Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutINTERSTATE LAND PUD - PRELIMINARY - 34-88B - CORRESPONDENCE - OTHER JURISDICTIONS (3)• STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Region 4 Larimer County, I-25 WFR 6ago7T 1420 2nd Street Interstate Land PUD P.O. Box 850 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 (970) 353-1232 December 27, 1995 Steve Olt City of Fort Collins Current Planning P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 Dear Steve: Harley Davidson Site and Overall Site Access Study Northwest Corner I-25/Prospect Rd. Fort Collins I have reviewed the revised preliminary site plan for Interstate Land PUD, Harley Davidson Development and the Site Access Study (revised November, 1995). I received these submittals from Cityscape on November 30, 1995. I offer the following comments: SITE ACCESS STUDY The revised traffic study recommends a continuous left turn lane through the development area and, in conclusions, merely states that the intersections shown on the site plan are adequately spaced to allow safe movement of traffic. The study does not specifically analyze the distances between planned accesses for conformance with the State Highway Access Code. Conformance is required. As stated in our November 22, 1995, meeting, the site identified as Lot 7 and 8 should not assume two accesses if auxiliary lanes catuiot be designed and col3stiaCted in conformance with the Code. The scaled distance between PCR's of those two accesses is only 140 feet. Both accesses require a left turn lane. The minimum lane length for each direction is 235 feet and a taper length of 90 feet should separate those left turns. Therefore, it seems that two accesses to the west side of Interstate Land are not appropriate. I do not see reasons that a variance should be approved for the nonconforming access spacing. Other accesses which warrant left turn lanes are spaced such that the continuous left lane should be appropriate. ACCESS Details of access design for access D (west leg) must be further reviewed. The access width is nonconforming. • Steve Olt Page 2 December 27, 1995 Interstate Land PUD My discussion with CDOT maintenance indicated that curb is not required or desirable through this area. The plans show a widening with curb and gutter. We should further discuss this plan. Please provide details regarding removal of portions of the existing guard rail to address minimum clear zone requirements. I recommend Sheri Wamhoff contact me in order to further review plans for access permitting. I can be contacted at (970) 350-2163. Sinc rely, Ter G. Jones Region Development/Access Coordinator TGJ:bIg cc: J. Springer G. Hice-Idler file