HomeMy WebLinkAboutFAIRWAY APARTMENTS - FDP210023 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
1
Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6689 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview RESPONSES
October 08, 2021
Cathy Mathis
TB GROUP
444 Mountain Ave
Berthoud, CO 80513
RE: Fairway Apartments, FDP210023, Round Number 1
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing
agencies for your submittal of Fairway Apartments. If you have questions about any
comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through your
Development Review Coordinator, Tenae Beane via phone at 970-224-6119 or via email
at tbeane@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Development Review Coordinator
Contact: Tenae Beane, 970-224-6119, tbeane@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/08/2021
10/08/2021: INFORMATION:
I will be your primary point of contact throughout the development review and
permitting process. If you have any questions, need additional meetings with the
project reviewers, or need assistance throughout the process, please let me
know and I can assist you and your team. Please include me in all email
correspondence with other reviewers and keep me informed of any phone
conversations. Thank you!
Response: SS Acknowledged
2
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/08/2021
10/08/2021: INFORMATION:
As part of your resubmittal you will respond to the comments provided in this
letter. This letter is provided to you in Microsoft Word format. Please use this
document to insert responses to each comment for your submittal, using a
different font color. When replying to the comment letter please be detailed in
your responses, as all comments should be thoroughly addressed. Provide
reference to specific project plans or explanations of why comments have not
been addressed, when applicable, avoiding responses like noted or
acknowledged.
Response: SS Acknowledged
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/08/2021
10/08/2021: INFORMATION:
Please follow the Electronic Submittal Requirements and File Naming
Standards found at https://www.fcgov.com/developmentreview/files/electronic
submittal requirements and file naming standards_v1_8 1 19.pdf?1566857888.
File names should begin with the file type, followed by the project information,
and round number. Example: UTILITY PLANS_PROJECT
NAME_PDP_Rd2.pdf
Response: SS Acknowledged
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/08/2021
10/08/2021: INFORMATION:
Resubmittals are accepted any day of the week, with Wednesday at noon being
the cut-off for routing the same week. When you are ready to resubmit your
plans, please notify me advanced notice as possible.
Response: SS Acknowledged
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/08/2021
10/08/2021: INFORMATION:
Temporary Service Changes - City of Fort Collins Development Review
In order to continue providing thorough reviews and giving every project the
attention it deserves, the City of Fort Collins is implementing temporary
changes in how we serve our development customers. As you may be aware,
we are experiencing staff shortages in a number of key departments, which has
begun to impact the timeliness of our reviews. We recognize that development
and construction play a critical role in our community’s vibrancy and economic
recovery, and we have been exploring options for mitigating impacts to our
customers. As a result, we will be making some temporary service changes.
Beginning Monday May 10th one additional week of review time will be added
to all 1st and 2nd round submittals (increase from 3 weeks to 4 weeks).
Response: SS Acknowledged
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/08/2021
10/08/2021: INFORMATION:
3
Development Review and Building Permit fees are proposed to change
January 1st, 2022. The fees are not finalized at this time, but your Development
Review Coordinator will keep you updated on the final amounts.
Response: SS Acknowledged
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/08/2021
10/08/2021:INFORMATION:
LUC 2.211 Lapse, Rounds of Review: Applicants, within one hundred eighty
(180) days of receipt of written comments and notice to respond from the City
on any submittal (or subsequent revision to a submittal) of an application for
approval of a development plan, shall file such additional or revised submittal
documents as are necessary to address such comments from the City. If the
additional submittal information or revised submittal is not filed within said
period of time, the development application shall automatically lapse and
become null and void.
Response: SS Acknowledged
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/08/2021
10/08/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
All "For Final Approval / For Approval" comments need to be addressed and
resolved prior to moving forward with the final documents and recording of this
project. I will provide a recording checklist and process information when we
are closer to this step.
Response: SS Acknowledged
Department: Planning Services
Contact: Kai Kleer, 970-416-4284, kkleer@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021 FOR APPROVAL:
There are numerous redlines in the elevation, site plan, and plat. Redlines
include:
Correcting callouts and naming.
Unifying line work and plan updates between the site, landscape, elevation,
lighting, and utility plans.
Addressing the private street building and landscape setback issues with
garages and parking lot on the north side of the site.
Providing detail of pedestrian spine entry feature.
Adding plan notes that clarify the conditions and modifications that were
approved at the hearing.
Sorting through curb ramps and raised walkway for the pedestrian spine.
Trash enclosure on the southeast portion of the site and ensuring that risk of
bumping into adjacent vehicles is minimized.
Add a parking note to the title sheet regarding garages.
Response: Redlines have been addressed.
Callouts and naming have been corrected.
All plans should be coordinated.
4
Setback issues have been addressed.
Pedestrian spine portal has been detailed in landscape sheets.
Notes added where appropriate.
Curb ramps have been added.
Trash enclosure has been modified.
Parking note regarding garage parking has been added to the site plan cover sheet.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021 FOR APPROVAL:
Please add the following language to the title page of the site plan set.
Response: Unable to address, no language provided.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: for approval:
The civil plan should be providing more detail on the work occurring on/around
the South Transit Center property in order to tie into the STC property. The
northern pedestrian path ends at a raised curb, it would seem that in
maintaining this pedestrian network as a continuous system that would align
with the pedestrian path on the western side of the parking spaces (and access
ramps to address the grade change should occur) to provide a logical
connection. Input from Transfort indicates that they are OK to the elimination of
the two parking spaces for the applicant to facilitate this. (Is there an existing
tree that isn't depicted that would need to be considered?) With respect to the
southern connection, there appears to be the depiction of a culvert, but no
labelling. Some sort of culvert would appear to be needed as a concrete
channel is present between the two pedestrian connections.
Response: SS - we have been working through these details and the North Transit center walk has
been laid out per the recent email response from Kai (dated October 25, 2021). The middle
connection to the Transit center has been detailed out more. As was previously shown in the plans, a
sidewalk chase is required to convey the Transit Center’s gutter flow as it does in its existing
condition.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: for approval:
City Real Estate provided an email prior to hearing that serves as a letter of
intent for the willingness to grant a temporary construction easement. The work
to be done on the City property would still need the formal granting of the TCE
and should be coordinated with City Real Estate.
Response: SS - Ownership is working with Keith (COFC Real Estate) with regarding to the temporary
construction easements (TCE’s).
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: for approval:
5
An exhibit was provided from John Tufte for the northeast corner of the site that
showed the relocation of a fiber optic pedestal, the final plan submittal now
shows this as being protected in place in the existing conditions sheet, which
would appear to conflict with the new sidewalk based upon the exhibit that was
previously provided (but not included in the submittal). Please clarify. The
southeast corner is showing on Sheet C4.3 that a pedestal is being protected in
place that's directly in conflict with the sidewalk. More detail on the northeast
and southeast corners of the site is needed showing how the sidewalk and
access ramps are to be constructed with utility facilities being separated from
them a minimum of 1 foot as prescribed in LCUASS Figure 16-1.
Response: SS - The utility plans have been clarified to reflect the exhibits that John and Marc (along
with others) worked through. The trees have also been moved away from the utilities and placed on
the west side of the walk along College Ave.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: for approval:
In general, the grading plan is lacking spot elevation and percent grade type
information along the College Avenue and Fairway Lane sidewalks (in addition
to the previously referenced areas along/within the South Transit Center.) The
plans should be demonstrating that City and ADA access requirements are
being met.
Response: SS - The utility plans include additional spot elevations, surface slopes, and ramps
supporting accessibility.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: for approval:
The tree placement of some trees along College Avenue isn't further west to be
out of the theoretical future College Avenue roadway. The response pre-hearing
was that a FCLWD facility was in conflict. With the plans still reflecting the trees
in the potential future roadway, we should verify if CDOT is OK with this,
otherwise we should be looking at other options to not place the trees in a
location that would ultimately be removed.
Response: SS – An exhibit was provided to Marc and Kai and Jeff (owner) on October 25, 2021. We
have revised the plans to reflect that tree layout.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: for approval:
For any stairs being shown as a linkage to a street sidewalk, please ensure and
depict that a minimum of 1' of landing occurs and that a step does not directly
abut the sidewalk.
Response: SS – A minimum of 1’ of landing is provided between steps and public sidewalk along
streets.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: for approval:
An offsite deed of dedication for the emergency access easement should be
worked on with a legal description for the area being dedicated provided for
review. The dedication requires a $250 fee and more information on the
process, including the emergency access easement template can be found
6
here: https://www.fcgov.com/engineering/devrev.php#cb-38308-6601
Response: SS – Ownership and adjacent property previously completed an emergency access
easement connection.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: information only:
Has it been confirmed whether the units can be accessed off of College and/or
Fairway and that name private drives would not be required? (Coordination
with GIS and/or PFA may be needed in this regard.) The establishment of any
private street names would need to occur via the plat.
Response: SS – Acknowledged
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Steve Gilchrist, 970-224-6175, sgilchrist@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Within the Traffic Signing and
Pavement Marking Construction Notes, all references to the "Local Entity
Engineer" should be changed to the City of Fort Collins Traffic Engineer.
Response: SS – Revised.
Department: Erosion Control
Contact: Basil Hamdan, 970-222-1801, bhamdan@fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/01/2021
10/01/2021: INFORMATION ONLY:
The City Manager’s development review fee schedule under City Code 7.5-2
was updated to include fees for Erosion Control and Stormwater Inspections.
As of January 1st, 2021, these fees will be collected on all projects for such
inspections.
The Erosion Control fees are based on; the number of building permits on lots,
the total site disturbance, the estimated number of years the project will be
active and the Stormwater Inspection Fees are based on the number of LID/WQ
Features that are designed for on this project.
Based on the proposed site construction associated with this project we are
assuming 16 building permits, 10.5 acres of disturbance, 1 year from demo
through build out of construction and an additional 3 years till full vegetative
stabilization due to seeding. Which results in an Erosion Control Fee estimate
of $1,887.83.
Based on 1 extended detention basin, and 2 underground treatment systems,
the estimate of the Stormwater LID/WQ Inspection fee is $1,080.
Please note that as the plans and any subsequent review modifications of the
7
above-mentioned values change the fees may need to be modified. I have
provided a copy of the spreadsheet used to arrive at these estimates for your
review.
Response: SS – We are in agreement with the assumptions and fees outlined above.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/01/2021
10/01/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please address all redlines on Erosion Control Plans and report notably the
plans need to protect the neighboring streets and properties better and clarify
plans to show all construction impacts more clearly.
The erosion control security estimate will need to be adjusted as these
comments are addressed.
Response: SS – The referenced redlines have been addressed and responses are provided with this
submittal. Additional street sweeping has been assumed and reflected in the updated EC security
estimate provided in the EC Report.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
The southern LID Stormtech underground water quality system is proposed in a
place that is not possible with all the existing trees that must be preserved. The
site's water quality design, as proposed, is unfeasible as shown, and a
considerable revision to either the method of treatment, or site layout may be
needed to resolve this issue. There does not seam to be another location
where an underground treatment facility can be placed with the current site plan.
Response: SS – The existing trees are proposed to be removed to accommodate the installation of
the Stormtech chamber systems.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021: INFORMATION ONLY:
Once the LID treatment design is complete and feasible with the site layout, a
detailed drainage review will conducted as changes are anticipated with the
drainage design.
Response: SS – Noted. The Stormtech chambers locations are unchanged from previous submittal.
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Rob Irish, 970-224-6167, rirish@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021: For Final Approval: The proposed streetlights shown along the
College Ave. frontage are not meeting separation requirements from sanitary
sewer. Please relocate the lights so they are not conflicting with any other
utilities. The number and location of lights will approx.. match the existing lights
8
on the east side of College Ave.
Response: SS – Per out discussion with you, the street lights were adjusted to be across the street
from those on the east side off of future back of walk. We will coordinate separately with SFCSD to
make sure light locations are acceptable.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021: For Final Approval: Please show an electric running line along the
College Ave. frontage the entire distance of the site meeting all separation
requirements from other utilities.
Response: SS – Per our discussion with you, a schematic line is shown on utility plan for the
electricity along College avenue. We will continue to coordinate this alignment with you.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021: For Final Approval: If the proposed utility easement needs to be
used along the College Ave. frontage, will there be balconies or door overhangs
or other obstructions protruding into the proposed 15' easement? This could
narrow the space to be used by utility companies.
Response: SS – Easements are shown and buildings were adjusted.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021: For Final Approval: Primary electric routing does not appear to be
shown on the plan set. Please indicate where you intend to have Light & Power
facilities running through the site so we can have a conversation. For instance,
are you intending for the electric to run under the parking or behind the
sidewalk?
Response: SS – Per our discussion with you, schematic primary line routing is shown on utility plan.
We will continue to coordinate this routing with you.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021: For Final Approval: A few of the proposed transformer locations
appear to not meet separation requirements from storm water. I believe this
would require 6 foot of separation if considered private. Please verify and make
adjustments.
Response: SS – Transformers now have adequate separation as shown. We will make sure that this
continues to be the case as design finalizes.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021: For Final Approval: Response letter indicated a blanket utility
easement for the site but it appears that a number of the electric facilities are
not within a Utility easement. Any proposed electric infrastructure that needs to
be installed, relocated or modified as part of this project, will be at the expense
of the developer and will need to be located within Public Right-of-Way or a
dedicated easement. Please coordinate relocations with Light and Power Engineering.
Response: SS – A blanket dry utility easement is now defined/stated in the submitted plat.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021: For Final Approval: A Customer Service Information form (C-1
form) and a one-line diagram for all commercial meters will need to be
9
completed and submitted to Light & Power Engineering for review prior to Final
Plan. A link to the C-1 form is below:
http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils-procedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C-1Form.pdf
Response: This information has been provided with the exception of the C-1 for the clubhouse which
will be provided to you as prior to final design.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021: For Final Approval: The plans show removal of the existing
attached sidewalk along Fairway Ln. Please show primary electric running in
the parkway along Fairway Ln for the length of the site.
Response: We are showing primary line routing as discussed. We will continue to work with you on
final routing.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021: For Final Approval: It maybe necessary for Light & Power to bring
electric into the site from Fossil Blvd. Would it be possible to bring it through the
dog park or near the dog park?
Response: SS – We have shown the routing as discussed with you.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Christine Holtz, choltz@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021: INFORMATION ONLY FOR FINAL APPROVAL
Thank you for preserving 7 existing large ash trees onsite. The emerald ash
borer was found in Fort Collins in May of 2020, and will be here permanently
from now on. This beetle will eventually cause 100% mortality in ash trees that
are untreated. Please consider creating a management plan to treat the ash
trees on your property. Forestry is treating strategically selected City ash trees
with systemic injections of emamectin benzoate, which is the most effective
form of treatment on larger diameter trees. Forestry is happy to provide a list of
plant health care companies that are licensed in Fort Collins to treat ash trees,
and provide any additional information necessary.
Response: As discussed with Forestry these trees unfortunately were unable to be saved due to the
requirement to install stormtech chambers in this area. Cash in lieu will be paid for the ash trees that
are being removed. Please refer to tree feasibility letter for details.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL
Although planetrees do okay in Fort Collins, they do have an above average
percent mortality. Please consider reducing the number being planted and
adding another species such as Kentucky coffeetree.
Response: Planetrees have been removed and replaced with a different tree species as shown on
the landscape plan.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10
10/05/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL
Please sub a different species for English oaks such as heritage oaks, or bur
oaks or a combination of both. English oaks do not tolerate cold winters, and
often become chlorotic in the summers.
Response: English Oaks have been removed.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL
The Final Erosion and Drainage report indicates a new and/or modified
impervious area is proposed in the exact location of 7 large ash trees that are
proposed to remain. Please address this issue. Forestry is willing to meet
offline if necessary.
Response: The trees that were previously shown to remain are now shown as being removed due to
the location of stormtech chambers. Forestry was contacted “offline” and this issue has been
resolved.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL
There are inconsistencies in the inventory table, the existing tree removal
feasibility letter, and the landscape plans with tree numbers 127 and 134 in
regards to whether they are being retained or removed. Please fix the
inconsistencies so the correct mitigation can be calculated.
Response: The tree removal and feasibility letter has been revised and coordinated with Forestry.
Department: PFA
Contact: Marcus Glasgow, 970-416-2869, marcus.glasgow@poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/30/2021
09/30/2021: FIRE LANE
A note shall be added to the civil plans indicating the fire lane is capable of
supporting 40 tons.
Response: SS – A note was added to the plan on notes sheet and overall site
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/01/2021
10/01/2021: FIRE DEPARTMENT HOSE CONNECTION
- IFC 912.2: Fire Department Connections shall be installed in accordance with
NFPA standards. Fire department connections shall be located on the street
side of buildings, fully visible and recognizable from the street or nearest point
of fire department vehicle access. The location of fire service lines and FDC(s)
shall be approved by the fire department and the location labeled on Utility
Plans.
Response: SS – FDC’s are shown on the utility plans
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Scott Benton, (970)416-4290, sbenton@fcgov.com
11
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: No comments.
Response: Acknowledged
Department: Building Services
Contact: Katy Hand, khand@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Insp Plan Review
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021:
FOR BUILDING PERMIT:
Please visit our website for current adopted codes, local amendments and
submittal requirements.
https://www.fcgov.com/building/application.php
https://www.fcgov.com/building/codes.php
https://www.fcgov.com/building/energycode
Response: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR BUILDING PERMIT: Each structure requires a separate
building permit including each garage.
Response: Acknowledged.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR BUILDING PERMIT: 10% of all parking spaces must be EV
ready (conduit in place) - ***Including Accessible parking.
Response: Acknowledged.
Contact: Lauren Wade, 970-302-5962, lwade@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/23/2021
09/23/2021: INFORMATION ONLY:
INFORMATION: Please provide floor plans for unit addressing of the
apartments.
Response: Acknowledged.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Response: Revised
12
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please revise the sub-title as marked. See redlines.
Response: SS – revised
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
The City has moved to the NAVD88 vertical datum, and as of January 1, 2015,
all projects are required to be on NAVD88 datum. Please provide the following
information for the Benchmark Statement in the EXACT format shown below.
Response: SS – benchmark information is updated
PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL
DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29
UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR
THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS.
IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS
DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION
SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF
FORT COLLINS DATUM) = NAVD88 DATUM - X.XX’.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Response: SS – We have tried to address line over text issues
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
10/05/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
There are text over text issues. See redlines.
Response: SS – Noted and addressed
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
The titles need to match on all plan sets. See redlines.
Response: SS – Addressed
13
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the
noted sheets. See redlines.
Response: Titles and indexes have been revised.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Response: Acknowledged and revised.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree
with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not
made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response
letter. If you have any specific questions about the redlines, please contact John
Von Nieda at 970-221-6565 or jvonnieda@fcgov.com
Response: SS – Noted. See provided revised plat.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Please revise the sub-title as marked. See redlines.
Response: Index Fixed – landscape sheets were removed and are now in their own set
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 10/04/2021
10/04/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:
Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the
noted sheets. See redlines.
Response: See above.
Department: Outside Agencies
Contact: Don Kapperman, Comcast, don_kapperman@comcast.com,
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/14/2021
09/14/2021: Comcast does not have any issues at this time. Thank you
Response: Acknowledged
Contact: Sam Lowe, FCLWD, slowe@fcgov.com, 970-226-3104,
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 10/05/2021
14
10/05/2021: Please attached for the Districts' comments.
Response: SS – We have been working with the District.
Department: Water Conservation
Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/29/2021
09/29/2021: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building
permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section
3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation
requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com
Response: Acknowledged.