Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIDGE ANNEXATION & ZONING - 1-89, A - REPORTS - FIRST READING (2)AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ITEM NUMBER: 40 FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL DATE: April 4, 1989 STAFF: Ken Waido SUBJECT: Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 72, 1989, Amending Chapter 4 of the Code of the City Relating to Bees. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of this Ordinance on First Reading. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: City Code Chapter 4, "Animals and Insects, Division 2. Bees," contains "Section 4-226. Keeping of bees prohibited.", which states: "The keeping by any person of bee hives in the city is declared to be a menace to the health and safety of the residents of the city and is hereby declared a nuisance and prohibited." The attached ordinance amends Section 4-226 to allow the keeping of bees under certain conditions which are summarized as follows: establishing the type of hives for beekeeping; fencing of flyways; providing adequate water supply; maintenance of hives; type of queen; colony density, ie., number of hives per lot area; required marking of hives; setting inspection authority; and establishing compliance violations. -2- BACKGROUND: Mr. Al Kilminster brought forth the issue of raising bees within the city limits in relation to the Ridge Annexation at the public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Board on February 21, 1989. Mr. Kilminster is a property owner and resident included in the Ridge Annexation, an involuntary annexation of a county enclave. Mr. Kilminster indicated that he raises bees on his property and asked if the keeping of bees was allowed under City Code. City Code Chapter 4, Animals and Insects, Division 2. Bees, contains Section 4-226. Keeping of bees prohibited., which states: "The keeping by any person of bee hives in the city is declared to be a menace to the health and safety of the residents of the city and is hereby declared a nuisance and prohibited." Staff first investigated the possibility of allowing the continuation of the keeping of the bees under the non -conforming use provision of the zoning code. However, the common law, while providing for the continuation of non -conforming uses, does not permit a use which is declared to be a nuisance to be continued under the guise of a non -conforming use. Since Section 4-226 of City Code declares bees to be a menace to health and safety and a nuisance, the keeping of bees as a non -conforming use would not be allowed. While Mr. Kilminster was the first to raise the issue of beekeeping within the city limits, the issue is of a broader scale. As the City continues to annex thin the UGA boundary, simi ar rural o urban transitio�nroblems will arise Some issues, suchas e peeping o arm animals, may be addressed through the zoning code. Other issues will require a review and possible modification of other sections of City Code. The keeping of bees within the city limits is the first issue requiring a review of existing City Code. There are essentially three options for the City to consider in order to deal with the beekeeping issue: 1. Continue to annex property within the UGA and enforce Section 4-226 which requires the property owner to remove any existing bees. 2. Delete Section 4-226 of the City Code declaring beekeeping a nuisance and allow the keeping of bees within all areas of the city. 3. Amend Section 4-226 to allow the keeping of bees under certain conditions, such as, minimum lot size, set back requirements, requirements for bee fences, etc. Staff has investigated Option #3 with the assistance Dr. Larry Johnson of the Larimer County Health Department, Dr. Whitney Cranshaw, Assistant Professor in the Department of Entomology at Co ora o a e University, and Dr. John G. Thomas, Extension Entomologist, of the Texas Agricultural x ension service of lexas A&M University. DATE: April 4, 1989 T -3- 1 ITEM NUMBER: 40 Dr. Thomas provided a model beekeepin or developed by the Texas Beekeeping Association in consu to ion with a number of city planning departments throughout Texas. Dr. Thomas has investigated and studied beekeeping problems in urban areas and the practical solutions to those problems. Over the years, problems arising in urban areas involving bees essentially resulted from: 1) disagreements between neighbors concerning other matters and bees happened to get "caught in the middle" of the conflict, or 2) the bees are owned by an individual who either does not understand good beekeeping management or does not follow those practices. Dr. Thomas concludes that there is a place for bees in urban areas. Bees serve an equally important role in urban areas as in rural areas pollination. If well managed, bees will not be a problem to neighbors any more than other domestic animals, 4cliGh as d&99, Domestic animals must be cared for properly or they pose a threat, concern or problem to neighbors. The attached ordinance amends Section 4-226 to allow the keeping of bees within the city limits under certain conditions. The conditions establish certain requirements of sound beekeeping practices. The ordinance also defines unlawful beekeeping, that is, the keeping of bees in such a manner or of such a disposition as to cause any unhealthy condition, interfere with the normal use and enjoyment of human or animal life of others, or interfere with the normal use and enjoyment of any public property or property of others. The major beekeeping conditions of the attached ordinance are summarized as follows: establishing the type of hives for beekeeping; fencing of flyways; providing adequate water supply; maintenance of hives; type of queen; colony density, ie., number of hives per lot area; required marking of hives; setting inspection authority; and establishing compliance violations. St a - he attached ordinance adequately defines and establishes the eepinwi he imits in order protectpublic-health, safety, and welfare concerns. Section 22 old be amended and the absolute prohibition of beekeeping within the city limits should be abo-is-hee ORDINANCE NO. _72 , 1989 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS AMENDING CHAPTER 4 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS RELATING TO BEES WHEREAS, honey bees are of benefit to mankind by providing agriculture, fruit and garden pollination services and by furnishing honey, wax and other useful products; and WHEREAS, domestic strains of honey bees have been selectively bred for desirable traits, including gentleness, honey production and tendency not to swarm; and WHEREAS, gentle strains of honey bees can usually be maintained within populated areas in reasonable densities without causing a nuisance if the bees are properly located and carefully managed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS that Article III, Division 2 of the Code of the City of Fort Collins is hereby repealed in its entirety and reenacted to read as follows: DIVISION 2. BEES • Sec. 4-226. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this Article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this Section: Apiary shall mean a place where bee colonies are kept. Bee shall mean any stage of the common domestic honey bee, Avis mellifera species. Colony shall mean a hive and its equipment and appurtenances, including bees, comb, honey, pollen and brood. Hive shall mean a structure intended for the housing of a bee colony. Tract shall mean a contiguous parcel of land under common ownership. Undeveloped property shall mean any idle land that is not improved or actually in the process of being improved with residential, commercial, industrial, church, park, school or governmental facilities or other structures or improvements intended for human use or occupancy, and the grounds maintained in association therewith. The term shall be deemed to include 0 property developed exclusively as a street or highway or property used for commercial agricultural purposes. Sec. 4-227. Certain conduct declared unlawful. (a) The general purpose of this Article is to establish certain requirements of sound beekeeping practices, which are intended to avoid problems that may otherwise be associated with the keeping of bees in populated areas. (b) Notwithstanding compliance with the various requirements of this Article, it shall be unlawful for any beekeeper to keep any colony or colonies in such a manner or of such disposition as to cause any unhealthy condition,, interfere with the normal use and enjoyment of human or animal life of others, or interfere with the normal use and enjoyment of any public property or property of others. Sec. 4-228. Hives. All bee colonies shall be kept in Langstroth type hives with removable frames, which shall be kept in sound and usable condition. Sec. 4-229. Fencing of flyways. In each instance in which any colony is situated within twenty-five (25) feet of a public or private property line of the tract upon which the apiary is situated, as measured from the nearest point on the hive to the property line, the beekeeper shall establish and maintain a flyway barrier at least six (6) feet in height consisting of a solid wall, fence, dense vegetation or combination thereof that is parallel to the property line and extends ten (10) feet beyond the colony in each direction so that all bees are forced to fly at an elevation of at least six (6) feet above ground level over the property lines in the vicinity of the apiary. It is a defense to prosecution under this Section that the property adjoining the apiary tract in the vicinity of the apiary is undeveloped property for a distance of at least twenty-five (25) feet from the property line of the apiary tract. Sec. 4-230. Water. Each beekeeper shall ensure that a convenient source of water is available at all times to the bees so that the bees will not congregate at swimming pools, bibcocks, pet water bowls, birdbaths or other water sources where they may cause human, bird or domestic pet contact. Sec. 4-231. General maintenance. Each beekeeper shall ensure that no bee comb or other materials that might encourage robbing are left upon the grounds of the apiary site. Upon their removal from the hive, all such materials shall promptly be disposed of in a sealed container or placed within a building or other bee -proof enclosure. Sec. 4-232. Queens. In any instance in which a colony exhibits unusually aggressive characteristics by stinging or attempting to sting without due provocation or exhibits an unusual disposition towards swarming, it shall be the duty of the beekeeper to re -queen the colony. Queens shall be selected from stock bred for gentleness and nonswarming characteristics. Sec. 4-233. Colony densities. (a) It shall be unlawful to keep more than the following number of colonies on any tract within the city, based upon the size or configuration of the tract on which the apiary is situated: (1) One -quarter (1/4) acre or less tract size - two (2) colonies; (2) More than one -quarter (1/4) acre but less than one-half (1/2) acre tract size - four (4) colonies; (3) More than one-half (1/2) acre but less than one (1) acre tract size - six (6) colonies; (4) One (1) acre or larger tract size - eight (8) colonies; (5) Regardless of tract size, where all hives are situated at least two hundred (200) feet in any direction from all property lines of the tract on which the apiary is situated, there shall be no limit to the number of colonies; and ( egardless of tract size, so long as all y, of e the tract upon which are situated, within a ra i wo hundred (200) feet from any hiv ns undeve o erty, there shall be n mit to the number of colonies. (b) For each two (2) colonies authorized under colony densities, Subsection (a) above, there may be maintained upon the same tract one nucleus colony in a hive structure not exceeding one (1) standard nine and five -eighths (9 5/8) inch depth ten (10) frame hive body with no supers attached as required from time to time for management of swarms. Each such nucleus colony shall be disposed of or combined with an authorized colony within thirty (30) days after the date it is acquired. 0 Sec. 4-234. Marking hives, presumption of beekeeping. (a) In apiaries, the name and telephone number of the beekeeper shall be branded, painted or otherwise clearly marked upon the structure of at least two (2) hives and placed at opposite ends of the apiary. Instead of marking the hives, the beekeeper may conspicuously post a sign setting forth the name and telephone number of the beekeeper. It is a defense to prosecution under this subsection that a colony is kept on the same tract upon which the owner resides. (b) Unless marked in accordance with Subsection (a), it shall be presumed for purposes of this Article that the beekeeper is the person or persons who own or otherwise have the present right of possession and control of the tract upon which a hive or hives are situated. The presumption may be rebutted by a written agreement authorizing another person to maintain the colony or colonies upon the tract setting forth the name, address and telephone number of the other person who is acting as the beekeeper. Sec. 4-235. Inspection. The City Manager shall have the right to inspect any apiary between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Where practicable, prior notice shall be given to the beekeeper if he/she resides at the apiary or if his/her name is marked on the hives. Sec. 4-236. Declaration of Nuisance. The keeping by any person of bee colonies in the city not in strict compliance with this Article is declared to be a menace to the health and safety of the residents of the city and is hereby declared to be a nuisance and is prohibited. Any bee colony not residing in a hive structure intended for beekeeping, or any swarm of bees, or any colony residing in a standard or homemade hive which, by virtue of its condition, has obviously been abandoned by the beekeeper, is hereby declared to be a menace to the health and safety of the residents of the city and is hereby declared to be a nuisance and is prohibited. Any bee colonies kept in the city not in compliance with this Article or otherwise declared to be a nuisance pursuant to this Section may be summarily destroyed or removed from the city by the City Manager. In each instance in which a bee colony is destroyed, all usable components of the hive structure that are not damaged or rendered unhealthy by the destruction of the bees shall upon the beekeeper's request be returned to the beekeeper, provided that the beekeeper agrees to bear all transportation expenses for their return. . Sec. 4-237. Enforcement. The City Manager shall be charged with enforcement of this Article. Introduced, considered favorably on first reading, and ordered published this 21st day of March, A.D. 1989, and to be presented for final passage on the 4th day of April, A.D. 1989. Mayor ATTEST: y Clerk Passed and adopted on final reading this 4th day of April, A.D. 1989. Mayor ATTEST: 0 City Clerk •