HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE HILLSIDE AT ROCK CREEK PUD - PRELIMINARY - 16-89C - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTES•
•
PLANNING 6 ZONING BOARD
METING KINUTSB
November 1, 1993
Gerry Horak, Council Liaison
TOM Paterson, Staff Support Liaison
The November 1, 1993, meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board was
called to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall
West, 300 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado. Board members
present included Vice Chair Jan Cottier, Jennifer Fontane, Bernie
Strom, Lloyd Walker, and Sharon Winfree. Chair Rene Clements and
Jim Klataske were absent.
Staff members present included Planning Director Tom Peterson,
Deputy City Attorney Paul Eckman, Sherry Albertson -Clark, Ted
Shepard, Mike Herzig, Kerrie Ashbeck, Carolyn Worden and Kayla
Ballard.
AGENDA REVIEII
NHENT AGENDA
ITEM 25 - NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY - #67-93.
Mr. Peterson said this was the most significant item to come before
the Board from the Land Development Guidance System audit in 1990.
He stated that the audit dealt with issues of how determination of
compatibility and PUDs in neighborhoods are evaluated. He said
over the past 18 months, a team of citizens, staff and consultants
have been working very hard to look at this issue. He concluded
that this is a significant milestone accomplished for the LDGS and
the results are good.
Chief Planner Sherry Albertson -Clark said this has been a joint
effort between staff, the consultants, and advisory committee. The
consultant team of Linda Ripley of Ripley Associates and Bob
Komives of Fort Collins and Marty Zeller of Design Workshop out of
Denver have been working with us since December of 1991 on this
project. She stated early on a volunteer advisory committee was
formed of approximately 14 members, some are present at this
meeting, as well as the consultants involved, and will be happy to
answer any questions the Board may have. She said compatibility
criteria were evaluated; and two specific areas of recommendation
evolved: (1) changes to the "All Development Criteria" and (2) a
set of recommendations that deal with "Process". She said this was
arrived at by having a significant amount of citizen involvement
(interviews with focus groups-- roundtable discussion (bringing
focus members together) --the advisory committee was then formed).
Planner Clark said there were two community workshops held early
on, to get a sense from the citizen standpoint, where this project
Planning & Zoning Board Meeting Minutes
November 1, 1993
Page 20
Vice Chair Cottier had some questions concerning the ditch.
Mr. Peterson admitted the ditch looked inadequate for function,
requested the opportunity to look at Tract D.
Vice Chair Cottier appreciated the attempt of the developers to try
to offer a density mix, and felt the project acceptable.
Member Walker felt the density on the southern interface is
adequate but wanted buffering explored and favored the general
density of the ODP.
Attorney Eckman stated if the motion is to deny the ODP, it would
be his recommendation that the person who makes the motion would
also include the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, not the
LDGS.
Member Fontana moved to recommend approval of the Overall
Development Plan of the Rock Creek POD.
Member Strom seconded the motion.
Motion passed 5-0.
ITEM 28 - HILLSIDE AT ROCK CREEK POD - PRELIMINARY #16-89C
Member Strom moved to accept the Hillside at Rock Creek Preliminary
POD.
Member Fontana seconded the motion.
Motion passed 5-0.
ITEM 29 - BROOKSIDE VILLAGE AT ROCK CREEK POD - PRELIMINARY #16-89E
Member Fontana requested that the staff, developer and neighbors
get together before any further plans are developed. She said the
storm Water and ditch plans need to be explored.
Member balker asked what is the best approach to solving this
situation.
vice Chair Cottier felt it was appropriate for the Board to
recommend a neighborhood meeting.
Mr. Peterson commented that a motion could be made to request this
item back onto the agenda on a specific date, November 15 or
December 13.