Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPARK SOUTH PUD - OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - 46-88B - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTSDevelo en-t Services
Planning Department
I
City of Fort Collins
August 22, 1991
Mr. Frank Vaught
Vaught -Frye Architects and Planners
2900 South College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
Dear Mr. Vaught:
The Development Review Center has reviewed the request for the Park
South Overall Development Plan and offers the following comments:
1. Staff supports the designation of Neighborhood Convenience
Shopping Center for Parcel A. There is a concern, however, that
the size of 7.3 acres exceeds the seven acre maximum as specified
in the definition given for point chart J in the Land Development
Guidance System (page 35). Similarly, Staff is concerned about the
size designation of 80,000 square feet of floor area which exceeds
the maximum of 50,000 square feet as specified in Neighborhood
Convenience Shopping Center, Design Guidelines, Policies, Criteria
(page 7). Consequently, it is recommended that the proposed
acreage and square footage be reduced accordingly at the O.D.P.
stage to comply with the recommended guidelines. If it is the
applicant's desire to increase these size limitations, then the
appropriate mechanism would be at the Preliminary P.U.D. stage by
requesting a specific variance from the Planning and Zoning Board.
2. The O.D.P. indicates pedestrian circulation between Parcel A
and Parcel C yet the Traffic Study (Leigh, Scott, % Cleary, Inc.)
states that:
"There will be local street interconnections within the Park South
P.U.D. allowing residents within the residential part of the
development to travel northward to the convenience shopping center
without necessitating their access on to Manhattan Avenue or
Horsetooth Road. This plan helps to maintain the integrity of the
whole development"
Staff recommends that the access between Parcels A and C be
upgraded to a local street connection. Please modify the fourth
paragraph under "Planning Objectives" accordingly.
3. Being at the corner of an arterial and neighborhood collector
street is a preferable location for the Neighborhood Convenience
Shopping Center. However, the project will probably need to take
advantage of the new energy conservation points in order to achieve
281 North College Avenue • P.O.,Box _580 • Fort Collins, CO "-05�0 • ; 3) 221-h7:;0
the appropriate percentage on point chart J of the L.D.G.S. Our
calculation is that the project achieves 34 points out of a total
of 62 for a score of 55% without factoring in any points for energy
conservation. (A minimum of 65% is required.) As you know, there
are new energy conservation criteria by which four multipliers can
achieve a total of eight points. By achieving six to eight points,
the old total of 34 points can be increased to 40 or 42
accordingly. An increase in points to 40 or 42 would result in a
percentage of 65% or 68% and thus satisfy the minimum percentage
requirement of the L.D.G.S. A worksheet is available that assists
in explaining how energy conservation points can be gained.
4. The height restrictions for Parcel B that are detailed on the
1988 plan should be carried over onto the 1991 edition. These
restrictions seem logical and have gained neighborhood acceptance.
Note number one should indicate that there are height restrictions
on Parcel B. Reference was made at the neighborhood meeting that
there would be some kind of height restriction next to the Villages
at Four Seasons.
5. Staff is concerned about the list of anticipated uses
described under note number four. In particular, the office area
should not include such uses as printing and small scale newspaper
office, small animal vet clinic, and indoor storage as these uses
are considered more intense and greater impact on the adjacent
neighborhood than traditional office uses.
In addition, "other similar small-scale, neighborhood compatible
uses" is too vague and open ended to accomplish the objective of
restricting Parcel B to office or duplex housing. Again, reference
was made at the neighborhood meeting emphasizing the restrictive
nature of allowable land uses on Parcel B. The notation does not
seem to reinforce this.intent and should be modified accordingly.
6. The list of anticipated land uses under Neighborhood
Convenience Shopping Center should also be modified. While
equipment rental is allowed, the prohibition against outdoor
storage is not limited to vehicles. Please delete the word
"vehicle" so the proposed land use matches the definition found on
Page 35 of the L.D.G.S.
7. Also under note number four, the "carwash and detail" land use
should be modified. The Neighborhood Convenience Shopping Center
specifically omits this use due to the impacts associated with the
multi -bay, self -serve, coin operated carwash. Recently, Staff has
been willing to recommend that the Planning and Zoning Board allow
the one -bay, automatic, carwash that is attended by a store clerk
and offered in a package with gasoline sales. These one -bay,
automatic operations are controlled and have less of an impact on
the surrounding area and are allowed as a "use being of similar
character as determined by the Planning and Zoning Board". Please
modify the notation to make this distinction.
8. The residences in Parcel C will only be allowed to served by
public streets, or in accordance with the recently signed agreement
0 •
made between the City of Fort Collins and Middel Enterprises
(Spring of 1991). In any event please delete the reference that
internal streets may include a driveway as a typical local street.
9. Please correct the spelling of Riva Ridge Drive.
Please note the following deadlines for the September Planning and
Zoning Board meeting:
Plan revisions are due Thursday, September 5, 1991.
P.M.T.'s, colored renderings, and 10 prints are due Sept. 16,
1991.
Final documents are due September 19, 1991.
The Planning and Zoning Board worksession is September 20,
1991.
As always, if there are any questions, comments or concerns, please
call to set up a meeting to discuss in detail.
Sincerely:
l
�a Ae�
Ted Shepard
Project Planner
cc: Sherry Albertson -Clark, Senior Planner
Kerrie Ashbeck, Civil Engineer