HomeMy WebLinkAboutFAIRWAY APARTMENTS - FDP210023 - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTSCommunity Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College AvenuePO Box 580Fort Collins, CO 80522970.221.6689970.224.6134 faxfcgov.com/developmentreviewDecember 03, 2021Cathy
Mathis TB GROUP444 Mountain AveBerthoud, CO 80513RE:Fairway Apartments, FDP210023, Round Number 2Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies
for your submittal of Fairway Apartments. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through your Development Review
Coordinator, Tenae Beane via phone at 9702246119 or via email at tbeane@fcgov.com. Comment Summary:Department: Development Review CoordinatorContact: Tenae Beane, 9702246119, tbeane@fcgov.comTopic:
GeneralComment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/08/202110/08/2021: INFORMATION:I will be your primary point of contact throughout the development review and permitting process.
If you have any questions, need additional meetings with the project reviewers, or need assistance throughout the process, please let me know and I can assist you and your team. Please
include me in all email correspondence with other reviewers and keep me informed of any phone conversations. Thank you!Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/08/202110/08/2021:
INFORMATION:As part of your resubmittal you will respond to the comments provided in this letter. This letter is provided to you in Microsoft Word format. Please use this document to
insert responses to each comment for your submittal, using a different font color. When replying to the comment letter please be detailed in your responses, as all comments should be
thoroughly addressed. Provide reference to specific project plans or explanations of why comments have not been addressed, when applicable, avoiding responses like noted or acknowledged.Comment
Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/08/202110/08/2021: INFORMATION:Please follow the Electronic Submittal Requirements and File Naming Standards found at https://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/files/electronic
submittal requirements and file naming standards_v1_8 1 19.pdf?1566857888. File names should begin with the file type, followed by the project information, and round number. Example:
UTILITY PLANS_PROJECT NAME_PDP_Rd2.pdfComment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/08/202110/08/2021: INFORMATION:Resubmittals are accepted any day of the week, with Wednesday
at noon being the cutoff for routing the same week. When you are ready to resubmit your plans, please notify me advanced notice as possible.Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated:
10/08/202110/08/2021: INFORMATION:Temporary Service Changes City of Fort Collins Development ReviewIn order to continue providing thorough reviews and giving every project the attention
it deserves, the City of Fort Collins is implementing temporary changes in how we serve our development customers. As you may be aware, we are experiencing staff shortages in a number
of key departments, which has begun to impact the timeliness of our reviews. We recognize that development and construction play a critical role in our community’s vibrancy and economic
recovery, and we have been exploring options for mitigating impacts to our customers. As a result, we will be making some temporary service changes.Beginning Monday May 10th one additional
week of review time will be added to all 1st and 2nd round submittals (increase from 3 weeks to 4 weeks).Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/08/202110/08/2021: INFORMATION:Development
Review and Building Permit fees are proposed to change January 1st, 2022. The fees are not finalized at this time, but your Development Review Coordinator will keep you updated on the
final amounts.Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/08/202110/08/2021:INFORMATION:LUC 2.211 Lapse, Rounds of Review: Applicants, within one hundred eighty (180) days of
receipt of written comments and notice to respond from the City on any submittal (or subsequent revision to a submittal) of an application for approval of a development plan, shall file
such additional or revised submittal documents as are necessary to address such comments from the City. If the additional submittal information or revised submittal is not filed within
said period of time, the development application shall automatically lapse and become null and void.Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/08/202110/08/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:All
"For Final Approval / For Approval" comments need to be addressed and resolved prior to moving forward with the final documents and recording of this project. I will provide a recording
checklist and process information when we are closer to this step.Department: Planning ServicesContact: Kai Kleer, 9704164284, kkleer@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 11/22/202111/22/2021: FOR APPROVALRegarding the public access easement for the pedestrian spine, the redlines noted that it was added to the plat, however,
deliniation could not be found.Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/22/202111/22/2021: FOR APPROVALRegarding the loss of trees due to underground detention, please mitigate
by adding additional trees to the detention pond on the southeast portion of the site and potentially tighten tree spacing wherever possible. Please work with forestry regarding placement
and species selection.Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/22/202111/22/2021: FOR APPROVALRegarding the Ped Spine entryway feature, please add natual stone and a cap (such
as local sandstone) to the base of the 10x10 posts.Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: Regarding the underground detention, it appears that the placement
of the system will have significant impact to the placement of trees along the parking (beyond the dashed outline that is shown on the site and utility plans). Planning staff does not
support an approach that would require removal of trees in grates.Department: Engineering Development ReviewContact: Marc Virata, 9702216567, mvirata@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment
Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/04/202111/23/2021: for information:The updated design looks to be resolved, but with a remaining concern with Transfort that the pedestrian
path on the STC property would need to be concrete.10/04/2021: for approval:The civil plan should be providing more detail on the work occurring on/around the South Transit Center property
in order to tie into the STC property. The northern pedestrian path ends at a raised curb, it would seem that in maintaining this pedestrian network as a continuous system that would
align with the pedestrian path on the western side of the parking spaces (and access ramps to address the grade change should occur) to provide a logical connection. Input from Transfort
indicates that they are OK to the elimination of the two parking spaces for the applicant to facilitate this. (Is there an existing tree that isn't depicted that would need to be considered?)
With respect to the southern connection, there appears to be the depiction of a culvert, but no labelling. Some sort of culvert would appear to be needed as a concrete channel is present
between the two pedestrian connections.Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/04/202111/23/2021: for approval:Carried over pending final granting of the easement.10/04/2021:
for approval:City Real Estate provided an email prior to hearing that serves as a letter of intent for the willingness to grant a temporary construction easement. The work to be done
on the City property would still need the formal granting of the TCE and should be coordinated with City Real Estate.Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/08/202111/23/2021:
for approval:Carried over as unresolved.10/08/2021: for approval:Please ensure that the areas that are identified as "streetlike private drives" as well as the major walkway spine
bisecting the property are dedicated as access easements. For the streetlike private drives, the full width (including sidewalks) should be dedicated as access easements.Comment Number:
10 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: for approval:Coordination with Stormwater on the review of any existing easements/agreements on the Woodley's property for acceptance
of offsite drainage (and providing the document to the City for review) should occur in order to verify what additional easement/agreement (if any) is needed. Should a deed of dedication
to the City be required, this would be coordinated through Engineering as well for review and acceptance.Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: for approval:The
status of the potential third party ownership along College Avenue and that property being neither the developer or rightofway needs to be resolved prior to final plan approval.Comment
Number: 12 Comment Originated: 12/03/202112/03/2021: for approval:There is an existing access easement referenced on the northern boundary of the site. In looking at the reception
number referenced, I'm not finding that this is an easement. Please double check this reference. Ultimately we're looking to ensure that the pedestrian path along the northern boundary
is in an access easement dedicated to the City (whether existing or proposed.)Department: Transportation PlanningContact: Seth Lorson, 9704164320, slorson@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment
Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/22/202111/22/2021: The sidewalk on the City of Fort Collins property needs to be constructed with concrete to ensure ADA access and for ease
of maintenance.Department: Traffic OperationContact: Spencer Smith, 9702216820, smsmith@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/22/202111/22/2021:
FOR FINAL APPROVALPlease add a stop sign to the outbound movement of the site access to Fairway Lane.Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/22/202111/22/2021: FOR FINAL
APPROVALI'm a bit confused on what is proposed for the raised/enhanced pedestrian crossings within the site. The Plan Notes on sheet 3.0 of the utility plans only reference a "Raised
Pedestrian Crossing". There are several different pedestrian crossing details included in the plans that are not shown or called out on the plans. Also, the raised ped. crossing detail
is a City of Loveland detail. Let's make sure that the crossing types are clear on the plans and all necessary details are included in the detail sheets, with no extraneous ones. Also,
I'd like to discuss the crosswalks shown on either side of the proposed emergency access lane on the north side of the site. I don't think the City would typically want to see painted
crosswalks here, but it is private property and not necessarily our determination. If the applicant and/or their consultants want the crosswalk's painted here, that is fine, but I'd
like to discuss if they are needed or not.Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/24/202111/24/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVALThe pedestrian spine crosswalks should be designed
similar to the one near the intersection of Willow and Pine, including the signage, etc. I can provide you with the design drawings from that project. Please contact me to coordinate.Department:
Erosion ControlContact: Basil Hamdan, 9702221801, bhamdan@fcgov.comTopic: Erosion ControlComment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/01/202110/01/2021: INFORMATION ONLY:The
City Manager’s development review fee schedule under City Code 7.52 was updated to include fees for Erosion Control and Stormwater Inspections. As of January 1st, 2021, these fees will
be collected on all projects for such inspections. The Erosion Control fees are based on; the number of building permits onlots, the total site disturbance, the estimated number of
years the project will be active and the Stormwater Inspection Fees are based on the number of LID/WQ Features that are designed for on this project. Based on the proposed site construction
associated with this project we are assuming 16 building permits, 10.5 acres of disturbance, 1 year from demo through build out of construction and an additional 3 years till full vegetative
stabilization due to seeding. Which results in an Erosion Control Fee estimate of $1,887.83.Based on 1 extended detention basin, and 2 underground treatment systems, the estimate of
the Stormwater LID/WQ Inspection fee is $1,080.Please note that as the plans and any subsequent review modifications of the abovementioned values change the fees may need to be modified.
I have provided a copy of the spreadsheet used to arrive at these estimates for your review.Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/18/202111/18/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL
[UPDATED]:Please address the last comment on the redlined Utility Plans. All remaining comments and redlines have been addressed.10/01/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:Please address all redlines
on Erosion Control Plans and report notably the plans need to protect the neighboring streets and properties better and clarify plans to show all construction impacts more clearly.
The erosion control security estimate will need to be adjusted as these comments are addressed.Department: Stormwater EngineeringContact: Wes Lamarque, 9704162418, wlamarque@fcgov.comTopic:
GeneralComment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/05/202110/05/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:The southern LID Stormtech underground water quality system is proposed in a place that
is not possible with all the existing trees that must be preserved. The site's water quality design, as proposed, is unfeasible as shown, and a considerable revision to either the method
of treatment, or site layout may be needed to resolve this issue. There does not seam to be another location where an underground treatment facility can be placed with the current site
plan.Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:The grading plan is incomplete as it is missing spot elevations throughout the site and
in the detention pond. Please update.Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:Please label BTW and TOW elevations along the detention
pond retaining wall. Please identify and label the pond emergency spillway as well on the Grading Plan.Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: FOR FINAL
APPROVAL:Please add "Basin Summary" and "Detention Pond Summary" tables to the Drainage Plan.Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:Detention
Ponds 4 feet or higher require a depth gage. Please add to plans.Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:Please use and add to the
Utility Plans the City's standard water quality outlet structure.Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:The Utility Plans do not include
the Stormtech design and details for construction. Please include these in the plan set with all necessary information including elevations, manifolds, WQ weirs, etc.Comment Number:
11 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:The Utility plan appears to show just a schematic of the Stormtech chamber system and does not show how this
will operate and connect to the storm sewer with the inflow and outflow points to the two systems. Please revise.Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: FOR
FINAL APPROVAL:The Landscape plan needs to show the storm sewers with the appropriate linework similar to the Utility Plan to better determine spacing from trees. Also, the Underground
Stormtech system needs to be shown on the Landscape Plan with trees 10 feet from the system and all incoming and outgoing storm sewers.Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated:
11/23/202111/23/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:Drainage easements are required for the two Stormtech underground water quality systems.Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021:
FOR FINAL APPROVAL:Inspection ports are needed for all rows in the Stormtech chambers.Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:Formalization
of the easement/permission for the drainage outfall is required before project approvals. This is to include any maintenance agreements and be filed with the County.Department: Light
And PowerContact: Rob Irish, 9702246167, rirish@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/05/202111/23/2021: Updated: Lights are still shown right
on SS in some spots. Have any discussions happened with South Fort Collins Sanitation with regard to separation requirements? Please adjust lights as far away as possible and get confirmation
from SFCS. These will need to be breakaway lights with a concrete base approx..30 inch in diameter and 9 feet deep. 10/05/2021: For Final Approval: The proposed streetlights shown along
the College Ave. frontage are not meeting separation requirements from sanitary sewer. Please relocate the lights so they are not conflicting with any other utilities. The number and
location of lights will approx.. match the existing lights on the east side of College Ave.Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/05/202111/23/2021: Updated: Need to make
sure the primary routing shown behind the walk and the streetlights in the parkway are going to be acceptable with existing utilities. 10/05/2021: For Final Approval: Please show an
electric running line along the College Ave. frontage the entire distance of the site meeting all separation requirements from other utilities.Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated:
10/05/202111/23/2021: Updated: A few of the transformer locations proposed are in conflict with proposed trees. For instance, at the NE and SE corners of building 4 there is a transformer
and switch cabinet proposed that are in conflict with proposed trees. Please correct this conflict and make sure there are no other conflicts between the Landscape Plan and the Utility
Plan. 10/05/2021: For Final Approval: A few of the proposed transformer locations appear to not meet separation requirements from storm water. I believe this would require 6 foot of
separation if considered private. Please verify and make adjustments.Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/05/202111/23/2021: Updated: Will need this before final approval.10/05/2021:
For Final Approval: A Customer Service Information form (C1 form) and a oneline diagram for all commercial meters will need to be completed and submitted to Light & Power Engineering
for review prior to Final Plan. A link to the C1 form is below:http://zeus.fcgov.com/utilsprocedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C1Form.pdfComment Number: 8 Comment Originated:
10/05/202112/01/2021: Updated: PLease show power in the proposed parkway along Fairway Ln for the length of the site. We will have a streetlight out there also.10/05/2021: For Final
Approval: The plans show removal of the existing attached sidewalk along Fairway Ln. Please show primary electric running in the parkway along Fairway Ln for the length of the site.Comment
Number: 10 Comment Originated: 12/01/202112/01/2021: For Final Approval: Plan set shows power running between buildings 4 and 5 and the proposed garages. Light & Power has
some concerns with running in this space especially between building 4 and the garage. It looks a little tight if we ever had to replace the conduit in that location. Lets see if we
can work together to find a solution.Department: ForestryContact: Christine Holtz, choltz@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/22/202111/22/2021:
FOR FINAL APPROVAL: There are multiple unlabeled trees on the landscape plan (see Forestry redlines). Please label trees for the final landscape plan.Comment Number: 7 Comment
Originated: 11/22/202111/22/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL The inventory table on page 6 of the landscape plan is missing trees 83 and 84. Please adjust the table so all trees are listed.Comment
Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVALOn the northeast corner of building 4, there is a transformer proposed where a tree is proposed (see
forestry redlines). Please shift the transformer so the tree can stay.Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: REVISED FOR FINAL APPROVALPlease increase
the number of trees you’re mitigating back onsite. There is room in the detention area (see forestry redlines). Certain native trees can be planted in detention areas such as peachleaf
willow, plains cottonwood, and lanceleaf cottonwood. Additionally, conifers can work well in these areas such as ponderosa pine, rocky mountain junipers, southwest white pine, and blue
spruce.Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVALThe trees proposed on the northeast end of building 1, are too close to the proposed
stormtech system. Please discuss with stormwater and shift the system so the trees can remain.Department: Environmental PlanningContact: Scott Benton, (970)4164290, sbenton@fcgov.comTopic:
GeneralComment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/04/202110/04/2021: No comments.Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: INFORMATION ONLY: Please
keep me abreast of the tree removal timeline. If tree removal occurs during the songbird nesting season (Feb 1 to July 31) then a nesting survey is required.Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: INFORMATION ONLY: If additional trees are located in the southeast detention pond then consideration should be given to the seed mix to
avoid initial establishment and longterm vegetative cover issues. Many native seed mixes do not handle excessive shade well.Department: Building ServicesContact: Katy Hand, khand@fcgov.comTopic:
Building Insp Plan ReviewComment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/04/202110/04/2021: FOR BUILDING PERMIT: Each structure requires a separate building permit including each
garage. 11/22/21: This also includes: Play structures, pergolas, bike/mail shelters, shade structures, pools.Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/04/202110/04/2021: FOR
BUILDING PERMIT: 10% of all parking spaces must be EV ready (conduit in place) ***Including Accessible parking.Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/22/202111/22/2021 FOR
BUILDING PERMITMultifamily Residential located within 1000ft of rail tracks, 500 of highway, or 250ft of a 4 lane road must provide exterior wall composite sound transmission of 39 STC
min.Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/22/202111/22/2021: RECOMMENDED Locate buildings 10ft from property lines and 20 feet from other buildings or provide fire rated
walls with limited openings (i.e. reduced doors and windows).Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/22/202111/22/2021: FOR BUILDING PERMIT: If trash chutes are proposed
in the building, dedicated recycle chutes must also be provided.Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 11/22/202111/22/2021: FOR BUILDING PERMIT:Accessibility is required per
IBC, ICCA117.1 and state law CRS 95Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 11/22/202111/22/2021: FOR BUILDING PERMIT:Exit stair enclosures cannot be used for any other purpose
other than egress (i.e. no bike racks, mail, or storage)Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 11/22/202111/22/2021: FOR BUILDING PERMIT:A City licensed commercial general
contractor is required to construct any new multifamily structure.Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 11/22/202111/22/2021: BUILDING PERMIT PRESUBMITTAL MEETING:Please
work with your review coordinator to schedule a building permit presubmittal meeting for any new commercial or multifamily building with Building Services for this project. PreSubmittal
meetings assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the design, that the new projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards. This should
be scheduled when architectural drawings are at least 50% complete. Be prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square
footage, type of construction, egress, accessibility, and energy compliance.Contact: Lauren Wade, 9703025962, lwade@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 1 Comment Originated:
09/23/202109/23/2021: INFORMATION ONLY:INFORMATION: Please provide floor plans for unit addressing of the apartments.Department: Technical ServicesContact: Jeff County, 9702216588,
jcounty@fcgov.comTopic: Construction DrawingsComment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/04/202111/22/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:All Benchmark Statements must match on all sheets.10/04/2021:
FOR FINAL APPROVAL:The City has moved to the NAVD88 vertical datum, and as of January 1, 2015, all projects are required to be on NAVD88 datum. Please provide the following information
for the Benchmark Statement in the EXACT format shown below.PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTIONELEVATION:BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTIONELEVATION:PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS
USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM
(PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) = NAVD88 DATUM X.XX’.Comment
Number: 10 Comment Originated: 10/04/202111/22/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVALUNRESOLVED & UPDATED:There are line over text issues. See redlines.10/04/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:There
are line over text issues. See redlines.Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 10/05/202111/22/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVALUNRESOLVED & UPDATED:There are text over text issues.
See redlines.10/05/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:There are text over text issues. See redlines.Topic: EasementsComment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 11/23/202111/23/2021: FOR
FINAL APPROVAL:There are some issues. See redlines.Topic: Landscape PlansComment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/04/202111/22/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:There are line over
text issues. See redlines.10/04/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:There are line over text issues. See redlines.Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 11/22/202111/22/2021: FOR FINAL
APPROVAL:There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines.Topic: PlatComment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/04/202111/22/2021: FOR FINAL
APPROVALUPDATED:Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide
any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. If you have any specific questions about the redlines, please contact John Von Nieda at 9702216565 or jvonnieda@fcgov.com10/04/2021:
FOR FINAL APPROVAL:Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide
any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. If you have any specific questions about the redlines, please contact John Von Nieda at 9702216565 or jvonnieda@fcgov.comTopic:
Site PlanComment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 11/22/202111/22/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:There are line over text issues. See redlines.Department: Outside AgenciesContact:
Sam Lowe, FCLWD, slowe@fcgov.com, 9702263104, Topic: GeneralComment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/05/202111/22/2021: Please see attached for FCLWD comments.10/05/2021:
Please attached for the Districts' comments.Department: Water ConservationContact: Eric Olson, 9702216704, eolson@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 1 Comment Originated:
09/29/202109/29/2021: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J)
of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 2216704 or eolson@fcgov.com