HomeMy WebLinkAboutPLANETSCALE LIVING - PDP200015 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 4 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS (2)Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College AvenuePO Box 580Fort Collins, CO 80522970.221.6689970.224.6134 faxfcgov.com/developmentreviewMay 18, 2021Serdar Badem
12933 Regan LaneSaratoga, CA 95070RE: PlanetScale Living, PDP200015, Round Number 3Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your
submittal of PlanetScale Living. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through your Development Review Coordinator,
Brandy Bethurem Harras via phone at 970 416 2744 or via email at bbethuremharras@fcgov.com. Comment Summary:Department: Development Review CoordinatorContact: Brandy Bethurem Harras,
970 416 2744, bbethuremharras@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 1 10/27/2020: INFORMATION:I will be your primary point of contact throughout the development review
and permitting process. If you have any questions, need additional meetings with the project reviewers, or need assistance throughout the process, please let me know and I can assist
you and your team. Please include me in all email correspondence with other reviewers and keep me informed of any phone conversations. Thank you!Comment Number: 2 10/27/2020:
INFORMATION:As part of any resubmittal you will respond to the comments provided in this letter. This letter is provided to you in Microsoft Word format. Please use this document to
insert responses to each comment for your submittal, using a different font color. When replying to the comment letter please be detailed in your responses, as all comments should be
thoroughly addressed. Provide reference to specific project plans or explanations of why comments have not been addressed, when applicable.Please avoid using acknowledged, noted, or
other non descriptive replies.Comment Number: 3 10/27/2020: INFORMATION:This proposed project is processing as a Type 1 Project Development Plan (PDP). The decisionmaker for
Type 1 projects is an Administrative Hearing Officer. Staff would need to be in agreement the project is ready for Hearing approximately 3 5 weeks prior to the hearing. Everyone is
able to prepare their presentations for the hearing during this time, and we do send out notices as it is a public hearing. The Hearing Officer has 10 business days to make their decision
on the project. Following the decision from the Hearing Officer there is a 14 day appeal period. Assuming the project is approved or approved with conditions, following the hearing we
would move to the Final Development Plan. The timeline and rounds of review for the FDP runs the same as the PDP. Please let me know if you have any questions about the timeline information,
I know I have provided quite a bit here.Comment Number: 4 10/27/2020: INFORMATION:Submittals are accepted any day of the week, with Wednesday at noon being the cut off for
routing the same week.Comment Number: 5 02/19/2021: FOR HEARING:I am letting you know that your quasi judicial item will be heard remotely and that there is the option to hold
off until an in person hearing can be conducted.Any person or applicant seeking a quasi judicial decision from City Council, a City board or commission or an administrative hearing officer
under the City Code or the City's Land Use Code, shall be notified in writing or by email of the intention to conduct a Quasi Judicial Hearing using Remote Technology. Such person or
applicant shall be entitled to request that the Quasi Judicial Hearing be delayed until such time as the Hearing can be conducted in person.Comment Number: 6 05/18/2021: INFORMATION:Temporary
Service Changes City of Fort Collins Development ReviewIn order to continue providing thorough reviews and giving every project the attention it deserves, the City of Fort Collins
is implementing temporary changes in how we serve our development customers. As you may be aware, we are experiencing staff shortages in a number of key departments, which has begun
to impact the quality and timeliness of our reviews. We recognize that development and construction play a critical role in our community’s vibrancy and economic recovery, and we have
been exploring options for mitigating impacts to our customers. As a result, we will be making some temporary service changes.Beginning Monday May 10th one additional week of review
time will be added to all 1st and 2nd round submittals (increase from 3 weeks to 4 weeks).Comment Number: 7 05/18/2021: INFORMATION:LUC 2.211 Lapse, Rounds of Review: Applicants,
within one hundred eighty (180) days of receipt of written comments and notice to respond from the City on any submittal (or subsequent revision to a submittal) of an application for
approval of a development plan, shall file such additional or revised submittal documents as are necessary to address such comments from the City. If the additional submittal information
or revised submittal is not filed within said period of time, the development application shall automatically lapse and become null and void.Department: Planning ServicesContact: Kai
Kleer, 970 416 4284, kkleer@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 5 05/17/2021 FOR HEARING UPDATED: (DONE)Thank you for updating the bike parking details, however, more
work needs to be done to demonstrate compliance with fixed standards. These spaces are required to be easily accessible to entrances and walkways and mounted to a pavement foundation
(not mulch). The fence also appears to overlay the bike parking area at the back of the site. PLEASE READ FIXED DEFINITION BELOW. Please provide details of both enclosure and fixed racks.This
has been taken care of. 02/17/2021 FOR HEARING:Bicycle parking has been calculated incorrectly within the Land Use Table. Additionally, there are only 4 spaces when 6 are required based
on the bedroom count. Please ensure that 60% of the 6 spaces are enclosed while the remaining 40% is located outside on fixed racks (4 Enclosed 2 on a fixed rack).Enclosed is defined
as, "enclosed shall mean bicycle storage in lockers, a room or other space within a parking structure or other building, including a shed or carport. All types of enclosed bicycle storage
must be easily accessible to entrances and walkways, secure, lighted and protected from the weather. Each storage space shall provide a minimum of six (6) square feet in area. The storage
space shall not impede fire exits or be located so that parked bicycles interfere with public access."Fixed is defined as, "fixed shall mean bicycle parking that allows the bicycle frame
and both wheels to be securely locked to the parking structure. The structure shall be of permanent construction such as heavy gauge tubular steel with angle bars permanently attached
to the pavement foundation. Fixed bicycle parking facilities shall be at least two (2) feet in width and five and one half (5½) feet in length, with additional back out or maneuvering
space of at least five (5) feet."10/26/2020: FOR HEARING:It appears that bicycle parking is not provided, please provide 1 space per bedroom (8 spaces) with 60% enclosed and 40% on
fixed racks. Enclose bike space is defined. See LUC Standard 3.2.2(C)(4) for more information.Comment Number: 11 05/17/2021 FOR FINAL PLAN UNRESOLVED:(DONE)This project does
not demonstrate an adequate amount of trash/recycling carts for each unit. Please include one 35 gallon trash and one recycling contained for each unit or increase the size of each proposed
container.This has been taken care of. 02/17/2021 FOR HEARING:It appears that the trash containers located on the rear of the site are a non standard size. Please update plans accordingly
and describe the frequency of anticipated pick up.Cart sizes are as follows:35 Gallon: 39.1" Tall x 20.2" Wide • 23" Depth • 27 lbs65 Gallon: 40.6" Tall x 26.5" Wide • 28.2" Depth •
36 lbs95 Gallon: 42.4" Tall x 28.5" Wide • 34.2" Depth • 46 lbs10/26/2020: FOR HEARING:How will trash and recycling be handled on the site? Please visit Enclosure Design Considerations
and Guidance Document for more information on compliance with Trash and Recycling requirements. https://www.fcgov.com/recycling/pdf/enclosure guidelines0804.pdf?1527027215Comment Number:
17 05/17/2021 FOR HEARING:(DONE)The bedroom count per unit is not calculated correctly. The floor plan should not be labeled "Optional Bedroom." Please revise land use table
to list Two 2 bedroom units and Two 1 bedroom units. Please also correct labeling on sheet 7 to correct bedroom counts.This has been taken care of. Department: Engineering Development
ReviewContact: Spencer Smith, 970 221 6603, smsmith@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 1 05/13/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN - UPDATED:(DONE)Please remember to submit your
easement and right of way survey documents, a completed TDRF application and associated fees ($250/dedication) for review with the FDP.The survey documents to dedicate the easements
and ROW are not required prior to hearing, but you must show the linework on the plans (utility plan and site plan). These are two separate plan sets that are both required to be submitted
and approved as part of your PDP. Thanks BBethuremHarras@fcgov.com Please see the survey docs and the application for TDRF. 10/27/2020: FOR FINAL PLAN:Stuart street is classified as
a Minor Collector in the City's Master Street Plan. This street section has an ultimate right of way (ROW) width of 76 feet. The owner will be required to dedicate 8 feet of ROW along
the property frontage to bring the half ROW width to 38 feet. The standard utility easement width of 9 feet will need to be dedicated adjacent to the ROW along the frontage as well.
These will need to be dedicated (along with any other easements required by other City departments) by separate instrument. Please have easement legal descriptions and exhibits prepared
by a Colorado licensed land surveyor. These should be submitted to the City along with the appropriate fees ($250/easement dedication) and TDRF application (you will need to submit
another completed TDRF application with the easement dedications indicated on it).Comment Number: 6 05/13/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN UNRESOLVED:(DONE)Please see the updated demo
plan from our new Civil engineer We believe that we already addressed the essence of this comment02/16/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN UNRESOLVED:10/27/2020: FOR FINAL PLAN:The existing site
and demo plan need to contain more details about what is being removed, relocated, demolished, etc. Particularly, we need to see information about the removal of existing ROW improvements,
such as curb and gutter, asphalt, sidewalk, etc.Comment Number: 8 05/13/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN UNRESOLVED:I tried to identify as many of the conflicts as I could on the redlines.
(DONE)Please see the updated demo plan from our new Civil engineer03/24/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN UPDATED:The plans are almost completely unreadable due to text overlapping, line over
text, etc. I would recommend quality control of the plans prior to resubmitting and addressing this prior to hearing. I will not make this a requirement for hearing, but final plans
cannot be approved in this condition. 02/16/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN:Comment not addressed completely. There are still instances of text that is difficult to read and needs to be moved,
masked, etc. to make the plans more clear. If there is confusion as to what text I am referring to, please contact me to discuss. 10/27/2020: FOR HEARING:There are many instances
of text that is obscured by other text, hatching, linework, etc. and is difficult to read. Please make sure all text is legible.Comment Number: 9 05/13/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN
UNRESOLVED:(DONE)Please see the WIP utility plans.03/24/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN UPDATED:Utility plans were not submitted, so I cannot update this comment. It remains as a requirement
to be addressed on your final utility plans.02/16/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN:Comment not addressed. These can be addressed with the final plans and are not necessarily needed to go to hearing.10/27/2020:
FOR HEARING:The typical drive access detail in the utility plans will need to be swapped for the correct one for detached walk.Comment Number: 11 05/13/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN:Please
remember to list the variances in the appropriate standard note on the note sheet.(DONE)We added the modifications to the note sheet02/16/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN:A couple of variances
were approved relating to the proposed driveway access (min. width and corner separation). Formal variance requests need to be submitted to the City for these. They can both be included
in the same written letter request. Refer to section 1.9.4 of the LCUASS for variance request procedures. I will include an example with these comments and redlines, for your reference.
This needs to be stamped and signed by a Colorado licensed civil engineer. Please list the approved variances in the appropriate general note (#48) on the notes sheet of the utility
plans. Also, the notes you have provided are not numbered correctly. Please refer to the LCUASS notes appendix for the correct City of Fort Collins general notes.Comment Number: 12
05/13/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN02/16/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN:The City is using a new signature block for electronic plan signing. Please use the provided signature block on your FDP
utility plans. The signature block will only go on the cover sheet, rather than every page.Comment Number: 13 05/13/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN UPDATED:(DONE)Cleaned upThank you
for adding spot elevations and flow arrows. Please work on cleaning up the final plans so that the grading plan is easier to follow. The spot elevation text may be a bit small and
the lineweight on some of them is pretty thick, making them hard to read unless zoomed in pretty close. There are also quite a few overlapping spots, text, linework, etc. Some of the
spot elevations don't appear to be located on anything in particular. Typically they would be defining corners, transitions, low points, high points, flowlines, etc.03/24/2021: FOR
FINAL PLAN UPDATED:Utility plans were not submitted, so I cannot update this comment. It remains as a requirement to be addressed on your final utility plans.02/16/2021: FOR FINAL
PLAN:There is very little grading information on the grading plan. Engineering will need to see spot elevations and flow arrows on the proposed sidewalk as well as driveway access.Comment
Number: 14 05/13/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN UPDATED:(DONE)Showing the sidewalk transitions on the plansThe sidewalk transitions are not shown as proposed in the utility plans.
Please show them accurately on the final utility plans with your FDP submittal.03/24/2021: UPDATEDThank you for addressing this comment on your site plan. I need to see your utility
plans to confirm that you show it the same on those plans as well. The utility plans are what the contractor will use to construct the improvements, so it is important that everything
is shown on those plans. 02/16/2021: FOR HEARING:The proposed sidewalk is not shown tying into the existing attached sidewalk on either side of the lot correctly. Please make sure
your plans show the existing sidewalk and the transition from proposed detached walk to the attached walk. Generally how you show the curves that transition to the attached walk are
fine, they just don't connect in the right spot and do not transition to the more narrow existing walk width.Comment Number: 15 05/13/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN:(DONE)Cleaned upPlease
see my redlines for more detailed comments to be addressed on your final utility plans for the FDP process.Department: Stormwater EngineeringContact: Wes Lamarque, 970 416 2418,
wlamarque@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 5 02/16/2021: FOR HEARING UPDATED:Calculations need to show that the proposed flows are less than or equal to existing
flows. Also, the Drainage Report needs to discuss exactly where these flows leave the site with an illustration of how these flows pass through the off site area and into the City right
of way or designated drainage path.10/26/2020: FOR HEARING:A Development that changes storm water flows in character (water quality or flow path), increases quantity, or increases flow
rate can not drain onto downstream properties without a drainage easement. Even if it is shown that the increase in impervious area is less than 1,000 sf, any of the above conditions
would require a drainage easement for any flows that are exiting the northeast corner of the site.This comment may require further discussion and the City welcomes a meeting to discuss.Comment
Number: 6 02/16/2021: FOR HEARING UPDATED:No hydrology calculations were submitted with this round of review. Please submit updated Drainage Report.10/26/2020: FOR HEARING:The
hydrology calculations in the drainage report do not meet City specifications. The C factors are not per the City's Criteria Manual. The rainfall intensities are not per City criteria
either.Also, these small sub basins should not have a TOC greater than 5 minutes just from my observation.Comment Number: 7 02/16/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN:This can be addressed
during Final Compliance.10/26/2020: FOR HEARING:The Grading Plan needs more detail with spot elevations to clearing show grading.Comment Number: 8 02/16/2021: FOR HEARING:The
existing and proposed site areas do not add up to the same number. Please revise.Comment Number: 9 05/17/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN UPDATED:The detail provided does not meet the
intent of reducing the site's impervious area and is not consistent with the City's Standard detail. The City's Standard detail could increase the cost of the porous pavers significantly
and the City is hereby advising the Applicant.02/16/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN:The porous paver system that is being used to reduce the impervious area calculations needs to be designed per
the City detail, except for the underdrain. This includes multiple aggregate layers at the the proper depths. This system can be costly with yearly maintenance and the City wants to
make sure the Applicant is aware of all that is entailed with this system.Comment Number: 10 05/17/2021: FOR HEARING:(DONE)Cleaned upDue to a number of comments not being addressed,
the review was stopped until comments can be clearly shown to be resolved. The Drainage Report and the Utility Plans do not seem to be modified since the last review. Please contact
me with any questions regarding the review process and how best to proceed.Department: Water Wastewater EngineeringContact: Wes Lamarque, 970 416 2418, wlamarque@fcgov.comTopic:
GeneralComment Number: 1 05/17/2021: FOR HEARING UNRESOLVED:(DONE)Updated02/16/2021: FOR HEARING UPDATED:It appears a 1 1/2 inch water meter was added to the existing
3/4 inch water service. This would not make sense or allowed per City Code. If a larger service is desired, then a new service will need to be tapped at the main in Stuart Street.
Also, if the existing 3/4 inch water service is not to be utilized, it will need to be abandoned at the main per City Criteria. Please revise.10/26/2020: FOR HEARING:The Utility Plan
shows the existing wet utilities, but no improvements or modifications. Are the existing wet utilities adequate for the proposed uses? In general, a 3/4 inch water service would not
be sufficient for a 4 plex.Comment Number: 3 02/16/2021: FOR FINAL PLAN:The water meter pit detail is not the correct detail for a 1 1/2 inch water service. Please revise.Department:
Light And PowerContact: Austin Kreager, 970 224 6152, akreager@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 2 10/27/2020: INFORMATION:Light and Power would like to remind
you that all of our facilities must have a ten foot clearance away from all water, wastewater, and storm sewer facilities. We also require a three foot clearance away from all other
utilities with the exception of communication lines.Comment Number: 3 10/27/2020: FOR FINAL PLAN:Please provide a one line diagram and a C 1 form to Light and Power Engineering.
The C 1 form can be found at: http://zeus.fcgov.com/utils procedures/files/EngWiki/WikiPdfs/C/C 1Form.pdfComment Number: 4 10/27/2020: INFORMATION:Transformer locations shall
be within 10' of a paved surface and must have a minimum of an 8' clearance from the front side and a 3' clearance around the sides and rear. (1000 kVA up to 2500 kVA requires 4' around
the sides and rear.)Comment Number: 5 10/27/2020: INFORMATION:Electric Capacity Fee, Building Site charges and any system modification charges necessary will apply to this
development.Comment Number: 6 10/27/2020: INFORMATION:You may contact Austin Kreager, project engineering if you have questions. (970) 224 6152. You may reference Light &
Power’s Electric Service Standards at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/img/site_specific/uploads/ElectricServiceStandards_FINAL_18November2016_Amendment.pdfYou may reference our policies,
development charge processes, and use our fee estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders and developers.Comment Number: 7 05/19/2021: FOR FINAL: *UPDATED*(DONE)UpdatedAs
discussed in the meeting on May 19th, the transformer can be located in the newly established parkway in a vault. This vault will need to meet separations from trees and other utilities,
but I am comfortable with this being shown on the final plans. 05/18/2021: FOR HEARING:Thank you for proposing a transformer location on your plans. Unfortunately it will not work for
several reasons. Transformers must be ten feet from combustible walls and three feet from non combustible walls. This transformer location would also not allow room to bring primary
wire to the transformer without being under your pavers or being too close to the existing water line. Please coordinate with me prior to your next submittal to find an allowable transformer
location.Department: ForestryContact: Christine Holtz, , choltz@fcgov.comTopic: Landscape PlansComment Number: 2 05/17/21: FOR FINAL PLAN UPDATED:(DONE)Please add the
boxed permit note to each page of the landscape plan. This note to be placed prominently on all landscape site plan sheets with a bold box around the text for emphasis.02/16/21: FOR
FINAL PLAN: Thank you for adding the Street Tree Notes, and the Tree Protection Notes, and the Site Plan notes. Please also add the boxed permit note to each page of the landscape plan.
Comment Number: 4 05/17/21: FOR FINAL PLAN – UNRESOLVED: (DONE)Pease provide an “Existing Tree Removal Feasibility Letter” for City Forestry staff to review. Proposals to remove
significant existing trees must provide a justification letter detailing the reason for tree removal. For example: Tree X removed due to grading which is necessary to improve storm
water drainage in this section of the development. This is required for all development projects proposing significant tree removal regardless of the scale of the project. The purpose
of this letter is to provide a document of record with the project’s approval and for the City to maintain a record of all proposed significant tree removals and justifications.02/16/21:
FOR FINAL PLAN: Thank you for moving the driveway to the east. The honey locusts will provide great benefits for your new development. Please provide a justification letter for the other
tree removals explaining why it is necessary for the development. Comment Number: 5 05/17/21: FOR FINAL PLAN UPDATED:(DONE)Thank you again for reserving the honey locusts
on the west boundary of the development. Your request for a variance for the code requirement: According to Land Use Code 3.2.1.(D)(c), canopy shade trees shall constitute at least (50%)
of all tree plantings, is acceptable by Forestry. Please submit a variance request outlining the purpose and reason for this modification, ie. existing trees are being preserved and
therefore there is no more room on the property to plant the number of shade trees required for the 50% requirement. You can add this to the Existing Tree Removal Feasibility Letter
if need be. 02/16/21: FOR FINAL PLAN:Thank you again for reserving the honey locusts on the west boundary of the development. Your request for a variance for the code requirement below
is acceptable by Forestry. Please explain in your variance request the purpose and reason for this modification, ie. existing trees are being preserved and therefore there is no more
room on the property to plant the number of shade trees required for the 50% requirement.You can add this to the Existing Tree Removal Feasibility Letter if need be. Comment Number:
12 05/17/21: FOR FINAL PLAN UPDATED:(DONE)According to Land Use Code 3.2.1, separation requirements for street trees are listed below. Please follow the shade tree requirement
spacing for the two catalpas proposed as street trees. Currently they are 26.9 ft apart. Canopy shade trees 30’ – 40’ spacingConiferous evergreens 20’ – 40’ spacingOrnamental trees 15’
– 40’ spacing02/16/21: FOR FINAL PLAN:To ensure proper separation, please shift the street trees; the western most catalpa should be shifted ~ 8 ft west, and the eastern catalpa, should
shift 3 ft east (this will keep it 6 ft from the water line and increase the separation from the Accolade elm).Department: Building ServicesContact: Russell Hovland, 970 416 2341,
rhovland@fcgov.comTopic: Building Insp Plan ReviewComment Number: 1 10/26/2020: Construction shall comply with adopted codes as amended. Current adopted codes are:2018 International
Building Code (IBC) with local amendments2018 International Existing Building Code (IEBC) with local amendments2018 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) with local amendments2018
International Mechanical Code (IMC) with local amendments2018 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) with local amendments2018 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code (ISPSC) with local
amendments2018 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado2020 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of ColoradoCopies of current City of Fort
Collins code amendments can be found at fcgov.com/building.Accessibility: State Law CRS 9 5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1 2017.Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF.Frost Depth:
30 inches.Wind Loads: Risk Category II (most structures):· 140mph (Ultimate) exposure B or· Front Range Gust Map published by The Structural Engineer's Association of Seismic Design:
Category B.Climate Zone: Zone 5Energy Code: · Multi family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2018 IECC residential chapter.· Commercial and Multi family 4 stories and taller: 2018 IECC
commercial chapter.Comment Number: 2 10/26/2020: For a building code change of occupancy to R 2 multi family, the building must be fire sprinkled (13R min, but appears that
an existing NFPA13 system currently exists).Type B accessible units must be provided per chapter 11 of the IBC.1 hour dwelling separation walls/floors are required between each dwelling
unit.Plans must be submitted showing how the building will comply with the building code for all dwellings.Comment Number: 3 10/27/2020: INFORMATION BUILDING PERMIT: 10%
of all parking spaces must be EV ready (conduit in place)Comment Number: 4 10/27/2020: INFORMATION BUILDING PERMIT: This building is located within 250ft of a 4 lane road
or 1000 ft of an active railway, must provide exterior composite sound transmission of 39 STC min.Comment Number: 5 10/27/2020: INFORMATION BUILDING PERMIT: R 2 occupancies
must provide 10ft setback from property line and 20 feet between other buildings or provide fire rated walls and openings per chapter 6 and 7 of the IBC.Comment Number: 6 10/27/2020:
INFORMATION BUILDING PERMIT: City of Fort Collins amendments to the 2018 IBC require a full NFPA 13 sprinkler system in multifamily units with an exception to allow NFPA 13R systems
in buildings with no more than 6 dwelling units (or no more than 12 dwelling units where the building is divided by a 2 hour fire barrier with no more than 6 dwelling units on each side).Comment
Number: 7 10/27/2020: INFORMATION BUILDING PERMIT: Bedroom egress windows required below 4th floor regardless of fire sprinkler. All egress windows above the 1st floor require
minimum sill height of 24”.Comment Number: 8 10/27/2020: INFORMATION BUILDING PERMIT: Prescriptive energy compliance with increased insulation values is required for buildings
using electric heat.Comment Number: 9 10/27/2020: INFORMATION BUILDING PERMIT: A City licensed commercial general contractor is required to construct any new multi family
structure.Comment Number: 9 10/27/2020: PRIOR to FINAL PLAN: Building Permit Pre Submittal Meeting: Please schedule a pre submittal meeting with Building Services for this project.
Pre Submittal meetings assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the design, that the new projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards
listed below. The proposed project should be in the early to mid design stage for this meeting to be effective. Applicants of new projects should work with their Coordinator to schedule
a pre submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage, type of construction,
and energy compliance method being proposed.Department: Technical ServicesContact: Jeff County, 970 221 6588, jcounty@fcgov.comTopic: GeneralComment Number: 1 05/18/2021:
INFORMATION ONLY:Unless required during PDP, a complete review of all plans will be done at FDP.Comment Number: 2 05/18/2021: FOR FINAL APPROVAL:There are a number of plan
quality & scanning issues that will need to be addressed when the project goes to FDP. If you would like to start addressing these now, feel free to let me know at jcounty@fcgov.com