HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOLLINDALE BUSINESS PARK / CBW INC - I*P SITE PLAN REVIEW - 2-89 - MINUTES/NOTES - MINUTES/NOTES• a
CBW ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING MINUTES
Tuesday, February 14, 1989
The meeting was called to order in the Engineering Conference Room at 1:30
P.M. by Tom Peterson, Director of Planning.
In attendance at the meeting were: David Carson, CBW, Inc.; Bill Tiley,
property owner; Phil Robinson, Stewarts; Greg Fisher and Bob Hosana, Neenan
Company; Stacy Swearingen, Landscape Architect; Linda Hopkins, Economic
Development Administrator; Mike Herzig, Development Coordinator; Tom Peter-
son, Director of Planning; Sherry Albertson -Clark, Project Planner; Joe Frank,
Assistant Planning Director; Bill Neal, Fort Collins, Inc.
Albertson -Clark gave a staff presentation on the project, indicating the type of
review and criteria used in review of an I-P Site Plan. She recommended
approval, stating that the project meets all I-P zoning requirements and
performance standards.
Peterson stated that if there are any violations of performance standards,
developer would be subject to fines under the City Code. He asked Mr. Fisher
whether the proposed lighting would spill beyond the property line.
Fisher replied that the lighting is 400 pressure sodium lights in parking areas
and they would be screened downward. Sodium packs will be placed on the
building and would also reflect downward. Only other lighting would be in
soffits.
Paul Eckman, Assistant City Attorney arrived at the meeting at this point.
Peterson asked Mr. Carson if he believes the project will meet the required
performance standards.
Carson replied it would.
Peterson asked Mr. Herzig if the plat meets the minor plat requirements.
Herzig replied it does.
Peterson asked if anyone was there to provide testimony regarding any of the
performance standards, landscape standards, bulk and area requirements. He
also asked Mr. Fisher if he believes that the project meets these criteria, in
Section 29-403,404 and 405.
Fisher replied that the project does meet these criteria and added that there is
a minor shift in the building entrance being proposed and that it would also
require minor shifting in the adjacent parking area.
Eckman recommended a continuation of the hearing until Thursday, February
16, 1989 so that any decision made on the project would comply with the
minor plat ordinance requirements of holding administrative hearings on the
first or third Thursdays.
•
Peterson stated that the meeting would be continued to 1:30 P.M. on Thursday,
February 16, 1989 to allow additional information from anyone at the meeting
and to allow review of the revised plans. He stated that Ward Luthi had
submitted a letter for the record regarding the disposal of wastes from the site
and added that Mr. Luthi's comments and concerns are not a part of the I-P
Site Plan Review and therefore, there is no authority to consider them. He
stated he would respond to Mr. Luthi.
Hopkins asked what the process would be on Thursday.
Peterson replied that the meeting would be re -convened to consider a decision
on the proposed project.
Eckman added that if additional information was received on the project, the
result of the hearing might be different.
Fisher discussed the possibility of also adding a screened outdoor storage area
and outlined the location.
Peterson stated that the storage area would not be permitted to be used for
manufacturing purposes.
Fisher answered no, it would not be for manufacturing.
Eckman asked how disposal of solvents is done at the present plant.
Carson replied that they use everything and there is nothing disposed of.
Peterson asked if Mr. Carson is aware of pre-treatment requirements.
Carson replied yes.
The meeting was adjourned at 1:50 P.M.
-2-