the nearby residents, submitted a
letter he had typed up to the City and would like it attached to
the minutes.
Meeting adjourned at approximately 8:40 pm.
City of Fart Collins
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORI`TATION MEETING
for
--- Project:--- --- - -
Meetina Location: G • lJt�
Date:
Attendees: PIease sign this sheet. The information will be used to
update the project mailing list and confirm attendance at neighborhood
ZN�.
meetings. Contact the Planning Department (221-6750) if you wish to
Did You Receive
Correct
receive minutes of this meeting.
Written Notirication
address.
of this meeting?
Name Address Zip
Yes
No
Yes
No
1 z O L►) 1 Il �
��J
.!
Swee �e�
S (!:�a LC/-.3s �=SaS
x
x
23cz, k 4AvN 5�
c - Zed
ova s 6 L4 ► o 1K,
v
t #.Q 5A iV�C9
C/1 U S ,cif,
d' 2 ecu� �65�s
✓
2(; �� (� oJ1J coio n ALA. CY7 z�
✓
&/Lja la I v y 5 016, c CT SOS
1/
'V� Cfneck. lnexr✓ i
o U LT V. .
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
Did You Receive
Vritten Notification
of this meeting?
Correct
Address.
Name Address Zip
Yes
No
Yes
No
e Has r
0
1w Ad d44 9s / lT Q sa 6
G / ,�
✓'
Velt)"le-tA Lckklae Jaq SKvidctv 12,
Ix
03r
I
—7T
•
0
July 20, 1994
Planning Department
City of Fort Collins
Good evening, my name is Stanley Scott, I reside at 6022 Venus Avenue in the Skyview
Addition. I would prefer to see the undeveloped land near my home remain in its current
near -natural state. At the same time, I believe it is unrealistic to expect that land abutting
US 287 in this area will remain "Prairie Dog Estates". My specific concerns with the
proposed development include noise, lighting, traffic, and aesthetics. I believe the
best we can hope to achieve is a development that is a "tolerable" commercial neighbor.
I therefore urge the Fort Collins Planning Commission to require the following conditions
for development of this property as a Payless Cashways:
1) Prohibit all outside sound amplification;
2) Limit the hours of most illumination of the property to the hours of operation;
3) Require that lighting be directed onto the property, not into the
neighborhood;
4) Limit access to and egress from the property to only US 287 (College Ave.),
thus providing no access to or egress from the property from or onto
Skyway Drive (Skyway Drive is a collector street serving residential
neighborhoods and Foothills -Gateway Rehabilitation Center.);
5) Require solid screening and quality, well -maintained landscaping, especially
along the north and west property lines;
6) Provide no waivers of existing height or size restrictions for signs;
7) Prohibit overnight, on -sight parking of delivery trucks and trailers;
8) Limit size and location "of display areas; and
9) Prohibit outside storage of equipment and materials.
While I would prefer to see a less intense development (ie. offices), you will receive my
"informed consent" if the above conditions are included in the development plan.
Stanley J. Scott
Nancy A. Banman �jJ0 6022 Venus Vd3)I VZ�
Fort Collins, CO 80525 (303) 651-8840
f
00
M
LO
0
00
O
rV
Q
O
J
O
V
z
J
W
>
O
J
w
D
z
w
a
z
a
}
z
Q
m
M
v
Cl)
W
V
J
W
G
09
J
W
2
F-
F--
Q
z
w
w
z
z
w
J
V
z
O
'Q
CC
0
a
�n
z
a
U
LL
w
Q
IN
MEMORANDUM
To: Tom Vosburg, Fort Collins Transportation Division
Steve Olt, Fort Collins Planning Department
From: Matt Delich
Date: October 5, 1994
Subject: Hugh M. Woods - Response to Transportation Division
concerns (File: 9480MEM1)
This memorandum addresses the concerns reflected in the
"Project Comment Sheet" (9/26/94) from Tom Vosburg.
a. The attached sketch is a plan that shows the alignment
of Skyway Drive on both sides of College Avenue. The attached
sketch is being formally drawn to scale, under my direction,
by Jim Sell Design, for submission also.
b. The attached sketch also shows a potential alignment of
the frontage road around the Hickory House. It shows a
potential access scheme for the Hickory House.
C. The nomographs in Appendix A show the left -turn storage
analysis for Skyway Drive west of College Avenue. Using the
afternoon peak hour volume (230 vph), a turn lane of 240-315
feet is required. The dual left -turn lanes shown provide 340
feet of storage. The westbound left -turn lane at the H.M.
Woods access is technically not required. However, since the
pavement will be available, a 50 foot left -turn lane is shown
on the sketch. This left -turn lane will reduce vehicle
conflicts.
Refinement of this design should occur in the course of
the development review process.
No Text
APPENDIX A
C - 100
on
600
r
I
M
w
-V.
-Al
m
=
j 400
N
�
Z
10
a 300
U
—
�
�
PM LEAK
= M
n
a
N'-
—eoo
500 r
Vvc.v IA �"' 200
0
I
230 vPN
-
Too-
Z
'4
o
O-
500 J
C
N
i 100
(
-
C9
�w 600- - Z
_ J z
H r(A� - 400 a
500- -73
C7 ~
Q-
Cc)O LL
J�',ti o
400- - 300
o. z
4 .Y 1-
- oQ -- -- 300-
w
ti
— — 2 00 J
M
200- - ^'^
IJ
1o0 Q
10 0
0
LENGTI{ OF RIGHT- OR LEFT -TURN LANE
SovacE: Lp-IsCNI JACK, "CAr/1CITY ANALYSIS IELNNI�jUEs
FOR DESIGN OF- 51G" •L17-ED INTr-msCGrio"s"
APPENDIX A, VOLUME WARRANT CHARTS (CONTINUED)
(Grade, Untignolized Intersections)
L• % Left Turns in VA
S•Storoge Length Repuired
. I V" • 40 mDh
L • 20 %
tma�sewu�aetasmarr
rar_����������
mom
BE
INNEWN
ME
lm����®
MENmm
®EMMEILI
a
I
Mills
ME
Emmm I
I
Fmal"mm
WE
E
E
ILI
0%04
1
SIR a
MINE
i
MINELM
lrmmmAmmmE
LEM
FIGURE A-5, WARRANT FOR LEFT -TURN STORAGE LANES,
TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS
A-4
APPENDIX A, VOLUMES WARRANT CHARTS (CONTINUED)
.«
•••� ,�• !
'
`
(Grode . Unsignoli:ed Intersections)
�;
1
1
L' �: Left Turns in VA
roe
•1.. :.. ..
=
._._
1
1
5•SlOropt Length Repoired
_L
v mph
1
e
1
;. No Uf1 -�Irre Letle . 1
1
-
I � ' ' •
IIj
r
e
,ee eee
fee .oe
.« eee ree
v, .0—c'.e .e...t I...t
tes eea oee n«
FIGURE A-7, WARRANT FOR LEFT -TURN STORAGE LANES,
TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS
T- T
1 Grode , Unvgrlollted Intersections 1
—.....�
;.:. ..........
Lr t Lef Turns in V
,
S'Sle.ope Length Re4w*d
:�
V1 • SO mph
L S
: tee
I. Lett. I.,. Lee.
11ee.. of
• 1
. I
e
I 1
e gee
too
..0 we ws eee M. eee
.ea..e 1..•.
«e ooe ,.sa
FIGURE A-8, WARRANT FOR LEFT -TURN STORAGE LANES,
TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS
A-5