Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWEBERG PUD - PRELIMINARY - 76-88F - CORRESPONDENCE - STORMWATER-RELATED DOCUMENTSUtiiā€¢ Services Stormwater City of Fort Collins HAND DELIVERED April 14, 1989 Mr. Lloyd McLaughlin Mr. Brian Cole RBD, Inc. 2900 South College Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 RE: Weberg PUD Dear Lloyd and Brian: Since there are several outstanding issues and questions on the Weberg PUD site, I wanted to document them in a letter. Last week (April 4, 1989) I met with Kevin Mill (Mill Brothers Nursery) and Bob Wilkinson (Natural Resources Department) to take an up -close look at the pond system located downstream of the Weberg site. We looked at the three ponds, and their connecting channels, ending up at the Cameron Park development. Since you are proposing to drain a portion of the Weberg site into this drainage system I feel it is important for you to be aware of some of the concerns that came up based upon this site visit. 1. Water Quality It looks like you are already making headway on addressing the water quality issues and coming to an agreement with the offsite landowners. It did come up at the site meeting that Mill Brothers does not own the entire pond that is situated directly behind their building. They own only a small portion of it and have rights to pump water out of it. The remainder of the pond is located on property owned by a general partnership. One of the members of this partnership is Paul Heffron. I have spoken with Paul about the site, and he was not aware that the City has required the Developer of the Weberg site to negotiate an agreement with the offsite property owners. Any agreement made must include all of the owners, not just Mill Brothers. 2. On -site Detention and Staged Release Rate Even though the site is located in the Fossil Creek Basin, in which there is not a basin benefit for on -site detention, the particular circumstances of this site (ie: the downstream conditions) necessitate detention. At the initial preliminary review I stated that a staged release rate would be allowed. The question has come up, what storms must be matched? For instance, should the 10 year and 100 year storms be matched? I have had discussions on this with Brian and said that I would discuss this issue with Bob Smith. Both Bob and I agree that the downstream conditions must dictate the allowable release rate. 235 Mathews - P.O. Box 580 - Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 - (303) 221-6389 In your Preliminary Drainage Report there is a description of the outfall of the Weberg site all the way down to Fossil Creek. However, there is not yet an assessment of whether or not the runoff from the developed Weberg site will have an adverse impact on the downstream ponds. The site visit revealed that the embankment of the uppermost pond shows signs of erosion. The only outlets from the two ponds just downstream of the site are "overflow ditches" which carry water down to the next pond. The channel downstream of the middle pond and just upstream from the Cameron Park pond shows severe erosion. What will be the impact of developed flows on these existing facilities? An assessment must be made of these restrictions before a detention release rate can be decided. For instance, a smaller release rate may be required due to the restriction of the overflow ditch capacity. If a larger release rate is desired, perhaps the overflow ditch can be enlarged and stabilized. The increase in volume may necessitate erosion control protection farther downstream. In other words, it is not appropriate to arbitrarily choose a detention release rate. The downstream impacts must be addressed, and then an appropriate release rate chosen. I'd like to point out that the Stormwater Utility does have the authority to impose stricter criteria than the master plan shows if there are downstream impacts which must be mitigated. For your information, I have attached the pertinent sections of our criteria. I have also reviewed the revised Preliminary Drainage Report and Grading Plan. For Preliminary approval it is sufficient, however, prior to Final approval the offsite impacts must be resolved and the agreements with the offsite landowners obtained. Please refer to the revised drainage report and grading plan for additional comments. If you have any questions or comments, or would like to meet to discuss these issues, please call me at 221-6589. Sincerely, Susan Duba Hayes Civil Engineer II cc: Sherry Albertson -Clark, Planner Mike Herzig, Development Review Coordinator Frank Vaught, Vaught -Frye Architects