HomeMy WebLinkAboutWEBERG PUD - FINAL - 76-88G - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTESPLAANG AND ZONING BOARD MINU'I
July 24, 1989
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board was called to order at
6:34 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall West, 300 LaPorte Avenue, Fort
Collins, Colorado. Board members present included: Chairwoman Laurie O'Dell,
Jim Klataske, Rex Burns and Alternate Joe Carroll. Members absent included
Sanford Kern, Lloyd Walker, Jan Shepard and Bernie Strom.
Staff members present included Tom Peterson, Ken Waido, Joe Frank, Ted
Shepard, Linda Ripley, Rick Richter, Paul Eckman, Kari VanMeter, Kayla
Ballard and Georgiana Taylor.
Planning Director Tom Peterson reviewed the Consent and Discussion Agenda.
The Consent Agenda included: Item 1 - Minutes of the June 26 and 28, 1989
meetings; Item 2 - Ed Carroll Volswagen-Audi - Amended PUD - Preliminary
and Final, #133-79A; Item 3 - Centre for Advanced Technology, Congregate
Living PUD - Final, #53-85Y was continued to the August 28, 1989 Board
meeting; Item 4 - Burger King at the Market Place PUD - Final, #21-89B; Item
5 - Graham Bed and Breakfast Inn PUD - Preliminary and Final, #26-89 was
continued to the August 28, 1989 Board meeting; Item 6 - Poudre Valley
Hospital Expansion - Amended PUD - Preliminary and Final, #39-84B; Item 7
-Dellenbach Chevrolet Addition - Amended PUD - Preliminary and Final,
#22-89; Item 8 - Markley Motors Expansion - Amended PUD - Preliminary and
Final, #92-80A; Item 9 - Warren Farms 3rd Filing - Final Subdivision, #53-84G
was continued to the August 28, 1989 Board meeting; Item 10 - Resolution
PZ89-6 - Vacation of a "Phone and T.V." Easement in Tract A of Collindale
PUD '85, #40-89; Item 11 - Allin Annexation and Zoning, #33-89.
Chairwoman O'Dell asked if there were any items that staff, the Board or the
audience wished to have pulled for discussion. There was no response.
Member Klataske moved to approve Consent Items 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11.
Member Burns seconded the motion. Motion to approve passed 4-0.
WEBERG PUD - FINAL - #76-88G
Linda Ripley gave a description of the proposed project.
Frank Vaught represented the applicant. He discussed the six conditions placed
in the preliminary approval which included: 1) provision of mitigation for the
loss of existing trees on the final plans; 2) provision of unified signage design
with the final plans; 3) provision of building elevations greater visual interest
through the use of greater variety in building materials, openings, colors and/or
texture and consistent architectural theme for the entire site; 4) provision of
preliminary design for Fossil Boulevard off -site; 5) evaluation by staff of
fencing along the south property lines; and 6) the annual monitoring of the
drainage filter system with results reported to staff. Mr. Vaught stated that
these conditions have been met.
Lynn Block, 5328 Fossil Ridge Drive, was concerned with the drainage of the
project and Fossil Creek. She stated that there were no assurances with this
drainage. She added that Mail Creek has eroded and feared that this would
happen to Fossil Creek.
Debra Moyer, resident of Fossil Creek subdivision, stated that she also had
concerns with the drainage system.
Chairwoman O'Dell as ed for explanation of the drainage syl*n and the
requirements for how much runoff and problems with the bridge.
Ms. Ripley stated that provisions were made for stormwater detention which
were required by the State Highway Department. She stated that the applicant
would construct a control berm designed to trap pollutants and trash. She
added that the bridge in Fossil Creek which flooded was built below flood
level. The bridge design was reviewed and approved by the County.
Ms. Block commented that the low water bridge had nothing to do with the
flooding that they had just experienced.
Member Strom arrived at this time.
Member Burns asked if Stan Meyers had responses to the property owners
concerns of drainage. He asked if the rate would be the same before and after
development and if it would worsen Fossil Creek.
Stan Meyers, RBD Engineering, explained the 10 year and 100 year historic
rates. He added that there would be a limit in the increase rate. This would
take into consideration the acreage of the overall basin.
Member Burns moved to approve_ Weberg PUD Final. Member Carroll seconded
the motion. Motion to approve carried 5-0.
THE LILY PONDS AT STONEHENGE PUD - PRELIMINARY AND FINAL
-#26-80E
Chairwoman O'Dell abstained from consideration of this item because of a
potential for perception of a conflict of interest.
Ted Shepard gave a description of the proposed project.
Ed Zdenek, Edward G. Zdenek Architects, discussed the history of the site and
the surrounding area, fencing, the proposed courtyards, landscaping, the
proposed larger private yards, access into Parkwood from the site, the exterior
design and elevations, and the continuation of the color of the Vineyards.
Mr. Shepard gave the staff report which recommended approval.
Hulan Winsett, President of the Stonehenge Homeowners' Association, read a
letter the association sent to Mr. Zdenek. It regarded the Stonehenge
Homeowners' Association By -Laws and requirements of the H.O.A.
Mr. Eckman stated that the homeowners' association had private protection
covenants with which the Planning and Zoning Board should not concern
themselves since it was not in their jurisdiction.
Member Carroll moved to approve The Lily Ponds at Stonehenge PUD
Preliminary and Final. Member Burns seconded the motion. The motion carried
4-0.
CACHE PA POUDRE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA (NRA) DRAFT
REPORT
Chairwoman O'Dell resumed the chair at this time.
Kari VanMeter presented slides and discussed the study purpose, location of the
study area, issues and values pertaining to the river, analysis of the historical
-2-