The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBUCKING HORSE PARK - BDR210011 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - DRAINAGE REPORT APPENDIX A Hydrologic Computations WDDXXXXDXDE DEDDD DDDDDD D D DLPDDDD R.T.U.R.T.U.R.T.U.UP MILES HOUSE AVENUENANCY GRAY AVENUE PA L O M I N O D R I V E P A L O M I N O C O U R TWALKALOOSA WAYPALOMINO DRIVEWALKALOOSA WAYMILES HOUSE AVENUEDRAKE ROADGREAT WESTERN RAILROADTRACT BFUTURE CITY PARKTRACT EHORSEAREANANCY GRAYWETLANDTRACT ICOMMUNITYSUPPORTEDAGRICULTUREXXXXX420 SF CLASSRO O M9 HALL11 1149 SFBARN12 6" 114 SFOFFICE15 115 SFOFFICE16 WOMENS17 MENS18 371 SF TRACTOR / EQUIP.STORAGE19 COW MILKING20 MILKING PREP21 JAN.22MECH.23OFFICEBUILDING 1OFFICEBLDG 2OFFICEBLDG 3TRACT ATRACT FT R A C T G TRACT HTRACT DOUTLOT AOUTLOT DOUTLOT FOUTLOT EOUTLOT GOUTLOT HOFFICECOMPLEXNATIVE UPLANDHABITAT AREA/DETENTION PONDTRACT CWORKINGFARM101102103105108109100107a107b104DRAWN BY: ATCSCALE: 1" = 500'ISSUED: 10/19/2021SWMM BASIN UPDATESHEET NO:1BUCKING HORSE SECOND FILING Elapsed Time (hours) 6543210Volume (ft3)900000.0 800000.0 700000.0 600000.0 500000.0 400000.0 300000.0 200000.0 100000.0 0.0 Node 215 Volume (ft3) SWMM 5 Page 1 Elapsed Time (hours) 6543210Flow (CFS)90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Link out215 Flow (CFS) SWMM 5 Page 1 Elapsed Time (hours) 6543210Flow (CFS)350.0 300.0 250.0 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0 0.0 Link IN_215a Flow (CFS) SWMM 5 Page 1 EPA STORM WATER MANAGEMENT MODEL - VERSION 5.1 (Build 5.1.014) -------------------------------------------------------------- WARNING 02: maximum depth increased for Node 302 WARNING 02: maximum depth increased for Node 303 WARNING 02: maximum depth increased for Node 304 WARNING 02: maximum depth increased for Node 305 WARNING 02: maximum depth increased for Node 306 WARNING 02: maximum depth increased for Node 307 ********************************************************* NOTE: The summary statistics displayed in this report are based on results found at every computational time step, not just on results from each reporting time step. ********************************************************* **************** Analysis Options **************** Flow Units ............... CFS Process Models: Rainfall/Runoff ........ YES RDII ................... NO Snowmelt ............... NO Groundwater ............ NO Flow Routing ........... YES Ponding Allowed ........ NO Water Quality .......... NO Infiltration Method ...... HORTON Flow Routing Method ...... KINWAVE Starting Date ............ 11/21/2012 00:00:00 Ending Date .............. 11/21/2012 06:00:00 Antecedent Dry Days ...... 0.0 Report Time Step ......... 00:01:00 Wet Time Step ............ 00:05:00 Dry Time Step ............ 01:00:00 Routing Time Step ........ 30.00 sec ************************** Volume Depth SWMM 5 Page 1 Runoff Quantity Continuity acre-feet inches ************************** --------- ------- Total Precipitation ...... 62.620 3.669 Evaporation Loss ......... 0.000 0.000 Infiltration Loss ........ 18.769 1.100 Surface Runoff ........... 43.386 2.542 Final Storage ............ 0.753 0.044 Continuity Error (%) ..... -0.458 ************************** Volume Volume Flow Routing Continuity acre-feet 10^6 gal ************************** --------- --------- Dry Weather Inflow ....... 0.000 0.000 Wet Weather Inflow ....... 43.385 14.138 Groundwater Inflow ....... 0.000 0.000 RDII Inflow .............. 0.000 0.000 External Inflow .......... 0.000 0.000 External Outflow ......... 34.675 11.299 Flooding Loss ............ 1.442 0.470 Evaporation Loss ......... 0.000 0.000 Exfiltration Loss ........ 0.000 0.000 Initial Stored Volume .... 0.000 0.000 Final Stored Volume ...... 7.247 2.361 Continuity Error (%) ..... 0.050 ******************************** Highest Flow Instability Indexes ******************************** Link out002 (36) Link 202 (27) Link 5 (23) Link 204 (3) Link 203 (2) ************************* Routing Time Step Summary ************************* Minimum Time Step : 30.00 sec SWMM 5 Page 2 Average Time Step : 30.00 sec Maximum Time Step : 30.00 sec Percent in Steady State : 0.00 Average Iterations per Step : 1.27 Percent Not Converging : 0.00 *************************** Subcatchment Runoff Summary *************************** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total Total Total Total Imperv Perv Total Total Peak Runoff Precip Runon Evap Infil Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Coeff Subcatchment in in in in in in in 10^6 gal CFS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 109 3.67 0.00 0.00 0.68 1.98 0.97 2.95 1.15 101.36 0.805 108 3.67 0.00 0.00 0.68 1.98 0.97 2.95 1.74 153.81 0.805 100 3.67 0.00 0.00 0.42 2.52 0.69 3.20 1.04 105.75 0.873 102 3.67 0.00 0.00 0.68 1.94 1.03 2.96 2.61 245.74 0.808 101 3.67 0.00 0.00 1.33 1.76 0.51 2.28 0.97 39.41 0.621 104 3.67 0.00 0.00 0.65 1.99 1.00 2.99 0.78 75.55 0.816 105 3.67 0.00 0.00 0.64 2.01 0.98 2.99 1.71 161.94 0.816 106 3.67 0.00 0.00 2.68 0.04 0.95 0.99 0.00 0.04 0.270 107a 3.67 0.00 0.00 1.76 0.62 1.28 1.90 1.63 73.64 0.519 107b 3.67 0.00 0.00 1.66 0.83 1.16 1.99 2.52 127.09 0.542 ****************** Node Depth Summary ****************** --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average Maximum Maximum Time of Max Reported Depth Depth HGL Occurrence Max Depth Node Type Feet Feet Feet days hr:min Feet --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 302 JUNCTION 1.84 4.00 101.90 0 00:56 4.00 mh002 JUNCTION 0.51 2.29 102.59 0 00:49 2.29 mh001 JUNCTION 2.78 10.00 109.00 0 00:52 10.00 303 JUNCTION 1.05 1.84 97.74 0 00:40 1.83 SWMM 5 Page 3 304 JUNCTION 1.14 2.79 96.69 0 00:40 2.77 305 JUNCTION 1.23 3.03 95.93 0 00:41 3.03 306 JUNCTION 1.23 3.03 95.53 0 00:41 3.03 307 JUNCTION 0.59 1.49 93.49 0 00:41 1.49 OUTFALL OUTFALL 0.00 0.00 90.00 0 00:00 0.00 001 STORAGE 2.36 6.15 106.15 0 01:14 6.15 002 STORAGE 0.84 7.43 109.43 0 00:49 7.43 4 STORAGE 2.77 3.64 105.64 0 02:07 3.64 18 STORAGE 0.74 2.84 104.84 0 00:55 2.84 215 STORAGE 3.08 4.17 95.17 0 02:25 4.17 ******************* Node Inflow Summary ******************* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maximum Maximum Lateral Total Flow Lateral Total Time of Max Inflow Inflow Balance Inflow Inflow Occurrence Volume Volume Error Node Type CFS CFS days hr:min 10^6 gal 10^6 gal Percent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 302 JUNCTION 0.00 98.62 0 01:42 0 6.3 0.000 mh002 JUNCTION 0.00 109.39 0 00:49 0 2.61 0.000 mh001 JUNCTION 0.00 122.79 0 01:14 0 6.77 -0.000 303 JUNCTION 75.55 120.51 0 00:40 0.78 7.07 -0.000 304 JUNCTION 161.94 274.44 0 00:40 1.71 8.77 0.000 305 JUNCTION 0.04 270.30 0 00:41 0.00269 8.76 0.000 306 JUNCTION 73.64 340.99 0 00:41 1.63 10.4 0.000 307 JUNCTION 127.09 464.21 0 00:41 2.52 12.9 -0.000 OUTFALL OUTFALL 0.00 82.00 0 01:55 0 11.3 0.000 001 STORAGE 39.41 183.67 0 00:47 0.965 6.79 0.031 002 STORAGE 245.74 245.74 0 00:40 2.61 2.61 0.033 4 STORAGE 255.17 255.17 0 00:40 2.89 2.89 0.016 18 STORAGE 105.75 105.75 0 00:40 1.04 1.04 0.043 215 STORAGE 0.00 464.29 0 00:41 0 12.9 -0.000 ********************* Node Flooding Summary ********************* SWMM 5 Page 4 Flooding refers to all water that overflows a node, whether it ponds or not. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Maximum Maximum Time of Max Flood Ponded Hours Rate Occurrence Volume Volume Node Flooded CFS days hr:min 10^6 gal 1000 ft3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- mh001 0.93 30.42 0 01:14 0.470 0.000 ********************** Storage Volume Summary ********************** -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average Avg Evap Exfil Maximum Max Time of Max Maximum Volume Pcnt Pcnt Pcnt Volume Pcnt Occurrence Outflow Storage Unit 1000 ft3 Full Loss Loss 1000 ft3 Full days hr:min CFS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 001 49.352 12 0 0 184.148 46 0 01:13 122.79 002 6.389 5 0 0 78.352 60 0 00:49 109.39 4 184.780 8 0 0 289.040 13 0 02:07 16.00 18 11.650 2 0 0 60.646 8 0 00:54 23.90 215 536.149 11 0 0 870.255 17 0 02:25 82.00 *********************** Outfall Loading Summary *********************** ----------------------------------------------------------- Flow Avg Max Total Freq Flow Flow Volume Outfall Node Pcnt CFS CFS 10^6 gal ----------------------------------------------------------- OUTFALL 97.08 72.08 82.00 11.298 ----------------------------------------------------------- System 97.08 72.08 82.00 11.298 SWMM 5 Page 5 ******************** Link Flow Summary ******************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maximum Time of Max Maximum Max/ Max/ |Flow| Occurrence |Veloc| Full Full Link Type CFS days hr:min ft/sec Flow Depth ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 202 CONDUIT 109.39 0 00:49 9.98 0.23 0.33 201 CONDUIT 98.62 0 01:42 8.55 1.07 1.00 203 CONDUIT 97.93 0 00:56 7.71 0.01 0.08 204 CONDUIT 117.67 0 00:41 8.27 0.02 0.09 205 CONDUIT 270.26 0 00:41 10.26 0.04 0.14 206 CONDUIT 269.50 0 00:41 11.02 0.10 0.22 IN_215a CONDUIT 341.10 0 00:41 32.19 0.01 0.07 IN_215b CONDUIT 464.29 0 00:41 45.01 0.01 0.07 out002 DUMMY 109.39 0 00:49 out001 DUMMY 122.79 0 01:14 out4 DUMMY 16.00 0 00:50 5 DUMMY 23.90 0 00:55 out215 DUMMY 82.00 0 01:55 ************************* Conduit Surcharge Summary ************************* ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hours Hours --------- Hours Full -------- Above Full Capacity Conduit Both Ends Upstream Dnstream Normal Flow Limited ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 201 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.92 Analysis begun on: Wed Oct 20 08:52:10 2021 Analysis ended on: Wed Oct 20 08:52:10 2021 Total elapsed time: < 1 sec SWMM 5 Page 6 This unofficial copy was downloaded on Oct-11-2021 from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website: http://citydocs.fcgov.com For additional information or an official copy, please contact City of Fort Collins Utilities 700 Wood Street Fort Collins, CO 80524 USA [TITLE] ;;Project Title/Notes [OPTIONS] ;;Option Value FLOW_UNITS CFS INFILTRATION HORTON FLOW_ROUTING KINWAVE LINK_OFFSETS DEPTH MIN_SLOPE 0 ALLOW_PONDING NO SKIP_STEADY_STATE NO START_DATE 11/21/2012 START_TIME 00:00:00 REPORT_START_DATE 11/21/2012 REPORT_START_TIME 00:00:00 END_DATE 11/21/2012 END_TIME 06:00:00 SWEEP_START 01/01 SWEEP_END 12/31 DRY_DAYS 0 REPORT_STEP 00:01:00 WET_STEP 00:05:00 DRY_STEP 01:00:00 ROUTING_STEP 0:00:30 RULE_STEP 00:00:00 INERTIAL_DAMPING PARTIAL NORMAL_FLOW_LIMITED BOTH FORCE_MAIN_EQUATION H-W VARIABLE_STEP 0.75 LENGTHENING_STEP 0 MIN_SURFAREA 12.566 MAX_TRIALS 8 HEAD_TOLERANCE 0.005 SYS_FLOW_TOL 5 LAT_FLOW_TOL 5 MINIMUM_STEP 0.5 THREADS 1 [EVAPORATION] ;;Data Source Parameters ;;-------------- ---------------- CONSTANT 0.0 DRY_ONLY NO [RAINGAGES] ;;Name Format Interval SCF Source ;;-------------- --------- ------ ------ ---------- FtCollins-100yr INTENSITY 0:05 1.0 TIMESERIES 100yr [SUBCATCHMENTS] ;;Name Rain Gage Outlet Area %Imperv Width %Slope CurbLen SnowPack ;;-------------- ---------------- ---------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ---------------- 109 FtCollins-100yr 4 14.3 55 2076 1 0 108 FtCollins-100yr 4 21.7 55 3150 1 0 100 FtCollins-100yr 18 12.0 70 1742 2.6 0 102 FtCollins-100yr 002 32.4 53.9 4705 2.2 0 101 FtCollins-100yr 001 15.6 49.8 2265 .004 0 104 FtCollins-100yr 303 9.6 55.4 1343 3 0 105 FtCollins-100yr 304 21.0 56 3049 2.1 0 106 FtCollins-100yr 305 .1 1 1 2.6 0 107a FtCollins-100yr 306 31.5 17.2 1087 1.5 0 107b FtCollins-100yr 307 46.6 23.0 1373 1.5 0 [SUBAREAS] ;;Subcatchment N-Imperv N-Perv S-Imperv S-Perv PctZero RouteTo PctRouted ;;-------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 109 .016 .25 .1 .3 0 OUTLET 108 .016 .25 .1 .3 0 OUTLET 100 .016 .25 .1 .3 0 OUTLET 102 .016 .25 .1 .3 0 OUTLET 101 .016 .25 .1 .3 0 OUTLET 104 .016 .25 .1 .3 0 OUTLET 105 .016 .25 .1 .3 0 OUTLET 106 .016 .25 .1 .3 0 OUTLET 107a .016 .25 .1 .3 0 OUTLET 107b .016 .25 .1 .3 0 OUTLET [INFILTRATION] ;;Subcatchment MaxRate MinRate Decay DryTime MaxInfil ;;-------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 109 .51 0.5 6.48 7 0 108 .51 0.5 6.48 7 0 100 .51 0.5 6.48 7 0 102 .51 0.5 6.48 7 0 101 .51 0.5 6.48 7 0 104 .51 0.5 6.48 7 0 105 .51 0.5 6.48 7 0 106 .51 0.5 6.48 7 0 107a .51 0.5 6.48 7 0 107b .51 0.5 6.48 7 0 [JUNCTIONS] ;;Name Elevation MaxDepth InitDepth SurDepth Aponded ;;-------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 302 97.9 10 0 0 0 mh002 100.3 10 0 0 0 mh001 99 10 0 0 0 303 95.9 10 0 0 0 304 93.9 10 0 0 0 305 92.9 10 0 0 0 306 92.5 10 0 0 0 307 92.0 10 0 0 0 [OUTFALLS] ;;Name Elevation Type Stage Data Gated Route To ;;-------------- ---------- ---------- ---------------- -------- ---------------- OUTFALL 90 FREE NO [STORAGE] ;;Name Elev. MaxDepth InitDepth Shape Curve Name/Params N/A Fevap Psi Ksat IMD ;;-------------- -------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- 001 100 10 0 TABULAR P1 0 0 002 102 10 0 TABULAR P2 0 0 4 102 10 0 TABULAR P4 0 0 18 102 10 0 TABULAR t 0 0 215 91 10 0 TABULAR P215 0 0 [CONDUITS] ;;Name From Node To Node Length Roughness InOffset OutOffset InitFlow MaxFlow ;;-------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 202 mh002 001 55 .013 0 0 0 0 201 mh001 302 266 .013 0 0 0 0 203 302 303 505 .013 0 0 0 0 204 303 304 482 .013 0 0 0 0 205 304 305 260 .013 0 0 0 0 206 305 306 95 .013 0 0 0 0 IN_215a 306 307 10 0.01 0 0 0 0 IN_215b 307 215 10 0.01 0 0 0 0 [OUTLETS] ;;Name From Node To Node Offset Type QTable/Qcoeff Qexpon Gated ;;-------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------- --------------- ---------------- ---------- -------- out002 002 mh002 0 TABULAR/DEPTH O2 NO out001 001 mh001 0 TABULAR/DEPTH O1 NO out4 4 001 0 TABULAR/DEPTH O4 NO 5 18 001 0 TABULAR/DEPTH T_O NO out215 215 OUTFALL 0 TABULAR/DEPTH O215 NO [XSECTIONS] ;;Link Shape Geom1 Geom2 Geom3 Geom4 Barrels Culvert ;;-------------- ------------ ---------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 202 CIRCULAR 7 0 0 0 1 201 CIRCULAR 4 0 0 0 1 203 CIRCULAR 20 0 0 0 1 204 CIRCULAR 20 0 0 0 1 205 CIRCULAR 20 0 0 0 1 206 CIRCULAR 14 0 0 0 1 IN_215a CIRCULAR 20 0 0 0 1 IN_215b CIRCULAR 20 0 0 0 1 [CURVES] ;;Name Type X-Value Y-Value ;;-------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- det1 Rating 102 0 det1 104 30 det1 106 60 ; pond2 Rating 0 0 pond2 4 7 pond2 8 14 ; det2 Rating 0 0 det2 4 7 det2 8 14 ; p1out Rating 0 0.0 p1out 1 0.3 p1out 2 0.5 p1out 3 0.6 p1out 4 0.7 p1out 5 0.8 p1out 6 0.8 p1out 7.2 0.9 ; p2out Rating 0.00 0.00 p2out 0.20 4.00 p2out 1.20 8.34 p2out 2.20 8.59 p2out 3.20 8.83 p2out 4.20 9.06 p2out 5.20 9.29 p2out 6.00 9.47 ; out3 Rating 0.00 0.00 out3 1.10 6.00 out3 2.10 12.94 out3 3.10 18.90 out3 4.10 23.38 out3 5.10 27.14 out3 6.10 30.43 out3 6.70 33.40 ; outlet4 Rating 0 0 outlet4 2 1 outlet4 4 1.5 ; outle5 Rating 0 0 outle5 2 1 outle5 4 1.5 ; O4 Rating 0 0 O4 1 4 O4 2 10 O4 3 16 ; O3 Rating 0 0 O3 2.6 20 O3 4.6 40 O3 5.6 60 ; O1 Rating 0 0 O1 1.8 30 O1 3.8 60 O1 6.8 140 ; O2 Rating 0 0 O2 1.6 46.6 O2 3.6 72.10 O2 4.6 82.8 O2 5.6 92.3 O2 6.6 101.2 O2 7.6 111.1 ; T_O Rating 0 0 T_O 2 18 T_O 4 32 ; O215 Rating 0 0 O215 2 65 O215 4 82 ; pond1 Storage 0.00 186.71 pond1 1.00 11610.97 pond1 2.00 18910.48 pond1 3.00 27597.47 pond1 4.00 37457.72 pond1 5.00 42732.82 pond1 6.00 47703.39 pond1 7.20 53728.51 ; detpond2 Storage 0.00 422.47 detpond2 0.20 1667.16 detpond2 1.00 6743.86 detpond2 2.00 16049.38 detpond2 3.00 22104.10 detpond2 4.00 26630.53 detpond2 5.00 30414.38 detpond2 6.00 34190.32 ; pond3 Storage 0.00 0.00 pond3 1.10 7902.02 pond3 2.10 29813.22 pond3 3.10 64874.66 pond3 4.10 103295.75 pond3 5.10 112676.39 pond3 6.10 122158.92 pond3 6.70 127897.52 ; detpond4 Storage 0 0 detpond4 2 25000 detpond4 4 50000 ; detpond5 Storage 0 0 detpond5 2 20000 detpond5 4 50000 ; P4 Storage 0 0 P4 1 43560 P4 2 87120 P4 3 130680 ; P3 Storage 0 0 P3 2.6 12637 P3 4.6 16646 P3 5.6 18800 ; P1 Storage 0 0 P1 1.8 24042 P1 3.8 37538 P1 6.8 51067 ; P2 Storage 0 0 P2 1.6 7629 P2 3.6 10697 P2 4.6 12381 P2 5.6 14165 P2 6.6 16049 P2 7.6 18034 ; t Storage 0 0 t 2 30000 t 4 60000 ; P215 Storage 0 0 P215 2 200000 P215 4 400000 [TIMESERIES] ;;Name Date Time Value ;;-------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 100yr 0:05 1 100yr 0:10 1.14 100yr 0:15 1.33 100yr 0:20 2.23 100yr 0:25 2.84 100yr 0:30 5.49 100yr 0:35 9.95 100yr 0:40 4.12 100yr 0:45 2.48 100yr 0:50 1.46 100yr 0:55 1.22 100yr 1:00 1.06 100yr 1:05 1 100yr 1:10 0.95 100yr 1:15 0.91 100yr 1:20 0.87 100yr 1:25 0.84 100yr 1:30 0.81 100yr 1:35 0.78 100yr 1:40 0.75 100yr 1:45 0.73 100yr 1:50 0.71 100yr 1:55 0.69 100yr 2:00 0.67 [REPORT] ;;Reporting Options SUBCATCHMENTS ALL NODES ALL LINKS ALL [TAGS] [MAP] DIMENSIONS 0.000 0.000 10000.000 10000.000 Units None [COORDINATES] ;;Node X-Coord Y-Coord ;;-------------- ------------------ ------------------ 302 4359.410 7244.898 mh002 3520.408 7494.331 mh001 4359.410 7925.170 303 4393.733 6403.270 304 4475.477 5422.343 305 4543.597 4441.417 306 4598.093 3487.738 307 5242.215 3483.276 OUTFALL 6432.403 2650.215 001 4359.410 8492.063 002 2658.730 7494.331 4 3554.422 9387.755 18 3506.006 8483.483 215 6121.245 3487.124 [VERTICES] ;;Link X-Coord Y-Coord ;;-------------- ------------------ ------------------ [Polygons] ;;Subcatchment X-Coord Y-Coord ;;-------------- ------------------ ------------------ 109 2783.447 9078.798 109 2783.447 9101.474 109 2772.109 9101.474 109 2794.785 9090.136 108 2866.591 9527.589 108 2741.875 9527.589 108 2775.888 9686.319 100 2859.033 8473.167 100 2722.978 8473.167 100 2802.343 8597.884 102 1986.017 7475.435 102 1838.624 7588.813 102 1838.624 7452.759 101 5273.998 8450.491 101 5160.620 8439.153 101 5160.620 8552.532 104 3428.771 6298.883 104 3400.838 6452.514 105 3417.382 5364.807 105 3353.004 5354.077 105 3363.734 5482.833 106 3385.193 4366.953 106 3310.086 4345.494 106 3310.086 4484.979 107a 3893.093 3008.413 107a 3828.715 2997.684 107a 3817.985 3094.250 107b 4638.601 2964.245 107b 4684.737 3033.449 107b 4534.794 3033.449 [SYMBOLS] ;;Gage X-Coord Y-Coord ;;-------------- ------------------ ------------------ FtCollins-100yr -582.579 8495.475 Bucking Horse Park Final Erosion Control Report VII. EROSION CONTROL REPORT A comprehensive Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (along with associated details) has been included with the construction drawings. It should be noted, however, that any such Erosion and Sediment Control Plan serves only as a general guide to the Contractor. Staging and/or phasing of the BMPs depicted, and additional or different BMPs from those included may be necessary during construction, or as required by the authorities having jurisdiction. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to ensure erosion control measures are properly maintained and followed. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan is intended to be a living document, constantly adapting to site conditions and needs. The Contractor shall update the location of BMPs as they are installed, removed, or modified in conjunction with construction activities. It is imperative to appropriately reflect the current site conditions at all times. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall address both temporary measures to be implemented during construction, as well as permanent erosion control protection. Best Management Practices from Volume 3, Chapter 7 – Construction BMPs will be utilized. Measures may include, but are not limited to, silt fencing along the disturbed perimeter, gutter protection in the adjacent roadways, and inlet protection at existing and proposed storm inlets. Vehicle tracking control pads, spill containment and clean-up procedures, designated concrete washout areas, dumpsters, and job site restrooms shall also be provided by the Contractor. Grading and Erosion Control Notes can be found on the Utility Plans. The Final Plans will contain a full-size Erosion Control sheet as well as a separate sheet dedicated to Erosion Control Details. In addition to this report and the referenced plan sheets, the Contractor shall be aware of, and adhere to, the applicable requirements outlined in the Development Agreement for the development. Also, the Site Contractor for this project will be required to secure a Stormwater Construction General Permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), Water Quality Control Division – Stormwater Program, prior to any earth disturbance activities. Prior to securing the said permit, the Site Contractor shall develop a comprehensive StormWater Management Plan (SWMP) pursuant to CDPHE requirements and guidelines. The SWMP will further describe and document the ongoing activities, inspections, and maintenance of construction BMPs. Bucking Horse Park Final Erosion Control Report VII. EROSION CONTROL REPORT A comprehensive Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (along with associated details) has been included with the construction drawings. It should be noted, however, that any such Erosion and Sediment Control Plan serves only as a general guide to the Contractor. Staging and/or phasing of the BMPs depicted, and additional or different BMPs from those included may be necessary during construction, or as required by the authorities having jurisdiction. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to ensure erosion control measures are properly maintained and followed. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan is intended to be a living document, constantly adapting to site conditions and needs. The Contractor shall update the location of BMPs as they are installed, removed, or modified in conjunction with construction activities. It is imperative to appropriately reflect the current site conditions at all times. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall address both temporary measures to be implemented during construction, as well as permanent erosion control protection. Best Management Practices from Volume 3, Chapter 7 – Construction BMPs will be utilized. Measures may include, but are not limited to, silt fencing along the disturbed perimeter, gutter protection in the adjacent roadways, and inlet protection at existing and proposed storm inlets. Vehicle tracking control pads, spill containment and clean-up procedures, designated concrete washout areas, dumpsters, and job site restrooms shall also be provided by the Contractor. Grading and Erosion Control Notes can be found on the Utility Plans. The Final Plans will contain a full-size Erosion Control sheet as well as a separate sheet dedicated to Erosion Control Details. In addition to this report and the referenced plan sheets, the Contractor shall be aware of, and adhere to, the applicable requirements outlined in the Development Agreement for the development. Also, the Site Contractor for this project will be required to secure a Stormwater Construction General Permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), Water Quality Control Division – Stormwater Program, prior to any earth disturbance activities. Prior to securing the said permit, the Site Contractor shall develop a comprehensive StormWater Management Plan (SWMP) pursuant to CDPHE requirements and guidelines. The SWMP will further describe and document the ongoing activities, inspections, and maintenance of construction BMPs. United States Department of Agriculture A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Larimer County Area, Colorado Bucking Horse Park Natural Resources Conservation Service November 10, 2021 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface....................................................................................................................2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 Soil Map..................................................................................................................8 Soil Map................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................11 Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Larimer County Area, Colorado......................................................................13 22—Caruso clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slope...............................................13 Soil Information for All Uses...............................................................................15 Soil Properties and Qualities..............................................................................15 Soil Qualities and Features.............................................................................15 Hydrologic Soil Group.................................................................................15 References............................................................................................................20 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and Custom Soil Resource Report 6 identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. Custom Soil Resource Report 7 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 9 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 44892704489310448935044893904489430448947044895104489550448959044896304489270448931044893504489390448943044894704489510448955044895904489630497570 497610 497650 497690 497730 497770 497810 497850 497570 497610 497650 497690 497730 497770 497810 497850 40° 33' 27'' N 105° 1' 43'' W40° 33' 27'' N105° 1' 31'' W40° 33' 14'' N 105° 1' 43'' W40° 33' 14'' N 105° 1' 31'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 25 50 100 150 Meters Map Scale: 1:1,890 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Larimer County Area, Colorado Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 2, 2021 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 11, 2018—Aug 12, 2018 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Custom Soil Resource Report 10 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 22 Caruso clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slope 18.4 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 18.4 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Custom Soil Resource Report 11 An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. Custom Soil Resource Report 12 Larimer County Area, Colorado 22—Caruso clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slope Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: jpvt Elevation: 4,800 to 5,500 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 15 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 50 degrees F Frost-free period: 135 to 150 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Caruso and similar soils:85 percent Minor components:15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Caruso Setting Landform:Flood-plain steps, stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Mixed alluvium Typical profile H1 - 0 to 35 inches: clay loam H2 - 35 to 44 inches: fine sandy loam H3 - 44 to 60 inches: gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Somewhat poorly drained Runoff class: High Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 24 to 48 inches Frequency of flooding:NoneOccasional Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:5 percent Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3w Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w Hydrologic Soil Group: D Ecological site: R067BY036CO - Overflow Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Loveland Percent of map unit:9 percent Custom Soil Resource Report 13 Landform:Terraces Ecological site:R067BY036CO - Overflow Hydric soil rating: Yes Fluvaquents Percent of map unit:6 percent Landform:Terraces Hydric soil rating: Yes Custom Soil Resource Report 14 Soil Information for All Uses Soil Properties and Qualities The Soil Properties and Qualities section includes various soil properties and qualities displayed as thematic maps with a summary table for the soil map units in the selected area of interest. A single value or rating for each map unit is generated by aggregating the interpretive ratings of individual map unit components. This aggregation process is defined for each property or quality. Soil Qualities and Features Soil qualities are behavior and performance attributes that are not directly measured, but are inferred from observations of dynamic conditions and from soil properties. Example soil qualities include natural drainage, and frost action. Soil features are attributes that are not directly part of the soil. Example soil features include slope and depth to restrictive layer. These features can greatly impact the use and management of the soil. Hydrologic Soil Group Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. 15 Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Custom Soil Resource Report 16 17 Custom Soil Resource Report Map—Hydrologic Soil Group 44892704489310448935044893904489430448947044895104489550448959044896304489270448931044893504489390448943044894704489510448955044895904489630497570 497610 497650 497690 497730 497770 497810 497850 497570 497610 497650 497690 497730 497770 497810 497850 40° 33' 27'' N 105° 1' 43'' W40° 33' 27'' N105° 1' 31'' W40° 33' 14'' N 105° 1' 43'' W40° 33' 14'' N 105° 1' 31'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 25 50 100 150 Meters Map Scale: 1:1,890 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Larimer County Area, Colorado Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 2, 2021 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 11, 2018—Aug 12, 2018 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Custom Soil Resource Report 18 Table—Hydrologic Soil Group Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 22 Caruso clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slope D 18.4 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 18.4 100.0% Rating Options—Hydrologic Soil Group Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher Custom Soil Resource Report 19 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 20 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf Custom Soil Resource Report 21 MAP POCKET DRAINAGE EXHIBITS