HomeMy WebLinkAboutSANCTUARY ON THE GREEN - PDP210018 - REPORTS - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTS (2)Contact Information
1
Jenny Axmacher
Senior City Planner
jaxmacher@fcgov.com
970-416-8089
Katie Claypool
Community Development
kclaypool@fcgov.com
Please email your name
and full address to Katie to
receive the decision report.
Please call 719-297-1058 during the hearing, if you’re having technical difficulties accessing the hearing online.
HOW TO ZOOM
2
Providing Public Comment on Zoom
~Please sign in with your first name and last name (or last initial).
~The Hearing Officer will call for public comment on each item after a short
presentation from staff and/or applicants.
~Use the “Raise Hand” button at the bottom of your screen to let us know you
would like to speak.
~OR, if you are listening to the meeting through a telephone, please dial *9 on
your phone to raise your hand.
~We will call on you and let you know when you are able to unmute yourself.
~State your name and address when you speak.
Order of Proceedings
3
1.Project Introduction (staff)
2.Applicant Presentation
3.Staff Presentation
4.Staff Response to Applicant Presentation
5.Public Testimony
6.Applicant Response
7.Staff Response
8.Decision
•Within 10 business days, Hearing
Officer issues written decision
•May approve, approve with
conditions, or deny the development
application
9. Decision is mailed to applicant and anyone
who provided testimony at public hearing
10. Appeal Process
•Appeals are filed with the City Clerk’s
Office
•Written appeal must be received
within 14 calendar days of the
decision
•Filing fee of $100.00
•City Clerk will schedule appeal for City
Council
4
Staff Presentation
Jenny Axmacher–Senior City Planner
May 2, 2022
Sanctuary on the Green, PDP210018
Project Development Plan
Project Overview
5
•41.34 acres
•Zoning: L-M-N,
Low Density
Mixed-Use
Neighborhood
•Northwest
Subarea Plan
•Annexed in
1982 (west of
ditch) and
2018 (east of
ditch)
Project
Overview
6
•New Mercer
Ditch
•Soldier Creek
Trail;
Bellwether
Open Space
•West Vine
Basin
drainage area
Project Overview
7
•212 dwellings total
•Three housing types:
•32 alley-loaded single
family dwellings
•14 two-family dwelling
units
•166 single-family
attached dwelling
units
•Overall density –5.13
dwelling units per
gross acre
Project History -Prior PDP190003
8
•Withdrawn from
Planning & Zoning
Commission
•Proposed:
•87 multifamily
dwelling units
•106 single
family attached
dwelling units
•26 two family
dwelling units
•31 single family
dwelling units
Project History -Prior PDP190003
9
•New Plan Submitted
November 5, 2021
•PDP210018
•Determined to
include substantial
changes per
2.2.11(E)(9)
•New plan removed
multifamily dwelling
units
•Remaining housing
types proposed fall
under Type 1 review
Northwest Subarea
Key Concepts
10
In summary --NSP Key Concepts:
The purpose of the Northwest Subarea Plan is to establish “a focused roadmap for the
area’s future through clearly defined goals, policies, and strategies. An overarching theme of
this Plan is to retain and enhance the area’s existing character.”
When reviewing the proposed project for compliance with the policies and strategies contained
in the Northwest Subarea Plan there are two fundamental components of the NSP:
•Following what is allowed with the zoning’s density provides predictability
•Addressing compatibility with existing neighborhoods through design
•New neighborhoods should entail creative master planning to lead to visually attractive,
pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods that have nearby services, parks, and other amenities
Modifications of Standards
Overview
11
Modifications of Standards --proposed to address walkway spine requirements and number of
housing types.
Modification to Section 3.5.2(D)(1) Orientation to a Connecting Walkway, requesting that building
entrances to dwellings be oriented to a walkway that is longer than 350 feet, and within walkway
open space that is narrower than 35 feet.
Modification to Section 4.5(D)(2)(a)3. Housing Types, requesting approval of three housing types
instead of four.
Alternative Compliance Request
3.6.3 -Street Pattern and Connectivity Standards
12
Alternative Compliance Requested, addresses:
•3.6.3(D) Spacing of Limited Movement Collector or Local Street Intersections with Arterial
Streets.
•3.6.3(E) Distribution of Local Traffic to Multiple Arterial Streets.
•3.6.3(F) Utilization and Provision of Sub-Arterial Street Connections to and From Adjacent
Developments and Developable Parcels. Incorporate and continue all sub-arterial streets
stubbed to the boundary of the development plan; Provide for future public street
connections to adjacent developable parcels by providing a local street connection spaced
at intervals not to exceed six hundred sixty (660) feet along each development plan
boundary that abuts potentially developable or redevelopable land.
•First two standards say: “unless rendered infeasible due to unusual topographic features,
existing development or a natural area or feature.”
13
Public Outreach
14
A neighborhood meeting was not required but one was held. Concerns raised
included:
•Traffic and safety concerns for vehicles and pedestrians, particularly related to traffic
patterns for nearby high schools.
•Concerns about building height and the impact of taller buildings on the viewsheds and
character of existing neighborhoods.
•Environmental resources on the site.
•Concerns about grading, flooding, and stormwater runoff.
•Attendees who spoke or submitted questions via chat were mostly opposed to the
development, though there were comments in support of the project because of the
improved infrastructure and amenities related to the development. Reasons for opposition
included concerns about a mismatch with the intent of the Northwest Subarea Plan,
increased traffic delays with the addition of new homes onto already busy roads, and
concerns about safety for students of nearby high schools.
Northwest Subarea Plan
Overview
15
Appearance and Design:
“The vision for the Northwest Subarea is for new
development to fit in with the low density and country-like
image of the area and to safeguard natural features.”
Northwest Subarea character –“country-feel and distinctive
image in the broader Fort Collins/Larimer County
community --wide variety of styles, lot sizes, and activities.”
Page 9: “Vision and Key Strategies”
Key Idea #5. Low-Density Housing with Stable
Neighborhoods.
“Allow predominately low-density housing consistent with
the land use/framework plan. Protect stable neighborhoods
from incompatible development.”
Northwest Subarea
Framework Plan
16
•“The Framework Plan also creates some level of
predictability in what type and intensity can be
expected for one’s own property as well as neighboring
properties.”
•“The Framework Plan provides guidance to land uses,
activities, and density levels, but it is not regulatory.”
•“One of the primary objectives of the Framework Plan
is to ensure that future development is compatible with
the density, uses, and character of existing
neighborhoods.”
•For large properties that are zoned L-M-N, policies,
goals and strategies focus on following the L-M-N
zoning established with the Framework Plan; while
other goals also discuss achieving compatibility with
existing neighborhoods through “site-specific and
contextual design.”
Northwest Subarea
Framework Plan
17
•“Future development density
may be up to 8 units per acre
overall (or up to 12 units per
acre for affordable housing).“
•“In areas designated as Low
Density Mixed-Use (L-M-N)
residential areas, protect
existing single-family
neighborhoods by ensuring that
infill development on parcels to
be annexed is appropriate
density and design.”
Northwest Subarea Plan
18
Overall, the PDP meets the objectives outlined in the NSP:
•Following Framework Plan and maximum density guideline for the L-M-N Zone District –not more
than 8 dwellings per gross acre;
•Landscaped drainage and open spaces areas provide land use transitions to the north, west and
south North Taft Hill Road and landscape frontage improvements provide a land use transition to
the east;
•Two -family and single-family detached buildings are located on the west portion of the property,
which contributes to an overall density, building mass and building height transition from east to
west;
•Multiple pedestrian connection points are provided to appropriately integrate the project into the
surrounding neighborhoods and street system;
•Existing streets are not connected (Webb, Irish, Impala) with Alternative Compliance requested to
allow these connections to be pedestrian only, which helps protect existing neighborhoods and
long-standing existing conditions where through-traffic does not occur.
Stormwater improvements
and floodplain remapping
19
•Stormwater flow conveyed through the site by
the regional channel.
•New grading proposed: new detention areas to
improve these conveyance channels
•Also improves the natural habitat characteristics
of these existing channel areas.
•PROPOSED: 5 surface detention areas, rain
gardens, and underground detention to improve
stormwater quality and reduce the rate of
stormwater discharge from the site;
•Flows routed under the New Mercer Canal and
directs all developed flows from the site into the
Larimer No. 2 Canal;
Stormwater improvements
and floodplain remapping
20
Future City-funded regional improvement project --
construct the Forney regional detention pond and
regional channel located east of N. Taft Hill Road;
Sanctuary on the Green site --open space
tracts/conveyance channels
•In the interim: stormwater detention;
•Once these future City improvements are in place to the
east, they will serve as the outfall for the project site,
and on-site stormwater detention will not be necessary.
•The detention volume for the proposed site can be
shifted to the proposed Forney regional detention pond,
with the on-site channels then limited to only stormwater
conveyance, while still providing habitat and open
space.
Article 3 Development Standards
3.2.2 –Access, Circulation and Parking
21
•Eight-foot-wide trail to
Soldier Creek Trail
•5 bicycle and pedestrian
connections to Laporte Ave.
•Detached sidewalks along
portions of Laporte Avenue
and Taft Hill Road
•2 pedestrian bridges across
New Mercer Ditch
•Extensive network of
internal sidewalks
•3 connections to Green
Acres Subdivision
Transportation Improvements
22
•Center turn lane on Taft Hill Road
•Westbound right turn lane on Laporte
Avenue
•Street sidewalks
•City managed project: additional sidewalk,
bicycle lane and bridge improvements
•Laporte Avenue between Fishback
Avenue and Sunset Street
•Bridge improvements are currently
funded, and roadway improvements
are tentatively planned for 2022
(dependent on funding)
Parking
23
•453 off-street
parking spaces
•47 off-street
surface parking
spaces
•400 garage
spaces
•41 on-street
parking spaces
available
Section 3.4.1 –
Natural Habitats and Features
24
•Habitat buffering: 10.36 acres
•13.72 acres additional open space
area, landscaping
•24.08 acres landscaped area total
•Restoration includes: weed
mitigation, enhancement
plantings, wetland restoration,
pollinator gardens,
•Berming and dense plantings –
near more developed areas to
mitigate impacts such as noise
and lighting
3.4.7–Historic Resources
25
Pre-submittal requirement completed with priorcase
(PDP190003): historic survey --two properties within the
city that were adjacent to the site; noted as potentially
eligible for local landmark designation (2318 Laporte and
2540 Laporte).
Surveys are valid for 5 years so a new survey was not
required for this submittal.
Both properties have lost much of their historic integrity;
staff determination --no further historic review required
in terms of design compatibility with those properties
under section 3.4.7;
330 N Taft Hill, (County property) --listed on the State
Register in that same time frame, historic influence area
map provided to the applicant to consider design
compatibility with this historic farm property.
3.4.7–Historic Resources
26
•Because Taft Hill is an arterial --the applicant has to comply with
a minimum of two of the design compatibility requirements in
Table 1 of Section 3.4.7(E).
•Proposed PDP building designs along Taft Hill meet at least two
of those requirements.
•PDP building elevations: roof forms, window proportions, and use
of materials --reference to the more traditional residential styles
in the area, including the property at 330 N Taft Hill.
•While the building height and width of the proposed new
construction does not meet the 3.4.7 requirements, because
other design connections are made and it is across an arterial,
(i.e. not directly abutting the historic property nor incorporating the
historic structures on the same development site), those building
massing requirements are not applicable under 3.4.7.
•Staff waived Historic Preservation Commission review
Overview of
Architecture
27
75 residential
buildings:
•7 two-family; all two
story
•36 single-family
attached; 8 are two-
story, 28 are three-
story
•32 Single-family
detached
Architecture
Proposed
28
•36 single-
family
attached;
•8 are two-
story,
•28 are
three-story.
2-story SFA
8 buildings
29
Mid Century
Craftsman
Modern Farmhouse
Article 3 Development Standards
Compatibility
30
Primary techniques to achieve compatibility and reduce the overall
apparent mass/bulk of the buildings include:
•Utilizing masonry on the ground level to define the base of the larger
buildings;
•Ground level entrances on all three-story buildings include a shed or
hip roof component which further emphasizes the ground level;
•Providing secondary massing elements at the second level,
including projecting covered balconies and bay window treatments;
•Large windows are provided within the majority of the building
modules to further break down the scale of the buildings
Article 3 Development Standards
Compatibility
31
•Colors and materials vary, earth-tone and neutral
and do not deviate from what would normally be
found in any residential development.
•Materials include various combinations of
manufactured stone or brick veneer, board and
batten siding, lap siding, composition shingle
main and accent roofs. Metal accent roofs are
also used on portions of the 2-story multifamily
buildings.
•3.5.1(G) –Building Height Review –keep overall
height below 40 feet has significance
•Land Use Transition –landscaped buffer space,
fencing to west
Article 3 --Compatibility
3.5.1(H) –Land Use Transition
32
•Land Use Code L-M-N standard 4.5(E)(4)(b). --Specific buffer yard standard:
Multi-family buildings shall be set back from the property line of abutting
property containing single-and two-family dwellings at least 25 feet
•Administrative Interpretation #1-18 would make this standard applicable to the
3-story townhomes as well.
•The proposed single-family attached buildings are separated from adjacent
properties by perimeter open space, N. Taft Hill Road landscape improvements
and building setback, and the width of the existing N. Taft Hill arterial street right -
of-way.
•In all of these instances, the separation between these proposed buildings and
adjacent single-family properties exceeds 25 feet.
Article 3 Development Standards
3.6.3 -Street Pattern and Connectivity Standards
33
Alternative Compliance Requested, addresses:
•3.6.3(D) Spacing of Limited Movement Collector or Local Street Intersections with Arterial
Streets.
•3.6.3(E) Distribution of Local Traffic to Multiple Arterial Streets.
•3.6.3(F) Utilization and Provision of Sub-Arterial Street Connections to and From Adjacent
Developments and Developable Parcels. Incorporate and continue all sub-arterial streets
stubbed to the boundary of the development plan; Provide for future public street
connections to adjacent developable parcels by providing a local street connection spaced
at intervals not to exceed six hundred sixty (660) feet along each development plan
boundary that abuts potentially developable or redevelopable land.
•First two standards say: “unless rendered infeasible due to unusual topographic features,
existing development or a natural area or feature.”
34
Article 3 Development Standards
3.6.3(H) Alternative Compliance
35
Upon request by an applicant, the decision maker may approve an
alternative development plan that may be substituted in whole or in part for a
plan meeting the standards of this Section.
•Alternative compliance is based on unusual topographic features, existing
development, naturals areas and other constraints, including the shape of the
property, the New Mercer Ditch, existing wetlands and floodway constraints;
•PDP provides local street connections to adjacent streets where possible;
•Provides pedestrian and bicycle connections to the adjacent arterial and
neighborhoods neighborhood streets as well as the Soldier Creek Trail;
Article 3 Development Standards
3.6.3(H) Alternative Compliance
36
Alternative Compliance Met –Staff Findings:
Design minimizes the impacts on natural areas and features.
Development's traffic level of service standards still met; neighborhood continuity and
connectivity is enhanced.
Accomplishes the purposes of this Division equally well or better based on the
proposed layout and design of streets including:
•Local street intersections with Laporte Avenue and N. Taft Hill Road.
•Facilities for bicycle, pedestrians maintained to the maximum extent feasible:
•2 bicycle and pedestrian crossings of the New Mercer Ditch,
•5 pedestrian/bicycle connections to Laporte Avenue, 5 to the north
Division 4.5
L-M-N Zone District Standards
37
•Minimum density met --4 dwelling units per
net acre (7.13 dwellings net)
•Maximum density met --9 dwelling units
per gross acre; (8 is NSP guideline) 5.13
dwellings/gross acre
•Mix of Housing –4 minimum housing types
provided per requirement
•Modification Requested for fourth
housing type
•Two -family dwellings
•Single-family attached dwellings
•Single-family detached dwellings with
rear loaded garages
Division 4.5
L-M-N Zone District Standards
38
•Small Neighborhood Park
Provided –at least one acre
required
•2-story maximum height
proposed for the 7 two-family
buildings and 32 single-family
detached buildings (2.5 story
maximum)
•3-story maximum height for the
single family attached buildings
•28 three-story buildings
proposed
•8 two-story buildings
proposed
Division 4.5
Neighborhood Center
39
•4.5(D)(3), a Neighborhood Center must comply with criteria related to access to the center, location, land
uses, design, and outdoor spaces.
•Proposed on the eastern edge of the project as a 3,000 square-foot mixed-use building with six parking
spaces
•Provides separate leasable spaces for commercial tenants
•Potential uses include: retail; convenience retail; personal and business service shops; small
animal veterinary facility; office; financial service; clinic; childcare center; limited indoor
recreation establishment; place of worship or assembly; dog day care; music studio. All of the
uses comply with LUC 4.5(D)(3)(c).
•Also serves as a clubhouse to the community
•Located adjacent to public right-of-way, the park with a playground, and connects to a trail network
•The adjacent open space and plaza may also function as a flex space for an open-air farmers
market
Division 4.5
Neighborhood Center
40
•4.5(D)(3), a Neighborhood Center must comply with criteria related to access to the center, location,
land uses, design, and outdoor spaces.
•The mixed-use building is one-and-a-half stories tall and the massing has been divided into three
separate compartments ranging from 875 square feet to 1,066 square feet. Those proportions match
the scale of nearby residential buildings.
•Meets the requirement of 90% of dwellings having access within three-quarters of a mile, without
crossing an arterial road.
•Based on the description of the proposed Neighborhood Center, the PDP meets with this standard.
Modifications of Standards
Overview
41
Modifications of Standards --proposed to address walkway spine requirements and number of
housing types.
Modification to Section 3.5.2(D)(1) Orientation to a Connecting Walkway, requesting that building
entrances to dwellings be oriented to a walkway that is longer than 350 feet, and within walkway
open space that is narrower than 35 feet.
Modification to Section 4.5(D)(2)(a)3. Housing Types, requesting approval of three housing types
instead of four.
Modifications
of Standards
42
•Walkway
requirements
•Number of Housing
Types
•Four Required
•Three Proposed
•Single Family
Attached
•Two Family
•Single Family
Detached
Modifications of Standards
Orientation to a Connecting Walkway
43
This standard requires that all buildings connect to public sidewalks.
•Direct connection –where buildings and entrances face a public street so that
new development extends the town-like pattern.
•Direct connection within 200 feet with a Connecting Walkway. This allows for
flexibility in building placement and results in an easy walking distance (roughly
one-half of a block in traditional terms) to the City sidewalk network.
•Direct connection between 200 and 350 feet by way of a Major Walkway Spine.
This allows for a maximum walking distance (less than one block length in
traditional terms) but only if this distance is mitigated by urban design features.
Modification to Section 3.5.2(D)(1) Orientation to a Connecting Walkway, requesting
that building entrances to dwellings be oriented to a walkway that is longer than 350
feet, and within walkway open space that is narrower than 35 feet.
Modifications of Standards
Orientation to a Connecting Walkway
44
2.8.2(H)(1) and (4) are met:
•the plan with longer walkways allows more residents access to shared
walkways with a pattern that provides a high level of interconnectivity
throughout the development and to adjacent neighborhoods
•site plan increases safety, connectivity, pedestrian interaction and quiet
enjoyment without sacrificing convenience;
•wider and more frequently spaced sidewalks are provided to
compensate for the increased sidewalk length, and pedestrian bridges
are provided in lieu of street crossings;
Modifications of Standards
Orientation to a Connecting Walkway
45
2.8.2(H)(3): Exceptional physical conditions, unique to such property, the
strict application of the standard sought to be modified would result in
unusual and exceptional practical difficulties, or exceptional or undue
hardship, provided that such difficulties or hardship are not caused by the act
or omission of the applicant;
2.8.2(H)(3) is met:
•unusual shape of the property, location of the New Mercer Ditch, location
of existing flood control channels, and location of existing development
are exceptional practical difficulties
•Providing a network of streets, shorter walkways and/or wider open space
for walkway spine green courts in all portions of the site is practically
infeasible.
Modifications of Standards
Four Housing Types
46
Modifications of Standards to Section 4.5(D)(2)(a)3 to address housing type variation
requirements for projects greater than 30 acres is not detrimental to the public good and meets
the modification criteria for the following reasons:
2.8.2(H)(1) is met: the PDP provides enough variation within the proposed 3 housing
types and 27 total different architectural elevations to provide a varied and unique
streetscape without significant repetition.
•The project provides 11 single family attached elevations where 3 are required. The
elevations vary between 2 and 3-story designs.
•The project provides 10 single family detached elevations and 6 different two-family
elevations where 4 total elevations between the 2 housing types is required.
•The curves and intersections within the internal streets help minimize sight lines, and open
spaces along the New Mercer Ditch allow angled views of the building corners, which adds
visual variety along the street.
Modifications of Standards
Four Housing Types
47
Modifications of Standards to Section 4.5(D)(2)(a)3 to address housing type variation
requirements for projects greater than 30 acres is not detrimental to the public good and meets
the modification criteria for the following reasons:
2.8.2(H)(4) is met: the PDP will continue to advance the purposes of the Land Use Code
Section 1.2.2 including:
(C) fostering the safe, efficient, and economic use of the land, the city's transportation infrastructure, and other public facilities and;
(G) increasing public access to mass transit, sidewalks, trails, bicycle routes and other alternative modes of transportation by providing
sidewalk and bicycle lane improvements along Laporte Avenue, N. Taft Hill Road, and connections to local streets and trails;
(I) minimizing the adverse environmental impacts of development by contributing to flood control plans;
(J) improving the design, quality, and character of new development by providing enhanced landscaping, architecture, and landscaped
buffer space;
(L) encouraging the development of vacant properties within established areas;
(M) ensuring that development proposals are sensitive to the character of existing neighborhoods by providing buffer space with enhanced
landscaping and landscaped street improvements;
(N) ensuring that development proposals are sensitive to natural areas and features by improving existing habitat features.
Sanctuary on the Green, PDP210018
Findings /Conclusion
48
•The PDP complies with process located in Division 2.2 –Common
Development Review Procedures for Development Applications of Article 2 –
Administration;
•Staff supports the request for the Modifications to address: Orientation to a
Connecting Walkway, and Number of Housing Types (Sections 3.5.2(D)(1) and
4.5(D)(2)(a)3);
•The PDP complies with relevant standards located in Article 3 –General
Development Standards, including the Alternative Compliance Findings per
3.6.3(H) for Division 3.6.3 Street Pattern and Connectivity Standards, with two
conditions recommended.
•PDP complies with relevant standards located in Division 4.5, (L-M-N) Low
Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood District of Article 4 –Districts.
Conditions
Staff recommends two conditions of approval:
1.A photometric plan conforming to 3.2.4 Exterior Site Lighting for the
neighborhood center will be submitted for review and approval during final
plan review.
2.Plans for the neighborhood center will be updated to conform with 3.2.5
Trash and Recycling Enclosures during final plan review.
49
50
Northwest Subarea
Framework Plan
51
•Appearance and Design Overview
(page 44): “New development
should fit the pattern and
character of the area in terms of
scale, use, lot sizes, setbacks,
and landscaping, and should
provide connected open space
and avoid natural areas.”
As Part of L-M-N Purpose and Intent:
•“New neighborhoods should entail
creative master planning to lead to
visually attractive, pedestrian-
friendly neighborhoods that have
nearby services, parks, and other
amenities.”
Northwest Subarea
Goals and Policies:
52
Goal AD -1:Unique Image and
Identity
•The Northwest Subarea will
continue to have a unique
image and identity, with a
wide variety of compatible
styles and activities.
Policy AD-1.1:
Compatibility—Residential
Guidelines
•Encourage site-specific and
contextual design and
planning to promote new
development that is
compatible with the area.
Article 3 Development Standards
3.2.1 –Landscaping and Tree Protection
53
•3.2.1(D); 3.2.1(D)(1)(c)
Full Tree Stocking: 692
trees provided, 402
trees, or 58% are
canopy trees
•3.2.1(F) Tree Protection
and Replacement: 43
trees are proposed to be
removed, 88 mitigation
trees and 410 shrubs are
provided meeting tree
replacement standards
54
55
56
57
Street and Sidewalk Pattern
58
•Three public street
connections
•One is future,
walkway connection
for now
•Alternative
Compliance is
proposed to allow
street connections to
be limited to bicycles,
pedestrians, and
emergency access
(Section 3.6.3)
Administrative Interpretation
A request was received to clarify which building height standards in Land Use
Code Section 4.5(E) would be applicable to a 4-unit or larger, single-family
attached building. The specific question is whether the maximum building height
standards in Section 4.5(E)(3) or Section 4.5(E)(4) would apply for a building
with 4 units or more where all units are located on individual, separate lots.
Section 4.5(E)(3) specifically references only one-, two-and three family
dwellings and is not applicable to buildings that contain 4 or more dwelling units.
Conclusion: Section 4.5(E)(4) would be applicable to buildings containing 4 or
more single-family attached units. The maximum building height, per Section
4.5(E)(4)(d) is three stories.
59