HomeMy WebLinkAboutGUARDIAN SELF STORAGE - FDP210018 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - STORMWATER-RELATED DOCUMENTS
Terracon Consultants, Inc. 1901 Sharp Point Drive, Suite C Fort Collins, Colorado 80525
P [970] 484 0359 F [970] 484 0454 terracon.com
September 22, 2021
ARCO Business Services, Inc.
4849 Greenville Avenue, Suite 1460
Dallas, Texas 75206
Attn: Mr. Ben Graber
P: (469) 349-7909
E: bgraber@arcomurray.com
Re: Engineering Calculations for Underdrain System
Guardian Storage
Northeast of South College Avenue and Fossil Creek Parkway
Fort Collins, Colorado
Terracon Project No. 20205090
Dear Mr. Graber:
Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) has completed field slug-out testing and engineering
analysis to determine the flow of groundwater into the underdrain system at the referenced
project. Analysis was performed using the finite element software SEEP/W, which models
groundwater flow in porous media. As part of our analysis, we reviewed the following information:
■ Guardian Storage Ft. Collins Utility Plan.
■ Supplemental Geotechnical Engineering Report Fossil Creek Self Storage Ft. Collins, CO,
dated September 2, 2016, by Terracon.
■ Soil Foundation Investigation Addendum Guardian Storage Ft. Collins, CO, dated
February 22, 2021, by CTL/Thompson Incorporated.
■ Surcharge Settlement Platform Layout Figure 1, by CTL/Thompson Incorporated.
The project includes a drainage basin toward the southeastern side of the site, near the
intersection of Fossil Creek Parkway and Snead Drive. The drainage basin includes a network of
4-inch diameter underdrain piping wrapped in a gravel blanket that drains into the adjacent storm
sewer system, which has catch basins in the drainage basin to collect stormwater run-off. The
total length of the underdrain pipe network is approximately 130 feet. The volume of the 4-inch
underdrain pipe network, excluding the surrounding gravel blanket, is approximately 12 cubic feet
or 90 gallons with a network flow capacity of 64 gallons per minute (gpm).
Based on the available information, the drainage basin is nearest Boring TH-4 (performed by
CTL/Thompson), which was used as the basis for our assumptions with respect to soil
stratigraphy, groundwater elevation and selection of soil parameters for the analysis. The average
proposed underdrain pipe invert elevation is +4938 feet, approximately one foot above
groundwater elevation +4937 feet. Existing and proposed grade surrounding the drainage basin
Engineering Calculations for Underdrain System
Guardian Storage ■ Fort Collins, Colorado
September 22, 2021 ■ Terracon Project No. 20205090
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 2
is assumed to be Elev. +4948 feet. The underdrain network is located within a comparatively soft
layer of sandy lean clay (CL).
Our services also included performed slug-out testing at two locations (Well 1 and Well 2 shown
on the attached Exploration Plan) on the site within groundwater monitoring wells installed by
others. The wells generally consisted of 1.5-inch, hand-slotted PVC pipe inserted into a borehole
with no materials placed around the annulus of the pipe. These were the only wells we could find
during our site visits. Information pertaining to each of these discovered well locations is
summarized in the following table.
Well No. Well Location Depth to
Groundwater, ft.
Approximate
Elevation of
Groundwater, ft.
Approximate Depth to
Bottom of Well, ft.
1 40.51492ºN /
105.07584ºW 10.3 4,940 27.3
2 40.51439ºN /
105.07563ºW 2.8 4,941 12.4
3 40.51424ºN /
105.07560ºW 3.05 4,940 12.45
4 40.51425ºN /
105.07550ºW 3.8 4,939 14.15
5 40.51463ºN /
105.07574ºW 9.35 4,938 12.15
Slug-out tests were conducted to collect site specific data to assist with estimating the coefficient
of permeability of the site soils. The slug-out tests were conducted by removing several volumes
of water from the wells with a bailer. Once the volume was removed, the depth to water was
recorded versus time using a down-hole pressure transducer and data logger.
Water level data recorded versus time was collected from each of the two test locations as the
water level recovered within each well. The field data was analyzed using the Hvorslev Method.
The coefficient of permeability was then calculated using the Hvorslev equation:
K = r2[ln(L/r)]
2LT0
Where:
K = Coefficient of permeability
r = Radius of the well
L = Length of the well
T0 = Time intercept where the head ratio (h/h0) equals 0.37
T0 is termed the “basic time lag” and is intended to account for transients in the well that do not
correspond to those in the adjacent formation, such as borehole radius. The coefficient of
permeability calculated for each of the well locations ranged from about 2 to 4 x 10-7 m/s.
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATION PLAN
Guardian Self Storage Underdrain System ■ Fort Collins, CO
September 22, 2021 ■ Terracon Project No. 20205090
DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS
NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED
BY MICROSOFT BING MAPS
Project: Guardian Self Storage Underdrain System
Project No.: 20205090 PAGE: 1 OF 8
DRAINAGE BASIN UNDERDRAIN ANALYSIS
Soil Design Parameters
Soil Permeability:k 10 7-m
s 3.281 10 7-´ft
s×=:=Ky/Kx Ratio = 0.2
EPRI manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design
Soil Constraint Modulus:
ν 0.3:=EPRI Table 5-1
average N value, use N 3:=
average shear wave velocity from different correlations (Ref: Guidelines for Estimation of Shear Wave
Velocity Profile)vs 131 m
s:=
γ 105pcf:=g 32.174 ft
s2×=assume unit weight
Gmax
γ
g vs
2× 6.028 105´psf×=:=
C:\Users\lduan\OneDrive - Terracon Consultants Inc\Documents\Work\Aug\Guardian sotrage underdrain\Guardian storage
Project: Guardian Self Storage Underdrain System
Project No.: 20205090 PAGE: 2 OF 8
E 0.5 Gmax× 2× 1 ν+()× 7.837 105´psf×=:=
M E 1 ν-()×
1 ν+() 1 2ν-()1.055 103´ksf×=:=EPRI (5-6)use M 1200ksf:=1
M 8.333 10 7-´1
psf×=
Soil Porosity:ns 0.6:=(mixed soil sandy or silty clay in NAVEFAC 7.1 Table 6)
C:\Users\lduan\OneDrive - Terracon Consultants Inc\Documents\Work\Aug\Guardian sotrage underdrain\Guardian storage
Project: Guardian Self Storage Underdrain System
Project No.: 20205090 PAGE: 3 OF 8
Groundwater Design Considerations
GWT Elevation:GWT 4939ft:=(assuming 2' rise above normal elevation 4937' as shown in boring TH-4)
Maximum Groundwater level between subdrainage trench network:DewaterEL 4938ft:=
Subdrainage System Geometry Considerations
Maximum Invert Elevation of Subdrainage:INV 4938ft:=
Average spacing between trenches:B 25ft:=
Pipe Diameter:Dia 4in:=
Minimum Pipe Slope (ft/ft)S 0.0075:=
Manning's Number (Corrugated Heavy Duty HDPE):n 0.015:=
Estimated Trench Flow
Considering Darcy's equation
Expected flow on trench per linear foot:Q ft k GWT DewaterEL-()
B× GWT DewaterEL-()× 1.312 10 8-´ft3
sec ft××=:=
C:\Users\lduan\OneDrive - Terracon Consultants Inc\Documents\Work\Aug\Guardian sotrage underdrain\Guardian storage
Project: Guardian Self Storage Underdrain System
Project No.: 20205090 PAGE: 4 OF 8
Considering finite element analyses with SEEP/W
C:\Users\lduan\OneDrive - Terracon Consultants Inc\Documents\Work\Aug\Guardian sotrage underdrain\Guardian storage
Project: Guardian Self Storage Underdrain System
Project No.: 20205090 PAGE: 5 OF 8
C:\Users\lduan\OneDrive - Terracon Consultants Inc\Documents\Work\Aug\Guardian sotrage underdrain\Guardian storage
Project: Guardian Self Storage Underdrain System
Project No.: 20205090 PAGE: 6 OF 8
C:\Users\lduan\OneDrive - Terracon Consultants Inc\Documents\Work\Aug\Guardian sotrage underdrain\Guardian storage
Project: Guardian Self Storage Underdrain System
Project No.: 20205090 PAGE: 7 OF 8
use Q ft_SEEP_ex 1.8 10 7-× ft3
sec ft×:=
Maximum Pipe Discharge Rate
Considering:Dia 4 in×=Pipe
Pipe Wetted Section Area (full):Afull
π Dia2×
4 12.566 in2×=:=
Pipe Wetted Section Perimeter (full):Pw_full π Dia× 12.566 in×=:=
Hydraulic Radius (full):Rfull
Afull
Pw_full
0.083 ft×=:=
Manning Equation Coefficient (Imperial Units):K 1.486 ft3
sec:=
Q 4in_max
K
Afull
ft2×
Rfull
ft
æçè
ö÷ø
2
3
× S
1
2
n 64.111 gpm×=:=(maximum capacity of 4" pipe)
C:\Users\lduan\OneDrive - Terracon Consultants Inc\Documents\Work\Aug\Guardian sotrage underdrain\Guardian storage
Project: Guardian Self Storage Underdrain System
Project No.: 20205090 PAGE: 8 OF 8
Pipe Network Analysis
Total flow (seepage rate from sandy clay into
the pipe network)
QT_ex Qft_SEEP_ex 130×ft 0.011 gpm×=:=
C:\Users\lduan\OneDrive - Terracon Consultants Inc\Documents\Work\Aug\Guardian sotrage underdrain\Guardian storage