Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSANCTUARY ON THE GREEN - PDP210018 - DOCUMENT MARKUPS - ROUND 2 - UTILITY PLANSN TAFT HILL RD.LAPORTE AVE. W VINE DR.N SUNSET ST.S IMPALA DR.W MULBERRY ST. 16' Concrete Pavements 8' Esmt. Util. 8' Esmt. Util. TRAVEL LANE 5'5' WALK 2'2' WALK 26' EOC-EOC 30' TRACT Concrete Pavements 8' Esmt. Util. 8' Esmt. Util. 5'5' 20' EOC-EOC 30' TRACT Slope and Crown Varies per Plan Concrete Pavements Esmt. Util. Esmt. Util. 20' EOC-EOC 20' TRACT Slope and Crown Varies per Plan Landscape Shoulder Landscape Shoulder 20 Concrete Pavements TRAVEL LANE 5'1'4' WALK 25' EOC-EOC 30' TRACT Landscape ShoulderLandscape Shoulder 8' Esmt. Util. 8' Esmt. Util. 10'10' 10' 8' TRAVEL PARK TRAVEL 8' PARK TRAVEL TURN 13' TRAVEL 13' LEFT 6' (MIN.) PKWY 36' ROADWAY 57' ROW (MIN.) (MIN) WALK 4.5' 6.5' MIN. FENCE SETBACK UTIL. ESMT. 9' 9'UTIL. ESMT. 36' ROADWAY (MIN) WALK 4.5' (MIN.) PKWY 6' 16' 7' PARK TRAVEL 7' PARK 6' (MIN.) PKWY 30' ROADWAY 51' ROW (MIN.) (MIN) WALK 4.5' 6'.5 Min. Fence Setback UTIL. ESMT. 9' 9'UTIL. ESMT. (MIN.) PKWY 6' WALK (MIN) 4.5' Lane Bike 72' ROW 49' Roadway 7' Walk (min.) (min.) Pkwy. 10' Util. Esmt. 15' Center 10' Travel 11' Travel 11' 3' Lane Bike 7' Bike Lane Buffer 6' EAST WEST Lane Bike (min.) Walk 84' ROW (min.) 52' Roadway 7' Walk (min.) (min.) Pkwy. 10' 8'Pkwy. 6' (min.) 10' Min. Fence Setback Util. Esmt. 15' Esmt. Util. 15' Center 10' Travel 11' Travel 11' 3' Lane Bike 7'3' Bike Lane Buffer Bike Lane Buffer LaneShlder42' ROW 55' Roadway 6' Walk (min.) (min.) Pkwy. 10' Util. Esmt. 15' Left 10' Travel 12' Travel 12' Lane Bike 7' 6' SOUTH NORTH Bike 30' ROW Turn Lane 8' SheetSANCTUARY ON THE GREENSThese drawings areinstruments of serviceprovided by NorthernEngineering Services, Inc.and are not to be used forany type of constructionunless signed and sealed bya Professional Engineer inthe employ of NorthernEngineering Services, Inc.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREVIEW SETENGINEERNGIEHTRONRNFORT COLLINS: 301 North Howes Street, Suite 100, 80521GREELEY: 820 8th Street, 80631970.221.4158northernengineering.comof 30 C0.00COVER SHEETCONTACT INFORMATION PROJECT TEAM: I hereby affirm that these final construction plans were prepared under my direct supervision, in accordance with all applicable City of Fort Collins and State of Colorado standards and statutes, respectively; and that I am fully responsible for the accuracy of all design. revisions, and record conditions that I have noted on these plans. These plans have been reviewed by the City of Fort Collins for concept only. The review does not imply responsibility by the reviewing department, the City of Fort Collins Engineer, or the City of Fort Collins for accuracy and correctness of the calculations. Furthermore, the review does not imply that quantities of items on the plans are the final quantities required. The review shall not be construed for any reason as acceptance of financial responsibility by the City of Fort Collins for additional quantities of items shown that may be required during the construction phase. DISCLAIMER STATEMENT: CERTIFICATION STATEMENT: PROJECT LOCATION VICINITY MAP NORTH PROJECT DATUM: NAVD 88 BENCHMARK #1: City of Fort Collins Benchmark 33-97: In front o f2540 West Laporte Ave., Approx. 70ft east of centerline of driveway, 3.5ft south of a fence, 3.0ft southeast of a power pole, on a concrete slab. Elevation: 5088.19 (NAVD 88 Datum) BENCHMARK #2: City of Fort Collins Benchmark 10-07: Southeast corner of Taft Hill Rd. and Laporte Ave. on the northeast wingwall of the bridge over an irrigation ditch. Elevation: 5062.84 (NAVD 88 Datum) NOTE: If NGVD29 unadjusted Datum is required for any purpose, the following equation should be used: NGVD29 unadjusted = NAVD88 - 3.17. Basis of Bearings: The basis of bearings is the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 9 as bearing North 00° 54' 31" East. Northern Engineering Services, Inc NE Project No. 1536-001 Date: September, 2018 ORIGINAL FIELD SURVEY BY: CTL Thompson, Inc. CTL Thompson Project No. FC08483-115 Date: October 10, 2018 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION BY: PROJECT BENCHMARKS: UTILITY PLANS FOR SANCTUARY ON THE GREEN A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 7 NORTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 1 CONTACT INFORMATION PROJECT TEAM: Northern Engineering Services, Inc. Danny Weber, PE 301 North Howes Street, Suite 100 Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 (970) 221-4158 Northern Engineering Services, Inc. Bob Tessley, PLS 301 North Howes Street, Suite 100 Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 (970) 221-4158 E N G I N E E R N GI EHTRON R N E N G I N E E R N GI EHTRON R N SITE ENGINEER SURVEYOR CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO Know what's below. before you dig.Call R LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT C & A Companies 7991 Shaffer Parkway, Suite 200 Littleton, Colorado 80127 DEVELOPER/APPLICANT Ripley Design Inc. Linda Ripley 401 West Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 (970) 224-5828 NOVEMBER 2021 I hereby affirm that these final construction plans were prepared under my direct supervision, in accordance with all applicable City of Fort Collins and State of Colorado standards and statutes, respectively; and that I am fully responsible for the accuracy of all design. revisions, and record conditions that I have noted on these plans. These plans have been reviewed by the City of Fort Collins for concept only. The review does not imply responsibility by the reviewing department, the City of Fort Collins Engineer, or the City of Fort Collins for accuracy and correctness of the calculations. Furthermore, the review does not imply that quantities of items on the plans are the final quantities required. The review shall not be construed for any reason as acceptance of financial responsibility by the City of Fort Collins for additional quantities of items shown that may be required during the construction phase. DISCLAIMER STATEMENT: CERTIFICATION STATEMENT: SHEET INDEX TRAFFIC ENGINEER Delich Associates Matt Delich, PE 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538-4903 (970) 669-2061 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER CTL Thompson Inc. 400 North Link Lane Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 (970) 206-9441 ■ land planning ■ landscape architecture ■ ■ urban design ■ entitlement ■ 1 C0.00 COVER SHEET 2 C0.01 GENERAL & CONSTRUCTION NOTES 3-5 C1.00-C1.02 EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION PLAN UTILITY SHEETS 6 C2.00 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN 7-11 C2.01-C2.05 UTILITY PLANS GRADING SHEETS 12 C3.00 OVERALL GRADING PLAN 13-17 C3.01-C3.05 GRADING PLANS ROADWAY SHEETS 18-19 C4.00-C4.01 STREET A PLAN & PROFILE 20 C4.02 STREET B PLAN & PROFILE 21-22 C4.03-C4.04 STREET C PLAN & PROFILE 23 C4.05 INTERIM N TAFT HILL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND STRIPING PLAN 24 C4.06 ULTIMATE N TAFT HILL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND STRIPING PLAN 25 C4.07 INTERIM LAPORTE AVE IMPROVEMENTS AND STRIPING PLAN 26 C4.08 ULTIMATE LAPORTE AVE IMPROVEMENTS AND STRIPING PLAN EROSION CONTROL PLAN 27-28 C5.00-C5.01 EROSION CONTROL PLAN DRAINAGE EXHIBIT 29 C6.00 DRAINAGE EXHIBIT FLOODPLAIN EXHIBIT (BY OTHERS) 30 C6.01 FLOODPLAIN EXHIBIT CONNECTOR LOCAL w/ PARKING STREET C & STREET B RESIDENTIAL LOCAL STREET A APPROVAL NEW MERCER IRRIGATION CANAL COMPANY *INTERIM 2-LANE ARTERIAL STREET TAFT HILL ROAD APPROVAL LARIMER COUNTY CANAL NO. 2 IRRIGATING CO. ULTIMATE 2-LANE ARTERIAL STREET TAFT HILL ROAD/LAPORTE AVE THE NATURAL HABITAT BUFFER ZONE IS INTENDED TO BE MAINTAINED IN A NATIVE LANDSCAPE. PROJECT SPECIFIC NOTES: NOTE: OTHER DRIVES PER PLAN INTERIM 2-LANE ARTERIAL STREET LAPORTE AVE PRIVATE ALLEY w/ DRAINAGE TO CENTER Tracts U,X, T, & Q PRIVATE ALLEY w/ DRAINAGE TO CENTER Tracts A, E, H, K 20' WIDE PRIVATE ALLEY Tracts P, S, & X EASEMENTS VARY PER PLAN EASEMENTS VARY PER PLAN EASEMENTS VARY PER PLAN PRIVATE ALLEY w/ DRAINAGE TO CENTER Tracts S, M, X EASEMENTS VARY PER PLAN City of Fort Collins, CO UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: CITY ENGINEER,APPROVED SHEETS DATE APPROVED: WATER & WASTEWATER UTILITY,APPROVED SHEETS DATE APPROVED: STORMWATER UTILITY,APPROVED SHEETS DATE APPROVED: PARK PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT,APPROVED SHEETS DATE APPROVED: TRAFFIC OPERATIONS,APPROVED SHEETS DATE APPROVED: ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER,APPROVED SHEETS DATE UTILITY CONTACT LIST: * UTILITY COMPANY * This list is provided as a courtesy reference only. Northern Engineering Services assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this list. In no way shall this list relinquish the Contractor's responsibility for locating all utilities prior to commencing any construction activity. Please contact the Utility Notification Center of Colorado (UNCC) at 811 for additional information. PHONE NUMBER GAS-----------------------Xcel Energy-----------------------------Al Ermer (970) 225-7869 ELECTRIC--------------City of Fort Collins Light & Power--Luke Unruh (970) 416-2724 CABLE-------------------Comcast----------------------------------Don Kapperman (970) 567-0245 TELECOM.-------------Qwest Local Network------------------Bill Johnson (970) 377-6401 WATER------------------City of Fort Collins Utilities-----------Matt Simpson (970) 416-2754 WASTEWATER-------City of Fort Collins Utilities-----------Matt Simpson (970) 416-2754 STORMWATER-------City of Fort Collins Utilities-----------Matt Simpson (970) 416-2754 W/WW INSPECTOR--City of Fort Collins Utilities-----------Jim McChesney (970) 556-8179 SheetSANCTUARY ON THE GREENSThese drawings areinstruments of serviceprovided by NorthernEngineering Services, Inc.and are not to be used forany type of constructionunless signed and sealed bya Professional Engineer inthe employ of NorthernEngineering Services, Inc.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREVIEW SETENGINEERNGIEHTRONRNFORT COLLINS: 301 North Howes Street, Suite 100, 80521GREELEY: 820 8th Street, 80631970.221.4158northernengineering.comof 30 C0.01NOTESGENERAL & CONSTRUCTION2 CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO Know what's below. before you dig.Call R A. GENERAL NOTES 1.All materials, workmanship, and construction of public improvements shall meet or exceed the standards and specifications set forth in the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards and applicable state and federal regulations. Where there is conflict between these plans and the specifications, or any applicable standards, the most restrictive standard shall apply. All work shall be inspected and approved by the City of Fort Collins. 2.All references to any published standards shall refer to the latest revision of said standard, unless specifically stated otherwise. 3.These public improvement construction plans shall be valid for a period of three years from the date of approval by the City of Fort Collins Engineer. Use of these plans after the expiration date will require a new review and approval process by the City of Fort Collins prior to commencement of any work shown in these plans. 4.The engineer who has prepared these plans, by execution and/or seal hereof, does hereby affirm responsibility to the City of Fort Collins, as beneficiary of said engineer's work, for any errors and omissions contained in these plans, and approval of these plans by the City of Fort Collins Engineer shall not relieve the engineer who has prepared these plans of all such responsibility. Further, to the extent permitted by law, the engineer hereby agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Fort Collins, and its officers and employees, from and against all liabilities, claims, and demands which may arise from any errors and omissions contained in these plans. 5.All storm sewer construction, as well as power and other "dry" utility installations, shall conform to the City of Fort Collins standards and specifications current at the date of approval of the plans by the City of Fort Collins Engineer. 6.The type, size, location and number of all known underground utilities are approximate when shown on the drawings. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer to verify the existence and location of all underground utilities along the route of the work before commencing new construction. The Developer shall be responsible for unknown underground utilities. 7.The Developer shall contact the Utility Notification Center of Colorado (UNCC) at 1-800-922-1987, at least 2 working days prior to beginning excavation or grading, to have all registered utility locations marked. Other unregistered utility entities (i.e. ditch / irrigation company) are to be located by contacting the respective representative. Utility service laterals are also to be located prior to beginning excavation or grading. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer to relocate all existing utilities that conflict with the proposed improvements shown on these plans. 8.The Developer shall be responsible for protecting all utilities during construction and for coordinating with the appropriate utility company for any utility crossings required. 9.If a conflict exists between existing and proposed utilities and/or a design modification is required, the Developer shall coordinate with the engineer to modify the design. Design modification(s) must be approved by the City of Fort Collins prior to beginning construction. 10.The Developer shall coordinate and cooperate with the City of Fort Collins, and all utility companies involved, to assure that the work is accomplished in a timely fashion and with a minimum disruption of service. The Developer shall be responsible for contacting, in advance, all parties affected by any disruption of any utility service as well as the utility companies. 11.No work may commence within any public storm water, sanitary sewer or potable water system until the Developer notifies the utility provider. Notification shall be a minimum of 2 working days prior to commencement of any work. At the discretion of the water utility provider, a pre-construction meeting may be required prior to commencement of any work. 12.The Developer shall sequence installation of utilities in such a manner as to minimize potential utility conflicts. In general, storm sewer and sanitary sewer should be constructed prior to installation of the water lines and dry utilities. 13.The minimum cover over water lines is 4.5 feet and the maximum cover is 5.5 feet unless otherwise noted in the plans and approved by the Water Utility. 14.A State Construction Dewatering Wastewater Discharge Permit is required if dewatering is required in order to install utilities or if water is discharged into a storm sewer, channel, irrigation ditch or any waters of the United States. 15.The Developer shall comply with all terms and conditions of the Colorado Permit for Storm Water Discharge (Contact Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control Division, (303) 692-3590), the Storm Water Management Plan, and the Erosion Control Plan. 16.The City of Fort Collins shall not be responsible for the maintenance of storm drainage facilities located on private property. Maintenance of onsite drainage facilities shall be the responsibility of the property owner(s). 17.Prior to final inspection and acceptance by the City of Fort Collins, certification of the drainage facilities, by a registered engineer, must be submitted to and approved by the Stormwater Utility Department. Certification shall be submitted to the Stormwater Utility Department at least two weeks prior to the release of a certificate of occupancy for single family units. For commercial properties, certification shall be submitted to the Stormwater Utility Department at least two weeks prior to the release of any building permits in excess of those allowed prior to certification per the Development Agreement. 18.The City of Fort Collins shall not be responsible for any damages or injuries sustained in this Development as a result of groundwater seepage, whether resulting from groundwater flooding, structural damage or other damage unless such damage or injuries are sustained as a result of the City of Fort Collins failure to properly maintain its water, wastewater, and/or storm drainage facilities in the development. 19.All recommendations of the Preliminary Drainage Report for Sanctuary West dated March 24, 2021 by Northern Engineering Services, Inc., shall be followed and implemented. 20.Temporary erosion control during construction shall be provided as shown on the Erosion Control Plan. All erosion control measures shall be maintained in good repair by the Developer, until such time as the entire disturbed areas is stabilized with hard surface or landscaping. 21.The Developer shall be responsible for insuring that no mud or debris shall be tracked onto the existing public street system. Mud and debris must be removed within 24 hours by an appropriate mechanical method (i.e. machine broom sweep, light duty front-end loader, etc.) or as approved by the the City of Fort Collins street inspector. 22.No work may commence within any improved or unimproved public Right-of-Way until a Right-of-Way Permit or Development Construction Permit is obtained, if applicable. 23.The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits for all applicable agencies prior to commencement of construction. The Developer shall notify the the City of Fort Collins Inspector (Fort Collins - 221-6605) and the City of Fort Collins Erosion Control Inspector (Fort Collins - 221-6700) at least 2 working days prior to the start of any earth disturbing activity, or construction on any and all public improvements. If the City of Fort Collins Engineer is not available after proper notice of construction activity has been provided, the Developer may commence work in the Engineer's absence. However, the City of Fort Collins reserves the right not to accept the improvement if subsequent testing reveals an improper installation. 24.The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining soils tests within the Public Right-of-Way after right of way grading and all utility trench work is complete and prior to the placement of curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement. If the final soils/pavement design report does not correspond with the results of the original geotechnical report, the Developer shall be responsible for a re-design of the subject pavement section or, the Developer may use the City of Fort Collins' default pavement thickness section(s). Regardless of the option used, all final soils/pavement design reports shall be prepared by a licensed Professional Engineer. The final report shall be submitted to the Inspector a minimum of 10 working days prior to placement of base and asphalt. Placement of curb, gutter, sidewalk, base and asphalt shall not occur until the City of Fort Collins Engineer approves the final report. 25.The contractor shall hire a licensed engineer or land surveyor to survey the constructed elevations of the street subgrade and the gutter flowline at all intersections, inlets, and other locations requested by the the City of Fort Collins inspector. The engineer or surveyor must certify in a letter to the City of Fort Collins that these elevations conform to the approved plans and specifications. Any deviations shall be noted in the letter and then resolved with the City of Fort Collins before installation of base course or asphalt will be allowed on the streets. 26.All utility installations within or across the roadbed of new residential roads must be completed prior to the final stages of road construction. For the purposes of these standards, any work except c/g above the subgrade is considered final stage work. All service lines must be stubbed to the property lines and marked so as to reduce the excavation necessary for building connections. 27.Portions of Larimer County are within overlay districts. The Larimer County Flood Plain Resolution should be referred to for additional criteria for roads within these districts. 28.All road construction in areas designated as Wild Fire Hazard Areas shall be done in accordance with the construction criteria as established in the Wild Fire Hazard Area Mitigation Regulations in force at the time of final plat approval. 29.Prior to the commencement of any construction, the contractor shall contact the City of Fort Collins Forester to schedule a site inspection for any tree removal requiring a permit. 30.The Developer shall be responsible for all aspects of safety including, but not limited to, excavation, trenching, shoring, traffic control, and security. Refer to OSHA Publication 2226, Excavating and Trenching. 31.The Developer shall submit a Construction Traffic Control Plan, in accordance with MUTCD, to the appropriate Right-of-Way authority. (The the City of Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado), for approval, prior to any construction activities within, or affecting, the Right-of-Way. The Developer shall be responsible for providing any and all traffic control devices as may be required by the construction activities. 32.Prior to the commencement of any construction that will affect traffic signs of any type, the contractor shall contact the City of Fort Collins Traffic Operations Department, who will temporarily remove or relocate the sign at no cost to the contractor, however, if the contractor moves the traffic sign then the contractor will be charged for the labor, materials and equipment to reinstall the sign as needed. 33.The Developer is responsible for all costs for the initial installation of traffic signing and striping for the Development related to the Development's local street operations. In addition, the Developer is responsible for all costs for traffic signing and striping related to directing traffic access to and from the Development. 34.There shall be no site construction activities on Saturdays, unless specifically approved by the City of Fort Collins Engineer, and no site construction activities on Sundays or holidays, unless there is prior written approval by Larimer County. 35.The Developer is responsible for providing all labor and materials necessary for the completion of the intended improvements, shown on these drawings, or designated to be provided, installed, or constructed, unless specifically noted otherwise. 36.Dimensions for layout and construction are not to be scaled from any drawing. If pertinent dimensions are not shown, contact the Designer for clarification, and annotate the dimension on the as-built record drawings. 37.The Developer shall have, onsite at all times, one (1) signed copy of the approved plans, one (1) copy of the appropriate standards and specifications, and a copy of any permits and extension agreements needed for the job. 38.If, during the construction process, conditions are encountered which could indicate a situation that is not identified in the plans or specifications, the Developer shall contact the Designer and the City of Fort Collins Engineer immediately. 39.The Developer shall be responsible for recording as-built information on a set of record drawings kept on the construction site, and available to the Larimer County's Inspector at all times. Upon completion of the work, the contractor(s) shall submit record drawings to the City of Fort Collins Engineer. 40.The Designer shall provide, in this location on the plan, the location and description of the nearest survey benchmarks (2) for the project as well as the basis of bearings. The information shall be as follows: PROJECT DATUM: NAVD 88 BENCHMARK #1: City of Fort Collins Benchmark 33-97: In front o f2540 West Laporte Ave., Approx. 70ft east of centerline of driveway, 3.5ft south of a fence, 3.0ft southeast of a power pole, on a concrete slab. Elevation: 5088.19 (NAVD 88 Datum) BENCHMARK #2: City of Fort Collins Benchmark 10-07: Southeast corner of Taft Hill Rd. and Laporte Ave. on the northeast wingwall of the bridge over an irrigation ditch. Elevation: 5062.84 (NAVD 88 Datum) If NGVD29 unadjusted Datum is required for any purpose, the following equation should be used: NGVD29 unadjusted = NAVD88 - 3.17. Basis of Bearings: The basis of bearings is the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 9 as bearing North 00° 54' 31" East. 41.All stationing is based on centerline of roadways unless otherwise noted. 42.Damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk existing prior to construction, as well as existing fences, trees, streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, landscaping, structures, and improvements destroyed, damaged or removed due to construction of this project, shall be replaced or restored in like kind at the Developer's expense, unless otherwise indicated on these plans, prior to the acceptance of completed improvements and/or prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 43.When an existing asphalt street must be cut, the street must be restored to a condition equal to or better than its original condition. The existing street condition shall be documented by the City of Fort Collins Construction Inspector before any cuts are made. Patching shall be done in accordance with the City of Fort Collins Street Repair Standards. The finished patch shall blend in smoothly into the existing surface. All large patches shall be paved with an asphalt lay-down machine. In streets where more than one cut is made, an overlay of the entire street width, including the patched area, may be required. The determination of need for a complete overlay shall be made by the Larimer County Engineer and/or the City of Fort Collins Inspector at the time the cuts are made. 44.Upon completion of construction, the site shall be cleaned and restored to a condition equal to, or better than, that which existed before construction, or to the grades and condition as required by these plans. 45.Standard Handicap ramps are to be constructed at all curb returns and at all "T" intersections. 46.After acceptance by the City of Fort Collins, public improvements depicted in these plans shall be guaranteed to be free from material and workmanship defects for a minimum period of two years from the date of acceptance. 47.The City of Fort Collins shall not be responsible for the maintenance of roadway and appurtenant improvements, including storm drainage structures and pipes, for the following private streets: ALL PRIVATE TRACTS 48.Approved Variances are listed as follows: N.A. CONSTRUCTION NOTES A. Grading and Erosion Control Notes 1.The erosion control inspector must be notified at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to any construction on this site. 2.There shall be no earth-disturbing activity outside the limits designated on the accepted plans. 3.All required perimeter silt and construction fencing shall be installed prior to any land disturbing activity (stockpiling, stripping, grading, etc). All other required erosion control measures shall be installed at the appropriate time in the construction sequence as indicated in the approved project schedule, construction plans, and erosion control report. 4.At all times during construction, the Developer shall be responsible for preventing and controlling on-site erosion including keeping the property sufficiently watered so as to minimize wind blown sediment. The Developer shall also be responsible for installing and maintaining all erosion control facilities shown herein. 5.Pre-disturbance vegetation shall be protected and retained wherever possible. Removal or disturbance of existing vegetation shall be limited to the area(s) required for immediate construction operations, and for the shortest practical period of time. 6.All soils exposed during land disturbing activity (stripping, grading, utility installations, stockpiling, filling, etc.) shall be kept in a roughened condition by ripping or disking along land contours until mulch, vegetation, or other permanent erosion control BMPs are installed. No soils in areas outside project street rights-of-way shall remain exposed by land disturbing activity for more than thirty (30) days before required temporary or permanent erosion control (e.g. seed/mulch, landscaping, etc.) is installed, unless otherwise approved by the City/County. 7.In order to minimize erosion potential, all temporary (structural) erosion control measures shall: a.Be inspected at a minimum of once every two (2) weeks and after each significant storm event and repaired or reconstructed as necessary in order to ensure the continued performance of their intended function. b.Remain in place until such time as all the surrounding disturbed areas are sufficiently stabilized as determined by the erosion control inspector. c.Be removed after the site has been sufficiently stabilized as determined by the erosion control inspector. 8.When temporary erosion control measures are removed, the Developer shall be responsible for the clean up and removal of all sediment and debris from all drainage infrastructure and other public facilities. 9.The contractor shall immediately clean up any construction materials inadvertently deposited on existing streets, sidewalks, or other public rights of way, and make sure streets and walkways are cleaned at the end of each working day. 10.All retained sediments, particularly those on paved roadway surfaces, shall be removed and disposed of in a manner and location so as not to cause their release into any waters of the United States. 11.No soil stockpile shall exceed ten (10) feet in height. All soil stockpiles shall be protected from sediment transport by surface roughening, watering, and perimeter silt fencing. Any soil stockpile remaining after thirty (30) days shall be seeded and mulched. 12.The stormwater volume capacity of detention ponds will be restored and storm sewer lines will be cleaned upon completion of the project and before turning the maintenance over to the City/County or Homeowners Association (HOA). 13.City Ordinance and Colorado Discharge Permit System (CDPS) requirements make it unlawful to discharge or allow the discharge of any pollutant or contaminated water from construction sites. Pollutants include, but are not limited to discarded building materials, concrete truck washout, chemicals, oil and gas products, litter, and sanitary waste. The developer shall at all times take whatever measures are necessary to assure the proper containment and disposal of pollutants on the site in accordance with any and all applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 14.A designated area shall be provided on site for concrete truck chute washout. The area shall be constructed so as to contain washout material and located at least fifty (50) feet away from any waterway during construction. Upon completion of construction activities the concrete washout material will be removed and properly disposed of prior to the area being restored. 15.Conditions in the field may warrant erosion control measures in addition to what is shown on these plans. The Developer shall implement whatever measures are determined necessary, as directed by the City. B. Street Improvement Notes 1.All street construction is subject to the General Notes on the cover sheet of these plans as well as the Street Improvements Notes listed here. 2.A paving section design, signed and stamped by a Colorado licensed Engineer, must be submitted to the City of Fort Collins Engineer for approval, prior to any street construction activity, (full depth asphalt sections are not permitted at a depth greater than 8 inches of asphalt). The job mix shall be submitted for approval prior to placement of any asphalt. 3.Where proposed paving adjoins existing asphalt, the existing asphalt shall be saw cut, a minimum distance of 12 inches from the existing edge, to create a clean construction joint. The Developer shall be required to remove existing pavement to a distance where a clean construction joint can be made. Wheel cuts shall not be allowed unless approved by the City of Fort Collins Engineer in Fort Collins. 4.Street subgrades shall be scarified the top 12 inches and re-compacted prior to subbase installation. No base material shall be laid until the subgrade has been inspected and approved by the City of Fort Collins Engineer. 5.Ft. Collins only. Valve boxes and manholes are to be brought up to grade at the time of pavement placement or overlay. Valve box adjusting rings are not allowed. 6.When an existing asphalt street must be cut, the street must be restored to a condition equal to or better than its original condition. The existing street condition shall be documented by the Inspector before any cuts are made. Cutting and patching shall be done in conformance with Chapter 25, Reconstruction and Repair. The finished patch shall blend smoothly into the existing surface. The determination of need for a complete overlay shall be made by the City of Fort Collins Engineer. All overlay work shall be coordinated with adjacent landowners such that future projects do not cut the new asphalt overlay work. 7.All traffic control devices shall be in conformance with these plans or as otherwise specified in M.U.T.C.D. (including Colorado supplement) and as per the Right-of-Way Work Permit traffic control plan. 8.The Developer is required to perform a gutter water flow test in the presence of the City of Fort Collins Inspector and prior to installation of asphalt. Gutters that hold more than 1/4 inch deep or 5 feet longitudinally, of water, shall be completely removed and reconstructed to drain properly. 9.Prior to placement of H.B.P. or concrete within the street and after moisture/density tests have been taken on the subgrade material (when a full depth section is proposed) or on the subgrade and base material (when a composite section is proposed), a mechanical "proof roll" will be required. The entire subgrade and/or base material shall be rolled with a heavily loaded vehicle having a total GVW of not less than 50,000 lbs. and a single axle weight of at least 18,000 lbs. with pneumatic tires inflated to not less that 90 p.s.i.g. "Proof roll" vehicles shall not travel at speeds greater than 3 m.p.h. Any portion of the subgrade or base material which exhibits excessive pumping or deformation, as determined by the City of Fort Collins Engineer, shall be reworked, replaced or otherwise modified to form a smooth, non-yielding surface. The City of Fort Collins Engineer shall be notified at least 24 hours prior to the "proof roll." All "proof rolls" shall be preformed in the presence of an Inspector. C. Traffic Signing and Pavement Marking Construction Notes 1.All signage and marking is subject to the General Notes on the cover sheet of these plans, as well as the Traffic Signing and Marking Construction Notes listed here. 2.All symbols, including arrows, ONLYS, crosswalks, stop bars, etc. shall be pre-formed thermo-plastic. 3.All signage shall be per the City of Fort Collins Standards and these plans or as otherwise specified in MUTCD. 4.All lane lines for asphalt pavement shall receive two coats of latex paint with glass beads. 5.All lane lines for concrete pavement should be epoxy paint. 6.Prior to permanent installation of traffic striping and symbols, the Developer shall place temporary tabs or tape depicting alignment and placement of the same. Their placement shall be approved by the City of Fort Collins Traffic Engineer prior to permanent installation of striping and symbols. 7.Pre-formed thermo-plastic applications shall be as specified in these Plans and/or these Standards. 8.Epoxy applications shall be applied as specified in CDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. 9.All surfaces shall be thoroughly cleaned prior to installation of striping or markings. 10.All sign posts shall utilize break-away assemblies and fasteners per the Standards. 11.A field inspection of location and installation of all signs shall be performed by the City of Fort Collins Traffic Engineer. All discrepancies identified during the field inspection must be corrected before the 2-year warranty period will begin. 12.The Developer installing signs shall be responsible for locating and protecting all underground utilities. 13.Special care shall be taken in sign location to ensure an unobstructed view of each sign. 14.Signage and striping has been determined by information available at the time of review. Prior to initiation of the warranty period,the City of Fort Collins Traffic Engineer reserves the right to require additional signage and/or striping if the City of Fort Collins Traffic Engineer determines that an unforeseen condition warrants such signage according to the MUTCD or the CDOT M and S Standards. All signage and striping shall fall under the requirements of the 2-year warranty period for new construction (except fair wear on traffic markings). 15.Sleeves for sign posts shall be required for use in islands/medians. Refer to Chapter 14, Traffic Control Devices, for additional detail. D. Storm Drainage Notes 1.The City of Fort Collins shall not be responsible for the maintenance of storm drainage facilities located on private property. Maintenance of onsite drainage facilities shall be the responsibility of the property owner(s). 2.All recommendations of the Preliminary Drainage Report for Sanctuary West dated March 24, 2021 by Northern Engineering Services, Inc., shall be followed and implemented. 3.Prior to final inspection and acceptance by the City of Fort Collins, certification of the drainage facilities, by a registered engineer, must by submitted to and approved by the Stormwater Utility Department. Certification shall be submitted to the Stormwater Utility Department at least two weeks prior to the release of a certificate of occupancy for single family units. For commercial properties, certification shall by submitted to the Stormwater Utility Department at least two weeks prior to the release of any building permits in excess of those allowed prior to certification per the Development Agreement. E. Utility Notes 1.All waterline and sanitary sewer construction shall conform to the Fort Collins Utility standards and specifications current to date of construction. 2.The minimum cover over water lines is 4.5 feet and the maximum cover is 5.5 feet unless otherwise noted in the plans and approved by the water utility. 3.Water mains shall be poly-wrapped D.I.P, or PVC with tracer wire. 4.HDPE pipe may be used for 1-1/2 and 2 inch water services. The pipe shall meet the standards of AWWA 901, NSF Standard 61 and ASTM. The HDPE pipe shall be SDR 9 having a pressure rating of 200 psi. Stiffeners shall be used at all fittings and connections. Tracer wire shall be installed with the HDPE service, and shall extend up the curb stop. The curb stop shall be covered with a metal box and tracer wire test lid per City Water Detail 25. TSALPOLYND D D ONOT POLLTEUC TILEIRONRAINSTOW ATERWAYS U TSALPOLYND D DONOTPOLLTEUC TILEI RONRAIN STOWATER WAYS USDSD SD TSALPOLYND D D ONOTPOLL TE UCTILEIRONRAIN S TOWATERWAYSU TSALPOLYN DD D ONOTPOLLT E UCTILEIRON RAINSTOWATERWAYSU TSALPOLYND D D O NOTPOLL TEUCTILEIR ONRAINSTOWATERWAYSU TSALPOLYN D DD ONOTPOLLTE UCTILEIRONR A INSTOWATERWAYSU TSALPOLYN D D D ONOTPOLLTE UCTILEIRON R AINSTOWATERWAYSU TSALPOLYND D DONOTPOLLTEU CTILEIRO NRAINSTOWATERWAYS U TSALPOLYN D D DONOTPOLLTE UCTILEIRO N RAINSTOWATERWAYS U TSALPOLYN D D D ONOTPOLLTE UCTILEIRON RAINSTOWATERWAYSU TSALPOLYN D D DONOTPOLLTE UCTILEIRON RAINSTOWATERWAYS U SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD TSALPOLYND D D ON OTPOLLTEUC TILEIRONRAINSTOWAT ERWAYS U TSALPOLYN D D DONOTPOLLTE U CTILEIRON RAINSTOWATERWA YS U SDSDTSALPOLYND D D ONOTPO LLTE UCTILEIRON RAINSTOWATERWAYS U SDTSALPOLYND D D ONOTPO LLTEU CTILEIRONRAINSTO WATERWAYS U SDTSALPOLYND D D ONOTPOLL TEUC TILEIRONRAIN STOWATERWAYSU NYLOPLAST DO NOT POLLUTE DRAINS TO WATERWAYS TSALPOLYN D D D ONOTPOLLTE UCTILE IRONRAINSTOWATERWAYSU TS ALPOL YND D D ONOTPOLLT EUCTILEIRO NRAINSTOWATERWAYSU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS OHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUGGWGGXXFOFOFOFOOHU OHU OHU OHU XXXTTTTGGGGFOFOFOFOCTVCTVCTVCTVEEEEWWWWTTE E W W W CTVCTVCTVCTVFO FO FO FO G G GFOFOFO FO FO FO FOFOCTVCTVFOFOFOFOCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVFOFOFOFOFOFOW W W W W W EEEEE E E EEEEEEG G G G G G EX X XXCTVGFOEE FOFOFOFOFOTTTTTTTTTTG G G G G G G G G GWWWW W CTVCTVFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOE E E GGGGWFO FOGGT T T T T TTT CTVTTTOHUOHUE E E GGGGG G G G G G G G G GFOFOFOCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTV XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX SS SS ST ST ST ST ST ST OHU OHU X X XXX XXXX X X X XX XX X MH V.P.VAULTELEC V.P. T CABLE FE SCABLE TELE S MMMMMMMM VAULTELEC H2O W C S CABLE ELEC W S W G SHYDVAULTCABLE CABLE TRAFFICVAULT VAULT ELEC VAULT ELEC ELEC TELECABLE CABLE TELE TELE VAULT CABLE F.O. CABLETELE W TELE VAULT ELEC ELEC VAULTELEC VAULT ELEC CONTROL IRR W F.O. TELEMTELEMTELE VAULT ELEC TELEM VAULT TELE VAULTCABLE VAULTCABLE VAULTF.O. GAS TELE CONTROLIRRCONTROLIRR CONTROLIRR HY DM VAULTELEC T SVAULTELEC CONTROLIRR CONTROL IRR CONTROL IRR CONTROLIRR TELE TELE CONTROL IRR CONTROLIRR F.O. VAULTELEC VAULT F.O.TELE VAULT CABLE GAS CONTROL IRR CONTROL IRR CONTROL IRR WH2O G CSW C SW CSW C S GAS S M CS HY DVAULTF.O. VAULTELEC VAULTCABLEVAULT CABLE CABLE MH D MH D CT T VAULT ELEC V.P. T M M VAULTELEC VAULTELEC CONTROL IRR CONTROLIRR VAULTELECT S VAULT F.O. VAULTF.O. VAULTCABLE S MH MHW G ELECELECELEC ELEC CS C S TT TVAULT ELEC W M S F.O. VAULT F.O. ELEC CONTROL IRR V.P. V.P.V.P. V.P. M E S TELE T X XXXXWWWWOWNER LORIN YOUNG 316 N IMPALA DR.N IMPALA DRIVEOWNER CHRISTOPHER & SARAH WEEKS 317 N IMPALA DR. OWNER LEORA & JAY SPENCE 316 IRISH DR. OWNER ROLAND & CAROL TREMBLE 317 IRISH DR. OWNER CARLA COOLEY 316 WEBB AVE. OWNER ERIC & MARY TACORONTE 317 WEBB AVE.IRISH DRIVEWEBB AVENUEOWNER KIRK WILSON W CHERRY STREET OWNER KIRK & DEBRA WILSON 320 N SUNSET STREET OWNER KIRK WILSON 310 N SUNSET STREET OWNER FRANK ERNSET 242 N SUNSET STREET OWNER KIRI SAFTLER 230 N SUNSET STREET OWNER POUDRE R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT 2444 LAPORTE AVE OWNER POUDRE R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT 2444 LAPORTE AVE OWNER FORREST SCHRUPP 2318 LAPORTE AVE OWNER CALVARY BAPTIST TEMPLE 2420 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER RICHARD & DIXIE LOYD 2316 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER SYDNE ARCHAMBAULT 2314 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER CURTIS LYONS LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER ALEX OZOLS 2224 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER DANNY ROGERS 2214 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER ROBERT JONES 2218 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER PATRICK ST. CLAIR 2216 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER LAURA LARSON 320 N IMPALA DR. OWNER SETH MCEWAN 324 N IMPALA DR. OWNER MARGOT STREFFENHAGEN 400 N IMPALA DR. OWNER VERNON BONDURANT 404 N IMPALA DR. OWNER PLEASANT VALLEY PROPERTIES LLC 408 N IMPALA DR. OWNER ANTHONY NEYLON 412 N IMPALA DR. OWNER MARY & PAUL WEIXELMAN 416 N IMPALA DR. OWNER ANDREA GABEL 420 N IMPALA DR. LAPORTE AVENUE LAPORTE AVENUE S IMPALA DRIVEOWNER POUDRE R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT 2444 LAPORTE AVE OWNER POUDRE R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT 2444 LAPORTE AVE ACCESS DRIVEIP IP IP IP IP IP WD WD WD SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF S F SF SF SF SF SFSF SF SF SFSFSFSF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF VTC CWA IP STREET A IP IP IP IP WD WD WD WD WDWDWDWD WD DETENTION POND 2 DETENTION POND 1 RAIN GARDEN D5 RAIN GARDEN B2 WD WD WD IP OP IP IP B M KEYMAP LAPORTE AVE.TAFT HILL RD.SheetSANCTUARY ON THE GREENSThese drawings areinstruments of serviceprovided by NorthernEngineering Services, Inc.and are not to be used forany type of constructionunless signed and sealed bya Professional Engineer inthe employ of NorthernEngineering Services, Inc.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREVIEW SETENGINEERNGIEHTRONRNFORT COLLINS: 301 North Howes Street, Suite 100, 80521GREELEY: 820 8th Street, 80631970.221.4158northernengineering.comof 30 NORTH C5.00EROSION CONTROL PLAN27 CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO Know what's below. before you dig.Call R ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = ft. Feet08080 80 160 240 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET C5.01C5.01C5.00 LEGEND: PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED SWALE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER PROPERTY BOUNDARY SFSILT FENCE SF RIPRAP w/ TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT RP 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED SLOPES BY CRIMP MULCHING OR SIMILAR METHODS. 2.SWMP ADMINISTRATOR: Contact ________________________________ Company ________________________________ Address ________________________________ Phone________________________________ 3.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL FOR CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA IF ACCESS IS OFF PAVEMENT. 4.REFER TO THE PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR SANCTUARY WEST DATED MARCH 24, 2021 BY NORTHERN ENGINEERING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. GENERAL NOTES: WATTLE DIKE WD CONCRETE WASH AREA CWA VERTICAL TRACKING CONTROL VTC INLET PROTECTION IP OPOUTLET PROTECTION SD SD SD SD SD TSALPOLYND D DONOTPOLLTE UCTILEIRON RAINSTOWATERWAYS U TSALPOLYN D DD ONOTPOLLTE UCTILEIRON RA INSTOWATERWAYSU SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD TSALPOLYN D D DONOTPOLLTE UCTILEIRON R AINSTOWATERWAYS U SDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD TSALPOLYND D D ONOTPO LLTEUCTILEIR ONRAINST OWATERWAYS U SDTSALPOLYND DD ONOTP OLLTE UCTILEIRONRA INSTO WATERWAYS U TSALPOLYND DD ONO TPOLLTE UCTILEIRONRAIN STOWA TERWAYS U SD SDTSALPOLYND D D ONOT POLLTEUCTIL EIRONRAINSTOW ATERWAYS U SD TSALPOLYN D D DONOTPOLLTE UCT ILEIRON RAINSTOWATERWAY S U SDTSA LPO LYND DD ONOTPOLLT E UCTILEIRONRA I NSTOWATERWAYSU TSALPOLYND DD ONOTPOLL TE UCTILEIRONRAI NSTOWATERWAYS U SDNYLOPLAST DO NOT POLLUTE DRAINS TO WATERWAYS XXOHUSS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHU GGWGGXXGFOFOFOFOFOOHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHUXXXXT TTTTGGGGGEFOFOFOFOFOCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVEEEEEWWWWWTTFOFOFOGWFOGT T T T T TT CTVTTTOHUOHUOHUOHU FOG WG EEEEEFO FO FO FO W WGEEFOFOCTVCTVCTVCTVCTV XFO FO FO FOEEOHUOHUOHUOHUCTVWWEGGGGWECTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTV ECTVWWWWWWCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOGGGGGGGGGGGGWWFOFOFOCTVCTVE EEEEEEEETTTTTTTTOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUCTVCTVEEGGGGGGGGGGWWWGGGWGGWGWWWGGGFOFOCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTV CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVGGGGGGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOWWWWWWWWWWWWXXXCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUGGGGGGXXXXXXTTTTTTTTTOHUOHUOHUOHUXXXXXOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUX SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS STST STSTSTST ST ST STST ST ST ST ST ST ST OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU X X XXX XXXXXX X X XXXXXXX X X X STSTSTSTT VAULTF.O. ELEC ELEC ELEC BRKRE CABLE CABLETT CELEC CABLE FE SCABLE B M T TELE D CABLE TELE TELE F.O. F.O. S VAULT F.O. S W F.O. GAS HY DM WCS M M S M M S S EELEC C MH D M M MMM W VAULT ELEC T MCSH2OMM S CS HY DVAULTELEC W D C S W WCSF E SW M M T W H2O TGAS F.O. S M C S HY DVAULTF.O. VAULTELEC VAULTCABLEVAULT CABLE CABLE MH D MH D M TESTSTA C T T VAULT ELEC V.P.M VAULTELEC VAULTELEC CS MW F.O. D D VAULT ELEC VAULTCABLE ELEC VAULTELEC D MW MW ELEC TFES C T M FE SMW VAULT ELEC T S T SVAULTELEC VAULT ELEC T SVAULT ELEC T SVAULTELEC GAS S VAULTELEC D S VAULT ELEC VAULT CABLEC VAULT ELEC VAULT ELEC W CVAULT CABLEVAULT ELEC S S S TH TH XWWWWVAULTELEC OWNER LORIN YOUNG 316 N IMPALA DR. ALEX OZOLS 2224 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER DANNY ROGERS 2214 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER ROBERT JONES 2218 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER PATRICK ST. CLAIR 2216 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER KURT VATTANO OWNER JAMES PEABODY 2212 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER RANDOLPH MILAN 2140 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER PAIGE HAIGH 2210 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER CYNTHIA HERNANDEZ 2208 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER KURT VATTANO OWNER KEITH & SHERALYN HESS 229 PENNSYLVANIA STREET OWNER SUSAN & CATHLEEN DESANTIS 230 PENNSYLVANIA STREET OWNER MELISSA VANDERSLUYS 223 PENNSYLVANIA STREET PENNSYLVANIA STREETOWNER PAULA METROPOULOS 224 PENNSYLVANIA STREET OWNER GILBERT BOYER 241 N TAFT HILL ROAD OWNER BRIAN & LAURA DAVIS 237 N TAFT HILL ROAD OWNER CARRIE HEYRMAN 233 N TAFT HILL ROAD OWNER HUGO RUTHERFURD 229 N TAFT HILL ROAD OWNER WILLIAM GREYBAR 413 N TAFT HILL ROAD OWNER LAURA LARSON 320 N IMPALA DR. OWNER SETH MCEWAN 324 N IMPALA DR. OWNER MARGOT STREFFENHAGEN 400 N IMPALA DR. OWNER VERNON BONDURANT 404 N IMPALA DR. OWNER PLEASANT VALLEY PROPERTIES LLC 408 N IMPALA DR. OWNER ANTHONY NEYLON 412 N IMPALA DR. OWNER MARY & PAUL WEIXELMAN 416 N IMPALA DR. OWNER ANDREA GABEL 420 N IMPALA DR. OWNER CITY OF FORT COLLINS OWNE R WEST V I N E B U N G A L O W S HOME O W N E R S LAPORTE AVENUE N TAFT HILL ROADN TAFT HILL ROADS IMPALA DRIVEBRIARWOOD ROADOWNER FAITH REALTY OWNER MIRANDA SPINDEL 330 N TAFT HILL ROAD OWNER LAPORT OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC. 220 N TAFT HILL ROAD OWNER CITY OF FORT COLLINS OWNER 7-ELEVEN 200 N TAFT HILL ROAD OWNER CITY OF FORT COLLINS N E W M E R C E R D I T C H NEW MERCER D ITCH WD SF VTC IP IP WD WD SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF S F SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF S F S F S F SF SF SF S F S F SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SFSFSF SF CWA STREET BSTREET A IPIP IP WD WD WD WD WD WD WD IP IP DETENTION POND 2 DETENTION POND 4 DETENTION POND 5 RAIN GARDEN D3 RAIN GARDEN D3 RAIN GARDEN C5 RAIN GARDEN C6 DETENTION POND 3 RAIN GARDEN D4 RAIN GARDEN B2 OP OP WD WD WD WD WD IP OP WD IP SheetSANCTUARY ON THE GREENSThese drawings areinstruments of serviceprovided by NorthernEngineering Services, Inc.and are not to be used forany type of constructionunless signed and sealed bya Professional Engineer inthe employ of NorthernEngineering Services, Inc.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREVIEW SETENGINEERNGIEHTRONRNFORT COLLINS: 301 North Howes Street, Suite 100, 80521GREELEY: 820 8th Street, 80631970.221.4158northernengineering.comof 30 NORTH C5.01EROSION CONTROL PLAN28 CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO Know what's below. before you dig.Call R ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = ft. Feet08080 80 160 240 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET C5.00B M KEYMAP LAPORTE AVE.TAFT HILL RD.C5.01C5.00 LEGEND: PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED SWALE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER PROPERTY BOUNDARY SFSILT FENCE SF RIPRAP w/ TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT RP 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED SLOPES BY CRIMP MULCHING OR SIMILAR METHODS. 2.SWMP ADMINISTRATOR: Contact ________________________________ Company ________________________________ Address ________________________________ Phone________________________________ 3.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL FOR CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA IF ACCESS IS OFF PAVEMENT. 4.REFER TO THE PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR SANCTUARY WEST DATED MARCH 24, 2021 BY NORTHERN ENGINEERING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. GENERAL NOTES: WATTLE DIKE WD CONCRETE WASH AREA CWA VERTICAL TRACKING CONTROL VTC INLET PROTECTION IP OPOUTLET PROTECTION N TAFT HILL RD.LAPORTE AVE. W VINE DR.N SUNSET ST.S IMPALA DR.W MULBERRY ST. 16' Concrete Pavements 8' Esmt. Util. 8' Esmt. Util. TRAVEL LANE 5'5' WALK 2'2' WALK 26' EOC-EOC 30' TRACT Concrete Pavements 8' Esmt. Util. 8' Esmt. Util. 5'5' 20' EOC-EOC 30' TRACT Slope and Crown Varies per Plan Concrete Pavements Esmt. Util. Esmt. Util. 20' EOC-EOC 20' TRACT Slope and Crown Varies per Plan Landscape Shoulder Landscape Shoulder 20 Concrete Pavements TRAVEL LANE 5'1'4' WALK 25' EOC-EOC 30' TRACT Landscape ShoulderLandscape Shoulder 8' Esmt. Util. 8' Esmt. Util. 10'10' 10' 8' TRAVEL PARK TRAVEL 8' PARK TRAVEL TURN 13' TRAVEL 13' LEFT 6' (MIN.) PKWY 36' ROADWAY 57' ROW (MIN.) (MIN) WALK 4.5' 6.5' MIN. FENCE SETBACK UTIL. ESMT. 9' 9'UTIL. ESMT. 36' ROADWAY (MIN) WALK 4.5' (MIN.) PKWY 6' 16' 7' PARK TRAVEL 7' PARK 6' (MIN.) PKWY 30' ROADWAY 51' ROW (MIN.) (MIN) WALK 4.5' 6'.5 Min. Fence Setback UTIL. ESMT. 9' 9'UTIL. ESMT. (MIN.) PKWY 6' WALK (MIN) 4.5' Lane Bike 72' ROW 49' Roadway 7' Walk (min.) (min.) Pkwy. 10' Util. Esmt. 15' Center 10' Travel 11' Travel 11' 3' Lane Bike 7' Bike Lane Buffer 6' EAST WEST Lane Bike (min.) Walk 84' ROW (min.) 52' Roadway 7' Walk (min.) (min.) Pkwy. 10' 8'Pkwy. 6' (min.) 10' Min. Fence Setback Util. Esmt. 15' Esmt. Util. 15' Center 10' Travel 11' Travel 11' 3' Lane Bike 7'3' Bike Lane Buffer Bike Lane Buffer LaneShlder42' ROW 55' Roadway 6' Walk (min.) (min.) Pkwy. 10' Util. Esmt. 15' Left 10' Travel 12' Travel 12' Lane Bike 7' 6' SOUTH NORTH Bike 30' ROW Turn Lane 8' SheetSANCTUARY ON THE GREENSThese drawings areinstruments of serviceprovided by NorthernEngineering Services, Inc.and are not to be used forany type of constructionunless signed and sealed bya Professional Engineer inthe employ of NorthernEngineering Services, Inc.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREVIEW SETENGINEERNGIEHTRONRNFORT COLLINS: 301 North Howes Street, Suite 100, 80521GREELEY: 820 8th Street, 80631970.221.4158northernengineering.comof 30 C0.00COVER SHEETCONTACT INFORMATION PROJECT TEAM: I hereby affirm that these final construction plans were prepared under my direct supervision, in accordance with all applicable City of Fort Collins and State of Colorado standards and statutes, respectively; and that I am fully responsible for the accuracy of all design. revisions, and record conditions that I have noted on these plans. These plans have been reviewed by the City of Fort Collins for concept only. The review does not imply responsibility by the reviewing department, the City of Fort Collins Engineer, or the City of Fort Collins for accuracy and correctness of the calculations. Furthermore, the review does not imply that quantities of items on the plans are the final quantities required. The review shall not be construed for any reason as acceptance of financial responsibility by the City of Fort Collins for additional quantities of items shown that may be required during the construction phase. DISCLAIMER STATEMENT: CERTIFICATION STATEMENT: PROJECT LOCATION VICINITY MAP NORTH PROJECT DATUM: NAVD 88 BENCHMARK #1: City of Fort Collins Benchmark 33-97: In front o f2540 West Laporte Ave., Approx. 70ft east of centerline of driveway, 3.5ft south of a fence, 3.0ft southeast of a power pole, on a concrete slab. Elevation: 5088.19 (NAVD 88 Datum) BENCHMARK #2: City of Fort Collins Benchmark 10-07: Southeast corner of Taft Hill Rd. and Laporte Ave. on the northeast wingwall of the bridge over an irrigation ditch. Elevation: 5062.84 (NAVD 88 Datum) NOTE: If NGVD29 unadjusted Datum is required for any purpose, the following equation should be used: NGVD29 unadjusted = NAVD88 - 3.17. Basis of Bearings: The basis of bearings is the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 9 as bearing North 00° 54' 31" East. Northern Engineering Services, Inc NE Project No. 1536-001 Date: September, 2018 ORIGINAL FIELD SURVEY BY: CTL Thompson, Inc. CTL Thompson Project No. FC08483-115 Date: October 10, 2018 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION BY: PROJECT BENCHMARKS: UTILITY PLANS FOR SANCTUARY ON THE GREEN A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 7 NORTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO 1 CONTACT INFORMATION PROJECT TEAM: Northern Engineering Services, Inc. Danny Weber, PE 301 North Howes Street, Suite 100 Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 (970) 221-4158 Northern Engineering Services, Inc. Bob Tessley, PLS 301 North Howes Street, Suite 100 Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 (970) 221-4158 E N G I N E E R N GI EHTRON R N E N G I N E E R N GI EHTRON R N SITE ENGINEER SURVEYOR CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO Know what's below. before you dig.Call R LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT C & A Companies 7991 Shaffer Parkway, Suite 200 Littleton, Colorado 80127 DEVELOPER/APPLICANT Ripley Design Inc. Linda Ripley 401 West Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 (970) 224-5828 JANUARY 2022 I hereby affirm that these final construction plans were prepared under my direct supervision, in accordance with all applicable City of Fort Collins and State of Colorado standards and statutes, respectively; and that I am fully responsible for the accuracy of all design. revisions, and record conditions that I have noted on these plans. These plans have been reviewed by the City of Fort Collins for concept only. The review does not imply responsibility by the reviewing department, the City of Fort Collins Engineer, or the City of Fort Collins for accuracy and correctness of the calculations. Furthermore, the review does not imply that quantities of items on the plans are the final quantities required. The review shall not be construed for any reason as acceptance of financial responsibility by the City of Fort Collins for additional quantities of items shown that may be required during the construction phase. DISCLAIMER STATEMENT: CERTIFICATION STATEMENT: SHEET INDEX TRAFFIC ENGINEER Delich Associates Matt Delich, PE 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538-4903 (970) 669-2061 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER CTL Thompson Inc. 400 North Link Lane Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 (970) 206-9441 ■ land planning ■ landscape architecture ■ ■ urban design ■ entitlement ■ 1 C0.00 COVER SHEET 2 C0.01 GENERAL & CONSTRUCTION NOTES 3-5 C1.00-C1.02 EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION PLAN UTILITY SHEETS 6 C2.00 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN 7-11 C2.01-C2.05 UTILITY PLANS GRADING SHEETS 12 C3.00 OVERALL GRADING PLAN 13-17 C3.01-C3.05 GRADING PLANS ROADWAY SHEETS 18-19 C4.00-C4.01 STREET A PLAN & PROFILE 20 C4.02 STREET B PLAN & PROFILE 21-22 C4.03-C4.04 STREET C PLAN & PROFILE 23 C4.05 INTERIM N TAFT HILL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND STRIPING PLAN 24 C4.06 ULTIMATE N TAFT HILL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND STRIPING PLAN 25 C4.07 INTERIM LAPORTE AVE IMPROVEMENTS AND STRIPING PLAN 26 C4.08 ULTIMATE LAPORTE AVE IMPROVEMENTS AND STRIPING PLAN EROSION CONTROL PLAN 27-28 C5.00-C5.01 EROSION CONTROL PLAN DRAINAGE EXHIBIT 29 C6.00 DRAINAGE EXHIBIT FLOODPLAIN EXHIBIT (BY OTHERS) 30 C6.01 FLOODPLAIN EXHIBIT CONNECTOR LOCAL w/ PARKING STREET C & STREET B RESIDENTIAL LOCAL STREET A APPROVAL NEW MERCER IRRIGATION CANAL COMPANY *INTERIM 2-LANE ARTERIAL STREET TAFT HILL ROAD APPROVAL LARIMER COUNTY CANAL NO. 2 IRRIGATING CO. ULTIMATE 2-LANE ARTERIAL STREET TAFT HILL ROAD/LAPORTE AVE THE NATURAL HABITAT BUFFER ZONE IS INTENDED TO BE MAINTAINED IN A NATIVE LANDSCAPE. PROJECT SPECIFIC NOTES: NOTE: OTHER DRIVES PER PLAN INTERIM 2-LANE ARTERIAL STREET LAPORTE AVE PRIVATE ALLEY w/ DRAINAGE TO CENTER Tracts U,X, T, & Q PRIVATE ALLEY w/ DRAINAGE TO CENTER Tracts A, E, H, K 20' WIDE PRIVATE ALLEY Tracts P, S, & X EASEMENTS VARY PER PLAN EASEMENTS VARY PER PLAN EASEMENTS VARY PER PLAN PRIVATE ALLEY w/ DRAINAGE TO CENTER Tracts S, M, X EASEMENTS VARY PER PLAN City of Fort Collins, CO UTILITY PLAN APPROVAL APPROVED: CITY ENGINEER,APPROVED SHEETS DATE APPROVED: WATER & WASTEWATER UTILITY,APPROVED SHEETS DATE APPROVED: STORMWATER UTILITY,APPROVED SHEETS DATE APPROVED: PARK PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT,APPROVED SHEETS DATE APPROVED: TRAFFIC OPERATIONS,APPROVED SHEETS DATE APPROVED: ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER,APPROVED SHEETS DATE UTILITY CONTACT LIST: * UTILITY COMPANY * This list is provided as a courtesy reference only. Northern Engineering Services assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this list. In no way shall this list relinquish the Contractor's responsibility for locating all utilities prior to commencing any construction activity. Please contact the Utility Notification Center of Colorado (UNCC) at 811 for additional information. PHONE NUMBER GAS-----------------------Xcel Energy-----------------------------Al Ermer (970) 225-7869 ELECTRIC--------------City of Fort Collins Light & Power--Luke Unruh (970) 416-2724 CABLE-------------------Comcast----------------------------------Don Kapperman (970) 567-0245 TELECOM.-------------Qwest Local Network------------------Bill Johnson (970) 377-6401 WATER------------------City of Fort Collins Utilities-----------Matt Simpson (970) 416-2754 WASTEWATER-------City of Fort Collins Utilities-----------Matt Simpson (970) 416-2754 STORMWATER-------City of Fort Collins Utilities-----------Matt Simpson (970) 416-2754 W/WW INSPECTOR--City of Fort Collins Utilities-----------Jim McChesney (970) 556-8179 SheetSANCTUARY ON THE GREENSThese drawings areinstruments of serviceprovided by NorthernEngineering Services, Inc.and are not to be used forany type of constructionunless signed and sealed bya Professional Engineer inthe employ of NorthernEngineering Services, Inc.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREVIEW SETENGINEERNGIEHTRONRNFORT COLLINS: 301 North Howes Street, Suite 100, 80521GREELEY: 820 8th Street, 80631970.221.4158northernengineering.comof 30 C0.01NOTESGENERAL & CONSTRUCTION2 CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO Know what's below. before you dig.Call R A. GENERAL NOTES 1.All materials, workmanship, and construction of public improvements shall meet or exceed the standards and specifications set forth in the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards and applicable state and federal regulations. Where there is conflict between these plans and the specifications, or any applicable standards, the most restrictive standard shall apply. All work shall be inspected and approved by the City of Fort Collins. 2.All references to any published standards shall refer to the latest revision of said standard, unless specifically stated otherwise. 3.These public improvement construction plans shall be valid for a period of three years from the date of approval by the City of Fort Collins Engineer. Use of these plans after the expiration date will require a new review and approval process by the City of Fort Collins prior to commencement of any work shown in these plans. 4.The engineer who has prepared these plans, by execution and/or seal hereof, does hereby affirm responsibility to the City of Fort Collins, as beneficiary of said engineer's work, for any errors and omissions contained in these plans, and approval of these plans by the City of Fort Collins Engineer shall not relieve the engineer who has prepared these plans of all such responsibility. Further, to the extent permitted by law, the engineer hereby agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Fort Collins, and its officers and employees, from and against all liabilities, claims, and demands which may arise from any errors and omissions contained in these plans. 5.All storm sewer construction, as well as power and other "dry" utility installations, shall conform to the City of Fort Collins standards and specifications current at the date of approval of the plans by the City of Fort Collins Engineer. 6.The type, size, location and number of all known underground utilities are approximate when shown on the drawings. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer to verify the existence and location of all underground utilities along the route of the work before commencing new construction. The Developer shall be responsible for unknown underground utilities. 7.The Developer shall contact the Utility Notification Center of Colorado (UNCC) at 1-800-922-1987, at least 2 working days prior to beginning excavation or grading, to have all registered utility locations marked. Other unregistered utility entities (i.e. ditch / irrigation company) are to be located by contacting the respective representative. Utility service laterals are also to be located prior to beginning excavation or grading. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer to relocate all existing utilities that conflict with the proposed improvements shown on these plans. 8.The Developer shall be responsible for protecting all utilities during construction and for coordinating with the appropriate utility company for any utility crossings required. 9.If a conflict exists between existing and proposed utilities and/or a design modification is required, the Developer shall coordinate with the engineer to modify the design. Design modification(s) must be approved by the City of Fort Collins prior to beginning construction. 10.The Developer shall coordinate and cooperate with the City of Fort Collins, and all utility companies involved, to assure that the work is accomplished in a timely fashion and with a minimum disruption of service. The Developer shall be responsible for contacting, in advance, all parties affected by any disruption of any utility service as well as the utility companies. 11.No work may commence within any public storm water, sanitary sewer or potable water system until the Developer notifies the utility provider. Notification shall be a minimum of 2 working days prior to commencement of any work. At the discretion of the water utility provider, a pre-construction meeting may be required prior to commencement of any work. 12.The Developer shall sequence installation of utilities in such a manner as to minimize potential utility conflicts. In general, storm sewer and sanitary sewer should be constructed prior to installation of the water lines and dry utilities. 13.The minimum cover over water lines is 4.5 feet and the maximum cover is 5.5 feet unless otherwise noted in the plans and approved by the Water Utility. 14.A State Construction Dewatering Wastewater Discharge Permit is required if dewatering is required in order to install utilities or if water is discharged into a storm sewer, channel, irrigation ditch or any waters of the United States. 15.The Developer shall comply with all terms and conditions of the Colorado Permit for Storm Water Discharge (Contact Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control Division, (303) 692-3590), the Storm Water Management Plan, and the Erosion Control Plan. 16.The City of Fort Collins shall not be responsible for the maintenance of storm drainage facilities located on private property. Maintenance of onsite drainage facilities shall be the responsibility of the property owner(s). 17.Prior to final inspection and acceptance by the City of Fort Collins, certification of the drainage facilities, by a registered engineer, must be submitted to and approved by the Stormwater Utility Department. Certification shall be submitted to the Stormwater Utility Department at least two weeks prior to the release of a certificate of occupancy for single family units. For commercial properties, certification shall be submitted to the Stormwater Utility Department at least two weeks prior to the release of any building permits in excess of those allowed prior to certification per the Development Agreement. 18.The City of Fort Collins shall not be responsible for any damages or injuries sustained in this Development as a result of groundwater seepage, whether resulting from groundwater flooding, structural damage or other damage unless such damage or injuries are sustained as a result of the City of Fort Collins failure to properly maintain its water, wastewater, and/or storm drainage facilities in the development. 19.All recommendations of the Preliminary Drainage Report for Sanctuary West dated January 19th, 2022 by Northern Engineering Services, Inc., shall be followed and implemented. 20.Temporary erosion control during construction shall be provided as shown on the Erosion Control Plan. All erosion control measures shall be maintained in good repair by the Developer, until such time as the entire disturbed areas is stabilized with hard surface or landscaping. 21.The Developer shall be responsible for insuring that no mud or debris shall be tracked onto the existing public street system. Mud and debris must be removed within 24 hours by an appropriate mechanical method (i.e. machine broom sweep, light duty front-end loader, etc.) or as approved by the the City of Fort Collins street inspector. 22.No work may commence within any improved or unimproved public Right-of-Way until a Right-of-Way Permit or Development Construction Permit is obtained, if applicable. 23.The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits for all applicable agencies prior to commencement of construction. The Developer shall notify the the City of Fort Collins Inspector (Fort Collins - 221-6605) and the City of Fort Collins Erosion Control Inspector (Fort Collins - 221-6700) at least 2 working days prior to the start of any earth disturbing activity, or construction on any and all public improvements. If the City of Fort Collins Engineer is not available after proper notice of construction activity has been provided, the Developer may commence work in the Engineer's absence. However, the City of Fort Collins reserves the right not to accept the improvement if subsequent testing reveals an improper installation. 24.The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining soils tests within the Public Right-of-Way after right of way grading and all utility trench work is complete and prior to the placement of curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement. If the final soils/pavement design report does not correspond with the results of the original geotechnical report, the Developer shall be responsible for a re-design of the subject pavement section or, the Developer may use the City of Fort Collins' default pavement thickness section(s). Regardless of the option used, all final soils/pavement design reports shall be prepared by a licensed Professional Engineer. The final report shall be submitted to the Inspector a minimum of 10 working days prior to placement of base and asphalt. Placement of curb, gutter, sidewalk, base and asphalt shall not occur until the City of Fort Collins Engineer approves the final report. 25.The contractor shall hire a licensed engineer or land surveyor to survey the constructed elevations of the street subgrade and the gutter flowline at all intersections, inlets, and other locations requested by the the City of Fort Collins inspector. The engineer or surveyor must certify in a letter to the City of Fort Collins that these elevations conform to the approved plans and specifications. Any deviations shall be noted in the letter and then resolved with the City of Fort Collins before installation of base course or asphalt will be allowed on the streets. 26.All utility installations within or across the roadbed of new residential roads must be completed prior to the final stages of road construction. For the purposes of these standards, any work except c/g above the subgrade is considered final stage work. All service lines must be stubbed to the property lines and marked so as to reduce the excavation necessary for building connections. 27.Portions of Larimer County are within overlay districts. The Larimer County Flood Plain Resolution should be referred to for additional criteria for roads within these districts. 28.All road construction in areas designated as Wild Fire Hazard Areas shall be done in accordance with the construction criteria as established in the Wild Fire Hazard Area Mitigation Regulations in force at the time of final plat approval. 29.Prior to the commencement of any construction, the contractor shall contact the City of Fort Collins Forester to schedule a site inspection for any tree removal requiring a permit. 30.The Developer shall be responsible for all aspects of safety including, but not limited to, excavation, trenching, shoring, traffic control, and security. Refer to OSHA Publication 2226, Excavating and Trenching. 31.The Developer shall submit a Construction Traffic Control Plan, in accordance with MUTCD, to the appropriate Right-of-Way authority. (The the City of Fort Collins, Larimer County, Colorado), for approval, prior to any construction activities within, or affecting, the Right-of-Way. The Developer shall be responsible for providing any and all traffic control devices as may be required by the construction activities. 32.Prior to the commencement of any construction that will affect traffic signs of any type, the contractor shall contact the City of Fort Collins Traffic Operations Department, who will temporarily remove or relocate the sign at no cost to the contractor, however, if the contractor moves the traffic sign then the contractor will be charged for the labor, materials and equipment to reinstall the sign as needed. 33.The Developer is responsible for all costs for the initial installation of traffic signing and striping for the Development related to the Development's local street operations. In addition, the Developer is responsible for all costs for traffic signing and striping related to directing traffic access to and from the Development. 34.There shall be no site construction activities on Saturdays, unless specifically approved by the City of Fort Collins Engineer, and no site construction activities on Sundays or holidays, unless there is prior written approval by Larimer County. 35.The Developer is responsible for providing all labor and materials necessary for the completion of the intended improvements, shown on these drawings, or designated to be provided, installed, or constructed, unless specifically noted otherwise. 36.Dimensions for layout and construction are not to be scaled from any drawing. If pertinent dimensions are not shown, contact the Designer for clarification, and annotate the dimension on the as-built record drawings. 37.The Developer shall have, onsite at all times, one (1) signed copy of the approved plans, one (1) copy of the appropriate standards and specifications, and a copy of any permits and extension agreements needed for the job. 38.If, during the construction process, conditions are encountered which could indicate a situation that is not identified in the plans or specifications, the Developer shall contact the Designer and the City of Fort Collins Engineer immediately. 39.The Developer shall be responsible for recording as-built information on a set of record drawings kept on the construction site, and available to the Larimer County's Inspector at all times. Upon completion of the work, the contractor(s) shall submit record drawings to the City of Fort Collins Engineer. 40.The Designer shall provide, in this location on the plan, the location and description of the nearest survey benchmarks (2) for the project as well as the basis of bearings. The information shall be as follows: PROJECT DATUM: NAVD 88 BENCHMARK #1: City of Fort Collins Benchmark 33-97: In front o f2540 West Laporte Ave., Approx. 70ft east of centerline of driveway, 3.5ft south of a fence, 3.0ft southeast of a power pole, on a concrete slab. Elevation: 5088.19 (NAVD 88 Datum) BENCHMARK #2: City of Fort Collins Benchmark 10-07: Southeast corner of Taft Hill Rd. and Laporte Ave. on the northeast wingwall of the bridge over an irrigation ditch. Elevation: 5062.84 (NAVD 88 Datum) If NGVD29 unadjusted Datum is required for any purpose, the following equation should be used: NGVD29 unadjusted = NAVD88 - 3.17. Basis of Bearings: The basis of bearings is the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 9 as bearing North 00° 54' 31" East. 41.All stationing is based on centerline of roadways unless otherwise noted. 42.Damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk existing prior to construction, as well as existing fences, trees, streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, landscaping, structures, and improvements destroyed, damaged or removed due to construction of this project, shall be replaced or restored in like kind at the Developer's expense, unless otherwise indicated on these plans, prior to the acceptance of completed improvements and/or prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 43.When an existing asphalt street must be cut, the street must be restored to a condition equal to or better than its original condition. The existing street condition shall be documented by the City of Fort Collins Construction Inspector before any cuts are made. Patching shall be done in accordance with the City of Fort Collins Street Repair Standards. The finished patch shall blend in smoothly into the existing surface. All large patches shall be paved with an asphalt lay-down machine. In streets where more than one cut is made, an overlay of the entire street width, including the patched area, may be required. The determination of need for a complete overlay shall be made by the Larimer County Engineer and/or the City of Fort Collins Inspector at the time the cuts are made. 44.Upon completion of construction, the site shall be cleaned and restored to a condition equal to, or better than, that which existed before construction, or to the grades and condition as required by these plans. 45.Standard Handicap ramps are to be constructed at all curb returns and at all "T" intersections. 46.After acceptance by the City of Fort Collins, public improvements depicted in these plans shall be guaranteed to be free from material and workmanship defects for a minimum period of two years from the date of acceptance. 47.The City of Fort Collins shall not be responsible for the maintenance of roadway and appurtenant improvements, including storm drainage structures and pipes, for the following private streets: ALL PRIVATE TRACTS 48.Approved Variances are listed as follows: N.A. CONSTRUCTION NOTES A. Grading and Erosion Control Notes 1.The erosion control inspector must be notified at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to any construction on this site. 2.There shall be no earth-disturbing activity outside the limits designated on the accepted plans. 3.All required perimeter silt and construction fencing shall be installed prior to any land disturbing activity (stockpiling, stripping, grading, etc). All other required erosion control measures shall be installed at the appropriate time in the construction sequence as indicated in the approved project schedule, construction plans, and erosion control report. 4.At all times during construction, the Developer shall be responsible for preventing and controlling on-site erosion including keeping the property sufficiently watered so as to minimize wind blown sediment. The Developer shall also be responsible for installing and maintaining all erosion control facilities shown herein. 5.Pre-disturbance vegetation shall be protected and retained wherever possible. Removal or disturbance of existing vegetation shall be limited to the area(s) required for immediate construction operations, and for the shortest practical period of time. 6.All soils exposed during land disturbing activity (stripping, grading, utility installations, stockpiling, filling, etc.) shall be kept in a roughened condition by ripping or disking along land contours until mulch, vegetation, or other permanent erosion control BMPs are installed. No soils in areas outside project street rights-of-way shall remain exposed by land disturbing activity for more than thirty (30) days before required temporary or permanent erosion control (e.g. seed/mulch, landscaping, etc.) is installed, unless otherwise approved by the City/County. 7.In order to minimize erosion potential, all temporary (structural) erosion control measures shall: a.Be inspected at a minimum of once every two (2) weeks and after each significant storm event and repaired or reconstructed as necessary in order to ensure the continued performance of their intended function. b.Remain in place until such time as all the surrounding disturbed areas are sufficiently stabilized as determined by the erosion control inspector. c.Be removed after the site has been sufficiently stabilized as determined by the erosion control inspector. 8.When temporary erosion control measures are removed, the Developer shall be responsible for the clean up and removal of all sediment and debris from all drainage infrastructure and other public facilities. 9.The contractor shall immediately clean up any construction materials inadvertently deposited on existing streets, sidewalks, or other public rights of way, and make sure streets and walkways are cleaned at the end of each working day. 10.All retained sediments, particularly those on paved roadway surfaces, shall be removed and disposed of in a manner and location so as not to cause their release into any waters of the United States. 11.No soil stockpile shall exceed ten (10) feet in height. All soil stockpiles shall be protected from sediment transport by surface roughening, watering, and perimeter silt fencing. Any soil stockpile remaining after thirty (30) days shall be seeded and mulched. 12.The stormwater volume capacity of detention ponds will be restored and storm sewer lines will be cleaned upon completion of the project and before turning the maintenance over to the City/County or Homeowners Association (HOA). 13.City Ordinance and Colorado Discharge Permit System (CDPS) requirements make it unlawful to discharge or allow the discharge of any pollutant or contaminated water from construction sites. Pollutants include, but are not limited to discarded building materials, concrete truck washout, chemicals, oil and gas products, litter, and sanitary waste. The developer shall at all times take whatever measures are necessary to assure the proper containment and disposal of pollutants on the site in accordance with any and all applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 14.A designated area shall be provided on site for concrete truck chute washout. The area shall be constructed so as to contain washout material and located at least fifty (50) feet away from any waterway during construction. Upon completion of construction activities the concrete washout material will be removed and properly disposed of prior to the area being restored. 15.Conditions in the field may warrant erosion control measures in addition to what is shown on these plans. The Developer shall implement whatever measures are determined necessary, as directed by the City. B. Street Improvement Notes 1.All street construction is subject to the General Notes on the cover sheet of these plans as well as the Street Improvements Notes listed here. 2.A paving section design, signed and stamped by a Colorado licensed Engineer, must be submitted to the City of Fort Collins Engineer for approval, prior to any street construction activity, (full depth asphalt sections are not permitted at a depth greater than 8 inches of asphalt). The job mix shall be submitted for approval prior to placement of any asphalt. 3.Where proposed paving adjoins existing asphalt, the existing asphalt shall be saw cut, a minimum distance of 12 inches from the existing edge, to create a clean construction joint. The Developer shall be required to remove existing pavement to a distance where a clean construction joint can be made. Wheel cuts shall not be allowed unless approved by the City of Fort Collins Engineer in Fort Collins. 4.Street subgrades shall be scarified the top 12 inches and re-compacted prior to subbase installation. No base material shall be laid until the subgrade has been inspected and approved by the City of Fort Collins Engineer. 5.Ft. Collins only. Valve boxes and manholes are to be brought up to grade at the time of pavement placement or overlay. Valve box adjusting rings are not allowed. 6.When an existing asphalt street must be cut, the street must be restored to a condition equal to or better than its original condition. The existing street condition shall be documented by the Inspector before any cuts are made. Cutting and patching shall be done in conformance with Chapter 25, Reconstruction and Repair. The finished patch shall blend smoothly into the existing surface. The determination of need for a complete overlay shall be made by the City of Fort Collins Engineer. All overlay work shall be coordinated with adjacent landowners such that future projects do not cut the new asphalt overlay work. 7.All traffic control devices shall be in conformance with these plans or as otherwise specified in M.U.T.C.D. (including Colorado supplement) and as per the Right-of-Way Work Permit traffic control plan. 8.The Developer is required to perform a gutter water flow test in the presence of the City of Fort Collins Inspector and prior to installation of asphalt. Gutters that hold more than 1/4 inch deep or 5 feet longitudinally, of water, shall be completely removed and reconstructed to drain properly. 9.Prior to placement of H.B.P. or concrete within the street and after moisture/density tests have been taken on the subgrade material (when a full depth section is proposed) or on the subgrade and base material (when a composite section is proposed), a mechanical "proof roll" will be required. The entire subgrade and/or base material shall be rolled with a heavily loaded vehicle having a total GVW of not less than 50,000 lbs. and a single axle weight of at least 18,000 lbs. with pneumatic tires inflated to not less that 90 p.s.i.g. "Proof roll" vehicles shall not travel at speeds greater than 3 m.p.h. Any portion of the subgrade or base material which exhibits excessive pumping or deformation, as determined by the City of Fort Collins Engineer, shall be reworked, replaced or otherwise modified to form a smooth, non-yielding surface. The City of Fort Collins Engineer shall be notified at least 24 hours prior to the "proof roll." All "proof rolls" shall be preformed in the presence of an Inspector. C. Traffic Signing and Pavement Marking Construction Notes 1.All signage and marking is subject to the General Notes on the cover sheet of these plans, as well as the Traffic Signing and Marking Construction Notes listed here. 2.All symbols, including arrows, ONLYS, crosswalks, stop bars, etc. shall be pre-formed thermo-plastic. 3.All signage shall be per the City of Fort Collins Standards and these plans or as otherwise specified in MUTCD. 4.All lane lines for asphalt pavement shall receive two coats of latex paint with glass beads. 5.All lane lines for concrete pavement should be epoxy paint. 6.Prior to permanent installation of traffic striping and symbols, the Developer shall place temporary tabs or tape depicting alignment and placement of the same. Their placement shall be approved by the City of Fort Collins Traffic Engineer prior to permanent installation of striping and symbols. 7.Pre-formed thermo-plastic applications shall be as specified in these Plans and/or these Standards. 8.Epoxy applications shall be applied as specified in CDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. 9.All surfaces shall be thoroughly cleaned prior to installation of striping or markings. 10.All sign posts shall utilize break-away assemblies and fasteners per the Standards. 11.A field inspection of location and installation of all signs shall be performed by the City of Fort Collins Traffic Engineer. All discrepancies identified during the field inspection must be corrected before the 2-year warranty period will begin. 12.The Developer installing signs shall be responsible for locating and protecting all underground utilities. 13.Special care shall be taken in sign location to ensure an unobstructed view of each sign. 14.Signage and striping has been determined by information available at the time of review. Prior to initiation of the warranty period,the City of Fort Collins Traffic Engineer reserves the right to require additional signage and/or striping if the City of Fort Collins Traffic Engineer determines that an unforeseen condition warrants such signage according to the MUTCD or the CDOT M and S Standards. All signage and striping shall fall under the requirements of the 2-year warranty period for new construction (except fair wear on traffic markings). 15.Sleeves for sign posts shall be required for use in islands/medians. Refer to Chapter 14, Traffic Control Devices, for additional detail. D. Storm Drainage Notes 1.The City of Fort Collins shall not be responsible for the maintenance of storm drainage facilities located on private property. Maintenance of onsite drainage facilities shall be the responsibility of the property owner(s). 2.All recommendations of the Preliminary Drainage Report for Sanctuary West dated January 19th, 2022 by Northern Engineering Services, Inc., shall be followed and implemented. 3.Prior to final inspection and acceptance by the City of Fort Collins, certification of the drainage facilities, by a registered engineer, must by submitted to and approved by the Stormwater Utility Department. Certification shall be submitted to the Stormwater Utility Department at least two weeks prior to the release of a certificate of occupancy for single family units. For commercial properties, certification shall by submitted to the Stormwater Utility Department at least two weeks prior to the release of any building permits in excess of those allowed prior to certification per the Development Agreement. E. Utility Notes 1.All waterline and sanitary sewer construction shall conform to the Fort Collins Utility standards and specifications current to date of construction. 2.The minimum cover over water lines is 4.5 feet and the maximum cover is 5.5 feet unless otherwise noted in the plans and approved by the water utility. 3.Water mains shall be poly-wrapped D.I.P, or PVC with tracer wire. 4.HDPE pipe may be used for 1-1/2 and 2 inch water services. The pipe shall meet the standards of AWWA 901, NSF Standard 61 and ASTM. The HDPE pipe shall be SDR 9 having a pressure rating of 200 psi. Stiffeners shall be used at all fittings and connections. Tracer wire shall be installed with the HDPE service, and shall extend up the curb stop. The curb stop shall be covered with a metal box and tracer wire test lid per City Water Detail 25. TSALPOLYND D D ONOT POLLTEUC TILEIRONRAINSTOW ATERWAYS U TSALPOLYND D DONOTPOLLTEUC TILEI RONRAIN STOWATER WAYS USDSD SD TSALPOLYND D D ONOTPOLL TE UCTILEIRONRAIN S TOWATERWAYSU TSALPOLYN DD D ONOTPOLLT E UCTILEIRON RAINSTOWATERWAYSU TSALPOLYND D D O NOTPOLL TEUCTILEIR ONRAINSTOWATERWAYSU TSALPOLYN D DD ONOTPOLLTE UCTILEIRONR A INSTOWATERWAYSU TSALPOLYN D D D ONOTPOLLTE UCTILEIRON R AINSTOWATERWAYSU TSALPOLYND D DONOTPOLLTEU CTILEIRO NRAINSTOWATERWAYS U TSALPOLYN D D DONOTPOLLTE UCTILEIRO N RAINSTOWATERWAYS U TSALPOLYN D D D ONOTPOLLTE UCTILEIRON RAINSTOWATERWAYSU TSALPOLYN D D DONOTPOLLTE UCTILEIRON RAINSTOWATERWAYS U SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD TSALPOLYND D D ON OTPOLLTEUC TILEIRONRAINSTOWAT ERWAYS U TSALPOLYN D D DONOTPOLLTE U CTILEIRON RAINSTOWATERWA YS U SDSDTSALPOLYND D D ONOTPO LLTE UCTILEIRON RAINSTOWATERWAYS U SDTSALPOLYND D D ONOTPO LLTEU CTILEIRONRAINSTO WATERWAYS U SDTSALPOLYND D D ONOTPOLL TEUC TILEIRONRAIN STOWATERWAYSU NYLOPLAST DO NOT POLLUTE DRAINS TO WATERWAYS TSALPOLYN D D D ONOTPOLLTE UCTILE IRONRAINSTOWATERWAYSU TS ALPOL YND D D ONOTPOLLT EUCTILEIRO NRAINSTOWATERWAYSU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS OHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUGGWGGXXFOFOFOFOOHU OHU OHU OHU XXXTTTTGGGGFOFOFOFOCTVCTVCTVCTVEEEEWWWWTTE E W W W CTVCTVCTVCTVFO FO FO FO G G GFOFOFO FO FO FO FOFOCTVCTVFOFOFOFOCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVFOFOFOFOFOFOW W W W W W EEEEE E E EEEEEEG G G G G G EX X XXCTVGFOEE FOFOFOFOFOTTTTTTTTTTG G G G G G G G G GWWWW W CTVCTVFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOE E E GGGGWFO FOGGT T T T T TTT CTVTTTOHUOHUE E E GGGGG G G G G G G G G GFOFOFOCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTV XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX SS SS ST ST ST ST ST ST OHU OHU X X XXX XXXX X X X XX XX X MH V.P.VAULTELEC V.P. T CABLE FE SCABLE TELE S MMMMMMMM VAULTELEC H2O W C S CABLE ELEC W S W G SHYDVAULTCABLE CABLE TRAFFICVAULT VAULT ELEC VAULT ELEC ELEC TELECABLE CABLE TELE TELE VAULT CABLE F.O. CABLETELE W TELE VAULT ELEC ELEC VAULTELEC VAULT ELEC CONTROL IRR W F.O. TELEMTELEMTELE VAULT ELEC TELEM VAULT TELE VAULTCABLE VAULTCABLE VAULTF.O. GAS TELE CONTROLIRRCONTROLIRR CONTROLIRR HY DM VAULTELEC T SVAULTELEC CONTROLIRR CONTROL IRR CONTROL IRR CONTROLIRR TELE TELE CONTROL IRR CONTROLIRR F.O. VAULTELEC VAULT F.O.TELE VAULT CABLE GAS CONTROL IRR CONTROL IRR CONTROL IRR WH2O G CSW C SW CSW C S GAS S M CS HY DVAULTF.O. VAULTELEC VAULTCABLEVAULT CABLE CABLE MH D MH D CT T VAULT ELEC V.P. T M M VAULTELEC VAULTELEC CONTROL IRR CONTROLIRR VAULTELECT S VAULT F.O. VAULTF.O. VAULTCABLE S MH MHW G ELECELECELEC ELEC CS C S TT TVAULT ELEC W M S F.O. VAULT F.O. ELEC CONTROL IRR V.P. V.P.V.P. V.P. M E S TELE T X XXXXWWWWOWNER LORIN YOUNG 316 N IMPALA DR.N IMPALA DRIVEOWNER CHRISTOPHER & SARAH WEEKS 317 N IMPALA DR. OWNER LEORA & JAY SPENCE 316 IRISH DR. OWNER ROLAND & CAROL TREMBLE 317 IRISH DR. OWNER CARLA COOLEY 316 WEBB AVE. OWNER ERIC & MARY TACORONTE 317 WEBB AVE.IRISH DRIVEWEBB AVENUEOWNER KIRK WILSON W CHERRY STREET OWNER KIRK & DEBRA WILSON 320 N SUNSET STREET OWNER KIRK WILSON 310 N SUNSET STREET OWNER FRANK ERNSET 242 N SUNSET STREET OWNER KIRI SAFTLER 230 N SUNSET STREET OWNER POUDRE R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT 2444 LAPORTE AVE OWNER POUDRE R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT 2444 LAPORTE AVE OWNER FORREST SCHRUPP 2318 LAPORTE AVE OWNER CALVARY BAPTIST TEMPLE 2420 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER RICHARD & DIXIE LOYD 2316 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER SYDNE ARCHAMBAULT 2314 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER CURTIS LYONS LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER ALEX OZOLS 2224 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER DANNY ROGERS 2214 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER ROBERT JONES 2218 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER PATRICK ST. CLAIR 2216 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER LAURA LARSON 320 N IMPALA DR. OWNER SETH MCEWAN 324 N IMPALA DR. OWNER MARGOT STREFFENHAGEN 400 N IMPALA DR. OWNER VERNON BONDURANT 404 N IMPALA DR. OWNER PLEASANT VALLEY PROPERTIES LLC 408 N IMPALA DR. OWNER ANTHONY NEYLON 412 N IMPALA DR. OWNER MARY & PAUL WEIXELMAN 416 N IMPALA DR. OWNER ANDREA GABEL 420 N IMPALA DR. LAPORTE AVENUE LAPORTE AVENUE S IMPALA DRIVEOWNER POUDRE R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT 2444 LAPORTE AVE OWNER POUDRE R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT 2444 LAPORTE AVE ACCESS DRIVEIP IP IP IP IP IP WD WD WD SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF S F SFSF SF SF SFSF SF SF SFSFSFSF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF VTC CWA IP STREET A IP IP IP IP WD WD WD WD WDWDWDWD WD DETENTION POND 2 DETENTION POND 1 RAIN GARDEN D5 RAIN GARDEN B2 WD WD WD IP OP IP IPSFSF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF S F SFSF WD SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SFB M KEYMAP LAPORTE AVE.TAFT HILL RD.SheetSANCTUARY ON THE GREENSThese drawings areinstruments of serviceprovided by NorthernEngineering Services, Inc.and are not to be used forany type of constructionunless signed and sealed bya Professional Engineer inthe employ of NorthernEngineering Services, Inc.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREVIEW SETENGINEERNGIEHTRONRNFORT COLLINS: 301 North Howes Street, Suite 100, 80521GREELEY: 820 8th Street, 80631970.221.4158northernengineering.comof 30 NORTH C5.00EROSION CONTROL PLAN27 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = ft. Feet08080 80 160 240 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET C5.01C5.01C5.00 LEGEND: PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED SWALE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER PROPERTY BOUNDARY SFSILT FENCE SF RIPRAP w/ TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT RP 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED SLOPES BY CRIMP MULCHING OR SIMILAR METHODS. 2.SWMP ADMINISTRATOR: Contact ________________________________ Company ________________________________ Address ________________________________ Phone ________________________________ 3.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL FOR CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA IF ACCESS IS OFF PAVEMENT. 4.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR WETLANDS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT AREA. 5.REFER TO THE PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR SANCTUARY WEST DATED JANUARY 19TH, 2022 BY NORTHERN ENGINEERING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. GENERAL NOTES: WATTLE DIKE WD CONCRETE WASH AREA CWA VERTICAL TRACKING CONTROL VTC INLET PROTECTION IP OPOUTLET PROTECTION 1.IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT ANY EROSION CONTROL PLAN SERVES ONLY AS A GUIDELINE TO THE CONTRACTOR. STAGING AND/OR PHASING OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs) IS EXPECTED. ADDITIONAL AND/OR DIFFERENT BMPs FROM THOSE ORIGINALLY DEPICTED MAY BE NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION DUE TO CHANGING SITE CONDITIONS OR AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES. 2.THIS EROSION CONTROL PLAN IS SCHEMATIC IN NATURE. AS SUCH, GRAPHICAL SYMBOLS MAY NOT BE TO SCALE, NOR ARE THEY NECESSARILY SHOWN IN THEIR EXACT LOCATION. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PERMITTING (CITY, STATE DISCHARGE PERMIT, ETC.) AND COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR (OR PERMIT HOLDER) TO ENSURE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE PROPERLY MAINTAINED AND FOLLOWED. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT THE APPROPRIATE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ACCORDING THE THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND LEVEL OF SITE STABILIZATION. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION FOR ALL STORMWATER FACILITIES UNTIL SITE IS FULLY STABILIZED. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION FOR DOWNSPOUT CONNECTIONS, TO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM, UNTIL CONNECTION IS ESTABLISHED WITH DOWNSPOUT. 7.INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE ADAPTED, AS NECESSARY, TO THE SURROUNDING SURFACE TYPE AND CONDITION (i.e., STAKE-DRIVEN WATTLES FOR BARE SOIL, GRAVEL SOCKS FOR PAVEMENT, ETC.) 8.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR STABILIZING ALL SLOPES, PARTICULARLY THOSE STEEPER THAN 6:1. CRIMP MULCHING, HYDRO MULCHING, EROSION MATS, TEMPORARY IRRIGATION, AND ADDITIONAL WATTLES OR SILT FENCING MAY BE NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH VEGETATIVE COVER AND STABILIZE THE SLOPE. 9.ADDITIONAL WATTLES, SILT FENCE, OR OTHER MEASURES, MAY BE NECESSARY TO INSURE THAT EACH BUILDING PAD IS STABILIZED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. AT NO TIME SHALL SEDIMENT BE ALLOWED TO CROSS THE PUBLIC SIDEWALKS. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT APPROPRIATE PERIMETER PROTECTION FOR AREAS DIRECTING DRAINAGE OFFSITE. PERIMETER PROTECTION SHALL BE ADAPTED, AS NECESSARY, TO THE SURROUNDING SURFACE TYPE AND CONDITION (i.e., STAKE-DRIVEN SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS OR SILT FENCE FOR BARE SOIL, SAND BAGS OR GRAVEL SOCKS FOR PAVEMENT, ETC.) 11.FUELING FACILITIES SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST ONE HUNDRED (100) FEET FROM NATURAL BODY OF WATER, WETLAND, NATURAL DRAINAGE WAY OR MANMADE DRAINAGE WAY. THE FUEL TANKS AND FUELING AREA MUST BE SET IN A CONTAINMENT AREA THAT WILL NOT ALLOW A FUEL SPILL TO DIRECTLY FLOW, SEEP, RUN OFF, OR BE WASHED INTO A BODY OF WATER, WETLAND OR DRAINAGE WAY. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 12.CONSTRUCTION WASTE STORAGE (DUMPSTERS) AND PORTABLE SANITATION UNITS (CONSTRUCTION TOILETS) SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST FIFTY (50) FEET FROM ANY STORMWATER INLET, WETLAND, OR DRAINAGE WAY. SAID FACILITIES MUST BE SET IN A CONTAINMENT AREA THAT WILL NOT ALLOW POLLUTANTS TO DIRECTLY FLOW, SEEP, RUN OFF, OR BE WASHED INTO A BODY OF WATER, WETLAND OR DRAINAGE WAY. DUMPSTERS SHALL BE LOCATED ON FLAT, STABLE GROUND, AND CONSTRUCTION TOILETS SHALL BE STAKED DOWN. 13.THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS WILL COOPERATE WITH THE CITY'S CONSTRUCTION INSPECTORS BY CEASING OPERATIONS WHEN WINDS ARE OF SUFFICIENT VELOCITY TO CREATE BLOWING DUST WHICH, IN THE INSPECTOR'S OPINION, IS HAZARDOUS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE. 14.WHERE SEASONAL CONSTRAINTS (E.G., DURING SUMMER AND WINTER MONTHS) INHIBIT PERMANENT SEEDING OPERATIONS, DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE TREATED WITH MULCH AND MULCH TACKIFIER OR OTHER MATERIALS APPROVED BY EROSION CONTROL STAFF TO PREVENT EROSION. 15.SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON PLANTING, REVEGETATION, HARDSCAPE AND OTHER PERMANENT SITE STABILIZATION METHODS. 16.ALL LID MEASURES SHALL BE BUILT BY THE END OF THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE. CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO Know what's below. before you dig.Call R SD SD SD SD SD TSALPOLYND D DONOTPOLLTE UCTILEIRON RAINSTOWATERWAYS U TSALPOLYN D DD ONOTPOLLTE UCTILEIRON RA INSTOWATERWAYSU SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD TSALPOLYN D D DONOTPOLLTE UCTILEIRON R AINSTOWATERWAYS U SDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD TSALPOLYND D D ONOTPO LLTEUCTILEIR ONRAINST OWATERWAYS U SDTSALPOLYND DD ONOTP OLLTE UCTILEIRONRA INSTO WATERWAYS U TSALPOLYND DD ONO TPOLLTE UCTILEIRONRAIN STOWA TERWAYS U SD SDTSALPOLYND D D ONOT POLLTEUCTIL EIRONRAINSTOW ATERWAYS U SD TSALPOLYN D D DONOTPOLLTE UCT ILEIRON RAINSTOWATERWAY S U SDTSA LPO LYND DD ONOTPOLLT E UCTILEIRONRA I NSTOWATERWAYSU TSALPOLYND DD ONOTPOLL TE UCTILEIRONRAI NSTOWATERWAYS U SDNYLOPLAST DO NOT POLLUTE DRAINS TO WATERWAYS XXOHUSS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHU GGWGGXXGFOFOFOFOFOOHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHUXXXXT TTTTGGGGGEFOFOFOFOFOCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVEEEEEWWWWWTTFOFOFOGWFOGT T T T T TT CTVTTTOHUOHUOHUOHU FOG WG EEEEEFO FO FO FO W WGEEFOFOCTVCTVCTVCTVCTV XFO FO FO FOEEOHUOHUOHUOHUCTVWWEGGGGWECTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTV ECTVWWWWWWCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOGGGGGGGGGGGGWWFOFOFOCTVCTVE EEEEEEEETTTTTTTTOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUCTVCTVEEGGGGGGGGGGWWWGGGWGGWGWWWGGGFOFOCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTV CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVGGGGGGFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOWWWWWWWWWWWWXXXCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUGGGGGGXXXXXXTTTTTTTTTOHUOHUOHUOHUXXXXXOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUX SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS STST STSTSTST ST ST STST ST ST ST ST ST ST OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU X X XXX XXXXXX X X XXXXXXX X X X STSTSTSTT VAULTF.O. ELEC ELEC ELEC BRKRE CABLE CABLETT CELEC CABLE FE SCABLE B M T TELE D CABLE TELE TELE F.O. F.O. S VAULT F.O. S W F.O. GAS HY DM WCS M M S M M S S EELEC C MH D M M MMM W VAULT ELEC T MCSH2OMM S CS HY DVAULTELEC W D C S W WCSF E SW M M T W H2O TGAS F.O. S M C S HY DVAULTF.O. VAULTELEC VAULTCABLEVAULT CABLE CABLE MH D MH D M TESTSTA C T T VAULT ELEC V.P.M VAULTELEC VAULTELEC CS MW F.O. D D VAULT ELEC VAULTCABLE ELEC VAULTELEC D MW MW ELEC TFES C T M FE SMW VAULT ELEC T S T SVAULTELEC VAULT ELEC T SVAULT ELEC T SVAULTELEC GAS S VAULTELEC D S VAULT ELEC VAULT CABLEC VAULT ELEC VAULT ELEC W CVAULT CABLEVAULT ELEC S S S TH TH XWWWWVAULTELEC OWNER LORIN YOUNG 316 N IMPALA DR. ALEX OZOLS 2224 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER DANNY ROGERS 2214 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER ROBERT JONES 2218 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER PATRICK ST. CLAIR 2216 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER KURT VATTANO OWNER JAMES PEABODY 2212 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER RANDOLPH MILAN 2140 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER PAIGE HAIGH 2210 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER CYNTHIA HERNANDEZ 2208 LAPORTE AVENUE OWNER KURT VATTANO OWNER KEITH & SHERALYN HESS 229 PENNSYLVANIA STREET OWNER SUSAN & CATHLEEN DESANTIS 230 PENNSYLVANIA STREET OWNER MELISSA VANDERSLUYS 223 PENNSYLVANIA STREET PENNSYLVANIA STREETOWNER PAULA METROPOULOS 224 PENNSYLVANIA STREET OWNER GILBERT BOYER 241 N TAFT HILL ROAD OWNER BRIAN & LAURA DAVIS 237 N TAFT HILL ROAD OWNER CARRIE HEYRMAN 233 N TAFT HILL ROAD OWNER HUGO RUTHERFURD 229 N TAFT HILL ROAD OWNER WILLIAM GREYBAR 413 N TAFT HILL ROAD OWNER LAURA LARSON 320 N IMPALA DR. OWNER SETH MCEWAN 324 N IMPALA DR. OWNER MARGOT STREFFENHAGEN 400 N IMPALA DR. OWNER VERNON BONDURANT 404 N IMPALA DR. OWNER PLEASANT VALLEY PROPERTIES LLC 408 N IMPALA DR. OWNER ANTHONY NEYLON 412 N IMPALA DR. OWNER MARY & PAUL WEIXELMAN 416 N IMPALA DR. OWNER ANDREA GABEL 420 N IMPALA DR. OWNER CITY OF FORT COLLINS OWNE R WEST V I N E B U N G A L O W S HOME O W N E R S LAPORTE AVENUE N TAFT HILL ROADN TAFT HILL ROADS IMPALA DRIVEBRIARWOOD ROADOWNER FAITH REALTY OWNER MIRANDA SPINDEL 330 N TAFT HILL ROAD OWNER LAPORT OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC. 220 N TAFT HILL ROAD OWNER CITY OF FORT COLLINS OWNER 7-ELEVEN 200 N TAFT HILL ROAD OWNER CITY OF FORT COLLINS N E W M E R C E R D I T C H NEW MERCER D ITCH WD SF VTC IP IP WD WD SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF S F SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF S F S F S F SF SF SF S F S F SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SFSFSF SF CWA STREET BSTREET A IP IP IP WD WD WD WD WD WD WD IP IP DETENTION POND 2 DETENTION POND 4 DETENTION POND 5 RAIN GARDEN D3 RAIN GARDEN D3 RAIN GARDEN C5 RAIN GARDEN C6 DETENTION POND 3 RAIN GARDEN D4 RAIN GARDEN B2 OP OP WD WD WD WD WD IP OP IP S F SFSF WD EXISTING WETLAND AREA SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SFSF SheetSANCTUARY ON THE GREENSThese drawings areinstruments of serviceprovided by NorthernEngineering Services, Inc.and are not to be used forany type of constructionunless signed and sealed bya Professional Engineer inthe employ of NorthernEngineering Services, Inc.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONREVIEW SETENGINEERNGIEHTRONRNFORT COLLINS: 301 North Howes Street, Suite 100, 80521GREELEY: 820 8th Street, 80631970.221.4158northernengineering.comof 30 NORTH C5.01EROSION CONTROL PLAN28 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = ft. Feet08080 80 160 240 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET C5.00B M KEYMAP LAPORTE AVE.TAFT HILL RD.C5.01C5.00 LEGEND: PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED SWALE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER PROPERTY BOUNDARY SFSILT FENCE SF RIPRAP w/ TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT RP 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED SLOPES BY CRIMP MULCHING OR SIMILAR METHODS. 2.SWMP ADMINISTRATOR: Contact ________________________________ Company ________________________________ Address ________________________________ Phone ________________________________ 3.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL FOR CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA IF ACCESS IS OFF PAVEMENT. 4.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR WETLANDS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT AREA. 5.REFER TO THE PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR SANCTUARY WEST DATED JANUARY 19TH, 2022 BY NORTHERN ENGINEERING FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. GENERAL NOTES: WATTLE DIKE WD CONCRETE WASH AREA CWA VERTICAL TRACKING CONTROL VTC INLET PROTECTION IP OPOUTLET PROTECTION 1.IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT ANY EROSION CONTROL PLAN SERVES ONLY AS A GUIDELINE TO THE CONTRACTOR. STAGING AND/OR PHASING OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs) IS EXPECTED. ADDITIONAL AND/OR DIFFERENT BMPs FROM THOSE ORIGINALLY DEPICTED MAY BE NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION DUE TO CHANGING SITE CONDITIONS OR AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES. 2.THIS EROSION CONTROL PLAN IS SCHEMATIC IN NATURE. AS SUCH, GRAPHICAL SYMBOLS MAY NOT BE TO SCALE, NOR ARE THEY NECESSARILY SHOWN IN THEIR EXACT LOCATION. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PERMITTING (CITY, STATE DISCHARGE PERMIT, ETC.) AND COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR (OR PERMIT HOLDER) TO ENSURE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE PROPERLY MAINTAINED AND FOLLOWED. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT THE APPROPRIATE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ACCORDING THE THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND LEVEL OF SITE STABILIZATION. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION FOR ALL STORMWATER FACILITIES UNTIL SITE IS FULLY STABILIZED. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION FOR DOWNSPOUT CONNECTIONS, TO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM, UNTIL CONNECTION IS ESTABLISHED WITH DOWNSPOUT. 7.INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE ADAPTED, AS NECESSARY, TO THE SURROUNDING SURFACE TYPE AND CONDITION (i.e., STAKE-DRIVEN WATTLES FOR BARE SOIL, GRAVEL SOCKS FOR PAVEMENT, ETC.) 8.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR STABILIZING ALL SLOPES, PARTICULARLY THOSE STEEPER THAN 6:1. CRIMP MULCHING, HYDRO MULCHING, EROSION MATS, TEMPORARY IRRIGATION, AND ADDITIONAL WATTLES OR SILT FENCING MAY BE NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH VEGETATIVE COVER AND STABILIZE THE SLOPE. 9.ADDITIONAL WATTLES, SILT FENCE, OR OTHER MEASURES, MAY BE NECESSARY TO INSURE THAT EACH BUILDING PAD IS STABILIZED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. AT NO TIME SHALL SEDIMENT BE ALLOWED TO CROSS THE PUBLIC SIDEWALKS. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT APPROPRIATE PERIMETER PROTECTION FOR AREAS DIRECTING DRAINAGE OFFSITE. PERIMETER PROTECTION SHALL BE ADAPTED, AS NECESSARY, TO THE SURROUNDING SURFACE TYPE AND CONDITION (i.e., STAKE-DRIVEN SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS OR SILT FENCE FOR BARE SOIL, SAND BAGS OR GRAVEL SOCKS FOR PAVEMENT, ETC.) 11.FUELING FACILITIES SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST ONE HUNDRED (100) FEET FROM NATURAL BODY OF WATER, WETLAND, NATURAL DRAINAGE WAY OR MANMADE DRAINAGE WAY. THE FUEL TANKS AND FUELING AREA MUST BE SET IN A CONTAINMENT AREA THAT WILL NOT ALLOW A FUEL SPILL TO DIRECTLY FLOW, SEEP, RUN OFF, OR BE WASHED INTO A BODY OF WATER, WETLAND OR DRAINAGE WAY. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 12.CONSTRUCTION WASTE STORAGE (DUMPSTERS) AND PORTABLE SANITATION UNITS (CONSTRUCTION TOILETS) SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST FIFTY (50) FEET FROM ANY STORMWATER INLET, WETLAND, OR DRAINAGE WAY. SAID FACILITIES MUST BE SET IN A CONTAINMENT AREA THAT WILL NOT ALLOW POLLUTANTS TO DIRECTLY FLOW, SEEP, RUN OFF, OR BE WASHED INTO A BODY OF WATER, WETLAND OR DRAINAGE WAY. DUMPSTERS SHALL BE LOCATED ON FLAT, STABLE GROUND, AND CONSTRUCTION TOILETS SHALL BE STAKED DOWN. 13.THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS WILL COOPERATE WITH THE CITY'S CONSTRUCTION INSPECTORS BY CEASING OPERATIONS WHEN WINDS ARE OF SUFFICIENT VELOCITY TO CREATE BLOWING DUST WHICH, IN THE INSPECTOR'S OPINION, IS HAZARDOUS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE. 14.WHERE SEASONAL CONSTRAINTS (E.G., DURING SUMMER AND WINTER MONTHS) INHIBIT PERMANENT SEEDING OPERATIONS, DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE TREATED WITH MULCH AND MULCH TACKIFIER OR OTHER MATERIALS APPROVED BY EROSION CONTROL STAFF TO PREVENT EROSION. 15.SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON PLANTING, REVEGETATION, HARDSCAPE AND OTHER PERMANENT SITE STABILIZATION METHODS. 16.ALL LID MEASURES SHALL BE BUILT BY THE END OF THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE. CALL UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO Know what's below. before you dig.Call R Ver 2.0 – 04/2020 Full review of the Erosion Control Plan Erosion control plans are required on all projects that are larger than 10,000 square feet, contain steep slopes (steeper than 3:1 or 18°), part of a larger common development, or are located near (50 ft or closer to a sensitive area) a sensitive area. All sections referenced are mandatory requirements from FCDCM Chapter 2 “Development Submittal Requirements” 1) Have all redlined comments on the erosion control plan been answered or corrected from the prior submittal?  Yes  No  N/A 2) Is the plan set stamped by a P.E. Licensed in Colorado? Sec. 6.1.3  Yes  No  N/A 3) Are the erosion control plan requirements easily found within one or more of the following locations; Title Sheet, Maps Sheets, Notes Sheet, and/or Details Sheet? Sec. 6.1.3  Yes  No  N/A 4) Is the information clearly shown and legible and not cluttered? Sec. 6.1.3  Yes  No  N/A 5) Is there a table of calculations or calculations chart? Sec. 6.1.3.1  Yes  No  N/A a. Is the total Disturbed Project Area included? Sec. 6.1.3.1  Yes  No  N/A b. Is the total On-site Disturbed Area included? Sec. 6.1.3.1  Yes  No  N/A c. Is the total Off-site Disturbed Area included? Sec. 6.1.3.1  Yes  No  N/A d. Is the total Staging/Storage Area included? Sec. 6.1.3.1  Yes  No  N/A e. Is the total area of Haul Road Area included? Sec. 6.1.3.1  Yes  No  N/A f. Is the total Construction Vehicle Traffic Areas included? Sec. 6.1.3.1  Yes  No  N/A g. Is the Estimated Percent of Project Exposed included? Sec. 6.1.3.1  Yes  No  N/A h. Is the Estimated Percent Vegetative Cover included? Sec. 6.1.3.1  Yes  No  N/A i. Is/Are the Existing Soil Type(s) Included? Sec. 6.1.3.1  Yes  No  N/A j. Is the groundwater depth included? Sec. 6.1.3.1  Yes  No  N/A k. Is the number of Phases shown? Sec. 6.1.3.1  Yes  No  N/A l. Is the total Volume of Import/Export Materials included? Sec. 6.1.3.1  Yes  No  N/A m. Is the steepest slope given? Sec. 6.1.3.1  Yes  No  N/A n. Is the distance from sensitive areas included? Sec. 6.1.3.1  Yes  No  N/A 6) Is there a legend? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A a. Is every symbol included on the map found in the legend? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A b. Are all symbols not to scale labeled as such? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A 7) Is the plan in a 24 x 36-inch format?  Yes  No  N/A 8) Is north shown on the map?  Yes  No  N/A 9) Are the map units Imperial/English/Standard?  Yes  No  N/A 10) Does the Map contain Stormwater Flow Arrows? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A a. Are slopes steeper than 3:1 marked and labeled? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A b. Are the arrows going the correct direction? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A c. Are curb and gutter locations marked with flow arrows? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A d. Are concentrated flows running onto a project? Sec. 6.1.3.3 (Includes rates for 2yr and 100yr)  Yes  No  N/A 11) Are the property lines and lot lines included in the erosion control sheets? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A a. Are the property lines keyed in the legend? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A b. Is the owner’s information marked on the sheet? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A 12) Are the limits of construction or limits of disturbance included? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A a. Are the limits labeled? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A Ver 2.0 – 04/2020 b. Boundary lines darkened, boldened, shaded or hatched to easily identify that boundary? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A 13) Are water features identified? (existing drainage, wetland, natural habitat buffer zones, streams, springs, stream corridors, creeks, lakes, or other surface water features)  Yes  No  N/A 14) Are any temporary channel diversions and crossings designed? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A a. Does the crossing include routes, pipe sizing and linings to be used? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A 15) Are Stormwater features identified? (detention basins, LID facilities, water quality structures, inlets, pipes, culverts, storm sewers, drainage swale, concrete pans, aprons, paved areas, retaining walls, cribbing, irrigation ditches, reservoirs and other facilities, and other permanent features or outfalls) Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A 16) Are permanent erosion control features shown? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A 17) Are permanent drainage features including a bold line at the 100-yr. storm event water surface elevation? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A 18) Are contours lines included? (typically, 1’ to 2’ intervals)  Yes  No  N/A a. Do the contour lines extend 50-100 ft around the disturbed area?  Yes  No  N/A b. Are the Existing contour lines dashed or in a light grey?  Yes  No  N/A c. Are the Proposed contour lines solid, bolded or black?  Yes  No  N/A 19) Are all locations shown for buildings, roads (named and labelled), paths ramps medians and sidewalks? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A 20) Are all off-site materials import of export and haul roads included as part of the plans? (Excluding landscaper’s or builder’s storage yards) Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A a. Are all off site stockpile storage locations labelled with the note to have a stockpile pulled? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A b. Are all locations protected from erosion using control measures? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A 21) Are control measures shown on the plan? Sec. 6.1.3.3  Yes  No  N/A 22) Are all services that will require “tie-in” from off-site marked and labeled?  Yes  No  N/A 23) Are the standard erosion control notes included and not changed in any form in the plan set? Sec. 6.1.3.4  Yes  No  N/A 24) Are all site-specific Erosion Control notes that are special to this site included in the erosion control plan or a sheet within the Utility Plan Set? Sec. 6.1.3.4  Yes  No  N/A 25) Are details included for every unique type of control measure as called out on the plan sheet? Sec. 6.1.3.5  Yes  No  N/A 26) Are all details shown ones accepted by the City either as a standard detail or through the accepted proprietary control detail or accepted alternative control method? Sec. 6.1.3.5  Yes  No  N/A 27) Are the details provided going to structurally work as designed in shown locations and will it function properly as proposed based off sound engineering principals? (think about the sediment laden flows and volumes that will be directed to these control measures and are they sized appropriately to contain pollutants and are they designed to prevent flooding at the same time)  Yes  No  N/A Control Measure specific questions for plan evaluation Perimeter Protection 1) Do all down gradient perimeters of the site have an adequate form of sediment control? (i.e. Silt Fence, Straw Wattle, Compact Berm, etc.)  Yes  No  N/A 2) Do all perimeters have adequate site control (typically construction fence or other diversion) to prevent contractors, subs, builders, etc. from leaving the site in non- designated entrances and to redirect them to use the entrance protection?  Yes  No  N/A Ver 2.0 – 04/2020 3) Verify that only appropriate sediment controls are used on hardscape areas? (i.e. not calling out silt fence or wattle to be installed on asphalt or concrete as they will not function as a control in those locations and using rock socks or other controls that will work on hard surfaces)  Yes  No  N/A 4) Do wattles have some form of construction fence or physical barrier to protect the wattles from being driven over or parked on by equipment and causing the control measure to fail?  Yes  No  N/A 5) Once internal streets are installed, are there interior perimeter controls planned for? (Either the sediment controls for lots or blocks that would run off onto the newly installed streets or construction fences to limit access from driving off these individual lots at any given location of the internal streets)  Yes  No  N/A 6) Are all the utility installations shown coming on to a site and if so, are the areas that the utilities breech the perimeter, are there control installed down gradient?  Yes  No  N/A Curb Sock (Rock Socks installed in the curb line) 7) Are the curb socks facing the correct direction of flow? (i.e. where the flow meets the wedge portion of the control _Rocksock_/ Flow )  Yes  No  N/A 8) Are the curb socks roughly at the correct spacing?  Yes  No  N/A Inlet protection 9) Are all of the interior inlet devices showing some form of control measure?  Yes  No  N/A 10) Are all roof drains and subdrains showing some form of control measure at any openings?  Yes  No  N/A 11) Are there any existing inlets that might be affected by construction activities? (i.e. down gradient inlets near entrances and perimeters of a project)  Yes  No  N/A 12) Are provided details allowing for overflows in flooding conditions?  Yes  No  N/A 13) Are they designed in a way to make sure they are not overly restricting flows and becoming a flooding source?  Yes  No  N/A Concrete Work 14) Is there a concrete washout area called out on the erosion control plans?  Yes  No  N/A 15) Is the location of the concrete washout area >50 ft from an inlet or drainage path?  Yes  No  N/A 16) Is there access to the washout areas from a stabilized surface or vehicle tracking control?  Yes  No  N/A Entrances 17) Are all shown entrances protected or to be barricaded or fenced off to limit/prevent traffic from leaving the site uncontrolled?  Yes  No  N/A 18) Are all entrances calling out for sweeping activities?  Yes  No  N/A Steep Slopes (greater than 3:1) 19) Do slopes show surface roughening as a temporary control measure at a minimum?  Yes  No  N/A 20) Do the notes or a callout identify hydromulch or tackifier to be used if riling is occurring?  Yes  No  N/A 21) Is Blanket and/or tackifier called out for the final slope stabilization?  Yes  No  N/A 22) Are the blankets going to be installed in a snake prone area? (If so, specific blankets need to be used to prevent entanglement or entrapment of wildlife on the netting used on erosion control blankets)  Yes  No  N/A 23) Is the slope steep enough or takes run-on that additional uphill controls or diversions to slope drains are needed as an option?  Yes  No  N/A Stabilized Storage Area 24) Are all storage or laydown areas marked on the map?  Yes  No  N/A Concentrate flows through or directly adjacent to the site (Stream work) Ver 2.0 – 04/2020 25) Are diversion around the project planned and shown on the plans?  Yes  No  N/A 26) Are dewatering permits pulled for flows across the banks?  Yes  No  N/A 27) Are the control measures adequate to handle the flow velocities on the banks?  Yes  No  N/A Water Quality Structures and LIDs 28) Are to control measures adequate size to handle the anticipated amount of flow to the structure? (Rock socks and 8” wattles are not typically sufficient to protect these type of structures)  Yes  No  N/A 29) Are there controls or notes addressing how to prevent rain gardens, bioswales, and other LIDs from heavy sediment loading during construction to prevent failure before they can be fully vegetated?  Yes  No  N/A Grading Activities 30) Are controls installed prior to grading activities? (Typically all the perimeter controls and existing inlets, entrance controls, site access controls, etc.)  Yes  No  N/A 31) Are controls called out for use during grading activities? (Grade differential, compact berms, limiting disturbed areas, terracing, surface roughening, etc.)  Yes  No  N/A 32) Are controls called out for after grading? (temporary seeding, permanent seeding, limiting access)  Yes  No  N/A Vegetation 33) Are there areas identified to be seeded and mulched? (These are included in the landscape plan if permanent seeding is planned, however these areas should be identified if temporary seeding is need) (on larger project temporary seeding should be planned for and shown in later phases of construction after site grading is finalized)  Yes  No  N/A 34) Follow Flow arrows on the plan and make sure there are enough sediment controls to reducing the migration of sediment across the site? Look for issues at low points.  Yes  No  N/A 35) Look at bare areas that are intending to be seeded and determine if those large areas could use some erosion controls to prevent sediment suspension to begin with?  Yes  No  N/A Sequence Chart For projects that are required to supply erosion control plans and are less than 3 acres sequence charts are required to be submitted on the plans in accordance with 6.1.3.2. All sections referenced are mandatory requirements from FCDCM Chapter 2 “Development Submittal Requirements” 1) Is there a sequence chart included in the erosion control plans? Sec 6.1.3.2  Yes  No  N/A 2) Are all the control measures shown on the erosion control plans included in the sequence chart? Are there ones missing? Are there ones that are not applicable? Sec 6.1.3.2  Yes  No  N/A 3) Are all the appropriate sequences selected for the designed project? Are there ones missing? Are there ones that are not applicable? Sec 6.1.3.2  Yes  No  N/A 4) Are all the correct control measures to be installed, maintained, and removed across the appropriate sequences of construction? Sec 6.1.3.2  Yes  No  N/A Ver 2.0 – 04/2020 Sequence Sheets For projects that are required to supply erosion control plans and are greater than 3 acres sequence sheets are required to be submitted on the plans in accordance with 6.1.3.2. All sections referenced are mandatory requirements from FCDCM Chapter 2 “Development Submittal Requirements” 1) Are there at least 3 sequence sheets for the major activities during construction? Sec 6.1.3.2  Yes  No  N/A 2) Does each individual sequence sheet meet the Erosion Control Plan Check sheet section above? Sec 6.1.3.2  Yes  No  N/A 3) Does the title page label each of the sequence sheets? Sec 6.1.3.2  Yes  No  N/A 4) Does the page label match each sequence? Sec 6.1.3.2  Yes  No  N/A 5) Is each control measure shown on each sequence sheet needed for those construction activities? Sec 6.1.3.2  Yes  No  N/A Ver 2.0 – 04/2020 Full Review of the Erosion Control Report Erosion control reports are required on all projects that are larger than 43,560 square feet or are part of a larger common development. All sections referenced are mandatory requirements from FCDCM Chapter 2 “Development Submittal Requirements” 1) Have all redlined comments on the erosion control report been answered or corrected from the prior submittal?  Yes  No  N/A 2) Is an erosion control report located in an acceptable location upon submittal? (typically, a stand-alone document or as part of the drainage report)  Yes  No  N/A 3) Is the material stamped by a P.E. Licensed in Colorado? See 6.1.4  Yes  No  N/A 4) Is the material typed? See 6.1.4  Yes  No  N/A 5) Does the Erosion Control Report Contain all of the key elements? See 6.1.4  Yes  No  N/A 6) Is a Title Page, Cover Letter and Notification of Responsibility section included? See 6.1.4.1  Yes  No  N/A a. Is the Name of the Project included? See 6.1.4.1  Yes  No  N/A b. Does the name match the one on the erosion control plan?  Yes  No  N/A c. Is the Date Submitted included? See 6.1.4.1  Yes  No  N/A d. Is the Landowner’s contact info included? See 6.1.4.1  Yes  No  N/A e. Is the Developer’s contact info included? See 6.1.4.1  Yes  No  N/A f. Is the Contractor’s contact info included? See 6.1.4.1  Yes  No  N/A g. Is the Engineer’s contact info included? See 6.1.4.1  Yes  No  N/A h. Is the Erosion Control Administrator’s contact info included? See 6.1.4.1  Yes  No  N/A A fully signed and dated copy submitted before beginning construction activities and initial inspection request 7) Is the Table of Contents included? See 6.1.4.2  Yes  No  N/A 8) Is the Project Description and Nature of Construction Included? See 6.1.4.3  Yes  No  N/A a. Does it describe the existing site condition and proposed condition? See 6.1.4.3  Yes  No  N/A b. Does the description include Project Location? See 6.1.4.3 (typically including 2 of the follow methods: Written description, legal description, parcel number, address, GPS Coordinates in decimal degrees)  Yes  No  N/A c. Does the existing site condition describe physical soil properties, hydraulic soil properties, and soil features? See 6.1.4.3  Yes  No  N/A d. Does the existing site condition describe the pathway to the nearest receiving water? See 6.1.4.3 (i.e. the drainage path from the outfall to either the Poudre River or Fossil Creek Reservoir)  Yes  No  N/A e. Does the existing site condition describe the existing vegetated areas to impervious areas? See 6.1.4.3 (typically, a ratio)  Yes  No  N/A f. Does the existing site condition describe the estimated percent vegetative ground cover? See 6.1.4.3 (estimate of density of vegetation)  Yes  No  N/A g. Does the existing site condition describe the existing groundwater depth? See 6.1.4.3  Yes  No  N/A h. Does the existing site condition describe identified non-stormwater discharges? See 6.1.4.3 (Springs, irrigation return flows, etc.)  Yes  No  N/A i. Are those non-stormwater discharges included on the erosion control plans?  Yes  No  N/A j. Does the existing site condition describe steepness of slopes on site? See 6.1.4.3  Yes  No  N/A k. Does the existing site condition describe existing structures? See 6.1.4.3  Yes  No  N/A Ver 2.0 – 04/2020 l. Does the existing site condition describe distance from riparian or sensitive areas? See 6.1.4.3  Yes  No  N/A m. Does the existing site condition describe a summary of ground contamination? See 6.1.4.3  Yes  No  N/A n. Does the existing site condition describe rainfall and wind erodibility? See 6.1.4.3 (Be sure to summarize the soil erosion potential and the possible impacts of those soils to impact water quality. Typically, the soil type is described with no mention as to what that means for erosion and its impact as a potential to discharge from a site)  Yes  No  N/A o. Does the existing site condition contain any other relevant site data for erosion control?  Yes  No  N/A p. Does the proposed condition contain a description of the construction activities from the beginning until the final stabilization of the project? See 6.1.4.3  Yes  No  N/A q. Does the Proposed Construction Activities Section include the Total Area of the Project? See 6.1.4.3  Yes  No  N/A r. Does the Proposed Construction Activities Section include a description of where the size was limited to reduce soil exposure? See 6.1.4.3  Yes  No  N/A s. Does the Proposed Construction Activities Section include the Total Area of Disturbance? (both on-site and off-site) See 6.1.4.3  Yes  No  N/A t. Does the Proposed Construction Activities Section include the Total Areas of Staging and Storage? See 6.1.4.3  Yes  No  N/A u. Does the Proposed Construction Activities Section include the Total Areas for Hauling? See 6.1.4.3  Yes  No  N/A v. Does the Proposed Construction Activities Section include the Total Volumes of imported and Exported Material? See 6.1.4.3  Yes  No  N/A w. Does the description identify any possible environmental impacts? See 6.1.4.3 (wetlands, streams, and endangered species identified, etc.)  Yes  No  N/A x. Does the description identify any State or Federal Permits that needed to be pulled? See 6.1.4.3 (State Dewatering Permit, ACOE 404 Permit, 401 Water Quality Cert, State Stormwater Construction Permit, etc.)  Yes  No  N/A 9) Is a section called Potential Pollutant Sources included? See 6.1.4.4  Yes  No  N/A 10) Are at a minimum all 16 commonly identified potential pollutant sources included? See 6.1.4.4  Yes  No  N/A 11) Are each of 16 sources labeled with Presence on site? See 6.1.4.4 (i.e. “Yes” present on site or a “No” not anticipated on site)  Yes  No  N/A 12) Have each of the 16 sources Identified and Described the pollutant source? See 6.1.4.4  Yes  No  N/A 13) Has each of the 16 sources Evaluated the source’s pollutant potential to contribute to site discharge? See 6.1.4.4  Yes  No  N/A 14) Have each of the 16 sources Prescribed control measures to prevent pollutants from contributing to site discharges? See 6.1.4.4  Yes  No  N/A i. All disturbed and stored soils  Included ii. Vehicle tracking of sediments  Included iii. Management of contaminated soils  Included iv. Loading and unloading operations  Included v. Outdoor storage of construction materials, building materials, fertilizers, and chemicals  Included vi. Bulk storage of materials  Included vii. Vehicle and equipment maintenance and fueling  Included Ver 2.0 – 04/2020 viii. Significant dust or particulate generating processes  Included ix. Routine maintenance activities involving fertilizers, pesticides, detergents, fuels, solvents, and oils  Included x. On-site waste management practices  Included xi. Concrete truck/equipment washing, including the concrete truck chute and associated fixtures and equipment  Included xii. Dedicated asphalt and concrete batch plants  Included xiii. Non-industrial waste sources such as worker trash and portable toilets  Included xiv. Saw Cutting and Grinding  Included xv. Other non-stormwater discharges including construction dewatering not covered under the Construction Dewatering Discharges general permit and wash water that may potentially contribute pollutants to the MS4  Included xvi. Other areas or operations where spills can occur  Included 15) Is a section called Control Measures included? See 6.1.4.5  Yes  No  N/A a. Are all the Prescribed Controls from the pollutant sources section included in this section? See 6.1.4.5  Yes  No  N/A b. Are all the controls measures in this section included on the erosion control plans? See 6.1.4.5  Yes  No  N/A c. Are all the controls measures in erosion control plans included in this section? See 6.1.4.5  Yes  No  N/A d. Does each control measure have a description? See 6.1.4.5  Yes  No  N/A e. Does each control measure have how it is to be implemented? See 6.1.4.5  Yes  No  N/A f. Does each control measure have a corresponding detail? See 6.1.4.5  Yes  No  N/A 16) Is a section called Installation and Removal Sequence of Control Measures included or incorporated into the section called Control Measure? See 6.1.4.6  Yes  No  N/A a. Does the section convey the estimated Installation and Removal of Control Measures based upon the sequence of the construction activities? See 6.1.4.6  Yes  No  N/A b. Is the section Installation and Removal Sequence of Control Measures simple to follow, clear, and concise?  Yes  No  N/A 17) Is a section called Maintenance and Inspection Requirements? See 6.1.4.8  Yes  No  N/A a. Does the section include how to maintain each control? See 6.1.4.8 (when it is needed, how to clean it out or repair it)  Yes  No  N/A b. Does the section identify the frequency of inspections? See 6.1.4.8  Yes  No  N/A 18) Is a section called Final Vegetation and Stabilization? See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A a. Does the section Final Vegetation and Stabilization include the means to return the exposed dirt from construction activities to a stabilized state? See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A b. Areas for immediate vegetation and stabilization (i.e. traditional landscaping) See 6.1.4.9 i. Is there a discussion of soil preparation in accordance with Municipal Code §12-132? See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A ii. Is there a planting method described? See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A iii. Is there an anticipated planting schedule? See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A iv. Is how and when these areas are considered stabilized described? See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A v. Reference to using the approved landscape plans and following City Landscape Standards (LUC 3.2.1 (3)) See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A c. Areas that will require seeding (either temporary or permanent) See 6.1.4.9 i. Is there a description of soil preparation in accordance with Municipal Code §12-132? See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A Ver 2.0 – 04/2020 ii. Is a selected seed mix used? Or states it can be found in the approved landscape plans? See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A a. Is Species Name and common name included? See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A b. Is the Seed application Rate in (lbs. of PLS/acre) included? See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A c. Is the Drill Depth included? See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A iii. Is there an explanation of the seeding method and schedule? See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A iv. Is there an explanation of the crimping and mulching method being applied 24 hours after seeding has occurred? See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A v. Is there description of how to determine and when such areas will be considered stabilized? See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A d. Is the estimated timeline for stabilization of the exposed area included? (immediate, seasons, years, etc.) See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A e. Is there a description to remove all accumulated sediment in the pipes after the site has been stabilized and how any remaining controls should be removed after cleaning the infrastructure? See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A 19) Is there a section called Appendix? See 6.1.4.10  Yes  No  N/A 20) Does the section called Appendix contain at a minimum all referenced material from any previous section of the erosion control report? See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A 21) Does the section called Appendix contain a copy of all control measure details to be used on the project? See 6.1.4.9  Yes  No  N/A Ver 2.0 – 04/2020 Full Review of the Erosion Control Escrow Calculation Erosion control escrow calculations are required on all non-City projects that are larger than 10,000 square feet, contain steep slopes (steeper than 3:1 or 18°), part of a larger common development, or are located near (closer than 50 ft from a sensitive area) a sensitive area. All sections referenced are mandatory requirements from FCDCM Chapter 2 “Development Submittal Requirements” 1) Have all redlined comments on the erosion control report been answered or corrected from the prior submittal? Sec. 6.1.5  Yes  No  N/A 2) Is an erosion control escrow calculation sheet completed and in an appropriate location? (Stand- alone sheet or part of the erosion control or drainage report) Sec. 6.1.5  Yes  No  N/A 3) Is the name the same as what is shown on the Erosion Control Plan? Sec. 6.1.5  Yes  No  N/A 4) Are each of the control measures shown on the erosion control plan included in the calculation sheet? Sec. 6.1.5  Yes  No  N/A 5) Are the quantities of each control measure shown on the plan included in the calculation sheet? Sec. 6.1.5  Yes  No  N/A 6) Is the total disturbed area used for the entire site? (this area is not just the areas to be reseeded but any of the areas that would be disturbed) Sec. 6.1.5  Yes  No  N/A 7) Are the prices realistic and based upon recent prior estimates? Sec. 6.1.5  Yes  No  N/A 8) Is the calculation based upon one and a half times the cost to install the approved control measures as shown on the erosion control plan? Sec. 6.1.5  Yes  No  N/A 9) Is the calculation based upon one and a half times the cost to re-vegetate the disturbed land with dry land seeding? Sec. 6.1.5  Yes  No  N/A 10) Is the calculation based upon the minimum escrow? Sec. 6.1.5  Yes  No  N/A 11) Is the security based upon the highest of 8, 9, and 10? (Controls, Reseeding, and Minimum) Sec. 6.1.5  Yes  No  N/A 12) Are all prior redline comments corrected from prior submittal? Sec. 6.1.5  Yes  No  N/A 13) If quoted in the Report, does the amounts match in both places? Sec. 6.1.5  Yes  No  N/A 14) Would this escrow be better served by having phased escrows? (Landscaped areas that generally are finished early vs Native seed areas which can take several years before completion) (Splitting these escrows up is recommended to return some escrow prior to full site stabilization)  Yes  No  N/A Ver 2.0 – 04/2020 Phased Materials When phased materials are planned this section is to be reviewed in addition to the full review checklists for erosion control; plans, reports and escrows. Phased materials are required when a project is over 5 acres and highly recommended for any projects that require native seeding. All sections referenced are mandatory requirements from FCDCM Chapter 2 “Development Submittal Requirements” 1) Are the erosion control plans clearly delineating the various phases of a project? See 6.1.3.6  Yes  No  N/A a. Where scale and detail require, is an index map sheet or key map included and affixed to a corner of the erosion control plan map sheets? See 6.1.3.6  Yes  No  N/A b. Are all the control measures in the various phases included in the erosion control plans?  Yes  No  N/A 2) Is there a section in the erosion control report dedicated to the discussion of phases? See 6.1.4.7  Yes  No  N/A a. Does the Phasing section describe an estimated schedule for when each phase will begin and be stabilized? See 6.1.4.7  Yes  No  N/A b. Does the Phasing section describe how the site will be broken into phases? See 6.1.4.7  Yes  No  N/A c. Does the Proposed Construction Activities Section of the erosion control report include the Total Area of Each Phase? See 6.1.4.3  Yes  No  N/A 3) Is there a simple map to attach with the escrow calculation sheets clearly showing the boundaries of each phase of the erosion control escrow? See 6.1.5  Yes  No  N/A 4) Are there any individual security calculation sheets for each phase shown on the map? See 6.1.5  Yes  No  N/A 5) Is there a need for Native Seed areas to be a separate phase so that funds can be returned on the rest of the project after completion and only hold escrow for those area that are still left waiting for seed to grow?  Yes  No  N/A Ver 2.0 – 04/2020 Evaluation of Materials Unique Conditions To evaluate Prior Site Contamination Are there known environmental issues or prior site contamination with the site that will need to be mitigated for? (Asbestos in the soil, superfund sites, beet tailings, old landfills, industrial area, old gas station, old dry cleaners, or other legacy structures that could have produced chemical contaminations)  Yes  No  N/A If this is a “yes” please ensure this information is included in the erosion control report as this is an addition pollutant source beyond the 16 standard pollutant sources. Please include how to control the contaminated soils and appropriate methods to handle such materials, if no report is required please include a length page note stating how to handle the materials. The areas of concern should also be marked on the plans to have a guess as to where they are located within the disturbed area. Demo Activities Are the approximate areas to be exposed from the building and structure removal easily identified on the plans?  Yes  No  N/A Is the estimated length of interim time called out between demo work and site grading?  Yes  No  N/A Will the starting of construction really be immediate? (Asked because only about 5% of the projects start within a month of demo, in all reality and most can take 3-8 months before final approval and permitted construction can begin this is time that exposed dirt areas are typically not looked after or managed by demo contractors)  Yes  No  N/A Are temporary controls called out to be used in the interim to prevent run-off of the exposed soil between demo and site work?  Yes  No  N/A Will site access be limited to prevent vehicles from driving through the exposed soils?  Yes  No  N/A Will temporary seeding and mulching need to happen as the area is exposed for months?  Yes  No  N/A Will the materials remain on site for any length of time?  Yes  No  N/A Will the structures be fully mitigated for asbestos before any demolition begins?  Yes  No  N/A Will the materials remain on site for any length of time?  Yes  No  N/A Will the structures be fully mitigated for asbestos before any demolition begins?  Yes  No  N/A Will water be used to prevent dust to be suspended during demolition?  Yes  No  N/A High Ground Water Does the plan call out for a liner in the concrete wash out? (if a mobile unit is not being implemented) This liner is needed as there is a significant nexus between ground water and wash water that could negatively impact and become a source of contamination to the groundwater.  Yes  No  N/A Is there anticipated trenching of subgrade in the high ground water area? This work will typically encounter water and will need a plan to address the water in the trench and usually require dewatering activities. (See dewatering for further questions)  Yes  No  N/A Are there areas that will require seeding that may have water inundate for a long period of time? This might require planning for the optimum time to seed where the ground water will not choke out the seed and/or selecting the appropriate seed type that will be able to handle highly saturated ground that serves as a source to promote seed growth.  Yes  No  N/A If no dewatering is anticipated with a project with high water, are their notes about how handle dewatering if high water is encountered?  Yes  No  N/A Dewatering and Pumping Activities Ver 2.0 – 04/2020 Do the plans identify where the dewatering activity will pump the water to?  Yes  No  N/A Do the plans anticipate how much water is expected to be pumped?  Yes  No  N/A Will this be able to have some form of energy dissipation to not become an erosion source when pumped?  Yes  No  N/A Will it be a small enough volume of water that it will not discharged off site? If not able to contain to site, a State Dewatering permit will be needed.  Yes  No  N/A Are the pumps adequately sized to handle the appropriate volumes of water and enough power to divert flows the anticipated pumping distance?  Yes  No  N/A Does the erosion control plan have a note explaining that a dewatering permit is needed if water is to be discharged off site?  Yes  No  N/A Has the dewatering permit already been applied for? (permit needs to be approved before dewatering activities are to occur this can be a 45-day lead time at the State) (Conditions of the dewatering activities should be kept with the erosion control materials on site, there should also be some description of what frequency samples are being taken and what the samples are being tested for)  Yes  No  N/A Is the dewatering activity near a contaminated location? (if contaminated soils are present, dewatering activities may require the pulling of a remediation permit) (Conditions of those remediation activities should be kept with the erosion control materials on site)  Yes  No  N/A Is there a copy of the Dewatering permit? A copy should be placed with the erosion control materials when that has been approved.  Yes  No  N/A Run on Flows Are the flows identified on the erosion control plans?  Yes  No  N/A Do those flows identify if they are concentrated of distributed surface flows?  Yes  No  N/A Do the plans identify how much water will inundate the site?  Yes  No  N/A How much area will be impacted by these flows?  Yes  No  N/A Will some, or all, of the work expect to continue if inundated?  Yes  No  N/A Are there additional structures or pumping activities that will be used and shown on the plans to divert the flows from encountering the dirt on site, i.e. pump around the disturbed area?  Yes  No  N/A Are there means to control and treat the additional flow once it has encountered the dirt on site?  Yes  No  N/A Is there time delays built into the project due to weather constraints or when work areas are inundated?  Yes  No  N/A Are the stored materials and hazardous materials shown on the plans located away from the run on flow?  Yes  No  N/A Are there notes or directions on what to do if run on flows cause an upset condition?  Yes  No  N/A Is there a list of contractors who could help restore the project if impacted by an upset condition?  Yes  No  N/A Working in water way Have a 404 Permit been issued by the Army Corps of Engineers?  Yes  No  N/A Have a 401 Water Quality Certification been pulled from the State?  Yes  No  N/A Have surface flows that would encounter construction soils (such as a bank repair location, coffer dam installation, or stream crossing) been included in the project design? If so, the water moving across a property by State definition is considered a dewatering activity and would require a dewatering permit to be pulled  Yes  No  N/A As anticipated surface flows encounter those construction soils, is there an anticipated water volume that will interact with exposed soils planned for?  Yes  No  N/A Ver 2.0 – 04/2020 Are controls selected based upon those volume?  Yes  No  N/A Will there be hard armoring along the bank for permanent stabilization? (i.e. riprap)  Yes  No  N/A Will there be areas that will have grass or vegetation for permanent stabilization?  Yes  No  N/A Will those vegetated areas be blanketed or hydro-mulched?  Yes  No  N/A Will more aggressive control measures be needed for stabilization due to steep slopes, run on flows, or concentrated flows?  Yes  No  N/A Is the seeding a realistic expectation based upon river flows and the seasonal constraints?  Yes  No  N/A Are the activities going to be conducted in the wintertime to minimize flow contact with dirt?  Yes  No  N/A Will coffer dams be used? If so, is there a liner or impermeable layer to prevent mixing flowing water from scouring out the coffer dam and making that material become a pollutant source?  Yes  No  N/A Will there be above or in river crossings? Is it adequately sized and armored to prevent washing out and away of the pipes and materials? Is there a detail showing how the crossing will be designed and sized? Is the crossing shown on the erosion control Plan?  Yes  No  N/A Ver 2.0 – 04/2020 Minor Amendment Specific Items Key thing here is that these types of reviews build upon the designs of old plans that were approved prior. On these projects, it is important to first identify if the proposed changes significantly alter the scope of work in a way that may require additional Control Measures. Many times, these minor amendments are facades or elevation changes and do not affect the erosion control or will not disturb enough new area to trigger erosion control requirements. When the submitted materials for a minor amendment significantly change the area of disturbance, location of site or the scope of work it may require a reevaluation of the materials and potentially trigger a full review of the erosion control materials. It is also important to note that if the materials were approved under prior stormwater criteria, the old project planning materials will need to be brought up and held to the current standards which many times requires the applicant to (re)produce reports, plans, or escrow calculations (see those requirements under the full review process) that meet our current standard. 1) Are all the existing site conditions clearly different than the proposed changes?  Yes  No  N/A 2) If these amendments are of an older project, have those previous materials been updated to fulfill current drainage criteria?  Yes  No  N/A