Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutROCK CREEK PUD - OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - 16-89B - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY• • 00 0 00 O O o J 10 O '9 V Mo 0 z J W > O J W z w Q z a r z m M V z cc LLJ LLJ z ui "' J CL. > = z C- J a W cr- CL z a Cr 3 W LL S ccc t-- Q Memorandum TO: Tom Livingston, Everitt Enterprises Gary Hoover, Geneva Homes Eldon Ward, Cityscape Eric Bracke, Fort Collins Transportation Division FROM: Matt Delich -V�4eZ:�> DATE: July 26, 1993 SUBJECT: Rock Creek PUD Traffic Study (File: 9330MEM2) This memorandum documents the traffic impacts and site access considerations for a residential development known as Rock Creek PUD. Figure 1 shows the location of Rock Creek PUD. Rock Creek PUD is located on the east side of Timberline Road and south of Harmony Road. Land in the area is predominantly agricultural. There are other properties near Rock Creek PUD that are in the development approval process, but are on a schedule that is somewhat later. These properties are referred to as the "South Timberline Properties" and are shown in Figure 2. If the timing of the development of each of the individual properties were spaced over a long period of time, separate traffic studies would be required of each development. However, the development approval process for these properties Is close enough that one traffic study will be done for all of the South Timberline Properties. This study will be prepared based upon the approval process schedule for the Health Park and the Richland Homes properties. The submittal of this study is expected to be in September 1993. The purpose of this memorandum is to determine the short range impacts of just the first phase of the Rock Creek PUD. The Rock Creek PUD is approximately 1/2 mile south of Harmony Road. Harmony Road is a four lane divided highway with a posted speed of 45-55 mph. As development increases along Harmony Road, the posted speed will likely become 45 mph. The Harmony/Timberline intersection is signalized. There are right- and left -turn auxiliary lanes on both approaches of Harmony Road. Harmony Road is classified as a major arterial street. Timberline Road is a north/south street classified as a major arterial north of Harmony Road and an arterial south of Harmony Road. It has a two lane rural cross section north and south of Harmony Road. There are no auxiliary lanes on Timberline Road approaching Harmony Road. Figure 3 shows recent peak hour traffic counts at the Harmony/Timberline intersection. Raw data is provided in Appendix A. The traffic counts indicate a higher eastbound directional split in the morning peak hour and a higher westbound directional split in the afternoon peak hour. The southbound movement on Timberline Road is particularly heavy for a single approach lane. It was observed that some drivers manage to make right turns from southbound Timberline Road using the shoulder and perhaps some private land. The location of an irrigation ditch approximately 150 feet north of Harmony Road severely restricts the function of this right -turn maneuver. Table 1 shows the operation at the Harmony/Timberline intersection during the peak hours. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. With the northbound and southbound traffic in a single 'lane, the overall intersection operation is level of service C during each peak hour. Acceptable operation is defined as level of service D or better. However, review of the calculation forms indicates that the southbound approach is at levels of service F and E during the respective peak hours. Provision of an additional southbound lane will improve the operation of this movement. Table 1 also shows the level of service with two southbound lanes. The operation of the southbound approach then improves to levels of service C and B during the respective peak hours. Figure 4 shows the site plan of Rock Creek PUD. The northern 54.7 acres is being developed by Everitt Enterprises. Their program is to develop 172 single family detached dwelling units in one submission to the City. The southern 79.2 acres is being developed by Geneva Homes. Geneva Homes is proposing to develop the 1st and 2nd Filings in this submission to the City. The 1st Filing is comprised of 37 single family detached dwelling units and the 2nd Filing is comprised of 43 single family detached dwelling units. The remaining 177 dwelling units of the Geneva Homes portion will be addressed in the later traffic study. As shown in Figure 4, three intersections are proposed to Timberline Road. The "loop street" through Rock Creek PUD is proposed to be a collector level street. Some variance from the collector street standards are required to accomplish this. These have been discussed with Fort Collins Transportation Division Staff. A collector street will intersect with the "loop street" and connect with Corbett Drive, south of the school complex to the east of Rock Creek PUD. The 2nd Filing of the Geneva Homes portion will be served by a local street, which will also connects to the street system in the 1st Filing. All of the streets intersecting with Timberline Road will have stop sign control. Trip generation was estimated using Trip Generation, 5th Edition, ITE as the reference document. The single family detached dwelling unit category (Code 210) was used in the trip generation calculation. Table 2 shows the daily and peak hour vehicle trips generated at the Rock Creek PUD as proposed at this time. It is expected that 1650 daily trip ends will be generated at the Everitt Enterprises portion, and 760 daily trip ends will be generated at the Geneva Homes portion. 0 • The trip distribution used in the subsequent assignment is shown in Figure 5. This trip distribution is based upon the relative location of attractions for home based productions and the available street system in the area. Figure 6 shows the short range peak hour traffic at the key intersections in this area. These volumes also reflect an increase of three percent in the background traffic. The aforementioned later traffic study will expand this assignment to include the phased development of other portions of the South Timberline Properties. Table 3 shows the peak hour operation at the key intersections using the volumes shown in Figure 6. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. All intersections will operate acceptably. At the Harmony/Timberline signalized intersection, both the north and south approaches of Timberline Road should be striped to have a left -turn lane and a combined through/right-turn lane. This assumes that the improvement to the north leg mentioned earlier in this memorandum was implemented. The south leg should be widened and striped to line up with the north leg. Based upon the traffic projections shown in Figure 6 and the "Intersection Channelization Design Guide," NCHRP 279, TRB, November 1985, no auxiliary lanes are required along Timberline Road at any of the access streets to Rock Creek PUD. This conclusion is corroborated by the level of service A operation for the southbound left turns at each access street. However, it is my understanding that half the arterial street width will be constructed on the east side of Timberline Road from the Rock Creek PUD to Harmony Road. This coupled with half of the existing road will provide approximately 45 feet of pavement. If this is the case, it is recommended that Timberline Road be striped with one northbound lane, one southbound lane, and a center median which can be used as a left -turn lane at each of the access streets. Any excess pavement can be used as a paved shoulder/bike lane. Since the east side of Timberline Road will be widened with this portion of the Rock Creek PUD and the City of Fort Collins has said that they would continue that widening along the Stromberger Property (Poudre Valley Hospital) to Harmony Road, it is recommended that the north leg also be widened on the east. This has the advantages of the striping lining up both north and south of Harmony Road and it will not negatively impact the existing buildings in the northwest quadrant of the Harmony/Timberline intersection. With the initial phase of Rock Creek PUD, all intersections will operate acceptably. A more comprehensive traffic study should be prepared which includes the development proposals for all the South Timberline Properties. ILT J�(I._-"'T-.-1� -i. rilln�: • 1 r t V 491375 BM4954\I�,• M �. 1l_.7t71=71�C g _ 11 I 17 6 15 -IF — _ [ Gravel Pit �. \ a i _ Radio � r �C7Cll c, to C-JF1` a �„ r t V �� t \ _ �� wl ° o To rs n rl i Theat \\..._— 19 (up p zp.r' moot 21 '1 __ n (—'-7 — tl 111,1 .� Timnath ­ �I Cem l ILl ;I Y .\ • 13M4874 ,I� 11— rl_r,� .. �Bi,l) w95,��. 'pl �� ,l; 'yl L 4A60 /���» ---� 0��=—�l_ 028 c \� 1',ii ...� 7Gfaw — DO I,, .o 36 4991S --rU 31 -a° �` 32 . 133 34�llll._- _=3 V T6 at • �,�. n ' lr BM4867 ,4e3 =G ) - ,� OoQc Harmony `gym �4930 ' HARMONY ip. t • � I � � of r9, -_ - RO K CREEK P 17 4916 147 ,49e r� �.� tnt,.�t ' �C4, W /501 4923 t 48B0 I 1r ,t. 53 13 16 I _ 15, i_— NO SCALE SITE LOCATION Figure 1 Health Park cc W _Z _I W Richland Homes Residential No Scale A& ARMONI( ROAD j�j � �A N III rrr rrr Pnivirnn Wallew wo Vital III I i111101 googols►� .ea�ess� 4 D N AM / PM 1993 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 • 0 Table 1 1993 Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM Harmony/Timberline (signal) Combined lanes NB/SB C C Two lanes SB B B Land Use Everitt Enterprises 172 S.F.D.U. Geneva Homes 1st Filing 37 S.F.D.0 2nd Filing 43 S.F.D.U. Total Table 2 Trip Generation Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips in out in out 1650 33 95 112 62 350 7 20 24 13 410 8 24 28 15 2410 48 139 164 90 0 HARMONY ROAD ,w,lo nt r- • NO SCALE A& ,N III III III III III III III rr� r I r L�J > v, III I ��1 1 SITE PLAN Figure 4 45% •0 411k, N Lo HARMONY . 20 ROCK CREEK TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 5 oLO Lo „ � 215/355 oI �R - 575 1070 1 ,(-- 300 HARMONY 205/180 ---/ ) } r 885/760 — o Ln o 30/100 -4, �1-4z LO LO LO 0 o n� LO -- 90/60 - 5/5 EVERITT LOLO o-- LO 0 r- u7 cD to N 20/15 /r— 5/5 GENEVA r 1st FILING LOLO �o LO Lo LO 0 �o <:�fl) '25 15 ILO� 5 GENEVA r 2nd FILING w z c� J LO w AM / PM m Rounded to nearest 5 vehicles F- SHORT RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 6 • M Intersection Table 3 Short Range Peak Hour Operation Level of Service AM PM Harmony/Timberline (signal) B B "Timberline/Everitt Access (stop sign) WB LT A A WB RT A A SB LT A A Timberline/Geneva 1st Filing Access (stop sign) WB LT A A WB RT A A SB LT A A Timberline/Geneva 2nd Filing Access (stop sign) WB LT A A WB RT A A SB LT A A • 0 APPENDIX A P f1 A THEW J. DELICH, P.E. 3413 BANYAN AVENUE LOVELAND, CO 80538 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Observer Date �� 3 93 Day nCity �D�T �C%LL��% R = Right turn ,S = Straight � _ INTERSECTION OF ' 'L l ti L, AND �i4 1ZL l% ©ALI `� U ll t) L = Left turn TIME BEGINS k Gs' TOTAL NorthEnst South t4� i4 /Z p(4 O N Y trom WEST TOTAL TOTAL ALL tmm NORTH from SOUTH from EAST R I S I L I Total I R I S I L I Total I R I S I L I Total II R I S I L I Total -730 11401(0 76-11Z1 1115-1z1131 39 11 GO 1155113$14114-7110Izogl 12G.$ 4CDsII(oZ5 745-11351 $ '331130 11(o c 1 1 3 1 3? 11 1(9 f Its I ) g31 7 I Z49 11 2 I Zoo (g 1 330 I s`7 1 11747 �aa 113 1 1641103 1110 13 Z I1 41 11 Z I7-0614412-Sz_ 11443 I1571 IS 1I571 '7 114Z I!o 3 I Z I2o II ►CP 1301107 S 114Z11 Z I I"Z ZSSIZIZ. 13S 115/ Co II I I I I I II I I I I I I I I II 73v— 3U11/(s'71 z9 3ool 4 9 Coils' I 6, 1 110 I IZ Z 11 Co 1 8 117-o71525'411-1 1 7 9 l 6 1$ I gIIU1P ZI I$ 4 1 II 2 4 s II I I i I II I I I II (I I I I I I I II II I I I II I I I I II it I I I I I I II II i II I I I I I I II II i I I I I I II I i I I I I 1 I II 43o IIs312o14Coll1 IZ 13 IZ I l II /3 11621Zs119 13Z216, 1/?(-a1401Z32 5s�. I64U 4¢5 11s71 11 I&V13& 113 )1 1 g 1 z 3 II J s9 I!� 1 I z691 11 136p, 1 11 s I I Wo ¢¢ I Z z 1 s9 o 174-9 50U ZI 1 7 1to!� I I Z -7 11 3 1 1-3 1 1 15-11 / 42 111(D 23( 1 1(013 (93 11& 11$7 1,3 5-1 Zg 1-5,1 1 11733 61s 1391'14 1/07 13 11Z1 1 !T 11 /zslgsl2S'dIIZ13S'S (.1s31Z4-7 1&37-11757 II I I II 430-s3oIi90j& 2I237I4 B9II 11 4511� 17 3I5, (0Z344ro31I48I1431 Z6- i? 39 112 9 7I Zqz 9 • i APPENDIX B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..harmony/timberline AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... m,id DATE .......... 7/15/9 TIME......... &pm 1993 short COMMENT...... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NBSBSOB L EB L WB NB SB 4H b5q Sb4 bl 329 : T 12.0 7 12.0 LTR 12.0 LTR 12.0 RT 6 207 51 167 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0: R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ------------------------------------------------- - ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 13.8 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 13.8 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 31.8 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 31.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO X PD X GREEN 8.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.049 0.540 8.3 8 12.3 8 T 0.668 0.420 13.2 8 R 0.010 0.420 8.0 B WB L 0.049 0.540 8.3 8 9.6 8 T 0.432 0.420 9.8 8 R 0.362 0.420 9.4 B NB LTR 0.229 0.400 12.3 B 12.8 B 58 LTR 1.097 0.400 75.3 F 75.3 F ----------------------------L- ------------------------ INTERSECTION: Delay 23.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.772 LOS C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION_.harmony/timberline AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... mjd DATE .......... 7/15/93 TIME.......... am ® 993 short COMMENT....... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 172 46 17 237 L 12.0 L 12.0 LTR 12.0 LTR 12.0 TH 739 1039 45 62 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12. RT 25 344 11 190 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ----------- ----- - - - ------------------------------ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 13.8 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 13.8 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 31.8 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 31.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PO X GREEN 8.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.� YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.433 0.540 11.4 B 10.8 B T 0.576 0.420 10.7 8 R 0.044 0.420 8.1 B WB L 0.049 0.540 8.3 B 15.4 C T 0.810 0.420 17.0 C R 0.601 0.420 11.3 B NB LTR 0.157 0.400 12.4 B 12.4 B SB LTR 0.982 0.400 40.5 E 40.5 E -- --- - ----------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 17.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.835 LOS C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT r**x***�x*�c�cx*x�x�x�c*x:�c*acx****x**xx**■x*x����**:**:xx*�*�c�***�*x�sr*x:�*� INTERSECTION..harmony/timberline AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... mid DATE .......... 7/15/93 TIME......... pm 1999 short COMMENT....... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB N8 SB EB WB NB SB LT 199 18 10 300 L 12.0 L 12.0 LTR 12.0 LT 12.0 TH 857 554 61 29 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 RT 6 207 51 167 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) YIN Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 13.8 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 13.8 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 31.8 3 S8 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 31.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO X PD X WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PO X GREEN 8.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.049 0.540 8.3 B 12.3 B T 0.668 0.420 13.2 B R 0.010 0.420 3.0 8 WB L 0.049 0.540 8.3 B 9.6 8 T 0.432 0.420 9.8 B R 0.362 0.420 9.4 B NB LTR 0.397 0.400 14.2 B 14.2 B 38 LT 0.683 0.400 18.1 C 16.5 C R 0.305 0.400 13.3 B --------------------------- ----------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 12.4 (sec/veh) V/( 0.596 LOS B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..harmony/timberline AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... mid DATE .......... 7/19 TIME.......... am pm 1993.short COMMENT....... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 172 48 17 237 L 12.0 L 12.0 LTR 12.0 LT 12. TH 739 1039 45 62 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 R 12.0 RT 25 344 11 190 : T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV AOJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) YIN Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 13.8 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 13.8 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 31.8 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 31.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO X PO X WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PO X GREEN 8.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.0� YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.433 0.540 11.4 B 10.8 8 T 0.576 0.420 10.7 8 R 0.044 0.420 8.1 B WB L 0.049 0.540 8.3 8 15.4 C T 0.810 0.420 17.0 C R 0.601 0.420 11.3 8 NB LTR 0.347 0.400 13.8 8 13.8 8 SB LT 0.550 0.400 15.6 C 14.8 B R 0.347 0.400 13.6 8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delav = 13.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.651 LOS = B 0 APPENDIX C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION..harmony/timberline AREA TYPE. -.OTHER ANALYST ....... mid DATE .......... 7/15/93 TIME ......... pm 1993 shor COMMENT...... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 205 30 75 310 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 805 575 105 45 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 30 215 80 175 : T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 13.8 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 13.8 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 31.8 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 31.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO X PD X W8 LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO X PD X GREEN 8.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.049 0.540 8.3 B 12.4 B T 0.690 0.420 13.5 8 R 0.052 0.420 6.1 B WB L 0.049 0.540 8.3 B 9.7 B T 0.448 0.420 9.9 8 R 0.376 0.420 9.5 B NB L 0.197 0.400 14.9 B 13.8 B TR 0.307 0.400 13.3 B SB L 0.757 0.400 24.5 C 20.1 C TR 0.388 0.400 13.9 B ------------------------- -- - ----------------------------- INTERSECTION: Oelay 13.2 (sec/veh) V/C 0.637 LOS 8 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION_.harmony/timberline AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... mid DATE .......... 7/15/93 TIME .......... am pm 1993 short COMMENT....... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 180 80 60 245 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.� TH 760 1070 75 110 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12. RT 100 355 30 200 T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- AOJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEGS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 13.8 4 W8 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 13.8 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 31.8 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 31.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO X PD X WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO X PD X GREEN 8.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.0. YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.548 0.540 13.8 B 11.1 B T 0.592 0.420 10.8 B R 0.175 0.420 8.6 B WB L 0.049 0.540 8.3 B 16.2 C T 0.834 0.420 17.7 C R 0.620 0.420 13.2 8 NO L 0.195 0.400 14.9 B 13.4 B TR 0.170 0.400 12.5 B SB L 0.514 0.400 17.9 C 16.5 C TR 0.532 0.400 15.4 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 14.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.669 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT Kt*xM***Mc*y[yc MC MC IK**YM(****��cX �c Xlk JK MC �C*M***X****JK MCX XIKXIk K M[�YMcICYYMCJK XIK �t Ik IK ]K*Mc**M'. MCX XfG INTERSECTION..harmony/timberline AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... 7/1 GATE.... ...... 7/15/93 TIME......... pm 1993 short COMMENT...... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 205 30 75 310 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 885 575 105 45 : T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 30 215 80 175 : T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 13.8 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 13.8 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 31.8 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 31.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PO X WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 8.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 7.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.049 0.540 8.3 8 12.4 B T 0.690 0.420 13.5 B R 0.052 0.420 8.1 B WB L 0.049 0.540 8.3 8 9.7 B T 0.448 0.420 9.9 B R 0.376 0.420 9.5 B NB L 0.053 0.400 14.0 B 17.5 C TR 0.423 0.290 18.9 C SB L 0.053 0.400 14.0 B 16.5 C TR 0.535 0.290 20.1 C ------------------------- - -------------------- - INTERSECTION: Delay = 12.8 (secjveh) V/C 0.486 LOS _ 8 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT K**lKX*KIk MCJK*ICY*Jk*M(IC*�CJKJK�M[JK�M[*MIK �(�cM(*X7C lK ZMc 1c***�c**********�f M(IK MC*MC �[*M(*]t *]C Ik%X]K 1t K K INTERSECTION..harmony/timberline AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST ....... mjd DATE .......... 7/15/93 TIME.......... am(�im11993 short COMMENT....... (E// -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 180 80 60 245 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.� TH 760 1070 75 110 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12. RT 100 355 30 200 : T 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 13.8 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 13.8 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 31.8 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 1 N 31.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO X PD X WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 8.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 7.0 27.0 0.0 0.0• YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 ---------------- --------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.548 0.540 13.8 B 11.1 B T 0.592 0.420 10.8 B R 0.175 0.420 8.6 B WB L 0.049 0.540 3.3 8 16.2 C T 0.834 0.420 17.7 C R 0.620 0.420 13.2 8 NB L 0.053 0.400 14.0 B 16.2 C TR 0.235 0.290 17.5 C SB L 0.053 0.400 14.0 B 19.7 C TR 0.734 0.290 24.1 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 15.1 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.675 LOS = C 1985 HCM! UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... everitt NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 7/15/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm short OTHER INFORMATION._.. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 5 0 35 THRU -- 0 170 70 RIGHT -- 90 5 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB -------------- ----- - LANES -- 1 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET W8 LEFT 6 558 544 > 544 > 539 > A > 787 > 683 >A RIGHT 99 808 808 > 808 > 709 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 39 945 945 945 907 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... everitt NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberline DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 7/15/93 : am pm short OTHER INFORMATION._.. 1r u 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET__ 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... everitt NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 7/15/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm short OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 5 0 105 THRU -- 0 105 185 RIGHT -- 60 5 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES -- 1 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ MINOR STREET - WB LEFT 6 466 432 > 432 > 426 > A > 809 > 737 >A RIGHT 66 873 873 > 873 > 807 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 116 990 990 990 875 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------- -- -- - NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... everitt NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberline DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 7/15/93 ; a pm short OTHER INFORMATION... Is 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... geneva 1 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. m.jd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)....__ 7/15/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm short OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 5 0 5 THRU -- 0 155 70 RIGHT -- 20 5 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------- LANES ---------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- -- ------- 1 ------- 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 6 594 592 > 592 > 586 > A > 763 > 736 >A RIGHT 22 823 823 > 823 > 801 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 956 956 956 950 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... geneva 1 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberline DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 7/15/93 : am pm short OTHER INFORMATION..._ 1985 HCM: UNS[GNALIZEO INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... geneva 1 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 7/15/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm short OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUNO: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 5 0 25 THRU -- 0 95 165 RIGHT -- 15 5 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB -------------- LANES -- 1 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ MINOR STREET - WB LEFT 6 550 541 > 541 > 535 > A > 762 > 740 >A RIGHT 17 883 883 > 883 > 866 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 28 997 997 997 970 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... geneva 1 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberline DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 7/15/93 ; am pm short OTHER INFORMATION.... • I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... geneva 2 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 7/15/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am m short OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NS SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 5 0 10 THRU -- 0 135 65 RIGHT -- 25 5 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES -- 1 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 6 610 606 > 606 > 600 > A > 791 > 758 >A RIGHT 28 843 843 > 843 > 815 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 11 969 969 969 958 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... geneva 2 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberline DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 7/15/93 : am pm short OTHER INFORMATION... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... geneva 2 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. m.Jd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 7/15/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am am) short OTHER INFORMATION.... �� INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 5 0 30 THRU -- 0 85 140 RIGHT -- 15 5 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES -- 1 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 6 574 563 > 563 > 557 > A > 779 > 757 >A RIGHT 17 893 893 > 893 > 877 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 33 997 997 997 964 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... geneva 2 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberline DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS.__.. 7/15/93 ; am pm short OTHER INFORMATION...