HomeMy WebLinkAboutPARK SOUTH PUD - MASTER PLAN - 46-88 - CORRESPONDENCE - CORRESPONDENCE-CONCEPTUAL REVIEW•
0
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
April 25. 1988
Frank Vaught
c/o Vaught/Frye Architects
2900 South College Ave.
Fort Collins, CO 80525
Dear Sir,
For your information, attached is a copy of the Staff's comments concerning
Park South PUD Master Plan, which was presented before the Conceptual
Review Team on April 25, 1988.
r
The comments are offered informally by Staff to assist you in preparing the
detailed components of the project application. Modifications and additions to
these comments may be made at the time of formal review of this project.
If you should have any questions regarding these comments or the next steps in
the review process, please feel free to call me at 221-6750.
Sincerely,
Sherry Albson-Clark
Senior Pla4der
Attachment
SAC/bh
xc: Tom Peterson, Director of Planning
Mike Herzig, Development Coordinator
Jim Faulhaber, Civil Engineer 1
Project Planner
File
OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT ' 300 LaPorte Ave. • P O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 • (303) 221-6750
SERVICES, PLANNING
CONCEPTUAL REVIEW STAFF COMMENTS
INIEETING DATE: April 25, 1988
PROJECT: Park South PUD Master Plan
APPLICANT: Frank Vaught, Vaught -Frye Architects, 2900 S. College Ave.,
Fort Collins, CO 80525
LAND USE DATA: Request for 31 acres, consisting of 19 acres of commercial
uses and 12 acres of single family residential uses., Located at the southwest
corner of Horsetooth Road and Manhattan Drive.
COMMENTS:
1. There is a repay on an existing water line in Horsetooth. Sewer is existing
to the SE corner of the site.
2. Existing Light and Power system is in Manhattan and along the eastern-
most cul-de-sac shown on the preliminary phase plan for the SFD area.
Any relocation will be at the developer's expense.
3. Storm drainage staff will work with the developer on storm drainage spe-
cifics at the time of the preliminary for the first phase.
4. Manhattan is constructed and has been accepted by the City. Interior streets
must be designed to city standards. if variances to street design standards
are requested, such variances should be submitted as soon as possible.
5. A traffic study must be done with the project. The design of new streets
must be done in a manner that allows for the existing streets to be compa-
tible with new design (ie. curb cuts and returns. sidewalks). Critical points
Conceptual Review Comments
Page 2
to address in the traffic study are: signalization at Horsctooth and Manhat-
tan; capacity of Manhattan and relationship of proposed Manhattan access
points with the property to the cast side of Manhattan. The traffic study
needs to address an appropriate design of interior streets to accommodate
both residential and commercial streets.
6. Street tree planting design should be provided along both Manhattan and
Horsctooth and should coordinate with existing utilities that may be
located within this area.
7. Planning staff expressed a concerti regarding the potential impact on the
area street system (specifically those streets that serve a predominantly
residential area), given the magnitude of commercial uses proposed on this
master plan.
S. A neighborhood meeting is scheduled for this project on Wednesday, May 4,
1988 at 7:00 p.m. at Lopez School.
9. Consideration should be given to increasing the size of the single family
lots that front on the collector street in phase 1.
10. Intent to buffer this project from the existing development to the west
should be shown on the Master Plan.
11. The intent of maintenance of landscaping along streets needs to be clari-
fied.
PARK SOUTH P.U.D. - MASTER PLAN
Recommendations:
1) One entry Horsetooth (right in - right out).
2) Two entries Manhattan.
3) No entries Dennison (if necessary for emergency vehicles - chained, locked).
4) Dennison not a through street.
5) Coleridge Court be extended north a minimum of 300' more (contiguous with
the existing 6' fence).
6) If item 5 cannot be done, that there be a height restriction of single
story in Parcel "C" also Parcels "B" and "E".
7) Parcel "F" be designated as Single Family Housing.
8) Parcel "D", present Master Plan, be designated Community/Regional Retail
Center.
9) That the Master Plan NOTES be adjusted as noted on Exhibit "A".
10) Parcel "F" Why the delayed date if it is platted, utilities in, etc:
11) Adjust the Planning Objectives accordingly.
12) Specify roof style and pitch on office buildings.
PARK SOUTH PARCEL "A" P.U.D.
Recommendations:
1) Note 6: 2 story - (40' max). 2 story offices are stated at 30' max.
2) Dennison Avenue not be a through street.
3) Extend Coleridge as stated on Master Plan recommendation.
4) Parcel "F" be designated as Single Family lots.
5) Adjust the Planning Objectives.
I.
RT.IN RT.OUT
INTERSECTION
2.
3.
,7
NOTES'
Maximum building height is 40 f t . *xcept where shown otherwise
All public streets are to meet City Standards, uninss
specific vatiances are granted ptlbr to development-
Commom open space areas are to be maintained by an
owner's association or other appropriate vehicle
determined at time of approval of adjacent development.
Land Use catagories indicated may include the following
specific uses!
of e!
Professional offices
Research & Development Offices
Medical, Chiropractic, Dental
offices
�eA
Art, photo- Galleries
And other similar small-scale, neighborhood compatible
uaes.
etel c
Reta >;hbQs: � •
•peraogal 5'er'rlete bhops �':,• ,
standard Rdataa.tant♦
Retail laundry, 11r?-ClserfjPg outlevil
Hos+• fuYnishing, tiles, carpet, showreow. go""
� ,M,br oeparin�rA etorrj
WOMAN
Antique Sales,
Household appliances, sales,
Banks, Savings f: Loan, Credit Unions
The proposed land uses and desitles shown An this plan
are estimates of development potentlml. Approval of
this master plan by the City does not constitute final
Approval of these land rises, design or densities.
Rather, any future land uses must be approved according
to the procedures, processes and criteria of the
planned unit development regulations and other relevant
City policies and standards.
All signs to be to City of Fort Collins sign.Code.
0. Anticipated Phasing Schedule
Phase One Parcel A - 1989
t y' — Phase Two Parcel F _ 19A1
--�-� Phase Three Parcel F, r O 19A 90
o hi .e Tour PAFCel C n - 199A on
`
P�
zoKed r-po original/Master Plan consisted of 211
condos, 49 patio hdmes, 352 apartments and 194,500 square feet of
office/commercial/theatre uses on 13.9 acres. overall site is 56
acres. phase plan consisted of 10,000 square foot bank, 16,000 sq'
ft. theatre, 62,000 sq. ft. of office, 12,000 sq. ft. of retail, 8,500
sq. ft. health club and 13,000 sq. ft. of restaurant use (total sq.
ft. of 124,000 sq. ft.). Master Plan was then amended to change
apartments to single family and to delete theatre for a day care cen-
ter. a limit of 10,000 sq. ft. of retail could be located west of
Meadowlark. totak of non-residential sq. ft. was 150,000 sq. ft. on
MiUMCyo_Busines _PDQ- zoned H-B. 249,000 sq. ft. of office and
retail uses and 3,400 sq. ft. restaurant on 16.5 acres. HB zone per-
mits single-family and multi -family residential, banks, saving and
loan and finance companies, standard and fast-food restaurants, indoor
theaters, membership clubs, offices and clinics, personal service
shops, retail stores, laundry and dry-cleaning outlets, limited indoor
recreation uses, small veterinary clinics, aquarium shops, child-care
centers and churches.
other shopping centers:
Scotch Pines - zoned b-p. 10,000 sq. of office and 85,000 sq. ft. of
retail uses on 10.7 acres.
QQg_QgggiDg - zoned B-P. 82,000 sq. ft. retail, 7,000 sq. ft.
bank, 7,000 sq. ft. restaurant and 56,000 sq. ft. office (total of
152,000 sq. ft.) on 19 acres.
Fggntoiahgwd - zoned h-b. 104,000 sq. ft. office, 23,700 sq. ft.
retail and 4,400 sq. ft. restaurant (total of 132,000 sq. ft.) on 9.8
acres'
A
1-2 Country Club Corners, in Colorado Springs, is an innovative neighborhood shopping center with 43,350 square feet of
GLA, including 14,100 square feet of office space. A series of interconnected buildings, designed for compatibility with an
adjacent residential area, are oriented toward an open courtyard with a clock tower.
The neighborhood center provides for the sale of
convenience goods (food, drugs, and sundries) and
personal services, those which meet the daily needs
of an immediate neighborhood trade area.
A supermarket is the principal tenant in the
neighborhood center. Consumer shopping patterns
show that geographical convenience is the most
important factor in the shopper's choice of super-
markets. The customer usually chooses such stores
from among those most conveniently located,
usually those nearest the shopper's home. Only as
a secondary consideration does wide selection of
merchandise or service come into play.
The neighborhood center has a typical gross
leasable area of about 50,000 square feet but may
range from 30,000 to 100,000 square feet. For its
site area, the neighborhood center needs from 3 to
10 acres. It normally serves a trade area population
of 2,500 to 40,000 people within a 6-minute drive.
4
The neighborhood center, sometimes called a con-
venience center, is the smallest type of shopping
center.
The community center is built around a junior
department store or variety store as the major
tenant, in addition to the supermarket. Such a
center does not have a full -line department store,
although it may have a strong specialty or discount
store as an anchor tenant.
The community center offers shoppers greater
depth and range of merchandise —assortments in
clothing sizes, styles, colors, and prices —than does
a neighborhood or convenience center.
The community center has a typical gross leas-
able area of about 150,000 square feet but may
range from 100,000 to 300,000 square feet. For its
site area, the community center needs from 10 to
30 acres. It normally serves a trade area population
of 40,000 to 150,000 people.
0
1-3 Pomerado Village shopping center in Rancho Bernardo, the new community near San Diego, California. The Spanish-
st�-le center accommodates a variety of community -scale shopping needs and includes a bank, a grocery, beauty shops, barber
shops, a furniture store, and many other retail shops.
If population increases in the trade area can be
predicted reliably, the prudent developer of a com-
munity center will plan to have adequate land
available for expansion. When the growth in sales
volume warrants and the drawing power justifies,
the community center can often be increased in
status to that of a small regional by the introduc-
tion of a full -line department store and additional
shops, offices, and services.
In the metropolitan area, a community center is
vulnerable to competition. It is too big to thrive
from its immediate neighborhood trade area and
too weak to make a strong impact on the whole
community, except in smaller cities, those with
Populations of 50,000 to 100,000. The development
of a strong regional center, with the pulling power
of one or more department stores, may impinge on
a community center's trade area. But in a normally
strong market area, both can succeed, even if they
are within several miles of one another, because of
the difference in the types of merchandise offered
and because of the community center's conveni-
ence to the shopper, particularly the convenient
vehicle travel distance.
In cities with populations of 50,000 to 100,000,
the community center may actually take on the
stature of a regional center because of the center's
local dominance and pulling power, even though
the array of tenants does not include a full -line
department store. A popular price or discount store
may substitute locally in customer acceptance and
in function as the leading tenant.
A community shopping center is the type whose
size and pulling power are the most difficult to
estimate. Because some shopping goods are made
available, shoppers are less predictable in their
shopping habits for clothes and appliances but
will customarily go to their favorite supermarket
for their household's daily needs.
'f
1-6
CHARACTERISTICS OF SHOPPING CENTERS
CENTER TYPE
LEADING TENANT
(BASIS FOR
CLASSIFICATION)
TYPICAL
GLA
GENERAL
RANGE IN
GLA
USUAL
MINIMUM
SITE AREA
MINIMUM
SUPPORT
REQUIRED
NEIGHBORHOOD
Supermarket or
50,000 sq. ft.
30,000-100,000
3 acres
2,500-40,000
CENTER
drugstore
sq. ft.
people
COMMUNITY
Variety, discount,
150,000 sq. ft.
100,000-300,000
10 acres or more
40,000-150,000
CENTER
or junior depart-
sq. ft.
people
ment store
REGIONAL
One or more full-
400,000 sq. ft.
300,000-1,000,000
30-50 acres or
150,000 or more
CENTER
line department
sq. ft. or more*
more
people
stores of at least
100,000 sq. ft.
of GLA*
*Centers with more than 750,000 sq. ft. GLA usually include three or more department stores and hence are super-
regionals.
The community center is the in-between or inter-
mediate type of shopping center.
The regional center provides shopping goods,
general merchandise, apparel, furniture, and home
furnishings in full depth and variety. It is built
around the full -line department store, with a mini-
mum GLA of 100,000 square feet, as the major
drawing power. For even greater comparative shop-
ping, two department stores —even three or more —
are being included among the tenantry. The normal
design uses the pedestrian mall, either open or en-
closed, as a connector between the major anchor
stores. The mall also establishes a basic pattern for
directing customer flow past supplementary tenant
stores which are placed between the purposely
separated majors.
The regional center has a typical gross leasable
area of 400,000 square feet. Regional centers range
from 300,000 to more than 1,000,000 square feet.
When the regional center exceeds 750,000 square
feet in GLA and includes three or more depart-
ment stores, it becomes a super -regional center.
Regional and super -regional centers establish
their customer drawing power from their ability to
offer full ranges of shopping facilities and goods.
This attraction extends their trade areas by 10 to
15 miles or more, modified by such factors as com-
petitive facilities and travel time over access high-
ways. There is no difference in function between
regionals and super -regionals —only strength and
range in their customer drawing power.
The regional and super -regional are the largest
types of shopping center. They are also the glamour
centers. They come closest to reproducing shopping
facilities and customer attraction once available
only in central business districts.
Figure 1-6 compares the characteristics of the
three major types of shopping centers. Numbers
shown in the table must be regarded only as con-
venient indicators for defining the various types of
centers; the basic elements of any center may
change because of the need to adapt to the char-
acteristics of the trade area, including the nature
of the competition, population density, and income
levels. The number of people needed to support a
shopping center of any type, for example, cannot
be fixed, because income level, disposable income,
dilution by competition, and changing methods of
merchandising and changing store sizes all enter
into the calculations. Obviously, no rigid standard
for size would be realistic. Local conditions within
a trade area (number of households, income levels,
existing retail outlets) are more important than any
standard population figure in estimating purchas-
ing power needed to support a center.
Once more, it is emphasized that tenant compo-
sition and the characteristics of the leading tenant
define a shopping center type. Building area, site
size, and population do not.
Variations of the Major Types
The seventies has begun an era of consumer and
citizen awareness, energy and environmental con-
trols, and heightened levels of public taste and
sophistication. Established behavioral patterns are