HomeMy WebLinkAboutPARK SOUTH PUD - AMENDED ODP - 46-88F - MINUTES/NOTES - CORRESPONDENCE-NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING•
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
PROJECT. • Park South P. U.D., Third Filing
DATE: March 14, 1996
APPLICANT.- Mark Mytle (not present)
CONSULTANT.- Dick Rutherford Stewart Associates
PLANNER: Mike Ludwig
The applicant proposes to develop 75 residential lots on 13.2 acres, a residential density of
5.68 dwelling units per acre. The applicant indicated that they intend to build houses that
are the same size/market as those which exist south of this property (also developed by
Mark Mytle). The proposed residential use will generate approximately 720 vehicle trips
per day. The commercial uses shown on the existing Overall Development Plan for this
same 13.2 acres would generate 12,660 vehicles trips per day.
Questions, Concerns, Comments:
Will there be a curb installed along Manhattan?
A. Park South was originally developed in the County and curb and gutter was not
required. When the property was annexed into the City, the annexation agreement
stipulated that no curb and gutter would be required of remaining phases of Park
South. The City will be working with this developer to install a drainage pan along
Manhattan to correct existing problems.
2. What will be the setback distance of houses from the west property line?
A. The applicant is proposing 110 foot deep lots. The front yard setback is 20'. An
average house is approximately 50 feet deep. Therefore, the rear yard setback
distance will be approximately 40 feet.
3. Are these going to be the same type houses as those to the south?
A. Yes. The applicant proposes two story houses like those to the south.
4. Will there be a fence along Horsetooth Road?
A. The ends of the cul-de-sacs will be open (no fencing) for pedestrian access to
Horsetooth Road from within the development. Side yard fences may not extend
beyond the front of the houses.
5. How wide are the lots?
A. The lots will be 50 to 60 feet wide. The minimum side yard setback is 5 feet
which results in a 10 foot separation between buildings.
6. We ask that the City allow only 1-story buildings along the west property line as
houses to the west of this development are all 1-story, ranch style houses. We
don't want people looking into our backyards and windows.
7. Who will maintain fences along the west property line?
A. The consulting engineer will talk with Mr. Mytle. This development will have a
homeowners association which will maintain their fence. City staff would like to
see a single, common fence along this property line rather than two fences
separated by a couple of feet to avoid a tunnel effect. The applicant's engineer
indicated that they would be willing to meet with the neighbors to the west to
achieve a common solution.
8. Is there capacity at Lopez Elementary for students from this development?
A. The City Staff works closely with the Poudre R-1 School District. The District
receives copies of all development proposals. The School District continues to
state that there is capacity district wide. There is no guarantee that children from
this development will attend Lopez Elementary. The School District determines
attendance boundaries through processes outside of the City's development review
process.
9. Does the City regulate whether these houses are owner occupied or rented?
A. No.
10. Storm drainage is a concern for this area in general.
A. Last year there was an extensive amount of rain which was very unusual. The
regional stormwater detention ponds in this area have not decreased and will not
decrease in size with additional development. Storm drainage engineering is the
most expensive and extensive part of the development plan preparation.
11. Will the area south of Glen South remain open?
A. Yes, the detention pond will remain.
1J
12. What did the Overall Development Plan show regarding commercial development
on this same property?
A. (Staff) I believe it called for medical office and restaurant uses. It included a
greenbelt for buffering.
13. If the developer would not build two-story houses along the west property line
that is great. It is still better (traffic wise) than a commercial land use. We need to
keep a population base for Lopez Elementary.
14. There are advantages of a commercial use also, such as easy access to services by
the surrounding neighborhood.
NOTE: NO DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF FORT
COLLINS AS OF 4/18/96.
++Tt" NTT �{{ i'� TT 11 i� 1-11-11�T\ TT ^ T1 r rr- r � �r TT ter- ter. •. (�
c1 : L1L1"T11UL/(\:ll��L11 L��tJ
for
Project: F'�,� �,� �`� —
''� -Es Meeting Location: sp, r a,, C ^C -
-5 City of Fort Collinsc
\ Date: 3fry� —_
a Attendees: Please sign this sheet. The information will be used to
update the project mailing list and confirm attendance at neighborhood
meetings. Contact the Planning Department (221-6750) if you Nvish to Did You Receive orrect
receive minutes of this meeting, Written Notification Lddress—
of this meetino? I i
tame :address ZiD ( Yes ( do Yes I \'oj
X
�-- //to, l f. Ko l/i s r-z 6 I I X I I
Sell
72 -,0 aaioe,,
71 3-
r ' j
I ae- . line- j(
x - IvI i
� I +
�f
:�
cr� !VZ-2— r/7 0-1 S /I ell, R05 2-
6 OJ-41 h'i 5ch' Auc 8 0 5 Z G
!NJ
57 �-- �t-1�1s���nS2 6,I I
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION
•
Did You Receive Correct
MEETINGMEETINGi�ritten Yotifcatioa address.
— of this-meerin
Name Address�0�
Yes
INO Yes
No
�le
III
I
I
II
�N�OT t4s��
III
I
I
III
e KVE- Z61
II
II
III
I
i
I
II
I
ail
I
II!
I
!
III
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
i
I
II
I
I
III
I I
i
I
III