HomeMy WebLinkAboutMOUNTAIN PARK HOMES - CHANGE OF NON-CONFORMING USE - 37-88 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSITEM NO. 16
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING OF May 23, 1988
STAFF REPORT
PROJECT: Mountain Park Homes - Change of Non -Conforming Use, #37-88
APPLICANT: Fort Collins Housing Authority
1715 W. Mountain Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80521
OWNER: Maurice Garton & Walter Boyes
P. O. Box 494
Fort Collins, CO 80522
PROJECT PLANNER: Sherry Albertson -Clark
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A request for 27 elderly housing units, located at
114 S. Bryan (1600 Block of West Mountain), zoned R-L, Low Density Residen-
tial.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This was the site of the Sunset Trailer Court. An
existing building (114 Bryan) will remain and contain 3 one -bedroom elderly
housing units. Four buildings, each housing 6 one -bedroom units are also
proposed for elderly housing. Variances have been obtained from the Zoning
Board of Appeals to permit a reduction in the parking lot landscape setback
along Mountain Avenue, to reduce the number of parking spaces and to reduce
the amount of interior parking lot landscaping. Access to the site will be from
Bryan and Mountain Avenue. No alley improvements have been required since
the project does not take access from the alley. The applicant will participate
in future improvements to the alley. The proposal is consistent with the
review criteria for changes to non -conforming uses.
OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT 300 LaPorte Ave. • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 • (303) 221-6750
SERVICES, PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mountain Park Homes - Non Conforming Use #37-88
P & Z Meeting - May 23, 1988
Page 2
COMMENTS:
1. Background:
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
N: RK single family residences
S: RL; City Park, single family residences
E: RL; single family residences
W: RL; City Park
The site is zoned R-L, Low Density Residential and which would not permit
either the mobile home park or multi -family units. The mobile homes that
were previously on the site have been removed. A neighborhood meeting was
held on Monday, April 4, 1988. See attached summary.
2. Zoning Variances Granted:
Three variances were requested and granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals at
the May 12, 1988 ZBA meeting. These variances are as follows:
- reduce the required parking lot landscape setback along Mountain Avenue
from 10' to 7' behind the sidewalk;
- reduce the required number of parking spaces from 41 to 28;
- reduce the amount of required interior parking lot landscaping from 436
square feet to 210 square feet.
The ZBA approved these variances, with the condition that the parking
requirements be calculated at 1 vehicle per unit rather than the code -required
1.5 spaces per unit, which would require 27 parking spaces.
3. Non -Conforming Use Change Review:
The change from one non -conforming use to another requires the approval of
the Planning and Zoning Board. In considering a proposed non -conforming use
change, the Board shall determine whether or not the change in use is more
compatible with the uses of the surrounding property than the existing non-
conforming use. For the purpose of review, the following criteria shall be
considered:
(1) The nature and purpose of the existing non -conforming use;
(2) The difference in quality and character of the proposed use:
(3) The difference in the degree of use of the proposed use, including but not
limited to hours of operation and parking requirements;
(4)
The
reasons
for the
proposed change;
(5)
The
overall
impact
of the proposed use on the surrounding property.
Mountain Park Homes - Non Conforming Use #37-88
P & Z Meeting - May 23, 1988
Page 3
Note: The site is presently vacant. The following information, provided by
the applicant, is based on the occupancy of the Sunset Trailer Court.
The nature and purpose of the existing non -conforming use: The existing
non -conforming use consists of a two-story four-plex dwelling unit and 20
mobile home sites with mobile homes of varying size and condition. In gen-
eral, the condition of the existing use is extremely deteriorated, suffering from
overcrowding, deferred maintenance, and a lack of any coherent plan of dwel-
ling unit size and placement. The purpose of the existing use is high density
residential. The nature of the tenancy is medium to large family with very
low income.
The difference in quality and character of the proposed use: The proposed
non -conforming use is the development of 24 one -bedroom apartments for
elderly occupancy with rehabilitation of the existing four-plex into three units
and a community/laundry room for the use of the residents. The character
will change from family to elderly use. The dwelling units will be arranged
more suitably on the site. Parking will be centralized. Landscaping will be
extensive with reliance on the existing trees. Underground sprinkler systems,
area lighting, sitting areas and flower beds will add to the proposed project's
appearance. The buildings will be lap sided in a manner compatible with the
surrounding single family residences.
The difference in the degree of use of the proposed use: There will be little
difference in the degree of use in terms of the hours of operation. However,
the numbers of people utilizing the property will be significantly reduced by
virtue of the change in occupancy from family to elderly. As a result of the
change in occupancy as well as the better site utilization, the parking demand
and traffic impact of the project will be significantly reduced.
The reasons for the proposed change: The existing site detracts from the
neighborhood. The existing use consists of substandard housing conditions
unfit for human habitation due to the unsafe and unsanitary condition. All of
these conditions combine to adversely affect neighborhood property values.
The overall impact of the proposed use on the surrounding property: The
overall impact will be to reduce traffic congestion, aid in the revitalization of
the area, stabilize the neighborhood socially and economically, reduce vandalism
and crime associated with overcrowded and substandard housing, present a
cleaner streetscape and improve pedestrian access along Mountain Avenue.
4. Site Design:
The parking design provides one space per unit (as approved by ZBA), with
one additional space. Since the units are one -bedroom elderly units, the
provision of one space per unit should be sufficient. The applicant has also
indicated that tenant leases would further stipulate the parking arrangements
for one space per unit. There are numerous mature trees on the site. All but
one tree is to remain. Additional landscaping is planned along the fronts and
sides of buildings. Access to the parking areas will be from Bryan and Moun-
tain Avenue. There will not be any vehicular alley access, so no improvements
Mountain Park Homes - Non Conforming Use #37-88
P & Z Meeting - May 23, 1988
Page 4
are being required to the alley. The applicant will commit to participation in
any future alley improvements through the development agreement. Buffering
of the site to the south and east has been accomplished through a 6' privacy
fence.
RECOMMENDATION:
The proposed change of non -conforming use for elderly residents is signifi-
cantly more compatible than the existing non -conforming use status of a trailer
park. The parking and traffic impact will be significantly reduced. The
redevelopment of the site will aid in the revitalization and stabilization of the
neighborhood and present a much more pleasing appearance.
The proposed non -conforming use is consistent with the review criteria for
changes to non -conforming uses and staff recommends approval of the Moun-
tain Park Homes - Change of Non -Conforming Use.
• ►i
�' - J.
V m:
Ala ■� o r �'i`
mile
Lb
CITY OF FORT COLLINS 1715 West Mountain, Ft. Collins, Colorado 80521 Telephone (303) 221-5484
HOUSING AU911OR"
LAND USE DATA
Existing Zoning - RL
Net Area - 38,950 Square Feet
Land Use - Elderly Housing
Total Number New Units - 24 Units
Total Number Existing Units Rehabed - 3 Units
Total Bedrooms Per Unit - 1
Total Floor Area - 11,120 Square Feet
One Basement Unit of Four -flex Converted to Community Room
COVERAGE BREAKDOWN
Building Coverage Including Existing - 9,728 Square Feet
Paved Parking Area - 8,084 Square Feet
Total Parking Spaces - 28
Parking Spaces 8.5' x 20' - 27
Parking Spaces 12' x 20' - 1
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
HOUSING AUTHORITY
1715 West Mountain, Ft. Collins, Colorado 80521
MOUNTAIN PARK HOMES
Present Site Address: 114 South Bryan, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521
Proposed Project by Fort Collins Housing Authority
Type of Construction: '-',r--N
Occupancy: R-1
Telephone (303) 221-5484
The proposed project consists of placing modular built buildings on a garden
level site -built structures. Two buildings joined by a common courtyard and
laundry facilities. The first story and garden levels being served by ramps and
stairways.
Type of Construction: Wood framing on top, concrete foundations.
Heat: Gas fired hot water.
Existing Four-Plex
The existing four-plex will be converted to three elderly housing units. The
remaining unit will become a storage area.
Current condition of the building is run down and shows definite lack of upkeep.
During the conversion of this building, it will be rehabilitated in order tc
upgrade the electrical, plumbing,wall finishes and floor coverings.
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
On Monday, April 4, 1988
a neighborhood meeting was
held at
the Park
Shop regarding Mountain
Park Homes. Fifteen area
residents
were in
attendance and Debbie de
Besche was the City of Fort
Collins
represent-
ative. The following items
and concerns were discussed
during
this meet-
ing:
1. Concern with flooding of the property in the summer months.
2. Would not like to see a higher density than existing situation.
3. Would units be accessible to elderly.
4. Will Housing Authority retain ownership.
5. Possibility of life -estate.
6. What would criteria be for getting into one of these units.
7. Will this be considered "temporary" housing.
8. How are units restricted to just elderly.
9. Will there be an on -site manager.
10. Will garden level units have patios.
11. How does fire exit for garden level units work for elderly.
12. Does this project take the place of Robinson-Piersal.
13. Will the alley be maintained.
14. Residents would like to see the alley become two-way.
15. Will there be parking in the alley.
16. Where will dumpsters be located.
17. Would not like to see buildings be two-story above grade.
18. What type of buffering between site and neighborhood to the south
and east is proposed.
19. Would Transfort have a stop at this location.
20. Would like to see every effort to keep all trees.
s,
(Meeting minutes prepared by Sherry Albertson -Clark, Project Planner
from notes taken by Debbie de Besche at this neighborhood meeting.)
i
W
CL-
W
H
H
M
co
z
w
w
z
z
w
J
v
•
z
0
F-
x
0
a
LO
z
a
F-
U
LL
LL
Q
cc
F-
D �0Wq
Mar I eM
MEMORANDUM
To: Jim Kline, Ft. C:ol 1 i ns. Housing Corporation
Fick Ensdorff, Ft. Collins Traffic Engineer
Fort C:ol l i ns• Planning Staff
From: Platt Cie 1 i ch iJ�;%Ja5L>;
Date: May 10, 1'= 8
Subject: Mountain Park Homes Traffic Analysis.
I have been asked to comment on the traffic impacts
of a proposed residential development (Mountain Park
Homes) near the intersection of Mountain Avenue and
Bryan Avenue in Fort C:ol l i ns, Colorado. It is my
understanding that the historic building count on this
site was 24 dwelling units. cane 4-plex and 20 mobile
homes). The mobile homes have been moved from this
site. The proposed development i nl cudes, four 6-p l ex
units plus the existing 4-plex for a total of 28
dwelling units. It is intended that the proposed
development wi 1 1 primarily house senior c i t i Lens. There
are currently three accesses to Mountain Avenue, two
accesses. to Bryan Avenue and one access to the alley.
The proposed use will reduce the acces.s.es to one on
Mountain Avenue and two on Bryan Avenue.
Using the ITE Trip Generation Manual as the source
document, the existing !former) use on this parcel would
generate approximately 122 vehicle trip ends per
weekday. The proposed use wi 1 1 generate approximately
134 vehicle trip ends per weekday. This difference is
insignificant and will not likely be discernible.
Senior citizens, typically, are not on the same schedule
of a typical working household. Therefore, while the
number of daily trips are almost the same, the time of
travel is not 1 i ke 1 y to be during the peak hours.
It is concluded that the traffic impacts of the
proposed development wi l 1 be s.imi 1 ar• to the former use
of this. property. Reducing the number of accesses
should have a. positive effect on Mountain Avenue.