Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSANCTUARY ON THE GREEN - PDP210018 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - CORRESPONDENCE1 Sam Coutts From:David Pretzler <David@cacompanies.com> Sent:Tuesday, October 26, 2021 12:17 PM To:Sam Coutts Subject:FW: Sanctuary modification option David Pretzler C&A Companies 7991 Shaffer Parkway, Suite 200 Littleton, CO 80127 Direct: 303-389-6780 Fax: 303-639-5110 Cell: 303-941-2386 www.cacompanies.com From: Rebecca Everette [mailto:reverette@fcgov.com] Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 9:22 PM To: David Pretzler; Stephanie Hansen Cc: Todd Sullivan; Jason Holland; Paul S. Sizemore; Brad Yatabe Subject: RE: Sanctuary modification option Hi David and Stephanie, I’ve been coordinating with our legal staff and the CDNS Director, and we’ve identified two possible paths forward: 1. Proceed with the remainder of the P&Z hearing with the existing plan as previously proposed, including any changes or additional justification needed to address the modification request that was not approved. Basically, see the process through with the existing plan. 2. If you want to proceed with changes to replace the multi-family with single-family attached, the P&Z Commission would no longer have jurisdiction and could not hear the item. So, the application would need to be withdrawn and resubmitted for review as a Type 1 project. a. To ensure that the record would start clean for the project (i.e., making sure the hearing officer isn’t considering testimony from the prior P&Z hearing), this would need to be a new application with new fees. b. The proposed changes are substantial enough that the 6-month resubmittal delay would not apply – the application could be submitted right away. This has been confirmed by Paul. c. With the withdrawal of the project, the approval of the other 3 modifications would no longer be valid, since they were associated with the different version of the plan that was presented to P&Z. An additional modification would be needed to reduce the number of housing types below the required number. d. As a compromise on the fees, we would charge the following: i. Full planning fees (development review, PFA, mailings): $6,459.50 ii. Only the Transportation Development Review (TDR) Fee that applies to additional rounds of review. Since the TDR fee technically only covers 3 rounds of review, we would backcharge the project for the prior rounds 4-6, plus this new round of review (and any 2 additional rounds, if needed). At $500 per round, this would be $2000, which is much less than the $34k fee that would otherwise be charged. iii. So the total fee for the resubmitted Type 1 project would be $8,459.50. I hope that provides some clarity. Please let me know if you have additional questions or want to discuss further. Thanks, Rebecca Rebecca Everette Development Review Manager | City of Fort Collins reverette@fcgov.com | 970.416.2625 direct The City of Fort Collins is an organization that supports equity for all, leading with race. We acknowledge the role of local government in helping create systems of oppression and racism and are committed to dismantling those same systems in pursuit of racial justice. Learn more. From: David Pretzler <David@cacompanies.com> Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 9:12 AM To: Rebecca Everette <reverette@fcgov.com>; Stephanie Hansen <stephanie@ripleydesigninc.com> Cc: Todd Sullivan <TSullivan@fcgov.com>; Jason Holland <JHolland@fcgov.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Sanctuary modification option Hello All – Just following up on this as you had indicated you may have some feedback for us by the end of this week. Thank you. David David Pretzler C&A Companies 7991 Shaffer Parkway, Suite 200 Littleton, CO 80127 Direct: 303-389-6780 Fax: 303-639-5110 Cell: 303-941-2386 www.cacompanies.com From: Rebecca Everette [mailto:reverette@fcgov.com] Sent: Friday, July 2, 2021 4:30 PM To: Stephanie Hansen Cc: David Pretzler; Todd Sullivan; Jason Holland Subject: RE: Sanctuary modification option Hi Stephanie, Thanks for the site plan and density calcs. Do you know what the net density would be? The conversation yesterday was helpful, and I’ve discussed it with Paul and Brad. We need some more time to work through some of the questions about process and procedures related to these design changes, and we likely won’t have a response back to you until Thursday or Friday of next week.