Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPARK SOUTH PUD, PARCEL A - PRELIMINARY - 46-88A - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTES1 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING August 22, 1988 The regular meeting of Planning and Zoning Board was called to order at 6:31 p.m. in Council Chambers of New City Hall, 300 LaPortc Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado. Board members present at the meeting included, Dave Edwards, Frank Groznik, Sandy Kern, Bernie Strom, Jim Klataske, Lloyd Walker and Jan Shepard. Staff members present included Tom Peterson, Paul Eckman, Sherry Albertson Clark, Joe Frank, Linda Ripley, Ted Shepard and Barbara Hendrickson. Director of Planning,_ Torn Peterson, reviewed the Consent and Discussion Agenda. The Consent Agenda included: Item 1, July 25, 1988 minutes; Item 2, #13-82A1 OAKRIDGE VILLAGE PUD - AMENDED MASTER PLAN; Item 3, #13-82AJ OAKRIDGE VILLAGE PUD, 71-11 FILING - PRELIMINARY; Item 4, CONOCO SERVICE STATION - EXPANSION 01, A NON -CONFORMING USE; Item 5, #58-88 AMOCO SERVICE STATION - EXPANSION OF A NON- CONFORMING USE; Item 7, #57-86I-1 SUNSTONE VILLAGE PUD AND SUB- DIVISION, 4TIi FILING - FINAL; Item 8, #11-87B LIGHT AND POWER UTILITY SERVICE CENTER PUD (COMMUNICATION TOWER) - PRELIMI- NARY AND FINAL; Item 9, #90-85E WILD WOOD FARM 1ST PUD -CHARTER MEDICAL HOSPITAL - FINAL; Item 10, #25-81D VILLAGES AT HARMONY WEST PUD - TRACTS C & D -REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL; Item 11. #146-79B RAINTREE PUD - VARI- ANCE REQUEST AND ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF FINAL; Item 12, #7-8213 COLLINDALE BUSINESS PARK PUD - MASTER PLAN; Item 13, 7-82C COI, LINDALE BUSINESS PARK [IUD PHASE ONE - PRELIMINARY; Item 14, #59-88, A BUCKEYE FARMS/EINARSEN ANNEXATION AND "ZONING. Item 6, #37-84D LAKEWOOD ESTATES PUD - FINAL was continued to the Septem- ber 26 meeting. The Board removed Items 1, 4 and 5 from the agenda. Mcmhcr Shepard pointed out that the correct vote on the minutes was as fol- lows: June 26 meeting was 4-0 (not 6-0) and on July 11 was 2-0 (not 0-0). Mernber Kern moved to approve the corrected minutes. Member Shepard sec- onded the motion. Motion passed 7-0. Member Walker moved to approve Items 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16. Member Groznik seconded. The motion carried 7-0. Member Walker moved to approve Item 11. Member Strom seconded the motion. The motion passed 6-0, with Member Edwards not participating on the vote. C. Planning and Zoning Board Meeting - August 22, 1988 Page 14 Member Shepard based her vote for denial primarily on traffic reasons, but also because she believed this to be a gradual infringement of the South College Corridor. She also thought this project too intense and the uses arc more of a community/regional type use than a neighborhood service center. Member Klataske supported the motion for denial and commended the dcvcl- oper and consultant for the work they have done. He stated that they were looking at the highest use for this site, in terms of real estate, but not necessarily. the best use for this site. He added that traffic is the main concern. Member Edwards also supported the motion for denial but commended the applicant and the neighborhood and their representatives for making their positions known clearly and concisely. He stated that the LDGS offers mitiga- tion measures, but in this case, the intensity of the master plan cannot be mitigated. He cited policy #70 and thought that the applicant needed to go back to the drawing boards and the neighborhood. He pointed out to the neighborhood that the property rights granted them on their property is also extended to the owner of this property and he has rights as to the use of this land. He stated that the Board does not take issue with whether or not an area should be left as an open space, or the type of homes built on an area, or whether they will sell. He told the audience that the Board is not a market committee and the owner is best suited to take that risk. He stated the task of the Board is to look at land use and private property rights as well. Motion to deny Park South Master Plan carried 7-0. PARK SOUTH PRELIMINARY #46-88A Member Edwards stated that although the master plan was denied and the pre- liminary could not be adopted, he wished a staff report and a vote taken. Ms. Albertson -Clark gave a brief presentation of the proposed project. She stated that the master plan must be approved prior to approval of the prclimi- nary plan and based on the staff recommendation to deny the master plan, is also recommending denial of the phase plan. Mr. Vaught asked that the Board review the numbers in the existing traffic impact, as it appears to be the main concern. He stated a solution must be made as to this parcel, or the developer cannot do anything with the property. Member Edwards asked Legal Staff if a motion is required. Mr. Eckman, Assistant City Attorney, stated yes. Member Strom moved to deny Park South Preliminary. Member Shepard sec- onded the motion. Motion carried 7-0. FORT COLLINS MEDICAL CENTER (FORMERLY PROSPECT-LEMAY OFFICE PARK) Mr. Shepard gave staff report.