HomeMy WebLinkAboutPARK SOUTH PUD, 3RD REPLAT - PRELIMINARY & FINAL - 46-88G - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY40.
00
co
LO
0
CO cr)
0
LO
0 06
o cD
Q
0 0
0
U rn
o LL
z
w
O
J
w
Cr
0
z
w
a
z
w
J
0
N
rl-
N
W
a
J
W
0
'7
W
Q
0
0
N
M
CD
0
0
w
z
O
d
0
z
M
w
W
z
0
z
w
z
0
a
0
a
y
z
a
H
U
rL
LL
Q
H
MEMORANDUM
TO: Marc Middel, Middel Realty Inc.
Dick Rutherford, Stewart & Associates
Linda Ripley, V*F Ripley
Fort Collins Planning Department
Fort Collins Transportation Division
Lucia Liley, March Myatt
FROM: Matt Delich
DATE: November 11, 1996
SUBJECT: Park South revised trip generation study
(File: 9615MEM4)
This memorandum provides an updated comparison of the
trip generation for proposed land uses on a portion of the
Park South PUD, located in the southwest quadrant of the
Horsetooth/Manhattan intersection. The comparison that I
provided in my March 12, 1996 memorandum used a previous
proposal that dated to 1988, for which I performed a traffic
study. I was unaware of a revised land use proposal and
subsequent traffic study that was prepared by Leigh, Scott,
& Cleary, Inc., in 1991. I have contacted that firm and have
obtained trip generation information contained in their report
for the 1991 plan for Park South PUD.
The original 1991 plan indicates a convenience shopping
center at 80,000 square feet on Parcel A. The 1991 plan as
approved by the Planning & Zoning Board had 50,000 square feet
on Parcel A. This memorandum reflects the trip generation
using the approved 50,000 square feet of neighborhood
convenience retail on Parcel A. Parcel B has two potential
uses listed: 1) 24 duplex dwelling units, or 2) 30,000 square
feet of general office uses. Table 1 shows the expected trip
generation for Parcels A and B from the 1991 plan. There is
a range in the trip generation, depending upon which land use
is selected for Parcel B.
Using the office use on Parcel B, the subject portion of
the site is projected to generate 4470 daily trip ends, 167
morning peak hour trip ends, and 440 afternoon peak hour trip
ends. Using the residential use on Parcel B, the subject
portion of the site is projected to generate 4104 daily trip
ends, 107 morning peak hour trip ends, and 383 afternoon peak
hour trip ends.
The current proposal (62 single family dwelling units on
Parcels A and B) is projected to generate 590 daily trip ends,
46 morning peak hour trip ends, and 63 afternoon peak hour
trip ends. This is shown in Table 2. Thirteen dwelling
i •
units, of the 75 dwelling units considered here, are on Parcel C.
These should not be included in the trip generation comparison.
Regardless of which former land use option is used for
comparison, the proposed residential use (75 D.U.) will cause
a significant reduction in the trip generation on this parcel.
Operation at the key intersections will be acceptable.
Table 1
Trip Generation
1991 Land Use Proposals
Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak
Land Use Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips
in out in out
RETAIL/OFFICE
Parcel A - Retail
3900
57
34
181
181
50 KSF
Parcel B - Office
570
67
9
13
65
30 KSF
Total
4470
124
43
194
246
RETAIL/RESIDENTIAL
Parcel A - Retail
3900
57
34
181
181
50 KSF
Parcel B - Duplex
204
4
12
14
7
24 D.U.
Total
4104
61
46
195
188
Table 2
Trip Generation
1996 Land Use Proposal
Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak
Land Use Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips
in out in out
Single Family - 62 D.U. 590 12 34 41 22