The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTIMAN PUD PARCEL "A" - PRELIMINARY - 26-88C - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTS0 CITY OF FORT COLLINS OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 20, 1988 Mr. Tony Hughes 2900 South College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80525 Dear Mr. Hughes, Staff has reviewed the Tinian Master Plan and First Phase Preliminary PUD and has the following comments: MASTER PLAN COMMENTS 1. Indicate zoning on the Master Plan as BP with a planned unit develop- ment condition. 2. Indicate residential density of surrounding residential areas. 3. Staff would like to see a commitment from the developer that the site will be designed as a connercial/retail/office "center" with compatible architectural design and a master plan landscape concept. 4. Key the specific land uses to the land use categories. 5. Staff is reluctant to approve access points along College Avenue with- out the benefit of the South College Access Plan, expected to be avail- able in September 1988. 6. An additional traffic signal between Skyway Drive and Trilby Road will not be approved. 7. There needs to be a public street connection between Skyway Drive and the interior street system. 8. Access points on Skyway Drive need to align with existing access points . on the north side of the street. OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, PLANNING 300 LaPorte Ave. • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 • (303) 221-6750 Tinian Master Plan/First Phase Preliminary Comments May 20, 1988 - Pa* y • 9. The Planning and Zoninq Board cannot approve a master plan 'or them property at the southwest corner of Trilby Road and College Avenue because it is not within the city limits. Please show this property as an out pared. The "joint access" arrow along Trilby Road is okay. 10. A 70 foot half right-of-way will be required for College Avenue between Skyway Drive and Trilby Road. A 50 foot half right-of-way will be required for Trilby Road. ii. The developer wiIi be responsible for acquirinq State Highway "access permits" for curb cuts on College Avenue. 12. Final plat(s) need to dedicate i5 foot minimum width utility easements along College Avenue and Trilby Road and 8 foot minimum width utility easements on both sides of all interior streets. 13. The drainage report should discuss the final outfall of all culvert crossings on College Avenue. 14. The developer will need ditch company approval for piping the irriga- tion lateral. 15. The ponds will have to have staged releases since the site will be developed in phases. 16. Are there any existing drainage reports for the off -site areas (church, Skyway Subdivision, Foothills Gateway)? Is the data shown in the Master Drainage report assumed, or obtained from reports and field data? 17. Erosion control will be critical for the entire site. Siltation of the wetland areas must be minimized in order to retain the required pond volume. Temporary and permanent erosion control methods must be addressed. 18. See report and drainage plan for additional comments. 19. Extensive water line development will be needed to service proposed uses. Fire sprinkler systems would reduce fire flow demands and water supply costs. 20. Comments from the Water and Sewer department will be forwarded as soon as they are available. PRELIMINARY PLAN COMMENTS 1. A "retail/showroom" is classified as an auto -related commercial use, therefore, we need to use point chart D (see attached). Timan raster Plan/First Phase Preliminary Comments ' May 20, 1988 - Page * 0 2. Points nay be taken for being part of a planned center if the developer will aaree to submitting a superblock plan for each consecutive phase of the master plan to insure that the land uses are site planned as a commercial "center." 3. Partial credit may be taken for Joint parking if you provide pedestrian connections to future development within the master plan. 4. Submit preliminary architectural elevations. 5. Provide pedestrian connections to the neighborhood. 6. Indicat: proposed signage. 7. List specific land use alternatives. 8. Indicate the density of the adiacent residential area. 9. Indicate all existing trees. 10. Provide owner certification. 11. Submit a landscape plan. 12. Provide a master plan key map. 13. Erosion control will be critical on this site and Basin A. The deten- tion volume provided in the wetland area is just enough to meet requirements, therefore, you can't afford to have any siltation of the pond. Provide specific information on erosion control measures (tempo- rary and permanent) on the Final submittal. 14. Is the existing 24 inch RCP under Highway 287 functional? Where is the outfall? 15. A staged release from the pond is needed. See comments in the report. 16. Ditch company approval is required for piping of the irrigation lat- eral. 17. A 15 foot wide utility easement is required along College Avenue. An 8 foot wide utility easement is required along Skyway Drive. 18. The building exceeds the 1.50 foot access distance, therefore, the building must be equipped with a fire sprinkler system. 19. The water line in Skyway may be inadequate to supply the required fire flow and sprinkler system. A new water line may be needed. The water line size and hydrant locations must be reviewed by Poudre Fire Author- ity. Tinian master Plan/First Phase Preliminary Comments May 20, 1988 - Pa*4 • 20. If the west portion of the building is used for hinh rack storage in excess of 12,000 square feet, 20 foot access roadway must be extended from the lest parking lot to the southwes, corner. 21. A right -turn bay is required at Skyway and College .Avenue. 22. Show dimension of building envelope to property line. 23. Staff questions the building setback along Skyway. 24. Comments frnm the Water and Sewer department will be forwarded as soon as they are available. 25. Additional comments are red -lined on the utility plan. Plan revisions are due by noon on June 8, 1988. PMTs, colored renderings, and ten (10) prints are due June 20, 1988. Final mylars and documents are due June 23, 1988. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Linda Ripley Senior City Planner xc: Tom Peterson, Director of Planning Mike Herzig, Development Coordipator Jim Faulhaber, Civil Engineer I File AUTO -RELATED AND ROADSIDE COMMERCIAL POINT CHART D For All Critera Applicable Criteria Only Ry 1 n ill IV Circle Is The The Maximum Criterion Criterion Correct Points Applicable Applicable Score Multiplier Earned Points Yes No Yes VW No 1x11 a. Notattwo arterials X XA 0 2 4 b. Part of planned center X X 2 0 3 6 c. On non -arterial X X 2 0 4 g d. Two acres or more X X : 0 3 �, 6 e. Mixed -use X X 2 0 3 6 f, Joint parking 1 2 0 3 g. Energy conservation X 1 2 0 4 g h. Contiguity X IXq201- 5 c' 10 i, Historic preservation L 1 2101 2 r� j. 1 1 2101 k. ti 2 0 I. 12_ 0 VW — Very Well Done Totals ;7 v VI Percentage Earned of Maximum Applicable Points VNI =VI1 % VII —21— • 0