HomeMy WebLinkAboutFOSSIL CREEK DESIGN CENTER PUD - 94-88A - MINUTES/NOTES - MEETING COMMUNICATIONso
INFORMATION MEETING
Fossil Creek Design Center PUD (formerly Carpet Exchange)
February 22, 1989
Engineering Conference Room
An information meeting was held on February 22, 1989 on the
Fossil Creek Design Center PUD to discuss the extension of Snead Drive to
Fossil Creek Parkway. In attendance were: Dan Hunter and Ken Goff,
Hunter Architectural Group; Mike Lohz, Stewart Associates; Mike Herzig,
Development Coordinator; Joe Frank, Assistant Planning Director; Sherry
Albertson -Clark, Project Planner and ten residents of the Fossil Creek Meadows
area.
The following summarizes the discussion that took place and the questions and
comments made by residents:
Ken Goff discussed the changes that have been made on the plan since the last
neighborhood meeting. Included, is the building height reduction (4-6') and
provision of a 6' cedar fence to screen the service area until the remainder of
the building is completed.
1. How would parking be phased? What would happen to the turf area until
the rest of the building were built? Concerned about erosion.
2. What would happen to the sandstone outcropping on the site? Suggest it be
used for landscaping site.
3. What is the square footage for phase V phase 2?
4. What is the elevation of the building, with respect to the street elevation
(Snead Drive)?
5. How many trees are being saved? What is the size of proposed trees?
6. How is loading area being screened? How large is service area?
7. Could there be a sketch done to show the building, with respect to existing
site contours?
8. Where are the closest houses to the proposed connection of Snead Drive?
9. Are the same type of uses still proposed (ie. home improvement)?
10. What are building colors?
r^.
Page 2
11. How large is the parking area (in square footage)? Where are tree
loca-
tions in the parking area?
12. What is planned signage?
13. How would lighting be handled? How long would lights be on?
14. Can you control hours of operation (especially closing)?
15. What is the separation between the access point on College and Fossil
Creek
Parkway? Concerned about safety with accel/decel occurring in same area, up
a hill.
16. Why does Snead Drive need to be extended south?
17. How is drainage being handled? Concerned that drainage volumes
from
this site would affect Fossil Creek channel.
18. Can anything be done to detain on -site?
19. What is impact on Fossil Creek Parkway, with Snead connection?
Con-
cerned that more traffic would be using the only access into Fossil
Creek
Meadows.
20. Could final plan be approved without Snead connection? Seems
to be
integral part of plan.
21. How many access points are on College? Concerned about safety.
22. What about drains under College? Is this drainage being handled with
this
project?
23. What would happen in buffer strip along Snead Drive extended?
The meeting adjourned at 9:00 P.M.
11L
l r�L L,ti Cr c-2 sZGs Of /z/06.,�
Y 5�2-64 Fdss,l pld .f-1 Ir.
G
n ne e)( .-3Zy Qd D�(� ; -(° 8o s zs
U(l` Vbr�ISUn J Cr
-De oC,4 No ll r U J een U
! 7vl (3 Yaad yaw �/
_ '-�okD mac, � �-'c
�t 532; J-?,ss,` it, 4r byz r C
AN44�NN .
- Dd /